Oh. I see.deezer shoove » 25 Dec 2016 8:30 am » wrote: You really are a deluded idiot. Context is not your strong suit.
THEY believe to be the Chosen People and must perpetuate the race.
What I believe in this regard has nothing to do with it. I am above this particular fray.
deezer shoove » 23 Dec 2016 1:44 pm » wrote: Yes.
What a ****. Islamic banking was alluded to in the OPAlDonal » 24 Dec 2016, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Personally, I've tried and I can't find ONE good thing about Islam. Cat Stevens maybe...
SJConspirator » 26 Jul 2022, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ This was a great OP. I totally agree with it, all enemies of Jews have become the enemies of the USA. And likely because Islam still forbids usury.
However, to play devils advocate, I have to say that Muslims bring some of the hate on themselves. I mean, FGM? Really? I am no feminist but womens rights in the Muslim world are nonexistent.
The refusal to allow depictions of Mohammed is weird as ****. The turbans and veils and hajis, the close minded and generally backward culture they have, the radical never ending holy wars (Iraq v Iran in the 80s for example) all make them less endearing..
The anti usury banking more than compensates. And hookahs are pretty cool. And belly dancing women. After all, I would rather we side with Islam against Judaism, than with Judaism against Islam.
FOS » 26 Jul 2022, 11:39 pm » wrote: ↑ you know fgm isn't much different from circumcision. I'm circumcised...cause I live in a jew ruled country.
YOU are a FOOL!!Cannonpointer » 20 Dec 2016, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ The United States is interfering with and destroying governments which do not allow usury - all of which happen to be the Islamic nations.
All of those nations we have destroyed or are in the process of destroying have one thing in common: Ant-Usury laws.
All of those we trade with and are friendly with do not.
We are being used as the enforcer of the New World Order which our own pResident declared and which all subsequent pResidents have assiduously enforced. First we went to privately issued fiat currency, then we began to force others to do so.
The war aganst Islam has been marketed through the time-tested and long-used tricks of governments throughout history: Use false flag operations to produce the "problem" to which the "reaction" is your original intention. Want war with Spain? Sink your own ship in Havana Harbor. Want into WWII? Leave ships in port which you have advance warning will be bombed by the Japanese. Want to step up operations in Vietnam? Manufacture the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.
Want to wage war on Islam? Have the CIA create false flag groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS, and have the FBI create false crimes through their own agitation of young and impressionable citizens who, without being radicalized by their own government officials as pawns in a larger game, would almost certainly never have attempted the put-up offenses for which they were ensnared.
We are at war with Islam for one reason, and one reason ONLY. They won't play the Babylonian Money Magic game.
half truth isn't a whole solution.Cannonpointer » 20 Dec 2016, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ The United States is interfering with and destroying governments which do not allow usury - all of which happen to be the Islamic nations.
All of those nations we have destroyed or are in the process of destroying have one thing in common: Ant-Usury laws.
All of those we trade with and are friendly with do not.
We are being used as the enforcer of the New World Order which our own pResident declared and which all subsequent pResidents have assiduously enforced. First we went to privately issued fiat currency, then we began to force others to do so.
The war aganst Islam has been marketed through the time-tested and long-used tricks of governments throughout history: Use false flag operations to produce the "problem" to which the "reaction" is your original intention. Want war with Spain? Sink your own ship in Havana Harbor. Want into WWII? Leave ships in port which you have advance warning will be bombed by the Japanese. Want to step up operations in Vietnam? Manufacture the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.
Want to wage war on Islam? Have the CIA create false flag groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS, and have the FBI create false crimes through their own agitation of young and impressionable citizens who, without being radicalized by their own government officials as pawns in a larger game, would almost certainly never have attempted the put-up offenses for which they were ensnared.
We are at war with Islam for one reason, and one reason ONLY. They won't play the Babylonian Money Magic game.
How many Amish do you think are neck deep in debt vs average Americans?Xavier_Onassis » 27 Jul 2022, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Usury in the Bible is defined as lending money at ANY rate of interest.
There are a number of ruses used in the Muslim world that allow banks and moneylenders to profit from loans.
This is rather interesting, regarding banking among Muslims:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/islamicbanking.asp
Jews were forbidden to lend money to OTHER JEWS at interest. They could, however, lend money to Gentiles.
Pawnshops can simply claim they are charging a fee for the safekeeping of some valuable object.
The fact is that no one will lend money unless he has some motivation to do so.
Without money lending, capitalism cannot function.
Q-Anon **** propaganda.Cannonpointer » 20 Dec 2016, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ The United States is interfering with and destroying governments which do not allow usury - all of which happen to be the Islamic nations.
All of those nations we have destroyed or are in the process of destroying have one thing in common: Ant-Usury laws.
All of those we trade with and are friendly with do not.
We are being used as the enforcer of the New World Order which our own pResident declared and which all subsequent pResidents have assiduously enforced. First we went to privately issued fiat currency, then we began to force others to do so.
The war aganst Islam has been marketed through the time-tested and long-used tricks of governments throughout history: Use false flag operations to produce the "problem" to which the "reaction" is your original intention. Want war with Spain? Sink your own ship in Havana Harbor. Want into WWII? Leave ships in port which you have advance warning will be bombed by the Japanese. Want to step up operations in Vietnam? Manufacture the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.
Want to wage war on Islam? Have the CIA create false flag groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS, and have the FBI create false crimes through their own agitation of young and impressionable citizens who, without being radicalized by their own government officials as pawns in a larger game, would almost certainly never have attempted the put-up offenses for which they were ensnared.
We are at war with Islam for one reason, and one reason ONLY. They won't play the Babylonian Money Magic game.
Yet half is twice what you have offered.
Xavier_Onassis » 27 Jul 2022, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Usury in the Bible is defined as lending money at ANY rate of interest.
There are a number of ruses used in the Muslim world that allow banks and moneylenders to profit from loans.
This is rather interesting, regarding banking among Muslims:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/islamicbanking.asp
Jews were forbidden to lend money to OTHER JEWS at interest. They could, however, lend money to Gentiles.
Pawnshops can simply claim they are charging a fee for the safekeeping of some valuable object.
The fact is that no one will lend money unless he has some motivation to do so.
Without money lending, capitalism cannot function.
I must have missed this at the time it was posted - thanks for the post.SJConspirator » 26 Jul 2022, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ This was a great OP. I totally agree with it, all enemies of Jews have become the enemies of the USA. And likely because Islam still forbids usury.
Some Christians are snake handlers. But they do not represent Christianity. Not even a little bit. They are a tiny minority. If you look into FGM, I think you will find it is a LOCAL problem - a TRIBAL custom.SJConspirator » 26 Jul 2022, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ However, to play devils advocate, I have to say that Muslims bring some of the hate on themselves. I mean, FGM? Really? I am no feminist but womens rights in the Muslim world are nonexistent.
Yeah, some of that... But Iraq was an American proxy and Iran was purely acting in self defense and neither were asking clerics for permission. That was not an example of jihad.SJConspirator » 26 Jul 2022, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ The refusal to allow depictions of Mohammed is weird as ****. The turbans and veils and hajis, the close minded and generally backward culture they have, the radical never ending holy wars (Iraq v Iran in the 80s for example) all make them less endearing..
No ****. One is reacting. The other is doing mischief. And the US is siding with the mischief maker.SJConspirator » 26 Jul 2022, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ The anti usury banking more than compensates. And hookahs are pretty cool. And belly dancing women. After all, I would rather we side with Islam against Judaism, than with Judaism against Islam.
SJConspirator » 17 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ What a ****. Islamic banking was alluded to in the OP
The OP predates Q by 1 year