Why would I ask anything. You’re a ****** about answers, One Design.
Are you trying to convince yourself the Plaintiff is guilty.....another thing you know precious little about.Blackvegetable » 22 Oct 2026, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump Suffers Stinging Defeat in $10B Lawsuit He Filed Himself
A federal judge has ordered President Donald Trump to sit for a deposition he desperately tried to avoid in the $10 billion lawsuit he brought against the BBC.
The president, who has notoriously tried to avoid being deposed in past lawsuits, will need to sit for a deposition by December 11 or face sanctions. U.S. Magistrate Judge Enjoliqué Lett also warned Trump’s lawyers that the entire suit could be thrown out if he does not comply with court orders
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-suf ... ed-himself
![]()
![]()
I think there's gonna be some choice **** in the archives....
ABC just rolled over....BBC don't play that....they're gonna break one off in Grifty's tuchis...
So??Blackvegetable » 22 Oct 2026, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump Suffers Stinging Defeat in $10B Lawsuit He Filed Himself
A federal judge has ordered President Donald Trump to sit for a deposition he desperately tried to avoid in the $10 billion lawsuit he brought against the BBC.
The president, who has notoriously tried to avoid being deposed in past lawsuits, will need to sit for a deposition by December 11 or face sanctions. U.S. Magistrate Judge Enjoliqué Lett also warned Trump’s lawyers that the entire suit could be thrown out if he does not comply with court orders
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-suf ... ed-himself
![]()
![]()
I think there's gonna be some choice **** in the archives....
ABC just rolled over....BBC don't play that....they're gonna break one off in Grifty's tuchis...
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ At 1 am est, I landed in Amsterdam..
At 5 I landed in Copenhagen.
acknowledge that you were answered.
Now tell everyone why you didn't cast a 3rd proud vote for 2ndBesty..
He'll have to substantiate his claim regarding damages...Beekeeper » Yesterday, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ So??
He will ONLY have to answer questions about the LAWSUIT, and nothing more. Sucks, huh??
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑ He'll have to substantiate his claim regarding damages...
Assertion, contrary to the belief of you imbeciles, is not sufficient in the pursuit of the facts..
There's no dodging questions.
You idiots would get debarked in minutes...
c’mon man, brown was told once that “he could have been a lawyer”…that coupled with “he reads…he knows things” inclines me to believe he’d have made a great coffee getter for a public defender…Beekeeper » Yesterday, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Where did you get your LAW DEGREE FROM, ****??
Oh that's right, you have NONE!!!
And you want to "armchair" this to death and then you end up getting your *** handed to you!! Then we laugh AT YOU!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Yes, that is why I opined that he might have had better luck filing in London. But plaintiff or defendant, avoiding being deposed is the better part of valor.
Are you allowing for time zones?Huey » Yesterday, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ WOW! You posted all day yesterday with your last post at 0300 this morning. And you were back at it at 0630 this morning. WTF is wrong you?
UK law may not accommodate his complaint.Cannonpointer » Today, 12:20 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, that is why I opined that he might have had better luck filing in London. But plaintiff or defendant, avoiding being deposed is the better part of valor.
MIT.
No ****. But they can TRY to get out of it. No shame in that, unless you do it in a *** way.Blackvegetable » Today, 1:51 am » wrote: ↑ UK law may not accommodate his complaint.
But a plaintiff cannot presume that they will not be obliged to answer discovery questions under oath.
Cannonpointer » Today, 2:27 am » wrote: ↑ No ****. But they can TRY to get out of it. No shame in that, unless you do it in a *** way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AALREbJZEZk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dering_v_UrisCannonpointer » Today, 2:27 am » wrote: ↑ No ****. But they can TRY to get out of it. No shame in that, unless you do it in a *** way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AALREbJZEZk
No, I hadda google it.
This is exactly why one avoids depositions. Operations on prisoners and such. Or questions about raping children on Epstein Island.
Gee, that's funny, seems no one ever heard of the MIT School of Law.
Blackvegetable » Today, 1:51 am » wrote: ↑ UK law may not accommodate his complaint.
But a plaintiff cannot presume that they will not be obliged to answer discovery questions under oath.
The court awarded him a half penny in damages, the judge adds, and I quote