Liberal Forum

Question?  HOW do you KNOW that Democrats are behind a voter Fraudeffort, and Republicans are the victims?  It's when it takes REPUBLICANS to EXPOSE the BS, and Democrats are content just keeping quiet, and PRETENDING it doesn't exist !!

A conservative legal group filed an election complaint in Maine Tuesday, alleging that more than 3,000 potentially dead people and hundreds of duplicate registrations were discovered on the state’s voter rolls just days before the pivotal midterm elections.
 The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) identified 3,181 potentially dead voters and 693 duplicate registrations, urging the state to take action as Mainers prepare to cast their ballots Tuesday.

I'd bet a LOT of money that this BS can be found in EVERY Democrat Controlled state in the NATION... AND THERE SHOULD BE A DEATH PENALTY for ANYONE who ORCHESTRATES this BS... it DOES, in EVERY CONCEIVABLE WAY, UNDERMINE and DESTROY Democracy!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/troubl ... been-fixed

Leftist winning is generally generated by cheating and lowlife schemes

took away the Leftist taxpayer money laundering and they go broke....the woke goes broke too

take way the USAID and ACTBlue and it all goes to ****

then their is the massive fraud....juicy!

ConservativeWave » Today, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:41 am

Question?  HOW do you KNOW that Democrats are behind a voter Fraudeffort, and Republicans are the victims?  It's when it takes REPUBLICANS to EXPOSE the BS, and Democrats are content just keeping quiet, and PRETENDING it doesn't exist !!

A conservative legal group filed an election complaint in Maine Tuesday, alleging that more than 3,000 potentially dead people and hundreds of duplicate registrations were discovered on the state’s voter rolls just days before the pivotal midterm elections.
 The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) identified 3,181 potentially dead voters and 693 duplicate registrations, urging the state to take action as Mainers prepare to cast their ballots Tuesday.

I'd bet a LOT of money that this BS can be found in EVERY Democrat Controlled state in the NATION... AND THERE SHOULD BE A DEATH PENALTY for ANYONE who ORCHESTRATES this BS... it DOES, in EVERY CONCEIVABLE WAY, UNDERMINE and DESTROY Democracy!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/troubl ... been-fixed

 

There is a new dem/lefty talking point floating around that yes, indeed there is some voter fraud going on but it is insignificant. When I pointed out that in 2000 the New Mexico general between Gore and Bush, the vote differential was well below 400.  I asked them what in their mind would make it significant?  One said idiot said "one over the difference".

nefarious101 » Today, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:22 am

Leftist winning is generally generated by cheating and lowlife schemes

took away the Leftist taxpayer money laundering and they go broke....the woke goes broke too

take way the USAID and ACTBlue and it all goes to ****

then their is the massive fraud....juicy!

YOU ARE CORRECT... and I don't think there is a better example, than the entire recent "USAid" FIASCO !!

Democrats turned the USAid program into a GIANT CORRUPT scheme (Identified by the DOGE effort) to perpetually FUND a CORRUPT Democrat Party !!  Where FUNDS were sent to other countries, and where SOME of the money was parceled out to QUESTIONABLE Foreign recipients, BUT THEN, MUCH of it was funneled back to the Democrat Party thru the EQUALLY CORRUPT "ACT Blue" organization... which was/is a fundraising arm of the Democrat Party... 

THIS is the THE SAME "ACT BLUE" organization THAT was RECENTLY brought in front of congress to ANSWER for their questionable dealings (which were uncovered as part of the Trump investigations into FRAUD), AND, relating to bringing FOREIGN money into the U.S. to Illegally FUND Democrat candidates...  ILLEGAL in every way, but ESPECIALLY so if some of that money came BACK to the Democrat Party FROM "USAid" donations...

Well... ACT Blue leadership, while being questioned in front of congress... RESORTED to the:

"I REFUSE to answer on the grounds that may INCRIMINATE myself" 

Response over 100 times.. and never answered ANY of congresses questions... which is an ADMISSION of GUILT at it's very core... NOW, Congress just needs to didg deeper... and END CORRUPT DEMOCRAT ORGANIZATIONS like Act Blue, in the process !!

TODAY, Democrat coffers are pretty empty compared to 2020, and 2024 levels... AND I WONDER WHY !!

Huey » Yesterday, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:35 am

There is a new dem/lefty talking point floating around that yes, indeed there is some voter fraud going on but it is insignificant. When I pointed out that in 2000 the New Mexico general between Gore and Bush, the vote differential was well below 400.  I asked them what in their mind would make it significant?  One said idiot said "one over the difference".

That's not the Talking Point, Useful Idiot..

That is math. It doesn't care about your credulity.

One said idiot said "one over the difference".

I pointed out the obvious flaw in your Talking Point.

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:47 am

Huey » Yesterday, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:35 am

There is a new dem/lefty talking point floating around that yes, indeed there is some voter fraud going on but it is insignificant. When I pointed out that in 2000 the New Mexico general between Gore and Bush, the vote differential was well below 400.  I asked them what in their mind would make it significant?  One said idiot said "one over the difference".

That's not the Talking Point, Useful Idiot..

That is math. It doesn't care about your credulity.

One said idiot said "one over the difference".

I pointed out the obvious flaw in your Talking Point.

And the voter fraud supporter weighs in.  Hi Psych Stalker. 

Talking about pointing out an obvious flaw and actually pointing out an obvious flaw are two different things.  Right now you are the flapping your gums about it phase

Thank you for confirming the new talking point is correct.  
 

Huey » Today, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:02 am

And the voter fraud supporter weighs in.  Hi Psych Stalker. 

Talking about pointing out an obvious flaw and actually pointing out an obvious flaw are two different things.  Right no you are the flapping your gums about it phase

Thank you for confirming the new talking point is correct.

Talking about pointing out an obvious flaw and actually pointing out an obvious flaw are two different things.  

Naaah....I got this...

Right no 

:die:  

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:06 am

Naaah....I got this...

OH MY GOD!   THE HORROR!  I left out the "w"!!!! Forgive me father, for I have sinned.

Thanks, it's corrected.  And all you got FOR NOW is your gum flapping.

You talk to Tavy yet today...oh wait, he probably still sleeping it off.
 

Huey » Today, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:16 am

OH MY GOD!   THE HORROR!  I left out the "w"!!!! 

You do that a lot..

And lie...

I told you that your problem is assuming all illegal votes go in one direction.

And the voter fraud supporter weighs in.  

Only one of us has defended a vote fraudster...

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:21 am

Huey » Today, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:16 am

OH MY GOD!   THE HORROR!  I left out the "w"!!!! 

You do that a lot..

And lie...

I told you that your problem is assuming all illegal votes go in one direction.

And the voter fraud supporter weighs in.  

Only one of us has defended a vote fraudster...

 

And I told you I never assumed that.  You do that a lot.

And no, I have not defended a vote fraudster.  I have shown how your source led you astray, had to issue a correction you knew nothing about, and that the conviction was overturned and they STILL have not convicted him again.

Why do you lie so much, Psycho Stalker?

Huey » Yesterday, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:35 am

There is a new dem/lefty talking point floating around that yes, indeed there is some voter fraud going on but it is insignificant. When I pointed out that in 2000 the New Mexico general between Gore and Bush, the vote differential was well below 400.  I asked them what in their mind would make it significant?  One said idiot said "one over the difference".

Any illegal vote matters…

librul narrative claims “small numbers don’t matter”…

the problem with their BS, is the intangible numbers of those they haven’t caught…


 

Huey » Today, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:25 am

And I told you I never assumed that.  You do that a lot.

And no, I have not defended a vote fraudster.  I have shown how your source led you astray, had to issue a correction you knew nothing about, and that the conviction was overturned and they STILL have not convicted him again.

Why do you lie so much, Psycho Stalker?

If you aren't, what is your point?

And no, I have not defended a vote fraudster.  

In spite of the objective fact of his guilt, you have declared him innocent.

I have shown how your source led you astray,

It didn't 

had to issue a correction

It didn't 

you knew nothing about,

I did.

and that the conviction was overturned and they STILL have not convicted him again.

He is still being prosecuted...


 

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:32 am

Huey » Today, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:25 am

And I told you I never assumed that.  You do that a lot.

And no, I have not defended a vote fraudster.  I have shown how your source led you astray, had to issue a correction you knew nothing about, and that the conviction was overturned and they STILL have not convicted him again.

Why do you lie so much, Psycho Stalker?

If you aren't, what is your point?

And no, I have not defended a vote fraudster.

In spite of the objective fact of his guilt, you have declared him innocent.

I have shown how your source led you astray,

It didn't 

had to issue a correction

It didn't 

you knew nothing about,

I did.

and that the conviction was overturned and they STILL have not convicted him again.

He is still being prosecuted...

If he is still being prosecute it means they have to prove him guilty.  Remember, you're the **** who thinks he is lawyer.  Yet you can't grasp that most basic staple of our legal system

 
 

Huey » Today, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:36 am

If he is still being prosecute it means they have prove him guilty.  

No...they don't...they already did...

Which is why he is in negotiations

This is so regardless of your inability to understand the decision of the NH Supreme Court....
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:41 am

Huey » Today, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:36 am

If he is still being prosecute it means they have to prove him guilty.  Remember, you're the **** who thinks he is lawyer.  Yet you can't grasp that most basic staple of our legal system

 

No...they don't...they already did...

Which is why he is in negotiations

This is so regardless of your inability to understand the decision of the NH Supreme Court....
 

 

Try that again.

But let me get this straight.  In one post you claim he is being prosecuted.  In another you claim they are negotiating, although you can not say what these negations are.  And in another you claim they found him guilty.  If they have a guilty finding they don't need to prosecute or negotiate. 

When you have some info, let me know.  As of now the conviction was overturned. 

Huey » Today, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:16 am

OH MY GOD!   THE HORROR!  I left out the "w"!!!! Forgive me father, for I have sinned.

Thanks, it corrected.  And all you got FOR NOW is your gum flapping.

You talk to Tavy yet today...oh wait, he probably still sleeping it off.

Yea... well, YOU KNOW IDIOT DEMOCRATS...

When they GOT NOTHING... then attack Grammar & Typos !!

I think THIS ALONE epitomizes the STUPIDITY of Liberal Democrats, and the Liberal LEFT in general !!

Well, THAT and CHILDISH, OBVIOUS, & DIRTY tricks like the "Decoy Dan" FIASCO in Alaska !!  THAT one NOT ONLY exposes the IDIOT Democrats, BUT the SCUMBAG RINO's... like Lisa Murkowski !!  

BOTH the SCUM of the earth, and BOTH need to be PURGED from Democracise ALL across the WORLD !!