WHAT DID CNN DO WRONG UNDER AMERICAN LAW, "CONS?"

User avatar
By Cannonpointer
20 Jan 2017 11:00 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4 5
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 Jan 2017 4:45 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,963 posts
Huey » 21 Jan 2017 3:58 pm » wrote:Spin ya **** Dishonest turd, spin.
Reagan is the author of trickledown, the same as FDR is the author of all he campaigned against, rekected and destroyed.

Trickled own started with reagan, you ignorant *** wipe - and as i have preached to you turd handlers a thousand times, every successor including obama has stayed the course.

Now, get off my dick, princess - I don't play y'all's bathroom bumpery.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
*Huey
21 Jan 2017 4:47 pm
User avatar
      
25,062 posts
Cannonpointer » 21 Jan 2017 4:45 pm » wrote: Reagan is the author of trickledown, the same as FDR is the author of all he capmaigned against, rekected and destroyed.

Trickled own started with reagan, you ignorant *** wipe = and as i have preached to your turd handlers a thousand times, every successor including obama has stayed the course.

Now, get off my dick, princess - I don't play y'all's bathroom bumpery.
Enough of your lying ****. You thought Reagan gutted the FCC. You were wrong. Be right back pops.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 Jan 2017 4:52 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,963 posts
Huey » 21 Jan 2017 4:47 pm » wrote: Enough of your lying ****. You thought Reagan gutted the FCC. You were wrong. Be right back pops.
Listen, queer, I know well enough from dealing with you and your twin goopti how precious your perceived gotchas are.

But like it or not, dick sucker, I blame reagan for everything obama does - reagan is the author of reaganomics - that's why his name is on it.

Everything that is eating this nation alive right now began when reagan said that he wanted to be pResident so he could destroy the government. And you queers have been assaulting our government ever since - right down to trying to destroy the **** post office.

You're a sick bunch of **** - all the sicker because you think screeching, "Clinton did that one" is a w, you weak livered ***.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 Jan 2017 4:58 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,963 posts
Silverfox » 20 Jan 2017 7:25 pm » wrote:The truth is that the days of being able to demand that "the media" communicates information based on verifiable (and verified) facts is past - and it's an issue.

As technologies converge, start-ups are cheap and easy to initiate and massive audiences are only a click (or a viral post) away, who should be regulated, and by who?

At what point does an organisation become "mass media"? Is it a certain number of employees? A certain "readership"/audience? A newspaper or a cable company is easily identifiable, but what about a group of 6 people working in someone's basement? One person? Where does the line get drawn?

What about media created by the public? Facebook? Twitter?

Do we look at the channels and regulate those to the point that we place impossible demands on new companies? Could Facebook verify every post or share? Not realistically.

So we are left with us, the recipients. We could make it easier to sue, I guess - at least make the publication of lies about us constitute libel/slander (without having to show malicious intent as well - which may encourage at least a modicum of verification).

It isn't enough. We're ****. Unless someone has a plan that doesn't gut free speech.
I have an idea. Multinational corporations which have access to billions in anonymous dollars should be treated differently than the endeavors of real human beings. Corporations have no free speech rights under our laws - only privileges.

There is lawlessness in the land, and that lawlessness has lied aganst our founding documents, pretending that corporation are people. My stalker ***, huey, has defended that notion, while demanding we pretend he wasn't. He's a real squirrely bathroom boy, that one.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
*Huey
21 Jan 2017 4:58 pm
User avatar
      
25,062 posts
Cannonpointer » 21 Jan 2017 4:52 pm » wrote:Listen, queer, I know well enough from dealing with you and your twin goopti how precious your perceived gotchas are.

But like it or not, dick sucker, I blame reagan for everything obama does - reagan is the author of reaganomics - that's why his name is on it.

Everything that is eating this nation alive right now began when reagan said that he wanted to be pResident so he could destroy the government. And you queers have been assaulting our government ever since - right down to trying to destroy the **** post office.

You're a sick bunch of **** - all the sicker because you think screeching, "Clinton did that one" is a w, you weak livered ***.

No ,****, you got busted as ignorant. Then you lashed out. You are a psychotic, arrogant turd who refuse to admit you we're **** wrong.

I worked on in the radio/media industry shortly after the 1996 Telecommunication Act went into effect, I know how it affected the industry, and the downfalls of it. It isn't a complicated issue and with out you having even a basic knowledge of what not did, who did it, who it effects, it ain't worth discussing.

So, asshole, what standards don't you like?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 Jan 2017 5:03 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,963 posts
Huey » 21 Jan 2017 4:58 pm » wrote: No ,****, you got busted as ignorant. Then you lashed out. You are a psychotic, arrogant turd who refuse to admit you we're **** wrong.
We'll have to agree to disagree, dick sucker.
Huey » 21 Jan 2017 4:58 pm » wrote: I worked on in the radio/media industry shortly after the 1996 Telecommunication Act went into effect, I know how it affected the industry, and the downfalls of it. It isn't a complicated issue and with out you having even a basic knowledge of what not did, who did it, who it effects, it ain't worth discussing.
****, I don't give a **** who hires queers.
Huey » 21 Jan 2017 4:58 pm » wrote: So, asshole, what standards don't you like?
I tiold you, ya fapping queen. I reject the entire governmentalization of corporations, which began under reagan - and which you duck suckingly defend while crying - and which continues t.o. t.h.i.s. d.a.y, you dishonest, screeching ****.

I've made myself plain, as have you. Go play, because you're starting to spam and you're only writing for the peanut gallery.

I started this thread to have a serious discussion - not for a dick sucker to start a flame war with me - again, go play.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
*Huey
21 Jan 2017 5:15 pm
User avatar
      
25,062 posts
Huey » 21 Jan 2017 4:56 pm » wrote: So sincee every step of the way you have been wrong I again ask what standards are you talking about. Don't pull this **** about trickle down now that you have been busted.

1. ARe you discussing straight news or the opinion programming as well?

2. Who sets these standards?

3. Since cable networks do not fall under the FCC how should your standards, the ones you won't tell us, apply?

4. Reagan had nothing to do with it unless you are discussing the fairness doctrine.

5. Do you have an issue with the market size/country ownership rules? Is that what you are referencing?

6. Do you have an issue with the FEC laws that kick in at election time?

WHAT **** STANDARDS ARE WHINING ABOUT?

Here is your big chance, pops. Let's see if you are man enough to take it.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 Jan 2017 5:34 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,963 posts
For any who are not hysterical, the reason my thread title says, "under American law" is that my complaint is with American law.

I believe that multi-national corporations should be punished for malpractice.

One of my detractors in this thread has framed my use of that phrase as having a wonkish, sneaky purpose - and then went on to practice wonkery. It had no such purpose. The inclusion of the phrase IS my complaint - that corporations are immune from rules.

Spanners are not. Corporations are - not spammers, not in a peanut gallery thread.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 Jan 2017 9:30 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,963 posts
Huey » 21 Jan 2017 6:35 pm » wrote: Post a reply WHAT DID CNN DO WRONG UNDER AMERICAN LAW, "CONS?"

By law? Nothing.

My very first comment.
Yes - and that is my complaint.

I believe there should be consequences. There used to be, under the game rules of FDR, before the attack on America's middle class.

Now, there aren't - we're getting trickled down on.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
*Huey
21 Jan 2017 9:32 pm
User avatar
      
25,062 posts
Cannonpointer » 21 Jan 2017 9:30 pm » wrote:Yes - and that is my complaint.

I believe there should be consequences. There used to be, under the game rules of FDR, before the attack on America's middle class.

Now, there aren't - we're getting trickled down on.
Consequences for what? What have they done wrong IYO?

It is tough to debate or discuss when you won't give details.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 Jan 2017 9:37 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,963 posts
Huey » 21 Jan 2017 9:32 pm » wrote: Consequences for what? What have they done wrong IYO?

It is tough to debate or discuss when you won't give details.
The current complaint against the, is that they linked to a spurious attack on tRump, and falsely reported his agent - whose passport proves otherwise - to be on an errand of mischief in Vienna.

In other words, they lied about the pResident eLect, to damage his image as Deniguration Day approached.

That's the CURRENT complaint - surprised you're unaware, as it's been all over the board and there are heated exchanges about it in multiple threads. Could have sworn I saw you in Misty's thread where the topic is ablaze

You should look into it, since you haven't heard.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
*Huey
21 Jan 2017 9:46 pm
User avatar
      
25,062 posts
Cannonpointer » 21 Jan 2017 9:37 pm » wrote:The current complaint against the, is that they linked to a spurious attack on tRump, and falsely reported his agent - whose passport proves otherwise - to be on an errand of mischief in Vienna.

In other words, they lied about the pResident eLect, to damage his image as Deniguration Day approached.

That's the CURRENT complaint - surprised you're unaware, as it's been all over the board and there are heated exchanges about it in multiple threads. Could have sworn I saw you in Misty's thread where the topic is ablaze

You should look into it, since you haven't heard.

Actually, as misty has pointed out, and I agree with and posted as such, is that CNN reported that there was a briefing on the report. That is the "technical truth". They DID NOT address whether the actual allegations were true.

YOU should look into what I have said on the subject before you start putting words in my mouth and creating positions for me to defend. I made those comments days ago.you may have seen me but you failed to read my comments.
User avatar
*Huey
21 Jan 2017 9:51 pm
User avatar
      
25,062 posts
Cannonpointer » 21 Jan 2017 9:37 pm » wrote:The current complaint against the, is that they linked to a spurious attack on tRump, and falsely reported his agent - whose passport proves otherwise - to be on an errand of mischief in Vienna.

In other words, they lied about the pResident eLect, to damage his image as Deniguration Day approached.

That's the CURRENT complaint - surprised you're unaware, as it's been all over the board and there are heated exchanges about it in multiple threads. Could have sworn I saw you in Misty's thread where the topic is ablaze

You should look into it, since you haven't heard.

For the record this post was made two days ago. One dat before this mess of a thread:
Huey » 19 Jan 2017 6:35 am » wrote: Misty is TECHNICALLY correct on what CNN reported. Unfortunately this is how the MSM operates. Where CNN needs to be criticized is in how it was presented. It would be truthful to report such a report was presented but was it a responsible report it without verifying the contents first? Without delving into the points that golfboy brought up? This seems to a news item where CNN was attempting to sway public opinion and not respecting journalistic integrity.

It is the same as reporting that a forner fixer reported that he obtained sexual partners for Hilary Clinton WITHOUT investigating to see if it was true. It is true that a fixer did come forward and report that. It is not verified as a true story. But when the goal is to sway public opinion the actual truth is not important.
User avatar
Deezer Shoove
21 Jan 2017 11:26 pm
User avatar
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
8,727 posts
They have no more moral obligation than a bank does. If no laws are broken by a banks high interest rates, then why should anyone expect them to change either?

Banks, CNN, Automobile Companies, all those companies that make money. They're just fine except where lawbreaking has occurred.

Whatever the market will bear.
Please seat yourself.

Image

I like the very things you hate.
User avatar
*Huey
22 Jan 2017 10:01 am
User avatar
      
25,062 posts
deezer shoove » 21 Jan 2017 11:26 pm » wrote:They have no more moral obligation than a bank does. If no laws are broken by a banks high interest rates, then why should anyone expect them to change either?

Banks, CNN, Automobile Companies, all those companies that make money. They're just fine except where lawbreaking has occurred.

Whatever the market will bear.
Besides, news organizations are held accountable.

It is called RATINGS. Bad ratings lead to low advertising dollars.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 Jan 2017 1:09 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,963 posts
deezer shoove » 21 Jan 2017 11:26 pm » wrote:They have no more moral obligation than a bank does. If no laws are broken by a banks high interest rates, then why should anyone expect them to change either?

Banks, CNN, Automobile Companies, all those companies that make money. They're just fine except where lawbreaking has occurred.

Whatever the market will bear.
Funny you say that, since usury hurts the public and was illegal for most of our history - up until the banks openly chose our politicians for us. Your position plays right into their hands. You're a good citizen, kid - from our corporate rulers' perspective. From where I stand, you suck.

"Whatever the market will bear" is weak, partisan tripe.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
*Huey
22 Jan 2017 1:11 pm
User avatar
      
25,062 posts
Cannonpointer » 22 Jan 2017 1:09 pm » wrote:Funny you say that, since usury hurts the public and was illegal for most of our history - up until the banks openly chose our politicians for us. Your position plays right into their hands. You're a good citizen, kid - from our corporate rulers' perspective. From where I stand, you suck.
As it applies to news organizations like CNN or FOx, MSNBC etc, what obligation do they have to the public? Are you discussing opinions journalism, or straight news?

It would be novice if we knew what these standards are you keep dancing around.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 Jan 2017 1:12 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,963 posts
Huey » 22 Jan 2017 10:01 am » wrote:
Besides, news organizations are held accountable.

It is called RATINGS. Bad ratings lead to low advertising dollars.
And this assumes their only purpose to be collecting money, in the face of a CLEAR agenda to control the public discourse.

It also assumes that all advertising expenditures are based exclusively on ratings. They are not. Ratings cause demand and lead demand, ordinarily.
But certain advertisers could conceivably be willing to pay a premium, if they can influence programming. So the implicit assumption in your response is twice false.

When you have to rely on an implicit proposition which is demonstrably false, you've waived the white flag.

Those of us familiar with the business world have all heard the phrase, "You have to spend money to make money."
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 Jan 2017 1:16 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,963 posts
Huey » 22 Jan 2017 1:11 pm » wrote:
As it applies to news organizations like CNN or FOx, MSNBC etc, what obligation do they have to the public? Are you discussing opinions journalism, or straight news?

It would be novice if we knew what these standards are you keep dancing around.
I gave you a clear and precise answer in the case of CNN, son - you chose to ignore it and continue to pretend confusion, as areas of confusion are where dishonest minds love to make their mischief.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
*Huey
22 Jan 2017 1:18 pm
User avatar
      
25,062 posts
Cannonpointer » 22 Jan 2017 1:12 pm » wrote:And this assumes their only purpose to be collecting money, in the face of a CLEAR agenda to control the public discourse.

When you have to rely on an implicit proposition which is demonstrably false, you've waived the white flag.
As you compared now to the 30 and 40s you have a completely different dynamic. The "standards" back then were there for a leg image reason. Things like the fairness doctrine were there for a leg image reason. Ownership rules as well were there for a specific reason. All cable networks are not public domain. They are paid for broadcasts. You have to choose to watch them. So it would be nice for you to list these standards. I don't think you understand them.

Again, you are not prepared for this discussion. Hell, you reframed multiple times.
1 2 3 4 5

Who is online

In total there are 1177 users online :: 19 registered, 16 bots, and 1142 guests
Bots: Mail.RU_Bot, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, app.hypefactors.com, DuckDuckBot, proximic, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Yahoo! Slurp, curl/7, semantic-visions.com, YandexBot, Googlebot, linkfluence.com, ADmantX, bingbot
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum