Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » Today, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:42 am

Huey » 30 Oct 2026, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Oct 2026, 12:22 pm

Talerico also drove a RENTED full size Ram 1500 instead of his smaller Chevy Colorado.

Has he tried to go hunting yet and if so will he load his own shotgun?

Like Al Gore and Joey Lieberman in plaid. Just awkward and creepy.

Remember Tampon Tim's attempt?  He should have been like BV and posed with an empty shotgun.
 
 

ROG62 » 30 Oct 2026, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Oct 2026, 1:32 pm

Is there a Prius in his past?

There WAS a Tesla in his future.

And then, and then...

https://i.imgflip.com/64xdu3.jpg
 

Huey » Today, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:37 am

Just want to make sure that message sinks in and you completely understand my stance on the ramifications of your stalking, data mining, and your dealings in person info.

Just want to make sure that message sinks in and you completely understand my stance on the ramifications of your stalking

instead of leavening your incomprehensible with more vague, why don't you just define "stalking"....I  can assure you that you will be obliged to do so at some point in your scheme.

data mining, and your dealings in person info.

whatever tantrum of yours they inspire, they don't apply to me.

Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2026, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Oct 2026, 1:34 pm

What is this OP about,  @*TinyVictim?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2026, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Oct 2026, 1:39 pm

You NEVER  answer the question asked..

 

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:33 am

So that's a "no"..

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:47 am

Huey » Today, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:37 am

Just want to make sure that message sinks in and you completely understand my stance on the ramifications of your stalking, data mining, and your dealings in person info.

Just want to make sure that message sinks in and you completely understand my stance on the ramifications of your stalking

instead of leavening your incomprehensible with more vague, why don't you just define "stalking"....I  can assure you that you will be obliged to do so at some point in your scheme.

data mining, and your dealings in person info.

whatever tantrum of yours they inspire, they don't apply to me.

 

As long as you got the message stalker.

You don't data mine or dealing personal info? LMAO!  For how many years have did you post a pic of me that you also edited?  You don't data mine?  It was you that posted a link to a pic of me on another forum. 

Stop your **** Salem Boy.  It won't be Lawrence Ma where your trouble will be.
 

Huey » Today, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:55 am

As long as you got the message stalker.

You don't data mine or dealing personal info? LMAO!  For how many years have did you post a pic of me that you also edited?  You don't data mine?  It was you that posted a link to a pic of me on another forum. 

Stop your **** Salem Boy.  It won't be Lawrence Ma where your trouble will be.

I didn't bother reading it.

You don't data mine or dealing personal info? LMAO!  

No...

The record will show you volunteering yours and incessantly begging for mine.

It won't be Lawrence Ma where your trouble will be.

Of course not...you prefer the safety of a crowd 33 miles away.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:59 am

Huey » Yesterday, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:55 am

As long as you got the message stalker.

You don't data mine or dealing personal info? LMAO!  For how many years have did you post a pic of me that you also edited?  You don't data mine?  It was you that posted a link to a pic of me on another forum. 

Stop your **** Salem Boy.  It won't be Lawrence Ma where your trouble will be.

I didn't bother reading it.

You don't data mine or dealing personal info? LMAO!  

No...

The record will show you volunteering yours and incessantly begging for mine.

It won't be Lawrence Ma where your trouble will be.

Of course not...you prefer the safety of a crowd 33 miles away.

 

Why would I need safety?

The record SHOWS that you did in fact save pics of me, posts of mine and took those posts and pics and posted them on another forum.

The record also shows that you have been banned from at least one forum for dealing in personal info.  The record also shows you are coordinating with at least one poster on what to post to me.

You really don't want to go to the record, Psycho Stalker.

Huey » Yesterday, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:43 am

Remember Tampon Tim's attempt?  He should have been like BV and posed with an empty shotgun.

This is what the board's *** voted for...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrzyRXSxuAg
 

Huey » Yesterday, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:02 am

Why would I need safety?

The record SHOWS that you did in fact save pics of me, posts of mine and took those posts and pics and posted them on another forum.

The record also shows that you have been banned from at least one forum for dealing in personal info.  The record also shows you are coordinating with at least one poster on what to post to me.

You really don't want to go to the record, Psycho Stalker.

Because you are small and frail, I suppose...but I'm only guessing. 

The record SHOWS that you did in fact save pics of me,

one....of the many you volunteered...

Long before you stopped citing John Solomon.

The record also shows that you have been banned from at least one forum for dealing in personal info.

No, it doesn't....and it would be impossible for you to know.

The record also shows you are coordinating with at least one poster

Just another hysterical assertion....among many..

You really don't want to go to the record,

I much prefer it.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:03 am

Huey » Yesterday, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:43 am

Remember Tampon Tim's attempt?  He should have been like BV and posed with an empty shotgun.

This is what the board's *** voted for...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrzyRXSxuAg
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:10 am

Because you are small and frail, I suppose...but I'm only guessing. 

one....of the many you volunteered...

Long before you stopped citing John Solomon.

No, it doesn't....and it would be impossible for you to know.

Just another hysterical assertion....among many..

I much prefer it.

Whether I volunteered them or not is not the point.  The point is you saved them and posted them elsewhere.  That is creepy.

The record also shows that Tavy already admitted you two are coordinating.

Like I said, YOU do not want to go to the record.
 

Huey » Yesterday, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:17 am

Whether I volunteered them or not is not the point.  The point is you saved them and posted them elsewhere.  That is creepy.

The record also shows that Tavy already admitted you two are coordinating.

Like I said, YOU do not want to go to the record.

Whether I volunteered them or not is not the point. 

It very much is...

 The point is you saved them

No...only one...

and posted them elsewhere.  

 No...I didn't. 
 

The record also shows that Tavy already admitted you two are coordinating.

That's kind of vague....you and Mindless were quite close...

Like I said, YOU do not want to go to the record.

As I responded, I  very much do.

BV will not answer simple yes or no questions

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:29 am

Huey » Yesterday, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:17 am

Whether I volunteered them or not is not the point.  The point is you saved them and posted them elsewhere.  That is creepy.

The record also shows that Tavy already admitted you two are coordinating.

Like I said, YOU do not want to go to the record.

Whether I volunteered them or not is not the point. 

It very much is...

 The point is you saved them

No...only one...

and posted them elsewhere.  

 No...I didn't. 

The record also shows that Tavy already admitted you two are coordinating.

That's kind of vague....you and Mindless were quite close...

Like I said, YOU do not want to go to the record.

As I responded, I  very much do.

 

 

That's kind of vague....you and Mindless were quite close...

I posted his words a couple of hours ago.  

viewtopic.php?p=2944749#p2944749

But you have admitted to saving my data.  And posting it.  You also posted a link to another pic but that one you did to another forum, without permission.
 

Huey » Yesterday, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:43 am

I posted his words a couple of hours ago.  

viewtopic.php?p=2944749#p2944749

But you have admitted to saving my data.  And posting it.  You also posted a link to another pic but that one you did to another forum, without permission.

But you have admitted to saving my data.

No.

And posting it. 

No.

You also posted a link to another pic

It was a link to a post of yours. 

but that one you did to another forum, without permission

Permission?

You DEMANDED it.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:22 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:43 am

I posted his words a couple of hours ago.  

viewtopic.php?p=2944749#p2944749

But you have admitted to saving my data.  And posting it.  You also posted a link to another pic but that one you did to another forum, without permission.

But you have admitted to saving my data.

No.

And posting it. 

No.

You also posted a link to another pic

It was a link to a post of yours. 

but that one you did to another forum, without permission

Permission?

You DEMANDED it.

 

You did admit to saving my data by claiming it was only one pic.

It was a link to a post of yours.

You posted that link to personal info on .org. It was a link to here. You needed permission to do that. That's why you were almost banned.

And no, I did not demand it.  That post was from March of that years. The post I demanded was the one from JANUARY of that year.  

Guess I have a screen shot of my post that proved you lie, asshole.

Huey » Yesterday, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:28 pm

You did admit to saving my data by claiming it was only one pic.

You posted that link to personal info on .org. It was a link to here. You needed permission to do that. That's why you were almost banned.

And no, I did not demand it.  That post was from March of that years. The post I demanded was the one from JANUARY of that year.  

Guess I have a screen shot of my post that proved you lie, asshole.

No...that is saving one image...an image you posted....among many others.

You posted that link to personal info on .org. I

Info you volunteered, and a link you demanded.

That's why you were almost banned. 

No...because you ran, crying, to the mods...telling them half the story...when fully briefed, they laughed it off..

And no, I did not demand it.

You have no idea wtf you demanded.

This is what you do as you lie there, bleeding out from self inflicted injury...

Huey » Yesterday, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:13 am

Stalky, 

Decent interval, please...