Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:44 am

Huey » Yesterday, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:42 am

You got your yes or no answer today.

Disappeared in a flood of wrong and irrelevant ****..

 

FINALLY the lying POS acknowledges he got the yes or no answer.

Now what is your question.  

Huey » Yesterday, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:47 am

FINALLY the lying POS acknowledges 

I caught you lying about it once already.

Whatever it was, it was obscured in teams of your hysteria.

I want to see either "yes" or "no"...

I don't want to see anything else

 

Huey » Yesterday, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:46 am

@Blackvegetable  

Lie much, POS?

Which of your questions do you want answered?  Remember, it is one for one.

If you agree to my deal as offered, you have to answer FIRST, welshy..


So **** g'ddammned stupid 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:56 am

Huey » Yesterday, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:46 am

@Blackvegetable  

Lie much, POS?

Which of your questions do you want answered?  Remember, it is one for one.

If you agree to my deal as offered, you have to answer FIRST, welshy..


So **** g'ddammned stupid 

 

You **** *******.   I am **** asking you which of your **** questions you want **** answered.

Damn, you are POS moron.  Ask your **** question.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:53 am

Huey » Yesterday, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:47 am

FINALLY the lying POS acknowledges 

I caught you lying about it once already.

Whatever it was, it was obscured in teams of your hysteria.

I want to see either "yes" or "no"...

I don't want to see anything else

 

 

I don't give a **** what you want to see.  You got your yes answer.  No, I did not lie. I your proved I accepted challenge yesterday.

Ask your **** question, POS.

This is **** up that this POS makes a **** ignorant comment and I have to work to get him town up to it.
 

Huey » Yesterday, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:03 pm

I don't give a **** what you want to see.  

What a coincidence.. I don't give a **** what you want, either.

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2026, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2026, 9:13 am

Huey » 18 Oct 2026, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2026, 9:08 am

Is this the question you are whining about, asshole?

That's a question. 

I will trade you the answer for one from you.

Because you're a zerointegrity little ****, you'll have to pay in advance. 


Because you are a zerointegrity piece of ****...
 

 

What s this question you want answered? 

It looks like YOU are the zero integrity piece of ****. Is your daughter a member?  She see how **** up her father is.

Huey » Yesterday, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:15 pm

What s this question you want answered? 

It looks like YOU are the zero integrity piece of ****. Is your daughter a member?  She see how **** up her father is.

This meltdown is now total.

Ok...

Given that the words "family" and "design" in the following passage
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
are, and forever will remain, in the singular - standing as lasting and indelible monuments to your lack of literacy, dubious numeracy, ignorance in matters firearm and zerointegrity - why do you believe you can be redeemed by pursuing this line of inquiry?
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:24 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:15 pm

What s this question you want answered? 

It looks like YOU are the zero integrity piece of ****. Is your daughter a member?  She see how **** up her father is.

This meltdown is now total.

Ok...

Given that the words "family" and "design" in the following passage
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design are, and forever will remain, in the singular - standing as lasting and indelible monuments to your lack of literacy, dubious numeracy, ignorance in matters firearm and zerointegrity - why do you believe you can be redeemed by pursuing this line of inquiry?

Where is your question, #nointegrity?  And why the diversion?  And you made it clear it was a question you had already asked.
 
 

Huey » Yesterday, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:33 pm

Where is your question, 

It follows "ok", and ends with a QUESTION mark.

Damn.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:35 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:33 pm

Where is your question, 

It follows "ok", and ends with a QUESTION mark.

Damn.

 

Ok,.  So you lied #nointegrity, made it clear it was a question already asked on the thread.

why do you believe you can be redeemed by pursuing this line of inquiry?

The entire family IS NOT a singular design.  That is why at the site I gave you years ago the "family" is broken down into generally 2 categories.  Civilian and military. 

Your turn.


 

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2026, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2026, 12:16 pm

Huey » 16 Oct 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2026, 12:10 pm

Unfortunately 4 people are dead, 3 of them kids  Fortunately an armed civilian shot the **** before he could kill more.New details revealed about hero girl dad who stopped Oregon school shooter John J. Griffin during his lunch break

A hero dad was driving home for his lunch break when he heard gunshots and ran into an Oregon elementary school special education room to stop a crazed teen’s deadly mass shooting, according to a report.

 Kaylub Giamanco, a carpenter and father of two girls who attend Silver Rail Elementary, was driving home from his break on Thursday when he heard gunfire, his brother, Kyle Giamanco, told NBC News.

 https://nypost.com/2026/10/16/us-news/h ... nch-break/ 
 

After child with "long rifle" shoots 4.

Because what else is that long rifle for?


 

WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN CONTEXT OF THE OP?  YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.

Huey » Yesterday, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:39 pm

Ok,.  So you lied #nointegrity, made it clear it was a question already asked on the thread.

The entire family IS NOT a singular design.  That is why at the site I gave you years ago the "family" is broken down into generally 2 categories.  Civilian and military. 

Your turn.

You must learn to read the question asked and then answer that question.

I am never interested in your qualifications, because you are illiterate...

Try again.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:43 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:39 pm

Ok,.  So you lied #nointegrity, made it clear it was a question already asked on the thread.

The entire family IS NOT a singular design.  That is why at the site I gave you years ago the "family" is broken down into generally 2 categories.  Civilian and military. 

Your turn.

You must learn to read the question asked and then answer that question.

I am never interested in your qualifications, because you are illiterate...

Try again.
 

 

That is why it redeems me.  Here it is an example.  The M4 and the M16



WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN M16 AND AN M4?In the most basic terms, an M4 is a shorter, handier version of the M16 service rifle. The M4 is considered a carbine—pronounced CAR-bean (rhymes with the word seen) or CAR-byne (rhymes with the word line). A carbine is traditionally a lighter, shorter version of a longer rifle. The M4 has a 14.5-inch barrel compared to the M16’s 20-inch barrel. The M4 has a collapsable, adjustable buttstock compared to the M16’s fixed buttstock. The M4 has a carbine-length gas system compared to the M16’s rifle-length gas system. Most modern M4s are full-auto, while most M16s use a 3-round burst mechanism.

https://libertysafe.com/blogs/the-vault ... M16_and_M4

Same family, different design.

Now your turn, #nointegrity:

WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN CONTEXT OF THE OP?  YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.
 
 

Huey » Yesterday, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:49 pm

 

Read the passage, read the question

Answer the question.

Stop "interpreting" the citation.....You are illiterate

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:51 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:49 pm

 

Read the passage, read the question

Answer the question.

Stop "interpreting" the citation.....You are illiterate

I accept your surrender.  Stop the **** deleting, #nointegrity.  You got your answer.  Perhaps after answering the below you can explain what part of my answer you can't wrap your tiny mind around.  YOU are a Piece of **** Liar.  I am about to show you why.  I would to your face and you won't do **** about it.

WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN CONTEXT OF THE OP?  YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.
 
 

Huey » Yesterday, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:54 pm

I accept your surrender.  Stop the **** deleting, #nointegrity. 

Stop running...

Answer the question asked
\

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:55 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:54 pm

I accept your surrender.  Stop the **** deleting, #nointegrity. 

Stop running...

Answer the question asked
\

 

I did.  Maybe you should have thought of a better way to as it.

Here my dealt you POS Liar.  AFTER you answer this:

WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN CONTEXT OF THE OP?  YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.

We will do another one for one and you can me a clearer question, POS no integrity liar.
 

Huey » Yesterday, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:57 pm

I did.  Maybe you should have thought of a better way to as it.

 

Tiny,

You are running from it.

After being so persistent.....and certain....now you are back to eating ****.....

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:00 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:57 pm

I did.  Maybe you should have thought of a better way to as it.


 

Tiny,

You are running from it.



 

I will give you one more shot at it.  You can word  that mess into coherent question, free of charge and I will answer it.IF it is still not clear and I ask for a clarification, you do it and then I will answer.