Liberal Forum

Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly...          

The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:54 am

Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly...          

The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...

Could you go a little deeper into this? Not sure what you are getting at.

Social Security falls under the demand side of our supply and demand system.

Demand side meaning government transfers.
 
 

Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:28 pm

Could you go a little deeper into this? Not sure what you are getting at.

Social Security falls under the demand side of our supply and demand system.

Demand side meaning government transfers.

SS = Supply Side Economics, the Raygun fairy tales about how tax cuts for the Epstein class will fix everything wrong with our eCONomy
 
Bush tax cuts (for wealthy parasites)
tRumP tax cuts (for wealthy parasites)
etc.

You can probably throw in Clinton's capital gains tax cut (in 1997) into that mix as well even though Clinton himself was not an avowed SS'er

I bet you are a renter on welfare. A total life loser who is biter that normal people succeed.

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:54 am

Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly...          

The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...

The poster known as RIchClem hasn't posted here since 2015.  You didn't join until 2022 or 23.  

Who were you to know him?
 
 

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:46 pm

SS = Supply Side Economics, the Raygun fairy tales about how tax cuts for the Epstein class will fix everything wrong with our eCONomy
 
Bush tax cuts (for wealthy parasites)
tRumP tax cuts (for wealthy parasites)
etc.

You can probably throw in Clinton's capital gains tax cut (in 1997) into that mix as well even though Clinton himself was not an avowed SS'er

  my bad, I see SS and immediately think of Social Security.

One thing is for sure, I trust rich people with their own money over government having that money.

The estimated $260 billion found in fraud since the beginning of 2025 is an eye opener. I suspect the common criminal has bilked the US Government out of Trillions since Reagan. Giving even more money to the government black hole is straight jacket worthy.

Can you tell us why you think the government needs more money? What will you get out of it?

When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.

Fuelman » Yesterday, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:42 pm

  my bad, I see SS and immediately think of Social Security.

One thing is for sure, I trust rich people with their own money over government having that money.

The estimated $260 billion found in fraud since the beginning of 2025 is an eye opener. I suspect the common criminal has bilked the US Government out of Trillions since Reagan. Giving even more money to the government black hole is straight jacket worthy.

Can you tell us why you think the government needs more money? What will you get out of it?

When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.

Where did you get the idea that I think the govt needs more money? The govt can hit ctrl + alt + delete on all that digital tax revenue for all I care.

It's not about the "gubmint spending" at least from MY perspective...

All I want is to confiscate the "ill gotten" gains / wealth of the Epstein class (and their collaborators), as they are a bunch of THIEVES and criminals, and they DESERVE to have all of it taken from them.

As you are a lowly millionaire and have not (or have yet to) visit any Epstein Islands, you are exempt from my wrath!

    

When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.

I don't disagree with you at all.     I'm already pissed thinking about CA Dems' "proposed additional tax increases"...*groan*

That being said, I would NEVER stoop to "Supply Side Idiocy" just b/c I, like most people, do not enjoy paying taxes. FEEFEES DON'T MATTER!

"Render therefore unto Cesar the things which are Cesar's" - The LORD Jesus Christ  

 
 

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:54 am

Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly... :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  

The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...

People that believe their social mind is greater than a personal brain never learn to balance in life by heartbeats existing in plain sight proportionately here since conception.

there is no security socially here adapting to space one at time pretending nobody knew genetic outcomes never exceed their time adapting in space since date of birth, now.

who you became after birth is defined by social consensus every day alive.

What you been since conception was a replacement for your previous reproducing ancestors so far that is how eternal life operates every rotation one is living forward in plain sight. perpetual balancing outcomes of each reproduction entering space time leaving the womb recorded on a date of birth nobody can tell anyone their day conceived.

What missing link in evolution?

No conceptions, no births of another generation gap. Action and reaction adapting to the moment every heartbeat since a fertilized cell changing form since shape as conceived by prior generation and becomes extinct not adding their chromosomes to children changing population one generation gap at a time being part of total global population each rotation surviving their own stupidity for ignoring all they been since a fertilized cell biologically here framed from eroded molecular content of this universal position one lifetime at time now.

Don't let your nurtured contextual mind direct your chromosomes brain that originally was the nucleus of your fertilized cell and all the instincts acquired by every generation gap to biologically be able to move one at a time now by choice, here, now.

Those conceived never got a choice to be conceived, but those made the conception did.

Stop blaming everyone else for you never discovering how biological results are self evident positions daily here.

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:48 pm

Where did you get the idea that I think the govt needs more money? The govt can hit ctrl + alt + delete on all that digital tax revenue for all I care.

It's not about the "gubmint spending" at least from MY perspective...

All I want is to confiscate the "ill gotten" gains / wealth of the Epstein class (and their collaborators), as they are a bunch of THIEVES and criminals, and they DESERVE to have all of it taken from them.

As you are a lowly millionaire and have not (or have yet to) visit any Epstein Islands, you are exempt from my wrath!

    

I don't disagree with you at all.     I'm already pissed thinking about CA Dems' "proposed additional tax increases"...*groan*

That being said, I would NEVER stoop to "Supply Side Idiocy" just b/c I, like most people, do not enjoy paying taxes. FEEFEES DON'T MATTER!

"Render therefore unto Cesar the things which are Cesar's" - The LORD Jesus Christ

If Reagan, Bush & Trump hadn't imposed those tax cuts, where would that revenue have gone? (Government)

I didn't spend much time reading the whole Epstein ordeal.
That kind of stuff makes my stomach churn, best for me not to get too involved. Even though Epstein is gone, it continues around the world.   

Throw the book at them if possible, Trump included.

I can agree "trickle down" failed a lot of people. What I believe the determining factor though is personal responsibility. Government transfers wouldn't have made a difference in the outcome, may have been even worse.



 

Fuelman » Yesterday, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:40 pm

If Reagan, Bush & Trump hadn't imposed those tax cuts, where would that revenue have gone? (Government)

I didn't spend much time reading the whole Epstein ordeal.
That kind of stuff makes my stomach churn, best for me not to get too involved. Even though Epstein is gone, it continues around the world.  :twisted:  

Throw the book at them if possible, Trump included.

I can agree "trickle down" failed a lot of people. What I believe the determining factor though is personal responsibility. Government transfers wouldn't have made a difference in the outcome, may have been even worse.

Presidents, governors, mayors only suggests tax cuts, legislatures change the tax laws covering up raising tax revenues by tax cuts. it is all optics used within relative time logistics going beyond genetic zero sum gain evolving genetic outcomes living in plain sight.

Same thing between contextual souls after birth and living soles since conception.

Fuelman » Yesterday, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:42 pm

  my bad, I see SS and immediately think of Social Security.

One thing is for sure, I trust rich people with their own money over government having that money.

The estimated $260 billion found in fraud since the beginning of 2025 is an eye opener. I suspect the common criminal has bilked the US Government out of Trillions since Reagan. Giving even more money to the government black hole is straight jacket worthy.

Can you tell us why you think the government needs more money? What will you get out of it?

When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.

****?
 

ROG62 » Today, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:10 pm

****?

Not really sure. The people that complain about our current system never have an answer how to make it better.
Low IQ kind of painted himself into a corner. Complains about tax cuts for the rich yet states he doesn't want government to have more money?
I can't make heads or tails on that position.



 

Fuelman » Today, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:03 pm

Not really sure. The people that complain about our current system never have an answer how to make it better.
Low IQ kind of painted himself into a corner. Complains about tax cuts for the rich yet states he doesn't want government to have more money?
I can't make heads or tails on that position.

Karl Marx saw you coming fool..  150 years ago..

I know, I need to just STFU and keep on slaving it..
 
It appears Karl had no solutions  either..

JohnnyYou » Today, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:10 pm

Karl Marx saw you coming fool..  150 years ago..

I know, I need to just STFU and keep on slaving it..
 
It appears Karl had no solutions  either..

  I retired at 60 with a high school diploma.

Have seen a few articles stating 1 in 5 households making $300k are living paycheck to paycheck.
That's obscene, unfortunately you can't tell those people what they are doing wrong.
 

Fuelman » Yesterday, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:42 pm

  my bad, I see SS and immediately think of Social Security.

One thing is for sure, I trust rich people with their own money over government having that money.

The estimated $260 billion found in fraud since the beginning of 2025 is an eye opener. I suspect the common criminal has bilked the US Government out of Trillions since Reagan. Giving even more money to the government black hole is straight jacket worthy.

Can you tell us why you think the government needs more money? What will you get out of it?

When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.

Holy ****, are you people stupid.

Can you tell us why you think the government needs more money? What will you get out of it?

Because idiots like you insist on voting for fiscal arsonists,  in the belief that the Supply Side Fairy will make it better.
 

Fuelman » Yesterday, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:03 pm

Not really sure. The people that complain about our current system never have an answer how to make it better.
Low IQ kind of painted himself into a corner. Complains about tax cuts for the rich yet states he doesn't want government to have more money?
I can't make heads or tails on that position.

He’s all about the victimhood..that’s for sure…

you’re correct…bitching, pissing and moaning…yet nothing to counter except “the big short”…  
 

LowIQTrash » 23 Oct 2026, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2026, 11:54 am

Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly...          

The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...

Here is where you FAIL basic economics, ****!!

There are 2 sides to that equation. Supply. Demand.

Now, you can INCREASE DEMAND by INCREASING SUPPLY because that supply increase ALWAYS, and that's not "Depends on" ANYTHING , causes PRICES TO FALL and that in return ALWAYS leads to higher DEMAND.

Economic activity REQUIRES that both of these be in balance If one gets too high without an equal response from the other side, like demand, prices RISE and you have inflationary results. Let SUPPLY get too low without demand falling, same effect. 

So increasing SUPPLY by government ACTS to increase that supply means LOWER PRICES and HIGHER DEMAND. And because SUPPLY IS SOLID and not decreasing, prices remain stable and demand can increase. In MOST EVERY CASE, supply increases and the resulting PRICE STABILIZATION means even LOWER prices. Take TV's for example. What you paid $500 for 20 years ago, you can get TODAY for around $110. My first 35 in Flat screen can be purchased for around $120 today. DEMAND INCREASES and SUPPLY INCREASES forced prices DOWN and DEMAND UP!! And there are ZERO shortages of TV's to force price hikes today.

You're a **** IDIOT to think it works any other way, which your SOCIALIST INDOCRINATION has told you there is no way this works. But it ALWAYS DOES, ****!!           
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:23 pm

Because idiots like you insist on voting for fiscal arsonists,  in the belief that the Supply Side Fairy will make it better.

It's going to stay that way buckwheat until Democrats realize dicks shouldn't be in little girl's bathrooms.

I have a one year old great granddaughter, keep your perversion in your home closet!
 

ROG62 » Today, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:52 am

He’s all about the victimhood..that’s for sure…

you’re correct…bitching, pissing and moaning…yet nothing to counter except “the big short”…

Not that I want to do it all over again but the current market here brings $55-60/hour for landscaping or handyman.

Get the **** out of here with your victimhood ****!
 

Fuelman » 23 Oct 2026, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2026, 1:42 pm

  my bad, I see SS and immediately think of Social Security.

One thing is for sure, I trust rich people with their own money over government having that money.

 

Elon thinks money will dissappear.  If yours is with him I would take that to the bank..

The estimated $260 billion found in fraud since the beginning of 2025 is an eye opener. I suspect the common criminal has bilked the US Government out of Trillions since Reagan. Giving even more money to the government black hole is straight jacket worthy.

Can you tell us why you think the government needs more money? What will you get out of it?

When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.

A Nuke Free Iran?   Trump is running a scamathon  fool man...