This is why it is a waste of time.Beekeeper » Yesterday, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ There yuo go again making up **** to suit your LIES!!
FACTS are a stubborn thing, ****!!
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ This is why it is a waste of time.
When was the only period that we saw an actual REDUCTION?
Consider your alleged grasp of the of the lEnglish language. You just called Obama a crackcare.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑Huey avatar Huey +5 9 minutes agoBeekeeper » Yesterday, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ I have. MULTIPLE TIMES!!
Because the ANSWER kicks your *** doesn't mean you can keep trying to get an answer that suits your **** ideology.
FACTS are persistent little things that YOU HATE and will RUN FROM MASSIVELY!!
Chase me some more, ****!!
Did your KNEEGROW GOD's ovomitcare REDUCE COSTS OF HEALTHCARE AND REDUCE GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES?? When you answer that one, we can talk. UNTIL THEN, **** OFF!!
Run ****, RUN!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Now pay attention.
NO ONE, who isn't a crackhead, expected ACA to reduce the COST of Healthcare...the aim was to reduce the RATE OF GROWTH in AGGREGATE expenditures.
Do either of you idiots follow so far?
As if he's gonna take time explaining Rate of Growth to a slack jawed imbecile like you.Huey » Yesterday, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Consider your alleged grasp of the of the lEnglish language. You just called Obama a crackcare.
https://youtu.be/_o65vMUk5so?si=TG493Qa1Jt5vrZfU
During the plague...Beekeeper » Yesterday, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ Why don't you ANSWER YOUR OWN QUESTION, ****, and then tell us WHO WAS PRESIDENT WHEN THAT HAPPENED!!
this is a waste of time.Beekeeper » Yesterday, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ WAIT!! So, you're saying COSTS WENT UP WITH BYE-DUMB in charge!!! When HE passed MORE SUBSIDIES AND GOVERNMENT SPENDING!!
You don't know a **** thing about this either.Huey » Yesterday, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑
Now you sit back and pay attention:
Cut the cost of a typical family’s health insurance premium by up to $2,500 a year\Barack Obama"I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every
What a dumb question. The fat girl is always the bottom. It's just common sense. Google, "Logistics."
If they have to explain it, you're not going to understand it.Blackvegetable » 20 Oct 2026, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ So
@RebelGator & @PhiloBeddo
What is common sense about pledging to cut 1-2 trillion from the "bloated budget", while spending more, "taxing less" and running a LARGER deficit?
It's "common".Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ If they have to explain it, you're not going to understand it.
Consult the OP.
Giggity.Blackvegetable » 20 Oct 2026, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ President Trump said at a rally in Kansas Monday night that the Agriculture Department would provide $8 billion in economic aid to farmers hurt by high diesel prices.
It was the second time in two years that the president authorized billions of dollars in bailout money for farmers harmed by his administration’s policies, and came 15 days before a midterm election in which unhappy farmers and ranchers could be the deciding votes in close races across the country.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/20/busi ... ilout.html
"Common Sense" sure is expensive....
That's, like, 16 Solyndras!
Oh, it isn't stupid. He followed the Rand Corp's plan to the letter.Blackvegetable » 20 Oct 2026, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ This isn't about "food"...this is about the Cost of Stupid, Stupid.
Speeches at the Golden Globes, after a few shots, spoken by a silver-tongued devil with a lot of brass.
I was thinking it's because you're a hypocrite, and hooey nailed you.Blackvegetable » 20 Oct 2026, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ Because I understand Aggregate Demand and why it matters.
You don't.
Mine starts with you and your kind taking your lips off israel's cock and start putting AMERICA first.
Well, the answer is simple! You're a liar, and a **** moron!Blackvegetable » 20 Oct 2026, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑ @PhiloBeddo
&
@RebelGator
ask
How do Dems vote against every commonsense issue?
https://youtube.com/shorts/5qxjm4RH6oA? ... _21ddQMUEt
The U.S. budget deficit is ballooning, reaching $2 trillion this fiscal year, according to the latest figures.
Why it matters: That's the largest deficit since 2021, when the U.S. was climbing out of the pandemic recession.
The deficit is being driven in part by the cost of servicing the nation's enormous debt at a time when interest rates are rising due, in part, to the inflationary impact of the Iran war.
https://www.axios.com/2026/10/20/federa ... rest-rates
https://youtu.be/0hiUuL5uTKc?is=nI6hVF8icY-WWLX5
**** idiots.
It's about multipolarism. It's about the dollar as the global reserve currency. That is what attacking Iran is about.Blackvegetable » 20 Oct 2026, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ This isn't about "food"...this is about the Cost of Stupid, Stupid.
Perhaps strategically...but tactically, this is about Epstein.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ It's about multipolarism. It's about the dollar as the global reserve currency. That is what attacking Iran is about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxjGSwdgGSM