Liberal Forum

Huey » Today, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:55 am

You say 

Yea.

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:58 am

 

Ore gibberish.

What is a long rifle?

Huey » Today, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:00 am

Ore gibberish.

What is a long rifle?

What's "Ore gibberish"?

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:57 am

President Trump said at a rally in Kansas Monday night that the Agriculture Department would provide $8 billion in economic aid to farmers hurt by high diesel prices. 

 

Sweet, another check!

I will spend it wisely.  
 

Fuelman » Yesterday, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:45 am

Sweet, another check!

I will spend it wisely.

Be sure to complain about deficits as you do...

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:51 am

Fuelman » Yesterday, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:45 am

Sweet, another check!

I will spend it wisely.

Be sure to complain about deficits as you do...

 

And yet, you were a huge supporter of the COVID checks.  You weren't complaining when Biden was handing out checks.  You were defending it.

So, you can STFU and go sit in the corner.

Huey » Yesterday, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:01 am

And yet, you were a huge supporter of the COVID checks.  

Because I understand Aggregate Demand and why it matters.

You don't. 

Huey » Yesterday, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:01 am

And yet, you were a huge supporter of the COVID checks.  You weren't complaining when Biden was handing out checks.  You were defending it.

So, you can STFU and go sit in the corner.

He defends the Obongo Charities, too.

It took Solyndra exactly two years to go broke after receiving $530 Million in financial backing from the Obama administration. 

RebelGator » Yesterday, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:08 am

He defends the Obongo Charities, too.

It took Solyndra exactly two years to go broke after receiving $530 Million in financial backing from the Obama administration.

Aggregate Demand......is that when the voters cry for compensation.....asking for Eggplant. 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:09 am

**** idiots.

So what's your SOLUTION besides MORE GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS and FORCING PEOPLE to pay for that **** you love so much???

WE ae a nation didn't get here because of **** FISCAL RESTRAINT!!! Let's give you ONE that YOUR PARTY PASSED WITH ZERO REPUBLICANS BEHIND IT, ****!!

The gross federal cost for Affordable Care Act (ACA / Obamacare) marketplace subsidies grew from $18 billion in 2014 to an estimated $138 billion in 2025, driven by increasing enrollment and expanded tax credits.

Key Cost Breakdown for Taxpayers

• Marketplace Subsidies & Spending: Annual federal spending on ACA exchange subsidies was around $92 billion in 2023 and reached an estimated $138 billion by 2025. 
• Medicaid Expansion Impact: Expanding Medicaid under the ACA increased federal and state spending significantly, shifting state budget distributions (e.g., Medicaid growing to 31% of Florida’s state budget by 2020).
• Enhanced Subsidies & Expirations:
  • Temporary enhanced premium tax credits passed under the American Rescue Plan Act and extended through the Inflation Reduction Act cost roughly $34 billion and $64 billion, respectively.
  • These enhanced subsidies expired at the end of 2025, returning the program to its pre-2021 structure (reinstating the 400% federal poverty level "subsidy cliff").
  • Proposals to permanently extend those enhanced subsidies were projected by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Joint Committee on Taxation to cost taxpayers an additional $383 billion over 10 years.
• Long-Term Projections: Total federal health insurance subsidies (including ACA-related programs) are projected by the CBO to span trillions over the coming decade (with general federal subsidies projected at $33.6 trillion over the 2026–2036 window). 

Offsetting Revenues

While the gross cost to taxpayers is substantial, the initial ACA legislation and subsequent acts included tax increases, fees, and Medicare spending adjustments intended to offset a portion of the federal outlay, though temporary expansions (like pandemic-era relief) were deficit-financed UNDER BIDEN!!



Now, ****, **** OFF with your **** AND TDS HATE!!

Beekeeper » Yesterday, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:01 am

So what's your SOLUTION besides MORE GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS and FORCING PEOPLE to pay for that **** you love so much???

 

You aren't equipped for this debate.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:05 am

You aren't equipped for this debate.

No, I just put the cards on the table.

NOW YOU ARE RUNNING., ****, NOT ME!!

Nice try to deflect, so either DEFEND TOUR CLAIM OR ANSWER THE FACTS PUT ON THE TABLE, MORON!!

Chase me.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:05 am

You aren't equipped for this debate.

Long-Term Projections: Total federal health insurance subsidies (including ACA-related programs) are projected by the CBO to span trillions over the coming decade (with general federal subsidies projected at $33.6 trillion over the 2026–2036 window


YOUR PARTY'S ****, NOT MINE!!

Run ****, RUN!!

         

Beekeeper » Yesterday, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:07 am

No, I just put the cards on the table.


 

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HLTHSCPCHCSA

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:51 am

Be sure to complain about deficits as you do...

Doesn't bother me as much these days , besides, Democrat control of the House after the election will fix that at a snap of the finger.

       
 

Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:02 pm

Doesn't bother me as much these days , besides, Democrat control of the House after the election will fix that at a snap of the finger.

     

Doesn't bother me as much these days ,

of course not...it only bothers you when falling.

Democrat control of the House after the election will fix that at a snap of the finger.

let's hope so.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:04 pm

Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:02 pm

Doesn't bother me as much these days , besides, Democrat control of the House after the election will fix that at a snap of the finger.

     

Doesn't bother me as much these days ,

of course not...it only bothers you when falling.

Democrat control of the House after the election will fix that at a snap of the finger.

let's hope so.
 

 

You got time to do this **** you got time to ask your question on the Oregon Shooter thread.

Chop Chop
 

Huey » Yesterday, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:08 pm

You got 

:rofl:  

I'd have to give a **** what you want.

I don't. 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:10 pm

 

I'd have to give a **** what you want.

I don't.

You keep running from your long rifle idiocy and proving you are not a man of your word when it comes to challenges or conditions.

You got your answer to the yes or no question and you are still running from your words.

Huey » Yesterday, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:12 pm

You keep running from your long rifle idiocy and proving 

What is this OP about?