Liberal Forum

Misty » 13 Nov 2017 7:37 pm » wrote:Some morons are smashing their Keurig coffee makers in response to them pulling their advertising from Sean Hannity's show.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=26s&v=tqA5RqGcafE

I guess they are too stupid to understand how boycotts work.
If you want to boycott a company, you don't buy their products in the future.
You don't destroy something you already paid for.





I am not offended by a jackass throwing his Keurig off a building.
Now if he threw my Keurig off a building, that would be a different story.

I love how they are offended by a company being AGAINST the sexual assault of a minor.
And then show it by destroying THEIR OWN PROPERTY.
What we have is a nation where 30 or so percent of adults grew up near power lines and ate lead paint chips.

Edit:
Furthermore it will probably lead them to going to 'liberal' starbucks instead, that is until they don't see a bloody, crucified Jesus on the Christmas cups and throw a **** tantrum. ******.

roadkill » 12 Nov 2017 6:11 am » wrote:Juanita Broaddrick did say in an affidavit that Bill didn't rape her.

Then, after the fact, Ken Starr wanted to try and find out if Juanita had been intimidated into signing that affidavit...so Starr offered her immunity from perjury due Juanita's reasons for originally agreeing to the affidavit.

Juanita originally wanted to stay away from this whole thing...and one of the reasons was her fear of the Clintons.

So you think it's okay to commit perjury if you're scared?
Another issue I have with her is that she went to a fundraiser for Bill Clinton a few weeks after the alleged rape.

Maybe it's just me, but if someone brutally raped me, which is what she alleges he did, the last thing I would do is go to an event where he would be present.

Broaddrick said that she met Hillary for the first time at the fundraiser, and supposedly Hillary grabbed her arm and said, "Do you understand everything you do?"

Broaddrick said that she took that as a threat that Hillary was warning her to keep quiet, which would mean that Bill Clinton would have to had told her that he had raped Miss Broaddrick.

Do you think that he went home and told his wife that he had just raped someone?
And then he pointed her out in the crowd to Hillary, who had never met her, and said 'that's the woman I raped a few weeks ago?'

Does that sound logical to you?

onlyaladd » 13 Nov 2017 11:32 pm » wrote:

Love Rick Wilson.

roadkill » 12 Nov 2017 5:24 pm » wrote:

HILLARY! HILLARY! HILLARY!

Misty » 13 Nov 2017 11:37 pm » wrote: So you think it's okay to commit perjury if you're scared?
Another issue I have with her is that she went to a fundraiser for Bill Clinton a few weeks after the alleged rape.

Maybe it's just me, but if someone brutally raped me, which is what she alleges he did, the last thing I would do is go to an event where he would be present.

Broaddrick said that she met Hillary for the first time at the fundraiser, and supposedly Hillary grabbed her arm and said, "Do you understand everything you do?"

Broaddrick said that she took that as a threat that Hillary was warning her to keep quiet, which would mean that Bill Clinton would have to had told her that he had raped Miss Broaddrick.

Do you think that he went home and told his wife that he had just raped someone?
And then he pointed her out in the crowd to Hillary, who had never met her, and said 'that's the woman I raped a few weeks ago?'

Does that sound logical to you?

OK Misty...you're effectively calling Juanita a liar. Got it.

And yes...Hillary was aware of Bill's behavior.

While they lived in the Arkansas Gov. mansion Hillary told Bill to do whatever he wanted with women, just keep it out of sight and don't rub my nose in it.

Yep...I believe it's entirely possible, due to the Clintons' political ambitions, that they would coordinate on anything that could help or hurt them politically.

indago » 13 Nov 2017 12:24 pm » wrote: I had enquired of Bilko: "Point out where I "are usually attacking others aka fallacious ad hominem attacks"".

And did Bilko ""Point out where I "are usually attacking others aka fallacious ad hominem attacks""? Of course not; And why am I not surprised! Just some old bluster and BS. And didn't I just know, somehow, that this is the way this would turn out. So predictable. These BlowHards thrive on making bold and sweeping generalizations, but when called upon the carpet to examine into the ranting, the foundation crumbles, along with veracity; and, we find that the equivocations are just that; just blowing smoke.

Poor wee wittew indago is suffering from dementia since the poor guy is unable to remember his previous posts using the fallacious ad hominem attacks. Or is it that he is ignorant of the meaning of fallacious ad hominem attacks. Could be either one. I go with a combination of both. His dementia must be increasing causing his memory of the definition to be lost to him.

How about that for an ad hominem attack? But is truth an ad hominem attack?

Misty » 13 Nov 2017 7:05 pm » wrote: Geeez, I feel old.

Tell me about it.

Bigsky » 05 Oct 2017 4:05 am » wrote: you do realize that what you are doing here is calling out a rhino right....you are outing one of your double agent...you idiot

Every time one of you frauds gets caught, tyhe test of you frauds disown him and pretend your (bowel) movement is all cleaned up now.

Bigsky » 05 Oct 2017 4:59 pm » wrote: Hillary ain't no damn republican

Liar.

onlyaladd » 09 Oct 2017 1:03 pm » wrote:

You need to warn people before you post **** that funny. You sprained my laugh bone.

Huey » 09 Oct 2017 1:16 pm » wrote:
Darn. Even Alex Jones is laughing at you:

Q:
Did Donald Trump tell People magazine in 1998 that if he ever ran for president, he’d do it as a Republican because “they’re the dumbest group of voters in the country” and that he “could lie and they’d still eat it up”?
A:
No, that’s a bogus meme.

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/bogus- ... ets-trump/

Kill joy.

Oh, well. We still have his campaign website being hacked by the little poop emoji.

roadkill » 14 Nov 2017 6:12 am » wrote:OK Misty...you're effectively calling Juanita a liar. Got it.

No I did not call her a liar.
I said I have a few issues with her story.

roadkill » 14 Nov 2017 6:12 am » wrote:And yes...Hillary was aware of Bill's behavior.

So you think that he brutally raped a woman and then went home and told his wife about it?
Because Miss Broaddrick contends that she felt that Hillary knew about the alleged rape just a few weeks after it happened.

roadkill » 14 Nov 2017 6:12 am » wrote:While they lived in the Arkansas Gov. mansion Hillary told Bill to do whatever he wanted with women, just keep it out of sight and don't rub my nose in it.

How do you know what she told him?
Were you privy to that conversation?
And do you think that meant that she was giving him permission to commit rape?

Why are you allowed to question the Roy Moore accusers on the basis that they waited so many years to come forward, even though they told many people about their experiences with him over the years, and I am not allowed to question Juanita Broaddrick who also waited many years to come forward, denied that she was raped under oath at first, attended a fundraiser for Bill Clinton a few weeks after the alleged rape, and I believe only has one friend who said that she told her about the rape at the time?

There seems to be a lot more reasons to question Miss Broaddrick's accusations than the ones against Roy Moore.

Another thing you just ignore is the fact that there were a lot of anti-Clinton right wingers who were working very hard to bring down the Clintons.

One billionaire (Richard Mellon-Scaife) spent almost $2 million on the effort.

I do believe the accusations against other Libs, like Weinstein, Spacey, and Halperin, I just have a few issues with this particular case for the reasons I outlined.

You seem to believe all accusations made against Libs, and dismiss the ones that are made against Conservatives/Republicans.

Be still my heart.
This man is delicious.

Misty » 14 Nov 2017 2:54 pm » wrote: No I did not call her a liar.
I said I have a few issues with her story.

So you think that he brutally raped a woman and then went home and told his wife about it?
Because Miss Broaddrick contends that she felt that Hillary knew about the alleged rape just a few weeks after it happened.


How do you know what she told him?
Were you privy to that conversation?
And do you think that meant that she was giving him permission to commit rape?

Why are you allowed to question the Roy Moore accusers on the basis that they waited so many years to come forward, even though they told many people about their experiences with him over the years, and I am not allowed to question Juanita Broaddrick who also waited many years to come forward, denied that she was raped under oath at first, attended a fundraiser for Bill Clinton a few weeks after the alleged rape, and I believe only has one friend who said that she told her about the rape at the time?

There seems to be a lot more reasons to question Miss Broaddrick's accusations than the ones against Roy Moore.

Another thing you just ignore is the fact that there were a lot of anti-Clinton right wingers who were working very hard to bring down the Clintons.

One billionaire (Richard Mellon-Scaife) spent almost $2 million on the effort.

I do believe the accusations against other Libs, like Weinstein, Spacey, and Halperin, I just have a few issues with this particular case for the reasons I outlined.

You seem to believe all accusations made against Libs, and dismiss the ones that are made against Conservatives/Republicans.

#1 Of course you have issues with Juanita's story...she accused a dem. Daaaa.

#2 If he did say something to Hillary about Juanita, who knows what it was. Remember...Bill is not honest, so he may have admitted to sex but not rape.

#3 Info came out years ago about Bill and Hillary's arrangement back in the Arkansas years. It probably wasn't reported by Vox or someone so you brushed it aside like you usually do with news you don't like.

#4 You're the one that keeps saying "it was a long time ago" with respect to the Clintons, but you are inconsistent with other long past stories.

#5 I haven't dismissed anything, just that it conveniently happened just before the election considering Moore has run for office multiple times and has always been attacked, but never a mention of these recent claims until now.

#6 Try to be more concise next time...I'm not into reading an encyclopedia here...but I tried to respond this time. If you feel the need to act as a prosecutor with a laundry list of questions, then try someone else next.