You were just shown I accepted you challenge, as is, prior to your yes or no question.
It was Yes or No.
Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.
It's not about me:
Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.
:rofl: :die: :rofl: :die: :rofl: :die: :rofl: :die:
Huey » Yesterday, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑Huey » Yesterday, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.
But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
Because you editing of post by deleting relevant portions bit you in your flabby ***. You delete **** than later DEMAND I answer question that were already discussed. That's on you, twat..Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑Why should I give a ****?Huey » Yesterday, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.
But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
It was Yes or No.
You got your yes or now answer, bitch. now answer the **** question:Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑It was Yes or No.
You couldn't do it..
Now you're lying about it...
Huey » Yesterday, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑Huey » Yesterday, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.
But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
Because you editing of post by deleting relevant portions bit you in your flabby ***. You delete **** than later DEMAND I answer question that were already discussed. That's on you, twat..Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑Why should I give a ****?Huey » Yesterday, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.
But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
But let's see, I'll give you the answer. YES. Now, answer the **** question, twat:
WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN CONTEXT OF THE OP? YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.
No...I didn't.
THe record is EXTREMELY CLEAR, Lying Twat.
Huey » Yesterday, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑Huey » Yesterday, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.
But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
Because you editing of post by deleting relevant portions bit you in your flabby ***. You delete **** than later DEMAND I answer question that were already discussed. That's on you, twat..Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑Why should I give a ****?Huey » Yesterday, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.
But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
But let's see, I'll give you the answer. YES. Now, answer the **** question, twat:
WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN CONTEXT OF THE OP? YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑It was Yes or No.
You couldn't do it..
Now you're lying about it...
But let's see, I'll give you the answer. YES. Now, answer the **** question, twat:Huey » Yesterday, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑Huey » Yesterday, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.
But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
Because you editing of post by deleting relevant portions bit you in your flabby ***. You delete **** than later DEMAND I answer question that were already discussed. That's on you, twat..
But let's see, I'll give you the answer. YES. Now, answer the **** question, twat:
WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN CONTEXT OF THE OP? YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.
Since you got your yes or no answer, here is YOUR question:Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2026, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑After child with "long rifle" shoots 4.Huey » 16 Oct 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Unfortunately 4 people are dead, 3 of them kids Fortunately an armed civilian shot the **** before he could kill more.New details revealed about hero girl dad who stopped Oregon school shooter John J. Griffin during his lunch break
A hero dad was driving home for his lunch break when he heard gunshots and ran into an Oregon elementary school special education room to stop a crazed teen’s deadly mass shooting, according to a report.
Kaylub Giamanco, a carpenter and father of two girls who attend Silver Rail Elementary, was driving home from his break on Thursday when he heard gunfire, his brother, Kyle Giamanco, told NBC News.
https://nypost.com/2026/10/16/us-news/h ... nch-break/
Because what else is that long rifle for?
Oh, @Blackvegetable stop running from your words, ******.Huey » Yesterday, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑Since you got your yes or no answer, here is YOUR question:Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2026, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑After child with "long rifle" shoots 4.Huey » 16 Oct 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Unfortunately 4 people are dead, 3 of them kids Fortunately an armed civilian shot the **** before he could kill more.New details revealed about hero girl dad who stopped Oregon school shooter John J. Griffin during his lunch break
A hero dad was driving home for his lunch break when he heard gunshots and ran into an Oregon elementary school special education room to stop a crazed teen’s deadly mass shooting, according to a report.
Kaylub Giamanco, a carpenter and father of two girls who attend Silver Rail Elementary, was driving home from his break on Thursday when he heard gunfire, his brother, Kyle Giamanco, told NBC News.
https://nypost.com/2026/10/16/us-news/h ... nch-break/
Because what else is that long rifle for?
WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE OP? YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.
But I didn't get my answer...
You got your yes or no answer today. I posted it multiple times, ya **** liar.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑But I didn't get my answer...
To that, OR my actual question.
Disappeared in a flood of wrong and irrelevant ****..
@BlackvegetableHuey » Yesterday, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑It was Yes or No.
You couldn't do it..
Now you're lying about it...
But let's see, I'll give you the answer. YES. Now, answer the **** question, twat:Huey » Yesterday, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑Huey » Yesterday, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑
Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question. Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess.
But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
Because you editing of post by deleting relevant portions bit you in your flabby ***. You delete **** than later DEMAND I answer question that were already discussed. That's on you, twat..
But let's see, I'll give you the answer. YES. Now, answer the **** question, twat:
WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN CONTEXT OF THE OP? YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.
WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN CONTEXT OF THE OP? YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.
Time to stop running, twat!