Liberal Forum

"At Least Hillary Didn’t Win," Says Lone Survivor Of Nuclear Apocalypse



PLANO, TX—The lone survivor of the recent nuclear apocalypse triggered by Donald Trump’s saber rattling over North Korea and other hostile foreign powers reportedly told no one in particular that he was at least happy that Hillary Clinton didn’t win the 2016 election, sources confirmed Friday.

Sitting on a pile of smoldering rubble while taking potshots at mutated bloatflies swarming nearby, the last member of humanity confirmed his satisfaction at making sure Clinton wasn’t elected.

“Yeah, Trump had a few character flaws, but at least he wasn’t Hillary,” he said.

“Nobody’s perfect. God can use anybody—He used Pharaoh right?”

“I sure am glad I voted for the lesser of two evils,” he added.

As the wild winds of nuclear winter blow across the now-deserted USA and the last American on earth continues to move across the landscape, foraging and scavenging for food, fighting off feral ghouls and radiation-infected giant rats, he rests secure in the knowledge that he didn’t let a woman who lied about her email usage ever make it into the Oval Office, sources confirmed.

http://babylonbee.com/news/least-hillar ... pocalypse/

roadkill » 12 Nov 2017 6:11 am » wrote: Juanita Broaddrick did say in an affidavit that Bill didn't rape her.

Then, after the fact, Ken Starr wanted to try and find out if Juanita had been intimidated into signing that affidavit...so Starr offered her immunity from perjury due Juanita's reasons for originally agreeing to the affidavit.

So what did she say to Ken Starr, because from what I've read the first time she said that Clinton raped her was in a television interview on NBC in 1999.
Did she tell Ken Starr that she had been intimidated into signing that affidavit?
And if so, why was Bill Clinton not charged with that in his impeachment?

According to the Buzzfeed article Broaddrick lives in a colonial-style mansion on a 23-acre ranch.

Pretty good for someone who worked in a nursing home.
I'm just sayin'.



One of the reasons I take these stories with a grain of salt is because there were a lot of people financially backing people like Paula Jones to bring down the Clintons.
People like Richard Mellon-Scaife, Susan Carpenter McMillan and even Kellyanne Conway's husband George Conway.

I don't know if you remember, but Paula Jones who had no money went through a complete and radical makeover during that whole scandal, including plastic surgery.
Who do you think paid for that?

July 20, 1998-Paula Jones gets nose job funded by secret donor.

Paula Jones' makeover isn't finished yet.

After getting her teeth fixed, wardrobe upgraded and hair straightened, the woman who sued President Clinton decided to get her nose done.

The New York Post and Daily News said Jones was seen leaving a New York plastic surgeon's office Saturday morning with her nose heavily bandaged; it should take about three weeks to heal.

It's unclear who paid for the $9,000 nose job.

Jones, a former Arkansas secretary, is a housewife living in Long Beach, Calif., and her husband, Stephen, recently lost his job as an airline ticket agent.

The Post, citing unidentified sources, said the money came from an anonymous donor.

So she was a housewife, her husband was unemployed and she gets her teeth fixed (braces), her hair straightened, a new wardrobe and a $9,000 nose job?

Hmmm.

Misty » 12 Nov 2017 2:51 pm » wrote: So what did she say to Ken Starr, because from what I've read the first time she said that Clinton raped her was in a television interview on NBC in 1999.
Did she tell Ken Starr that she had been intimidated into signing that affidavit?
And if so, why was Bill Clinton not charged with that in his impeachment?

According to the Buzzfeed article Broaddrick lives in a colonial-style mansion on a 23-acre ranch.

Pretty good for someone who worked in a nursing home.
I'm just sayin'.



One of the reasons I take these stories with a grain of salt is because there were a lot of people financially backing people like Paula Jones to bring down the Clintons.
People like Richard Mellon-Scaife, Susan Carpenter McMillan and even Kellyanne Conway's husband George Conway.

I don't know if you remember, but Paula Jones who had no money went through a complete and radical makeover during that whole scandal, including plastic surgery.
Who do you think paid for that?


So she was a housewife, her husband was unemployed and she gets her teeth fixed (braces), her hair straightened, a new wardrobe and a $9,000 nose job?

Hmmm.

so why did Billy pay her $850,000?

Misty » 12 Nov 2017 2:51 pm » wrote: So what did she say to Ken Starr, because from what I've read the first time she said that Clinton raped her was in a television interview on NBC in 1999.
Did she tell Ken Starr that she had been intimidated into signing that affidavit?
And if so, why was Bill Clinton not charged with that in his impeachment?

According to the Buzzfeed article Broaddrick lives in a colonial-style mansion on a 23-acre ranch.

Pretty good for someone who worked in a nursing home.
I'm just sayin'.



One of the reasons I take these stories with a grain of salt is because there were a lot of people financially backing people like Paula Jones to bring down the Clintons.
People like Richard Mellon-Scaife, Susan Carpenter McMillan and even Kellyanne Conway's husband George Conway.

I don't know if you remember, but Paula Jones who had no money went through a complete and radical makeover during that whole scandal, including plastic surgery.
Who do you think paid for that?


So she was a housewife, her husband was unemployed and she gets her teeth fixed (braces), her hair straightened, a new wardrobe and a $9,000 nose job?

Hmmm.

TLDR

Misty » 08 Nov 2017 10:58 pm » wrote: Yes it is pure idiocy and the idiot SCROTUS actually said it.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TcBfAIM6A6c

He is saying he got lots of leaders in different countries calling him and the fool you far leftwing moonbats are you try to claim he really doesn't know how many countries there are. You **** just want to make him look foolish. I suggest you think you never ever make any mistakes in your posts or say something using similar words to convey a meaning you didn't mean. Misty the Trump hater uses every little thing he says when she is making accusations about him. She is such a **** Trump hater. But then her damaged brain is unable to make intelligent conversation. Just the ad hominem attacks all the time. Pathetic **** fool she is!!!

crimsongulf » 12 Nov 2017 3:38 pm » wrote:so why did Billy pay her $850,000?

I don't know, maybe to get a case off his back that had been dragging on for years.
Jones had a whole group of Clinton hating lawyers working pro bono for her who refused to let the case die even after it was dismissed by a judge.

The suit was filed in 1994.
In 1998 it was dismissed because the judge said that Paula Jones could not show damages.
But her lawyers appealed it anyway so he paid the settlement while it was still on appeal in 1998.

Seems like he could have won, but he just wanted it over with.

roadkill » 12 Nov 2017 4:21 pm » wrote:TLDR

Don't lie. You read it.
You just can't explain how it is that someone who worked in a nursing home lives in a mansion on 23 acres and how a housewife with an unemployed husband could afford all that ****.

Misty » 12 Nov 2017 4:39 pm » wrote: I don't know, maybe to get a case off his back that had been dragging on for years.
Jones had a whole group of Clinton hating lawyers working pro bono for her who refused to let the case die even after it was dismissed by a judge.

The suit was filed in 1994.
In 1998 it was dismissed because the judge said that Paula Jones could not show damages.
But her lawyers appealed it anyway so he paid the settlement while it was still on appeal in 1998.

Seems like he could have won, but he just wanted it over with.

Nobody pays almost 1M bucks to get a case off his back.

I was born at night, but it wasn't last night.

Sgt Bilko » 12 Nov 2017 4:37 pm » wrote:You **** just want to make him look foolish.

He doesn't need our help with that.

crimsongulf » 12 Nov 2017 4:32 pm » wrote:

It's easy to attack a fictional person whose argument you made up.

onlyaladd » 12 Nov 2017 4:47 pm » wrote: It's easy to attack a fictional person whose argument you made up.

Have you by chance read the thread title................................moron?

Misty » 12 Nov 2017 4:44 pm » wrote:
Don't lie. You read it.
You just can't explain how it is that someone who worked in a nursing home lives in a mansion on 23 acres and how a housewife with an unemployed husband could afford all that ****.

So now yer using someone's assets as a political attack?

Thanx...I win!

crimsongulf » 12 Nov 2017 4:45 pm » wrote:Nobody pays almost 1M bucks to get a case off his back.

Yes they do...all the time.

It had dragged on for four years.
The judge said she couldn't show any damages, and it was dismissed but her lawyers appealed it anyway.

Since she couldn't show any damages, he had a very good chance of winning.
But he paid the settlement while it was still on appeal, without having to admit any wrongdoing, because like I said, she had a whole team of lawyers working for free who would have dragged it on forever.

To me that says that he had enough and wanted it over with.

But to you he must be guilty because .........Clinton.

roadkill » 12 Nov 2017 4:54 pm » wrote:So now yer using someone's assets as a political attack?
Thanx...I win!

That's not a political attack, it's common sense.
Neither of these two women who made accusations against Bill Clinton had money yet they seemed to be able to afford a lot of expensive things.

You know who did have a lot of money?
Richard Mellon-Scaife also known as the billionaire bankroller of conservative crusades.

In the 1990s he gave $1.8 million to The American Spectator magazine to fund investigations into Whitewater and Bill Clinton’s personal life.

Google it.

This is fake but Copeland did say that 'leaders are chosen by God and must be followed in accordance with God’s will.'
Funny, I thought they were chosen by voters.



http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/st ... ot-threat/

Misty » 12 Nov 2017 5:01 pm » wrote: That's not a political attack, it's common sense.
Neither of these two women who made accusations against Bill Clinton had money yet they seemed to be able to afford a lot of expensive things.

You know who did have a lot of money?
Richard Mellon-Scaife also known as the billionaire bankroller of conservative crusades.

In the 1990s he gave $1.8 million to The American Spectator magazine to fund investigations into Whitewater and Bill Clinton’s personal life.

Google it.

Thanx for reminding the forum of one more of the Clinton's scandals.

Misty » 12 Nov 2017 4:54 pm » wrote: Yes they do...all the time.

It had dragged on for four years.
The judge said she couldn't show any damages, and it was dismissed but her lawyers appealed it anyway.

Since she couldn't show any damages, he had a very good chance of winning.
But he paid the settlement while it was still on appeal, without having to admit any wrongdoing, because like I said, she had a whole team of lawyers working for free who would have dragged it on forever.

To me that says that he had enough and wanted it over with.

But to you he must be guilty because .........Clinton.

Sure, buckwheat, sure.

Misty » 12 Nov 2017 4:54 pm » wrote: Yes they do...all the time.

It had dragged on for four years.
The judge said she couldn't show any damages, and it was dismissed but her lawyers appealed it anyway.

Since she couldn't show any damages, he had a very good chance of winning.
But he paid the settlement while it was still on appeal, without having to admit any wrongdoing, because like I said, she had a whole team of lawyers working for free who would have dragged it on forever.

To me that says that he had enough and wanted it over with.

But to you he must be guilty because .........Clinton.

You morons ignore the dead bodies that showed up and documents that were said not to exist were found by servants. But then the Clintons can do no wrong. There is a history of lies both of them told. But then idiots like you turn a blind eye to the lies and illegal actions!!!