Could you go a little deeper into this? Not sure what you are getting at.LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...
SS = Supply Side Economics, the Raygun fairy tales about how tax cuts for the Epstein class will fix everything wrong with our eCONomyFuelman » Yesterday, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Could you go a little deeper into this? Not sure what you are getting at.
Social Security falls under the demand side of our supply and demand system.
Demand side meaning government transfers.
The poster known as RIchClem hasn't posted here since 2015. You didn't join until 2022 or 23.LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...
LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ SS = Supply Side Economics, the Raygun fairy tales about how tax cuts for the Epstein class will fix everything wrong with our eCONomy
Bush tax cuts (for wealthy parasites)
tRumP tax cuts (for wealthy parasites)
etc.
You can probably throw in Clinton's capital gains tax cut (in 1997) into that mix as well even though Clinton himself was not an avowed SS'er
Where did you get the idea that I think the govt needs more money? The govt can hit ctrl + alt + delete on all that digital tax revenue for all I care.Fuelman » Yesterday, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑my bad, I see SS and immediately think of Social Security.
One thing is for sure, I trust rich people with their own money over government having that money.
The estimated $260 billion found in fraud since the beginning of 2025 is an eye opener. I suspect the common criminal has bilked the US Government out of Trillions since Reagan. Giving even more money to the government black hole is straight jacket worthy.
Can you tell us why you think the government needs more money? What will you get out of it?
When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.
I don't disagree with you at all.When you make that FU options trade, Uncle Sam and California are going to become your enemy I suspect.
I'm already pissed thinking about CA Dems' "proposed additional tax increases"...*groan*
People that believe their social mind is greater than a personal brain never learn to balance in life by heartbeats existing in plain sight proportionately here since conception.LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Useful lead to pursue...all I recall is RichClem (the biggest SS idiot) was the ONLY one to make that attempt repeatedly... :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
The other MAGATs (even more stooooopid than RC) probably gave up but still cling like a bunch of **** morons...
If Reagan, Bush & Trump hadn't imposed those tax cuts, where would that revenue have gone? (Government)LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Where did you get the idea that I think the govt needs more money? The govt can hit ctrl + alt + delete on all that digital tax revenue for all I care.
It's not about the "gubmint spending" at least from MY perspective...
All I want is to confiscate the "ill gotten" gains / wealth of the Epstein class (and their collaborators), as they are a bunch of THIEVES and criminals, and they DESERVE to have all of it taken from them.
As you are a lowly millionaire and have not (or have yet to) visit any Epstein Islands, you are exempt from my wrath!
![]()
![]()
I don't disagree with you at all.![]()
I'm already pissed thinking about CA Dems' "proposed additional tax increases"...*groan*
That being said, I would NEVER stoop to "Supply Side Idiocy" just b/c I, like most people, do not enjoy paying taxes. FEEFEES DON'T MATTER!
"Render therefore unto Cesar the things which are Cesar's" - The LORD Jesus Christ
Presidents, governors, mayors only suggests tax cuts, legislatures change the tax laws covering up raising tax revenues by tax cuts. it is all optics used within relative time logistics going beyond genetic zero sum gain evolving genetic outcomes living in plain sight.Fuelman » Yesterday, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ If Reagan, Bush & Trump hadn't imposed those tax cuts, where would that revenue have gone? (Government)
I didn't spend much time reading the whole Epstein ordeal.
That kind of stuff makes my stomach churn, best for me not to get too involved. Even though Epstein is gone, it continues around the world. :twisted:
Throw the book at them if possible, Trump included.
I can agree "trickle down" failed a lot of people. What I believe the determining factor though is personal responsibility. Government transfers wouldn't have made a difference in the outcome, may have been even worse.