Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:37 pm

No.

You are retarded.

“long rifle”…what a hoot!   
 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:39 pm

It's Trump, shaking hands with Idi Amin.

looks like Maxwell Smart and the Chief….

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:32 pm

The following is not for debate.


Roy Cohn and Donald Trump in a still from WHERE’S MY ROY COHN?

unsubstantiated….uh-oh…you lose…
 

ROG62 » Yesterday, 11:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:30 pm

put this to bed, brown…

brown, what’s the date of the original published article? 

when did VF acquire the photo?

It's done, JuCo. 

You lost.

what’s the date of the original published article? 

 Google broke?

when did VF acquire the photo?

Not a photo...a digitized image...

At some point prior to publication. 


Why was Judge Kaplan obliged to opine?

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:41 pm

Said the queer who thinks Bruce Jenner is a chick.           

Jenner thinks he's a woman.

I think it is exclusively his business.

You believe you're hetero...of that delusion I'm far less tolerant.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:38 pm

Pssst.

*******.

That's not Trump.

ROG62 avatar ROG62 +1 Today, 12:35 am

Look!

Validation.


 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:37 pm

Doesn't matter who it is, fruitcake. Matters who it isn't.

It isn't Trump, you pathetic retard.

ROG62 avatar ROG62 +1 Today, 12:34 am

You've convinced the guy who reads Peg from Wisconsin.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:35 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:22 pm

Looks like the ****** is running from his words.  You **** chase people down all day long accusing that of that. But when it is your **** you run like chicken little.  **** you.

If you want to proceed, it will be my way.

I'm numerate.

You're not

Bitch, take your demands and shove hem up your flabby white privileged ***.  Run from your words, bitch.

“but my ex was colored” blackvegetable whines.
 

Huey » Today, 5:28 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:28 am

Bitch, take your demands 

"This is not a tantrum...."
Woke up molten.

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:47 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:47 am

Huey » Today, 5:28 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:28 am

Bitch, take your demands 

"This is not a tantrum...."
Woke up molten.

 

 

LMAO!  Deletoboy is on a roll!  Tell me gain how your wife being colored (your words) makes up for your white privileged background.  Was that your way of giving back?

Huey » Today, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:54 am

LMAO!  Deletoboy is on a roll!  Tell me gain how your wife being colored (your words) makes up for your white privileged background.  Was that your way of giving back?

Your tantrums aren't worth reading..

My ex-wife is the product of a black man and an Amazon indian woman.

I don't have to "make up for" a **** thing.

Are these your words?

If you are going to get all personal, as is your tactic, there is no need to continue

 

ROG62 » Yesterday, 6:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:57 pm

OMG…what a **** moron…

I worked in the print / publication industry through the whole transition from film / photo paper to digital…I scanned thousands of photos…the only “metadata” the occurred was an effing timestamp…nothing else…chain of custody was nonexistent…

again, and I reiterate, what a **** moron…

then the **** VaG tried his damnedest to say IPTC was the metadata proving authenticity…which in its infancy, applied to faxes, etc…the real recordable metadata didn’t come into play until 1990, a decade after the Cohn photo was taken…  

good ol 0-fer, batting 1000…and like brown, a **** moron…

And I have been very active in Photography as well since I was 15 years old and started with nothing BUT film. Digital cameras didn't become something photo-journalists or even everyday photographers started carrying until the very late1980's and practical ones in the 1990's. Even then EXIF data was VERY limited and wasn't used until mid-1990's or later, depending on the camera brand.

So this PIECE OF MORON **** once again, gets that mutilated *** of his, torn to abject shreds again!!!

And his little "Trump" TDS photo of Cohn ALSO just got completely destroyes as well!! He's all curled up in the fetal position and begging for his pacifier.
 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:48 pm

Metadata cannot change Trump's identity.

But I guess that's the deal with you "science" believers. A is not A, unless it WANTS to be.

Like when you queers made Zimmerman a white guy, or Pocahontas an Indian, or Cameluh an africanized american.

Or Bruce Jenner a chick. 

We have to learn retard to reach you **** wits and try to talk you down.

A re-imagined reality is what helps delusional characters stay motivated.
Quentin Tarantino has become a very rich and famous guy because of a talent for that.
Inglorious Basterds and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood come to mind.

Then again, I think he knows what he's doing: Feeding a fantasy.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:48 pm

Metadata cannot change Trump's identity.

But I guess that's the deal with you "science" believers. A is not A, unless it WANTS to be.

Like when you queers made Zimmerman a white guy, or Pocahontas an Indian, or Cameluh an africanized american.

Or Bruce Jenner a chick. 

We have to learn retard to reach you **** wits and try to talk you down.

Deezer Shoove avatar Deezer Shoove +1 4 minutes ago

ROG62 avatar ROG62 +5 Today, 12:39 am


This post has LITERALLY zero substance...

The Post of the Day thread is little more than Coozie giving @ROG62  a daily tongue bath.

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:20 am

Why was Judge Kaplan obliged to opine?

He's a closet queer, looking to hookup with other queers......were you happy with his performance?

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:09 am

Your tantrums aren't worth reading..

My ex-wife is the product of a black man and an Amazon indian woman.

I don't have to "make up for" a **** thing.

Are these your words?

Ancestry.com
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:09 am

Your tantrums aren't worth reading..

My ex-wife is the product of a black man and an Amazon indian woman.

I don't have to "make up for" a **** thing.

Are these your words?

Listing your words and watching you delete them and run isn’t my tantrum, bitch.
 

Huey » 49 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

49 minutes ago

Listing your words and watching you delete them and run isn’t my tantrum, bitch.

Don't tell me what isn't a tantrum 

Define it.

Your retellings are of no value because you lie about EVERYTHING and have no integrity.

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:20 am

It's done, JuCo. 

You lost.

 Google broke?

Not a photo...a digitized image...

At some point prior to publication. 

Why was Judge Kaplan obliged to opine?

It’s not until you answer the questions…just 2…

you can do it, brown…prove yourself right, for once in your life…
 

Blackvegetable » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

Don't tell me what isn't a tantrum 

Define it.

Your retellings are of no value because you lie about EVERYTHING and have no integrity.

Lmao!  You really think you suddenly claiming your ex is “colored” (your word) erases the fact you grew up as the epitome of white privelege?  Although she looks Italian?