No, el douche, my refusal to go down for rabbit hole of diversion should be notedBlackvegetable » Today, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑Stop presuming.Huey » Today, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ And more reframing......
Sorry, Deletoboy, you deleted again too much respond.
Your uninterrupted cowardice is noted.
You mother is over 90 whose mind is going. Oh, before you ask....we are talking about your mother BECAUSE YOU brought into the conversation.Blackvegetable » Today, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑Her mother addresses my ex-wife as "Nega"..Huey » Today, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ And more reframing......
Sorry, Deletoboy, you deleted again too much respond.
You really should shut the **** up and dust that blue truck.
HER mother, you illiterate piece of ****.Huey » Today, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ You mother is over 90 whose mind is going. Oh, before you ask....we are talking about your mother BECAUSE YOU brought into the conversation.
I have proven my points here. Have a blast lying and spinning bitch.
We are only doing so because you are a bitter little ****.... are talking about your mother BECAUSE YOU brought into the conversation.
What "point" is that, specifically?I have proven my points here
:rofl:Huey » Today, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ No, el douche, my refusal to go down for rabbit hole of diversion should be noted
For the record...at 96, my mother lives in her own apt. and communicates coherently in 2 languages...it might have been 3, but she declined to test her French in front of The Beast, who is a savant..
Eskimo is mostly a series of grunts.....most have been a hell of a racket when she **** you.Blackvegetable » Today, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑ For the record...at 96, my mother lives in her own apt. and communicates coherently in 2 languages...it might have been 3, but she declined to test her French in front of The Beast, who is a savant..
You are entirely incoherent in one.
Her English is better than yours...and she's SwedishRebelGator » Today, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Eskimo is mostly a series of grunts.....most have been a hell of a racket when she **** you.
Wild Wood. Blackvegetable Groovin..
No. It's from Vanity Fair, you simple homo. Where's my Roy Cohn does NOT have that picture, you desperate lazy susan.*Roshambo » Yesterday, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑ The following is not for debate.
Roy Cohn and Donald Trump in a still from WHERE’S MY ROY COHN?
Because you are a valueless *** with no moral compass and no principles.Blackvegetable » Today, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑ Jenner thinks he's a woman.
I think it is exclusively his business.
It's not that the post lacks substance. It's that YOU lack substance. You stand for nothing - not even for Western science. You are on record supporting the scientific fallacy, "I am because I SAY I am." That is not science; It's a **** tantrum. You believe a TANTRUM is "science" because you are an easily gulled moron.Blackvegetable » Today, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑ Deezer Shoove avatar Deezer Shoove +1 4 minutes ago
ROG62 avatar ROG62 +5 Today, 12:39 am
This post has LITERALLY zero substance...
The Post of the Day thread is little more than Coozie giving @ROG62 a daily tongue bath.
you sure? I see it.Cannonpointer » Today, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑ No. It's from Vanity Fair, you simple homo. Where's my Roy Cohn does NOT have that picture, you desperate lazy susan.
I see it. NOWHERE does the documentary identify the soy-centurion as Trump. They are talking exclusively about Cohn when they show that photo.
Take the L.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:49 pm » wrote: ↑ I see it. NOWHERE does the documentary identify the soy-centurion as Trump. They are talking exclusively about Cohn when they show that photo.
And here's the thing. The only way to identify that person as Trump is to be a witting liar and a committed felcher.
Do you suck ejaculate from asses and consume it? No?
Then you don't believe that is Trump.
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑ The Post of the Day thread is little more than Coozie giving @ROG62 a daily tongue bath.
Are you a woman?Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:51 pm » wrote: ↑ It's not that the post lacks substance. It's that YOU lack substance. You stand for nothing - not even for Western science. You are on record supporting the scientific fallacy, "I am because I SAY I am." That is not science; It's a **** tantrum. You believe a TANTRUM is "science" because you are an easily gulled moron.
>60