Liberal Forum

Str8tEdge » 30 Nov 2017 11:01 pm » wrote:
Listen you **** retard......You even posted yourself in THAT thread you understood how faith was built. You got your **** panties in a bunch over the term irrefutable, even though it was CLEARLY attributed to the evidence and I even acknowledged there was no proof of God and you could believe whatever causation you wished.

You STILL misrepresented my argument AFTER all that was established for 30+ pages because you're a lying, deceitful piece of ****.

You need Anger management, son!

And then be put to sleep!

Str8tEdge » 30 Nov 2017 11:01 pm » wrote:
Listen you **** retard......You even posted yourself in THAT thread you understood how faith was built. You got your **** panties in a bunch over the term irrefutable, even though it was CLEARLY attributed to the evidence and I even acknowledged there was no proof of God and you could believe whatever causation you wished.

You STILL misrepresented my argument AFTER all that was established for 30+ pages because you're a lying, deceitful piece of ****.

You are still pressing this stupid false narrative . **** you, you lost, a long time ago.
If you claim to have irrefutable evidence that god exists and I question you, then launch into a year long hissy fit because you object to the phrase of gods existence (zero difference), and try to falsely accuse me of lying. Then you are **** retarded. There is not a person here who can't see that.
You made a **** claim and lost your cool when challenged.
Eat a dick.

nuckin futz » 30 Nov 2017 11:12 pm » wrote:

Str8tEdge » 30 Nov 2017 11:01 pm » wrote:
Listen you **** retard......You even posted yourself in THAT thread you understood how faith was built. You got your **** panties in a bunch over the term irrefutable, even though it was CLEARLY attributed to the evidence and I even acknowledged there was no proof of God and you could believe whatever causation you wished.

You STILL misrepresented my argument AFTER all that was established for 30+ pages because you're a lying, deceitful piece of ****.

You need Anger management, son!

And then be put to sleep!

**** you, I'll kick your geezer ***.

onlyaladd » 30 Nov 2017 11:34 pm » wrote:

Str8tEdge » 30 Nov 2017 11:01 pm » wrote:
Listen you **** retard......You even posted yourself in THAT thread you understood how faith was built. You got your **** panties in a bunch over the term irrefutable, even though it was CLEARLY attributed to the evidence and I even acknowledged there was no proof of God and you could believe whatever causation you wished.

You STILL misrepresented my argument AFTER all that was established for 30+ pages because you're a lying, deceitful piece of ****.

You are still pressing this stupid false narrative . **** you, you lost, a long time ago.
If you claim to have irrefutable evidence that god exists and I question you, then launch into a year long hissy fit because you object to the phrase of gods existence (zero difference), and try to falsely accuse me of lying. Then you are **** retarded. There is not a person here who can't see that.
You made a **** claim and lost your cool when challenged.
Eat a dick.

YOU LOST:

I proved you lied so many times I lost count like the most recent where you claimed you never stated the evidence I presented in the OP WAS NOT measurable, objective and irrefutable.

The thread was ABOUT FAITH YOU **** RETARD. EVEN THE THREAD TITLE SAID AS MUCH....

YOU **** BLEW YOUR WAD OVER IRREFUTABLE EVEN THOUGH.....THE EVIDENCE WAS AND IS IRREFUTABLE...

LEARN SOME READING COMPREHENSION, LYING BITCH.

Str8tEdge » 30 Nov 2017 11:01 pm » wrote:

onlyaladd » 30 Nov 2017 10:24 pm » wrote:

Str8tEdge » 28 Nov 2017 10:05 pm » wrote:
sorry, bitch. I PROVED the thread was about faith and PROVED you lied by misquoting me AND misrepresenting my argument.

Lie about something else, bitch.

Why are you still repeating your nonsense?
And embarrassing yourself? Sad
Of gods existence is not misrepresenting that he exists. It's exactly the same you stupid simpleton.
******* pos.

Listen you **** retard......You even posted yourself in THAT thread you understood how faith was built. You got your **** panties in a bunch over the term irrefutable, even though it was CLEARLY attributed to the evidence and I even acknowledged there was no proof of God and you could believe whatever causation you wished.

You STILL misrepresented my argument AFTER all that was established for 30+ pages because you're a lying, deceitful piece of ****.

You two should get a room...



They'll leave the light on for ya...

I just lost my lunch.



REP. JOE BARTON APOLOGIZES FOR SENDING JUNK PICS And Sexting Woman
http://www.tmz.com/2017/11/22/texas-con ... g-twitter/

Str8tEdge » 01 Dec 2017 12:11 am » wrote:
YOU LOST:

I proved you lied so many times I lost count like the most recent where you claimed you never stated the evidence I presented in the OP WAS NOT measurable, objective and irrefutable.

The thread was ABOUT FAITH YOU **** RETARD. EVEN THE THREAD TITLE SAID AS MUCH....

YOU **** BLEW YOUR WAD OVER IRREFUTABLE EVEN THOUGH.....THE EVIDENCE WAS AND IS IRREFUTABLE...

LEARN SOME READING COMPREHENSION, LYING BITCH.

I see no reason why I should have to listen to your continuous lies without calling you out for them.
Who gives a **** if your intended premise was faith. I'm not disputing that, idiot. It doesn't change my point and never has.
If you want to claim "that god does indeed exist" is based on something irrefutable then I'm going to ridicule that. And instead of being a man and offering a rebuttal you are going to continue to try to obscure the issue by wildly throwing accusations of dishonnesty around that have no merit.

You are a coward and a **** idiot.

Misty » 01 Dec 2017 12:12 pm » wrote:

Roughly the same amount of people will believe anything you tell them if it comes from a place of (supposed) authority.
Like Roy Moore is a good man. Etc.

Uh oh. The Commander-In-Tweet is not going to like this.

Misty » 01 Dec 2017 12:37 pm » wrote:Uh oh. The Commander-In-Tweet is not going to like this.

Let take another look...


http://www.fox5dc.com/news/local-news/n ... e-lighting

onlyaladd » 01 Dec 2017 12:29 pm » wrote:

Str8tEdge » 01 Dec 2017 12:11 am » wrote:
YOU LOST:

I proved you lied so many times I lost count like the most recent where you claimed you never stated the evidence I presented in the OP WAS NOT measurable, objective and irrefutable.

The thread was ABOUT FAITH YOU **** RETARD. EVEN THE THREAD TITLE SAID AS MUCH....

YOU **** BLEW YOUR WAD OVER IRREFUTABLE EVEN THOUGH.....THE EVIDENCE WAS AND IS IRREFUTABLE...

LEARN SOME READING COMPREHENSION, LYING BITCH.

I see no reason why I should have to listen to your continuous lies without calling you out for them.
Who gives a **** if your intended premise was faith. I'm not disputing that, idiot. It doesn't change my point and never has.
If you want to claim "that god does indeed exist" is based on something irrefutable then I'm going to ridicule that. And instead of being a man and offering a rebuttal you are going to continue to try to obscure the issue by wildly throwing accusations of dishonnesty around that have no merit.

You are a coward and a **** idiot.

Go back and read the thread, DUMB ****. It's ALL right there in black and white, you lying ****.

Misty » 30 Nov 2017 10:48 am » wrote: Sorry, but I don't answer my notifications, so if I happen to see your posts (like I did this one), then I might reply and if I don't, then I won't.



Besides, I really don't want to associate that much any more with people who still support a man who would promote a violent British hate group who murdered a member of Parliament by re-Tweeting their FAKE videos to his 43 milion followers on Twitter.

You do still support him, right?

The various issues he's trying to accomplish are due support, i.e., minimizing death and destruction from people who aren't here legally (have you been paying attention to the latest travesty?) but are set free by morons giving the finger to parents and other loved ones who lost them forever. It's a shame all you can think about are the things he says on twitter. Hell, you VOTED FOR a bitch who put classified information out there that jeopardized REAL lives, so don't lecture me on whom I support.

WTF?
He knew that Flynn lied to the FBI when he fired him?
So why did he ask Comey if he could let the Flynn thing go?
And then fire him for not doing that?
And if there was nothing to hide, then why did Flynn lie?


Someone needs to take his phone away.
He's not helping himself.

larryc12 » 02 Dec 2017 7:42 am » wrote:

Misty » 30 Nov 2017 10:48 am » wrote:You do still support him, right?

The various issues he's trying to accomplish are due support, i.e., minimizing death and destruction from people who aren't here legally (have you been paying attention to the latest travesty?) but are set free by morons giving the finger to parents and other loved ones who lost them forever. It's a shame all you can think about are the things he says on twitter. Hell, you VOTED FOR a bitch who put classified information out there that jeopardized REAL lives, so don't lecture me on whom I support.

I love how you just dismiss his crazy Tweets, because you can't justify them.

FYI his press secretary has assured us that his Tweets are official presidential statements, and that it is his preferred way of communicating with the public.

Two indictments and two guilty pleas so far.
A bunch of people who were private citizens at the time negotiating with the foreign adversary that meddled in our election, in order to undermine America's foreign policy.
That hardly gives you the high ground on who you chose to support.

You know what jeopardizes REAL lives?
Re-Tweeting FAKE anti-Muslim videos put out by a violent fringe group in Great Britain.
That puts our embassy personnel in foreign countries in danger.
But don't take my word for it, 45's own State Dept said so.

The State Department said it has ongoing conversations with the White House on issues concerning the safety of American diplomats abroad, hours after several media reported the department had warned that the president’s retweeting of several anti-Muslim videos could spark unrest in the Muslim world or put U.S. embassies at risk.

https://www.voanews.com/a/trump-anti-mu ... 44773.html

What are you going to say when we have another Benghazi that actually is caused by those videos?