Liberal Forum

I'm all for Wall Street capitalism. Eat the poor.

Chuck Warren » 25 Jul 2015 10:19 pm » wrote:I'm all for Wall Street capitalism. Eat the poor.

The thing is, the poor are much better at eating you. Did you think welfare was a charitable venture?

Cannonpointer » 25 Jul 2015 5:17 am » wrote:If government did not legislate the NYSE and other money markets into existence and officially recognize them, at the expense of the many others who are disallowed, then FREE ENTERPRISE would naturally occur. Instead, we have a state engineered economy, with the state deciding who can play what role, when, and where.

The ranting of a psychotic imbecile.

You're perhaps 2% correct.

RichClem » 26 Jul 2015 8:00 am » wrote: The ranting of a psychotic imbecile.

You're perhaps 2% correct.

From the guy who gets everything wrong, that number translates to 98% correct.

greatnpowerfuloz » 26 Jul 2015 8:07 am » wrote: From the guy who gets everything wrong, that number translates to 98% correct.

Another brainless twit who believes the lies of a psychotic.

greatnpowerfuloz » 26 Jul 2015 8:07 am » wrote: From the guy who gets everything wrong, that number translates to 98% correct.

What issues have I gotten wrong, moonbat?

Answer: you'll disappear, stonewall the question or write more bulls*** and empty rhetoric.

RichClem » 26 Jul 2015 8:23 am » wrote: What issues have I gotten wrong, moonbat?

Answer: you'll disappear, stonewall the question or write more bulls*** and empty rhetoric.

You name the issue, name the prediction, name the talking point. Name it, and it's a safe assumption that you've spared a few vocabulary words defending it. That covers a lot of ground and you are hardly worth the time I'm spending to provide you with this summation, never mind the time it would take to list ALL the many issues you've been wrong about.
But somewhere, very close by, there's a splendid list of your wrongness generously provided to you by CP, not once, but numerous times. I see no need for a redundant effort on my part.

Please stop trying my patience, tweaker.

RichClem » 26 Jul 2015 8:00 am » wrote:
The ranting of a psychotic imbecile.

You're perhaps 2% correct.

RichClem » 26 Jul 2015 8:10 am » wrote: Another brainless twit who believes the lies of a psychotic.

greatnpowerfuloz » 26 Jul 2015 8:48 am » wrote: You name the issue, name the prediction, name the talking point. Name it, and it's a safe assumption that you've spared a few vocabulary words defending it. That covers a lot of ground and you are hardly worth the time I'm spending to provide you with this summation, never mind the time it would take to list ALL the many issues you've been wrong about.
But somewhere, very close by, there's a splendid list of your wrongness generously provided to you by CP, not once, but numerous times. I see no need for a redundant effort on my part.

Please stop trying my patience, tweaker.

So with all the opinions I express, you can't think of one single issue I've gotten wrong?

Moonbat.

RichClem » 26 Jul 2015 8:23 am » wrote: What issues have I gotten wrong, moonbat?

RichClem » 05 Aug 2015 8:46 am » wrote: So with all the opinions I express, you can't think of one single issue I've gotten wrong?

Moonbat.

Last october the CLEMSCUM created a thread that challenged anyone to predict the results of the midterms, with the proviso that he was predicting that no non conservative would dare to answer his challenge.

I then proceeded to make my prediction, which turned out to be on the money. In the very next post in that thread, CLEMSCUM was still harping his claim that people were afraid to respond to his challenge, and he continued with that contention for days after.

Recognizing his disabilities, I accounted for any issues of hard-of-hearing-contradictions to his bought and paid for position, by repeating my predictions in his face several times until the biggest hack ever would be able to see that i was slapping the **** out of him. He was never courageous enough to admit that he was WRONG, and that someone did indeed make the predictions that he claimed that no one would.

CLEMSCUM is a dishonest piece of ****. He is 100% biased and does not allow himself the capacity to see ANYTHING that doesn't champion big business interest. Even now CLEMSCUM will just treat this confirmed indictment of GETTING SOMETHING WRONG, as if it will just go away if he ignores it enough.

Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2015 12:09 am » wrote: wrong, wrong, blah, blah

Hopeless Dim.

From what little I have seen of Richclem, I would say he is a bona fide **** moron

Nightmare » 06 Aug 2015 1:52 pm » wrote:From what little I have seen of Richclem, I would say he is a bona fide **** moron

Coming from a Dim like you, that's a great compliment.

Nightmare » 06 Aug 2015 1:52 pm » wrote:From what little I have seen of Richclem, I would say he is a bona fide **** moron

Give the moron a break.

Did you know he predicted that 5 out of 6 Red states would elect a Republican to Congress at some point? The one he missed was obviously Obama's fault.

That's gotta count for something, right?

greatnpowerfuloz » 06 Aug 2015 4:03 pm » wrote: Give the moron a break.

Did you know he predicted that 5 out of 6 Red states would elect a Republican to Congress at some point? The one he missed was obviously Obama's fault.

That's gotta count for something, right?

I predicted six national elections and got five right.

Stunning how liberals insist in mis-representing reality.

Rule #1: Liberals lie.

greatnpowerfuloz » 06 Aug 2015 4:03 pm » wrote: Give the moron a break.

I have yet to see the slightest sign of intelligence or knowledge from you, moonbat.

RichClem » 06 Aug 2015 4:57 pm » wrote: I have yet to see the slightest sign of intelligence or knowledge from you, moonbat.

It's like ******. You wouldn't recognize it if you had mouthful.

greatnpowerfuloz » 06 Aug 2015 4:03 pm » wrote:
Give the moron a break.

Did you know he predicted that 5 out of 6 Red states would elect a Republican to Congress at some point? The one he missed was obviously Obama's fault.

That's gotta count for something, right?

There is dumb and then there is REALLY dumb