How come Retarded MAGATs here are "Supply Side Idiots" but have never made an attempt to defend their SS Idiocy?

User avatar
By LowIQTrash
Yesterday 11:54 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
LowIQTrash
Yesterday 11:54 am
User avatar
     
3,504 posts
Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly... :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  

The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...
User avatar
Fuelman
Yesterday 12:28 pm
User avatar
     
2,490 posts
LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly... Image   Image   Image   Image   Image  

The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...
Could you go a little deeper into this? Not sure what you are getting at.

Social Security falls under the demand side of our supply and demand system.

Demand side meaning government transfers.
 
 
User avatar
LowIQTrash
Yesterday 12:46 pm
User avatar
     
3,504 posts
Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Could you go a little deeper into this? Not sure what you are getting at.

Social Security falls under the demand side of our supply and demand system.

Demand side meaning government transfers.
SS = Supply Side Economics, the Raygun fairy tales about how tax cuts for the Epstein class will fix everything wrong with our eCONomy
 
Bush tax cuts (for wealthy parasites)
tRumP tax cuts (for wealthy parasites)
etc.

You can probably throw in Clinton's capital gains tax cut (in 1997) into that mix as well even though Clinton himself was not an avowed SS'er
User avatar
PhiloBeddo
Yesterday 12:57 pm
User avatar
     
3,802 posts
I bet you are a renter on welfare. A total life loser who is biter that normal people succeed.
User avatar
Huey
Yesterday 1:13 pm
User avatar
      
37,945 posts
LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly... Image   Image   Image   Image   Image  

The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...
The poster known as RIchClem hasn't posted here since 2015.  You didn't join until 2022 or 23.  

Who were you to know him?
 
 
BV: If you're going to answer questions, we can play.
viewtopic.php?p=2938094#p2938094
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 2nd Sporter Loss: viewtopic.php?p=2941076#p2941076
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Fuelman
Yesterday 1:42 pm
User avatar
     
2,490 posts
LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ SS = Supply Side Economics, the Raygun fairy tales about how tax cuts for the Epstein class will fix everything wrong with our eCONomy
 
Bush tax cuts (for wealthy parasites)
tRumP tax cuts (for wealthy parasites)
etc.

You can probably throw in Clinton's capital gains tax cut (in 1997) into that mix as well even though Clinton himself was not an avowed SS'er
:rofl:  my bad, I see SS and immediately think of Social Security.

One thing is for sure, I trust rich people with their own money over government having that money.

The estimated $260 billion found in fraud since the beginning of 2025 is an eye opener. I suspect the common criminal has bilked the US Government out of Trillions since Reagan. Giving even more money to the government black hole is straight jacket worthy.

Can you tell us why you think the government needs more money? What will you get out of it?

When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.
User avatar
LowIQTrash
Yesterday 1:48 pm
User avatar
     
3,504 posts
Fuelman » Yesterday, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Image  my bad, I see SS and immediately think of Social Security.

One thing is for sure, I trust rich people with their own money over government having that money.

The estimated $260 billion found in fraud since the beginning of 2025 is an eye opener. I suspect the common criminal has bilked the US Government out of Trillions since Reagan. Giving even more money to the government black hole is straight jacket worthy.

Can you tell us why you think the government needs more money? What will you get out of it?

When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.
Where did you get the idea that I think the govt needs more money? The govt can hit ctrl + alt + delete on all that digital tax revenue for all I care.

It's not about the "gubmint spending" at least from MY perspective...

All I want is to confiscate the "ill gotten" gains / wealth of the Epstein class (and their collaborators), as they are a bunch of THIEVES and criminals, and they DESERVE to have all of it taken from them.

As you are a lowly millionaire and have not (or have yet to) visit any Epstein Islands, you are exempt from my wrath!

Image   Image  
When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.
I don't disagree with you at all. Image   Image  I'm already pissed thinking about CA Dems' "proposed additional tax increases"...*groan*

That being said, I would NEVER stoop to "Supply Side Idiocy" just b/c I, like most people, do not enjoy paying taxes. FEEFEES DON'T MATTER!

"Render therefore unto Cesar the things which are Cesar's" - The LORD Jesus Christ Image  

 
 
User avatar
sole
Yesterday 2:03 pm
User avatar
      
27,934 posts
LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly... :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  

The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...
People that believe their social mind is greater than a personal brain never learn to balance in life by heartbeats existing in plain sight proportionately here since conception.

there is no security socially here adapting to space one at time pretending nobody knew genetic outcomes never exceed their time adapting in space since date of birth, now.

who you became after birth is defined by social consensus every day alive.

What you been since conception was a replacement for your previous reproducing ancestors so far that is how eternal life operates every rotation one is living forward in plain sight. perpetual balancing outcomes of each reproduction entering space time leaving the womb recorded on a date of birth nobody can tell anyone their day conceived.

What missing link in evolution?

No conceptions, no births of another generation gap. Action and reaction adapting to the moment every heartbeat since a fertilized cell changing form since shape as conceived by prior generation and becomes extinct not adding their chromosomes to children changing population one generation gap at a time being part of total global population each rotation surviving their own stupidity for ignoring all they been since a fertilized cell biologically here framed from eroded molecular content of this universal position one lifetime at time now.

Don't let your nurtured contextual mind direct your chromosomes brain that originally was the nucleus of your fertilized cell and all the instincts acquired by every generation gap to biologically be able to move one at a time now by choice, here, now.

Those conceived never got a choice to be conceived, but those made the conception did.

Stop blaming everyone else for you never discovering how biological results are self evident positions daily here.
User avatar
Fuelman
Yesterday 2:40 pm
User avatar
     
2,490 posts
LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Where did you get the idea that I think the govt needs more money? The govt can hit ctrl + alt + delete on all that digital tax revenue for all I care.

It's not about the "gubmint spending" at least from MY perspective...

All I want is to confiscate the "ill gotten" gains / wealth of the Epstein class (and their collaborators), as they are a bunch of THIEVES and criminals, and they DESERVE to have all of it taken from them.

As you are a lowly millionaire and have not (or have yet to) visit any Epstein Islands, you are exempt from my wrath!

Image   Image  

I don't disagree with you at all. Image   Image  I'm already pissed thinking about CA Dems' "proposed additional tax increases"...*groan*

That being said, I would NEVER stoop to "Supply Side Idiocy" just b/c I, like most people, do not enjoy paying taxes. FEEFEES DON'T MATTER!

"Render therefore unto Cesar the things which are Cesar's" - The LORD Jesus Christ Image
If Reagan, Bush & Trump hadn't imposed those tax cuts, where would that revenue have gone? (Government)

I didn't spend much time reading the whole Epstein ordeal.
That kind of stuff makes my stomach churn, best for me not to get too involved. Even though Epstein is gone, it continues around the world.  :twisted:  

Throw the book at them if possible, Trump included.

I can agree "trickle down" failed a lot of people. What I believe the determining factor though is personal responsibility. Government transfers wouldn't have made a difference in the outcome, may have been even worse.



 
User avatar
sole
Today 7:13 am
User avatar
      
27,934 posts
Fuelman » Yesterday, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ If Reagan, Bush & Trump hadn't imposed those tax cuts, where would that revenue have gone? (Government)

I didn't spend much time reading the whole Epstein ordeal.
That kind of stuff makes my stomach churn, best for me not to get too involved. Even though Epstein is gone, it continues around the world.  :twisted:  

Throw the book at them if possible, Trump included.

I can agree "trickle down" failed a lot of people. What I believe the determining factor though is personal responsibility. Government transfers wouldn't have made a difference in the outcome, may have been even worse.
Presidents, governors, mayors only suggests tax cuts, legislatures change the tax laws covering up raising tax revenues by tax cuts. it is all optics used within relative time logistics going beyond genetic zero sum gain evolving genetic outcomes living in plain sight.

Same thing between contextual souls after birth and living soles since conception.
10 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 10041 users online :: 0 registered, 17 bots, and 10024 guests
Registered users:
Bots: oBot, Twitterbot, WhatsApp, DuckDuckBot, Baiduspider, NING, Pinterest, Adsbot, ADmantX, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, Googlebot, bingbot
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search