Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:34 pm

Under oath, Ornato stated, "I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol."

What is the purpose of an Oath given by a person and taken as surrendered to an artificial authority over the individual by leaderships of their assumed society promising to build 7 better days a week ahead than genetics arrived at this rotation of the planet?

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:34 pm

Huey » Today, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:03 pm

What are the three words after what you put in bold...oh wait, I'll post it for you.

or tell Hutchinson

You call me the dumbest **** on Earth?  LMMFAO

Hopefully you understand the meaning of the word OR.

So no, it has not been proven under oath. Another **** lie from you.

Under oath, Ornato stated, "I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol."

 

A lot of people say "I don't recall" when something didn't happen.  He also testified he did not tell her the president lunged at the driver.

The driver denies it happened.  The other denied it happened.

You got bupkis.

Huey » Today, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:43 pm

A lot of people say "I don't recall" when something didn't happen.  

Not under oath.

They say "do not recall" when they want to avoid a perjury charge, you **** idiot.

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:45 pm

Huey » Today, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:43 pm

A lot of people say "I don't recall" when something didn't happen.  

Not under oath.

They say "do not recall" when they want to avoid a perjury charge, you **** idiot.

 

Well, here is the point.  NOBODY could confirm HER story.  And they were under oath.  Amoto denied it from the first mention of it.

Now go get some tourniquets before you measly *** bleeds out.  If you need instruction on how to do it.

And don't forget to really tighten the one on your neck.

Huey » Today, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:57 pm

Well, here is the point.  NOBODY could confirm HER story.  

That is NOT the point, Dimbecile..

The point is that, in spite of all their efforts, MAGAts have never succeeded in impeaching her.

This is a perfect illustration of why nothing is ever done your way

Blackvegetable » Today, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:00 pm

Huey » Today, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:57 pm

Well, here is the point.  NOBODY could confirm HER story.  

That is NOT the point, Dimbecile..

The point is that, in spite of all their efforts, MAGAts have never succeeded in impeaching her.

This is a perfect illustration of why nothing is ever done your way

 

Andrew for the big reframe.  I am not going to argue they could not impeach her.  \

And you can't argue this, deleto boy.

Well, here is the point.  NOBODY could confirm HER story.  And they were under oath.  Amato denied it from the first mention of it.

You want to delete **** insults, asshole, fine.  Stop deleting facts that cut your limbs off.

Huey » Today, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:57 pm

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:45 pm

Huey » Today, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:43 pm

A lot of people say "I don't recall" when something didn't happen.  

Not under oath.

They say "do not recall" when they want to avoid a perjury charge, you **** idiot.


 

Well, here is the point.  NOBODY could confirm HER story.  And they were under oath.  Amoto denied it from the first mention of it.

Now go get some tourniquets before you measly *** bleeds out.  If you need instruction on how to do it.

And don't forget to really tighten the one on your neck.

 

 

Huey » Today, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:05 pm

Andrew for the big reframe

I'll ignore Andrew, whoever that is.

 
 

Huey » Today, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:44 pm

Dum, Dum, he said he didn't tell her that. So it is her story.  Plus, the SS in car refuted it also.

Her is the stupidity of your current argument.

If YOU claim I told YOU something, but I didn't, according toYOU it is still my story, even if I did not say it.  That's ignorant.

You are **** dumb.

It is all about the note and how he did not recognize his own Iawyer's  handwriting.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:31 pm

Note the ******* in the form of a question..

I missed this post.  Another creepy sign this mentally deranged ****** keeps a database of old posts & personal info. 

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:45 pm

Not under oath.

They say "do not recall" when they want to avoid a perjury charge, you **** idiot.

Thank you for explaining anytime someone says "I don't recall that detail/event...", they are avoiding perjury charges either by a court of law or media courts of framing social opinions of everyone alive honoring reasonable doubt about life itself is self evident time alive now. Academia, arts, economics, political wings, spiritual souls everything but actual reproductions evolving in plain sight from their own ancestral position daily alive born to buried.

Life cycle is conceived to decomposed each 1.0 lived .0-9 months before registered by society of their ancestral lineage created in history of passed current events not recalled by anyone with chromosomes. Except me. I am organically here without a higher intellect building universal moments like this.

All those neatly linear facts of human behavior since dawn of civilization in perfect grammar, not series parallel adapting to the moment here now as conceived into one's specific species, ancestral lineage, generation gap, body living per rotation forward now. Chromosomes are matter of periodic molecular characteristics that formed this planet and each lifetime within this atmosphere naturally timing each reproduction apart in the specific cycle existed or existing now..

Should I also include longitude and latitude displaced dead or alive?

You keep staging pretend space time continuum as corrupted since birth. I changed my nurtured mind back to navigating eternally separated with my own brain tuned to my chromosomes since a fertilized cell equally inhabiting space this rotation and most likely the next several hundred or thousands.

that factual 1461 date on the Gregorian calendar used since the 16th century BCE/AD, is a fake date. It was faked before Julian Calendar and even was in the Mayan calendar never exposed to Asian, European, African continents.

Bet your Ancient Alien possibilities added homo sapiens to the atmosphere ring loudest with that misnomer within the science of relative time logistics used to nurture brains to mind their previous 4 generations cradle to grave with the mannerisms of first come first served paying it forward in tax revenues paid by the governed masses creating power, wealth, fame for the selected people in charge of defending hypothetical values until extinction arrives.

Knock knock. Every reality is fighting every other reality today. one species supplies the ancestors to each.