Liberal Forum

*Roshambo » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

47 minutes ago

Johnny, my perseverance paid off. He is on a watch list. 

There is law enforcement  doing dumb shyt to people in my life. We got body cam on discovery.

I recall Chicken Fried said he was communicating with LE here..

It is astounding  how **** up the charges against my associate are.  The body cam is telling on how stupid the men in blue here can be. I am pretty sure the case will be dismissed..
 
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:25 am

But for the 8 years of George Bush Jr.  you could have made it comfortably..

So, you saying I'm right in believing what elder savers are experiencing.
Savings/ret. cannot keep up and SS COLA is inadequate as well.

*Roshambo » Today, 4:56 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:56 am

Johnny, my perseverance paid off. He is on a watch list. 

Dickens?   
 

DeezerShoove » Today, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:39 am

So, you saying I'm right in believing what elder savers are experiencing.
Savings/ret. cannot keep up and SS COLA is inadequate as well.

You are conflating savings with SS...

Savings earn "return".

SS increases by COLA's which, in theory, should keep you at "par".

Those who parked their money in the bank have been **** for 25 years...
 

JohnnyYou » Today, 4:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:25 am

Where's my Five Thou?

I want it now..

It's contingent on keeping control of the house and senate. Good phooking luck MAGAtzzzzz..

Where is it?

Check your ballot, pinhead.

ROG62 » Today, 5:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:55 am

Dickens? 

   
 

*Roshambo » Today, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:36 am

 

Paw the dirt if you understand what's being said, Flipper.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:32 pm

Most people who work these days have no problems with income. They're making good money, taxes are down - their finances look great.

The problem isn't making good money. The problem is the money's no good.

Now the PROBLEM with your claim is that GDP is UP ~3.4%. Which means, spending isn't an issue either.

What's the ISSUE is that the MSM propagandists have YOU thinking that there is a problem, when there isn't.

Incomes are UP above inflation, spending is UP, unemployment is DOWN and steady, and inflation is cooling from the BYEdumb days of massively loss of value. It's NOT perfect, which you seem to think is achievable, but it's a FAR CRY from what you are been fed that things are worse than ever!!

It's how you get MANIPULATED, moron!
 

RebelGator » Today, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:50 am

Paw the dirt if you understand what's being said, Flipper.

Nod derp nod  

RebelGator » Today, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:16 am

Where is it?

Check your ballot, pinhead.

Roll, Rube..

Beekeeper » Today, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:02 am

Now the PROBLEM with your claim is that GDP is UP ~3.4%. Which means, spending isn't an issue either.


 

No, it doesn't. 

You're a **** idiot.

PhiloBeddo » Yesterday, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:49 pm

I vote that way anyway, but 5k each for my wife and I,  Outstanding.

this OP would be hilarious if your post read. "Vote Blue and the take another 5k out of your earnings at each level of governance.".

JohnnyYou » Today, 4:50 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:50 am

Charles Dickens wrote  A Christmas Carol for a reason back in the day..

It's  weird, I lived my life taught Marxism was bad.  I now learn he was just the Sole Result of his time.. Marx only made predictions and warnings.. He had no solutions.. But sure as hell his predictions fit today like a glove.

Elon thinks money will cease to exist.. I am sure Karl Marx is cheering him on from wherever  he is.  If getting rid of currency and shaking the monetary system to its core isn't  **** nothing is..

I asked my Star Trek Food Replicator to make a gallon of gas.  The machine blew up..

He abandoned his wife & children. What a shock.

Johnny You » Today, 4:50 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:50 am

Charles Dickens wrote  A Christmas Carol for a reason back in the day..

It's  weird, I lived my life taught Marxism was bad.  I now learn he was just the Sole Result of his time..

why does what his ides fit like a glove today? Humanity was as corrupt then as it is today. Nobody corrected humanity governing by hindsight 24/7 yet.

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:00 am

You are conflating savings with SS...

Savings earn "return".

SS increases by COLA's which, in theory, should keep you at "par".

Those who parked their money in the bank have been **** for 25 years...

What I'm trying to understand is how separate income streams into a single household makes much difference if:
1. that income doesn't change (even S.S. COLA is completely inadequate).
2. wages are touted as the panacea to all the inflation problems (retired do not have wage increases).
3. your 8.3% interest earned isn't all that common (merely considered "plausible").
4. elders planning to keep savings intact forced into taking from accounts formerly out of reach of gubmint mitts.

(4. is what I was referring to when I posted "it ain't trapped anymore".)
 
 Conflating isn't really what I'm doing...

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:00 am

DeezerShoove » Today, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:39 am

So, you saying I'm right in believing what elder savers are experiencing.
Savings/ret. cannot keep up and SS COLA is inadequate as well.

You are conflating savings with SS...

Savings earn "return".

SS increases by COLA's which, in theory, should keep you at "par".

Those who parked their money in the bank have been **** for 25 years...
 

 

White Privilege Boy, you need to live in the real **** word.  Deezer is kicking your *** on this one.

 

Huey » Today, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:01 pm

White Privilege Boy, you need to 

You need to shut the **** up.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

Blackvegetable » Today, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:04 pm

Huey » Today, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:01 pm

White Privilege Boy, you need to 

You need to shut the **** up.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

 

Today is just another day you proved you are an ignorant **** trying to sound smart online.  Particularly when someone like me has kicked your physically cowardly *** all the forum, Too **** Far.

I'm out until tomorrow, ******. 

Now go dig up some **** about me from your database, ya **** data mining psycho.
 

DeezerShoove » Today, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:30 pm

What I'm trying to understand is how separate income streams into a single household makes much difference if:
1. that income doesn't change (even S.S. COLA is completely inadequate).
2. wages are touted as the panacea to all the inflation problems (retired do not have wage increases).
3. your 8.3% interest earned isn't all that common (merely considered "plausible").
4. elders planning to keep savings intact forced into taking from accounts formerly out of reach of gubmint mitts.

(4. is what I was referring to when I posted "it ain't trapped anymore".)
 
 Conflating isn't really what I'm doing...

1. It's called "fixed" for a reason.

2. No...it is not a panacea...it's a partial hedge...sometimes you beat inflation, other times you fall short.

3.The S&P 500 average annual return over the last 20 years is approximately 11.4% to 11.9% (with dividends reinvested). [1, 2]

4. Makes no sense...qualified money (not Roth) is eventually subject to taxation, but you're only obliged to meet your annual.RMD. And you are taxed at your current rate.


 

Huey » Today, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:13 pm

Today is just another 

Only in the retelling...

Stay out of the weeds..