Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:34 pm

Under oath, Ornato stated, "I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol."

What is the purpose of an Oath given by a person and taken as surrendered to an artificial authority over the individual by leaderships of their assumed society promising to build 7 better days a week ahead than genetics arrived at this rotation of the planet?

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:34 pm

Huey » Today, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:03 pm

What are the three words after what you put in bold...oh wait, I'll post it for you.

or tell Hutchinson

You call me the dumbest **** on Earth?  LMMFAO

Hopefully you understand the meaning of the word OR.

So no, it has not been proven under oath. Another **** lie from you.

Under oath, Ornato stated, "I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol."

 

A lot of people say "I don't recall" when something didn't happen.  He also testified he did not tell her the president lunged at the driver.

The driver denies it happened.  The other denied it happened.

You got bupkis.

Huey » Today, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:43 pm

A lot of people say "I don't recall" when something didn't happen.  

Not under oath.

They say "do not recall" when they want to avoid a perjury charge, you **** idiot.

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:45 pm

Huey » Today, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:43 pm

A lot of people say "I don't recall" when something didn't happen.  

Not under oath.

They say "do not recall" when they want to avoid a perjury charge, you **** idiot.

 

Well, here is the point.  NOBODY could confirm HER story.  And they were under oath.  Amoto denied it from the first mention of it.

Now go get some tourniquets before you measly *** bleeds out.  If you need instruction on how to do it.

And don't forget to really tighten the one on your neck.

Huey » Today, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:57 pm

Well, here is the point.  NOBODY could confirm HER story.  

That is NOT the point, Dimbecile..

The point is that, in spite of all their efforts, MAGAts have never succeeded in impeaching her.

This is a perfect illustration of why nothing is ever done your way

Blackvegetable » Today, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:00 pm

Huey » Today, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:57 pm

Well, here is the point.  NOBODY could confirm HER story.  

That is NOT the point, Dimbecile..

The point is that, in spite of all their efforts, MAGAts have never succeeded in impeaching her.

This is a perfect illustration of why nothing is ever done your way

 

Andrew for the big reframe.  I am not going to argue they could not impeach her.  \

And you can't argue this, deleto boy.

Well, here is the point.  NOBODY could confirm HER story.  And they were under oath.  Amato denied it from the first mention of it.

You want to delete **** insults, asshole, fine.  Stop deleting facts that cut your limbs off.

Huey » Today, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:57 pm

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:45 pm

Huey » Today, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:43 pm

A lot of people say "I don't recall" when something didn't happen.  

Not under oath.

They say "do not recall" when they want to avoid a perjury charge, you **** idiot.


 

Well, here is the point.  NOBODY could confirm HER story.  And they were under oath.  Amoto denied it from the first mention of it.

Now go get some tourniquets before you measly *** bleeds out.  If you need instruction on how to do it.

And don't forget to really tighten the one on your neck.

 

 

Huey » Today, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:05 pm

Andrew for the big reframe

I'll ignore Andrew, whoever that is.

 
 

Huey » Today, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:44 pm

Dum, Dum, he said he didn't tell her that. So it is her story.  Plus, the SS in car refuted it also.

Her is the stupidity of your current argument.

If YOU claim I told YOU something, but I didn't, according toYOU it is still my story, even if I did not say it.  That's ignorant.

You are **** dumb.

It is all about the note and how he did not recognize his own Iawyer's  handwriting.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:31 pm

Note the ******* in the form of a question..

I missed this post.  Another creepy sign this mentally deranged ****** keeps a database of old posts & personal info.