Your own rule, Tiny..
Hey, Dancing Queen, you got nuttin. The story is correct. And the majority are AGAINST trans women in real women's sports.
And there you go again sound like a 5th grade girl talking to her cat.
Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑And there you go again sound like a 5th grade girl talking to her cat.
It seems you support over 2,000 women having sporting awards lost to men. Why is that, ******?
Are you looking in the mirror and talking to yourself, ROTC? Only Pussies delete content that is on topic.
ROG62 » Today, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ A record of MALES who have robbed FEMALE athletes of success and opportunities in sport and the organizations who have helped them do so.…
Recent research from the Concerned Women of America found that transgender athletes have bumped biological women out of 2,293 championship spots since the mid-1980s. This is far different than simply noting the number of transgender athletes in sports. This is pointing out how many biological females would have won a specific honor if not for the trans athlete that took it.
For the report, the think tank drew on information compiled by HeCheated.org, a volunteer-operated database that tracks reported instances of trans athletes competing in women's sports. In total, it found that they have partaken in more than 14,000 female sporting events ranging from high school to college to amateur to professional.
The HeCheated.org list is extensive. The first page alone has 200 instances ranging from March 27, 2025, to September 18, 2026. It shows examples of biological males making league All-Star teams in high school lacrosse, or winning high school state championships in track and field in Washington, California and Oregon, or earning All-conference recognition in college fencing. There were also a couple of examples of trans athletes receiving "most improved" awards.
https://www.foxnews.com/outkick-sports/ ... e_vignette
46 years...have bumped biological women out of 2,293 championship spots since the mid-1980s.
Huey » Today, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑Huey » Today, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑And there you go again sound like a 5th grade girl talking to her cat.
It seems you support over 2,000 women having sporting awards lost to men. Why is that, ******?
Are you looking in the mirror and talking to yourself, ROTC? Only Pussies delete content that is on topic.
******, why are you deleting discussion of the topic from quote? Over 2000 women have lost sports awards to men and you delete discussion of it. To me that means you support it.
You want talk about being a ****** and cowardice you know exactly where to find.
I suggest you STFU on that count, Kung FU ******.
And the gay guy continues to edit any mention of the topic. Over 2000 women have lost sports awards to men and the ****** ignores it. Deletes any mention of it in the replies he quotes.
HE CHEAPED..*Roshambo » Today, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ JuCo pitched a tiny tent in his soiled underpants.
If your happy and happy you know it clap your hands
![]()
It is not an earth shattering problem from my perspective..Huey » Today, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑
And the gay guy continues to edit any mention of the topic. Over 2000 women have lost sports awards to men and the ****** ignores it. Deletes any mention of it in the replies he quotes.
Tiny,Huey » Today, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑
And the gay guy continues to edit any mention of the topic. Over 2000 women have lost sports awards to men and the ****** ignores it. Deletes any mention of it in the replies he quotes.
Scientific American thinks there might be 2 Billion more than the current census hypothesis.. Running in the jungles..Blackvegetable » Today, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
What's the "total population"?
Give me a reason to believe that talking numbers with you isn't a complete waste of time.
Long Rifle, you will have to post that info yourself and make your own **** case, you ****** POS.Blackvegetable » Today, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑Tiny,Huey » Today, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑
And the gay guy continues to edit any mention of the topic. Over 2000 women have lost sports awards to men and the ****** ignores it. Deletes any mention of it in the replies he quotes.
What's the "total population"?
Give me a reason to believe that talking numbers with you isn't a complete waste of time.
Oh, it is earth shattering to young girls who are missing out on scholarships and honors. But, it doesn't affect you so you don't give a ****.Johnny » wrote:It is not an earth shattering problem from my perspective..Huey » Today, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑
And the gay guy continues to edit any mention of the topic. Over 2000 women have lost sports awards to men and the ****** ignores it. Deletes any mention of it in the replies he quotes.
I bet a transexual pilot wouldn't lawn dart a lear jet..
I feel bad pandering the phrase Uber Goners on The Lawn Dart.Huey » Today, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, it is earth shattering to young girls who are missing out on scholarships and honors. But, it doesn't affect you so you don't give a ****.
Only because you are too **** stupid to understand why it matters.Huey » Today, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Long Rifle, you will have to post that info yourself and make your own **** case,
He identifies with the type of man who can't compete with his own sex, so he beats on weaker females and calls it victoryHuey » Today, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ And there you go again sound like a 5th grade girl talking to her cat.
It seems you support over 2,000 women having sporting awards lost to men. Why is that, ******?
Are you laboring under the delusion that either of you "compete"?RebelGator » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He identifies with the type of man who can't compete with his own sex, so he beats on weaker females and calls it victory