Liberal Forum

greatnpowerfuloz » 06 Aug 2015 5:01 pm » wrote: It's like ******. You wouldn't recognize it if you had mouthful.

Empty rhetoric.


Wow, how impressive.

Brainless twit.

RichClem » 06 Aug 2015 4:56 pm » wrote: I predicted six national elections and got five right.

Yeah, but you expect us to forget that those five were extremely easy to predict. When it comes to tough-to-call elections, you're zero for one.

jayjay » 06 Aug 2015 7:32 pm » wrote: Yeah, but you expect us to forget that those five were extremely easy to predict. When it comes to tough-to-call elections, you're zero for one.

You're full of crap, as usual, moonbat.

RichClem » 06 Aug 2015 9:14 pm » wrote: You're full of crap, as usual, moonbat.

Where CLEMSCUM receives a thorough *** KICKING
and is EXPOSED as a LYING subhuman PIECE OF ****!

Last october the CLEMSCUM created a thread that challenged anyone to predict the results of the midterms, with the proviso that he was predicting that no non conservative would dare to answer his challenge.

I then proceeded to make my prediction, which turned out to be on the money. In the very next post in that thread, CLEMSCUM was still harping his claim that people were afraid to respond to his challenge, and he continued with that contention for days after.

Recognizing his disabilities, I accounted for any issues of hard-of-hearing-contradictions to his bought and paid for position, by repeating my predictions in his face several times until the biggest hack ever would be able to see that i was slapping the **** out of him. He was never courageous enough to admit that he was WRONG, and that someone did indeed make the predictions that he claimed that no one would.

CLEMSCUM is a dishonest piece of ****. He is 100% biased and does not allow himself the capacity to see ANYTHING that doesn't champion big business interest. Even now CLEMSCUM will just treat this confirmed indictment of GETTING SOMETHING WRONG, as if it will just go away if he ignores it enough.

snickers at sok jockey.

Salvaged

Cedar » 25 Jul 2015, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2015, 6:47 am

We pretty much had Capitalism in the US until the late 1700's, then the "little guy" started bitching for government regulations.

so the height of capitalism was when homesteaders rode a wagon 20 miles west and planted a flag and automatically owned that land?

that’s not capitalism - that’s geoism

SJConspirator » 26 Jul 2022, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 9:46 pm

so the height of capitalism was when homesteaders rode a wagon 20 miles west and planted a flag and automatically owned that land?

that’s not capitalism - that’s geoism

Heh heh. 

Geoism. Precisely.

Capitalism is a state run economic model.