Liberal Forum

roadkill » 06 Nov 2017 2:50 pm » wrote:Do you think Graham is right in asking for a special counsel to investigate Hillary?

I think Graham is trying to protect his new golf buddy.

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 2:54 pm » wrote: I think Graham is trying to protect his new golf buddy.

OK...you don't want a special counsel to investigate Hillary.

Got it.

HUNTING QUESTION??????

My 14 year old Grandson just got his Junior hunting license and says that he wants hunting apparel for Christmas.
He's gone pheasant hunting with my Daughter-In-Law's brother (his uncle) and will be going deer hunting when the season opens.

Do I get him Camo stuff or orange safety stuff?
Seems like his Uncle wears orange stuff for pheasant hunting, but is that good for deer hunting too?

roadkill » 06 Nov 2017 2:55 pm » wrote:OK...you don't want a special counsel to investigate Hillary. Got it.

Let's just lock her up without a trial or anything.
Then I won't have to listen to people like you bellyaching about her any more.

Before the election 45 led the chants of "lock her up!"
Right after the election, when asked about his previous statements about appointing a special prosecutor to go after Clinton he said, "I don't want to hurt them, I don't want to hurt them. They’re good people."

So what has happened since the election to make him change his mind again?

Oh yeah.
Robert Mueller.

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 3:25 pm » wrote: Let's just lock her up without a trial or anything.
Then I won't have to listen to people like you bellyaching about her any more.

Before the election 45 led the chants of "lock her up!"
Right after the election, when asked about his previous statements about appointing a special prosecutor to go after Clinton he said, "I don't want to hurt them, I don't want to hurt them. They’re good people."

So what has happened since the election to make him change his mind again?

Oh yeah.
Robert Mueller.

OK...you don't want a special counsel to investigate Hillary. Got it.



"I don't want to hurt them, I don't want to hurt them. They’re good people."


I would call that very smart politics and could be just one of the reasons he picked up a lot of democrat voters.


The point still is...you DO NOT want Hillary investigated by a special counsel.

And it becomes clearer everyday that there is no evidence of Russian collusion with Trump.

roadkill » 06 Nov 2017 3:31 pm » wrote:OK...you don't want a special counsel to investigate Hillary. Got it.
"I don't want to hurt them, I don't want to hurt them. They’re good people."
I would call that very smart politics and could be just one of the reasons he picked up a lot of democrat voters.

Yeah, except he said that a few days AFTER the election Sparky, so he didn't need to pick up any more voters.
He had already won.

That means that all that 'lock her up' crap that he spouted during the campaign was a bunch of ****.
He never had any intention of having her investigated, but you bought that line of ****.

Now, nine months later, he needs a distraction from his own problems, so he dusted off that whole 'Crooked Hilary' thing and dragged it out again.

And once again, you buy his ****, hook, line and sinker.

Do you not understand that he actually likes Hillary Clinton?
Before the campaign he only spoke glowingly of her.

When Donald Trump Praised Hillary Clinton

roadkill » 06 Nov 2017 3:31 pm » wrote:The point still is...you DO NOT want Hillary investigated by a special counsel.

Special counsel for what?
You've already declared her guilty of everything except kidnapping one of 45's Grandkids.
I say lock her up and throw away the key, and then maybe you will finally STFU up about her.

If I never hear the name Hillary again, it will be too soon.

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 3:44 pm » wrote: Yeah, except he said that a few days AFTER the election Sparky, so he didn't need to pick up any more voters.
He had already won.

That means that all that 'lock her up' crap that he spouted during the campaign was a bunch of ****.
He never had any intention of having her investigated, but you bought that line of ****.

Now, nine months later, he needs a distraction from his own problems, so he dusted off that whole 'Crooked Hilary' thing and dragged it out again.

And once again, you buy his ****, hook, line and sinker.

Special counsel for what?
You've already declared her guilty of everything except kidnapping one of 45's Grandkids.
I say lock her up and throw away the key, and then maybe you will finally STFU up about her.

"You've already declared her guilty"

Good point...and when E.F. roadkill speaks people listen.

For some reason you still won't come out and say it.

Trump is being investigated based on a phony dossier that Hillary and other opponents funded...so Hillary is not out of the picture.

And the recent revelations about Hillary's involvement is likely what prompted Trump to go after her again.


Let's find out who's guilty cause it could help clean up this kind of behavior in the future...Hillary is very much relative in this whole thing.

indago » 06 Nov 2017 7:32 am » wrote: Just look at him there, laughing away, just as happy as if he was in his right mind.

Misty was right about you:

"You are an ignorant atheist windbag spouting gibberish nonsense about everything" — Sgt Bilko
Got it right about you!!

"You are a vacuous simpleton shrieking the same claptrap and rubbish over and over like some kind of a deranged parrot." — Misty
So says the one posting over and over again ad hominem attacks on Trump!!!


Just continue to do the handwringing thing, with the weeping and wailing, and gnashing of teeth... :

There's my hand wringing!!

And throw in some WhineySnively too..


You're really good at that...

roadkill » 06 Nov 2017 3:50 pm » wrote:Trump is being investigated based on a phony dossier that Hillary and other opponents funded.

That's a bunch of ****.
His associates are being investigated because they all met with Russians during the campaign, while Russians were hacking DNC emails and spreading disinformation and they all lied about it.

You do realize that you just said that Trump is being investigated, right?
Don't let him hear you say that.
He swears he's not.

Ricky Tavy » 06 Nov 2017 6:51 pm » wrote:I don't know how funny it is, but anybody else ever notice how (appropriately?) the top of the Washington Monument at night looks like a lonesome Klucker?

OMG, it does.

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 11:56 pm » wrote: That's a bunch of ****.
His associates are being investigated because they all met with Russians during the campaign, while Russians were hacking DNC emails and spreading disinformation and they all lied about it.

You do realize that you just said that Trump is being investigated, right?
Don't let him hear you say that.
He swears he's not.

"His associates are being investigated because they all met with Russians during the campaign"


Nope...they are being investigated for other things that they may or may not be guilty of...they are being used as a squeeze-play on Trump.

Dems like the Podesta Group are also under investigation for the same things.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story ... 017-215768

roadkill » 07 Nov 2017 4:58 am » wrote:"His associates are being investigated because they all met with Russians during the campaign"
Nope...they are being investigated for other things that they may or may not be guilty of...they are being used as a squeeze-play on Trump.
Dems like the Podesta Group are also under investigation for the same things.

Whatever gets you through the night Sweetie.
Might want to check out how Carter Page's testimony before the House Intel Committee actually supports key parts of the Steele dossier.

http://www.businessinsider.com/carter-p ... er-2017-11

Misty » 07 Nov 2017 10:59 am » wrote: Whatever gets you through the night Sweetie.
Might want to check out how Carter Page's testimony before the House Intel Committee actually supports key parts of the Steele dossier.

http://www.businessinsider.com/carter-p ... er-2017-11

Would you please copy and paste the part of the article that shows evidence of collusion or any crimes?


TIA

Fruit Loop Wilson strikes again...what she said about Trump this time.


“And I think he is going to come up with an excuse like ‘somebody is trying to kill Barron, and so I’m going to resign.’”

https://downtrend.com/vsaxena/leftist-fruit-loop

roadkill » 07 Nov 2017 11:26 am » wrote:
Would you please copy and paste the part of the article that shows evidence of collusion or any crimes?

TIA

While you're at it, try to find something here too...

http://thehill.com/policy/national-secu ... -to-russia

roadkill » 07 Nov 2017 11:26 am » wrote:Would you please copy and paste the part of the article that shows evidence of collusion or any crimes?
TIA

You mean like you show evidence when you accuse Democrats of committing crimes?
Collusion is not a crime.
Mueller would have to prove conspiracy.

I don't know If there is fire, but there sure as hell is a lot of smoke.
You can keep pretending that it is perfectly normal that almost everyone on the campaign was meeting with Russians and lying about it.
It's not.

roadkill » 07 Nov 2017 11:30 am » wrote:Fruit Loop Wilson strikes again...what she said about Trump this time.
“And I think he is going to come up with an excuse like ‘somebody is trying to kill Barron, and so I’m going to resign.’”
https://downtrend.com/vsaxena/leftist-fruit-loop

I don't click on wingnut sites.

Do I need to remind you again that this is a humor thread?

Misty » 07 Nov 2017 12:34 pm » wrote:Test

While we're waiting for your evil-Trump excerpts from the article, let's watch something based in reality.


https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/need-bi ... nt=2150931