Liberal Forum

Misty » 17 Jan 2018 7:42 pm » wrote:I love that you and your girlfriend Clementine are having such a hissy fit because it is being pointed out that your dear leader has once again embarrassed you by telling yet another ridiculous and easily disproven lie.

This is more fun than I have had on this forum in a long time.

indago » 17 Jan 2018 10:52 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 17 Jan 2018 4:03 pm » wrote:Who the **** are you kidding, psycho?

Clinton was a literal sociopath who lied about everything. Not even his own party trusted him.

Obama lied about huge issues; health care, taxes, the economy, the War on Terror.

Trump tells an occasional small lie, but on important issues, he's right on the money.

And not that you'll respond, he's keeping almost all his campaign promises, whereas Clinton and Obama broke almost all theirs, while committing or allowing massive abuses of power.

BIG LIE

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 8:39 am » wrote:

indago » 17 Jan 2018 10:52 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 17 Jan 2018 4:03 pm » wrote:Who the **** are you kidding, psycho?

Clinton was a literal sociopath who lied about everything. Not even his own party trusted him.

Obama lied about huge issues; health care, taxes, the economy, the War on Terror.

Trump tells an occasional small lie, but on important issues, he's right on the money.

And not that you'll respond, he's keeping almost all his campaign promises, whereas Clinton and Obama broke almost all theirs, while committing or allowing massive abuses of power.

BIG LIE

.

What's your evidence to refute what I said?

Nothing.

Imbecile.

Misty » 17 Jan 2018 8:11 pm » wrote: I tune it out after a while.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01 ... tus-trump/

indago » 18 Jan 2018 10:04 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 8:39 am » wrote:What's your evidence to refute what I said?

Nothing.

Imbecile.

I see you signed your little rant "Imbecile"

Misty » 17 Jan 2018 6:55 pm » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 8:19 am » wrote:
Why does my name hav to be on it? Do you actually read the posts before you embarrass yourself? I told you Cedar already addressed it.

onlyaladd » 18 Jan 2018 11:16 am » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 8:19 am » wrote:
Why does my name hav to be on it? Do you actually read the posts before you embarrass yourself? I told you Cedar already addressed it.

It seems like a pretty simple question. And no it's not old news, it's not as if he stopped lying 5 times a day.
Are you ok with it or not? Simple.

onlyaladd » 18 Jan 2018 11:16 am » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 8:19 am » wrote:
Why does my name hav to be on it? Do you actually read the posts before you embarrass yourself? I told you Cedar already addressed it.

It seems like a pretty simple question. And no it's not old news, it's not as if he stopped lying 5 times a day.
Are you ok with it or not? Simple.

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 11:22 am » wrote:

onlyaladd » 18 Jan 2018 11:16 am » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 8:19 am » wrote:Why does my name hav to be on it? Do you actually read the posts before you embarrass yourself? I told you Cedar already addressed it.

It seems like a pretty simple question. And no it's not old news, it's not as if he stopped lying 5 times a day.
Are you ok with it or not? Simple.

Pick the lies that are used to sell policy.
Then, eliminate those that are repeats. Then ask me the question.
Ask me about alleged SPECIFIC Lies.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 12:44 pm » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 11:22 am » wrote:

onlyaladd » 18 Jan 2018 11:16 am » wrote: It seems like a pretty simple question. And no it's not old news, it's not as if he stopped lying 5 times a day.
Are you ok with it or not? Simple.

Pick the lies that are used to sell policy.
Then, eliminate those that are repeats. Then ask me the question.
Ask me about alleged SPECIFIC Lies.

How about the lie that his tax cuts are going to mainly benefit middle and working class people and hurt rich people like him?

Or the lie that his failed healthcare bill was going to deliver on his promise that everyone would be covered, and it would be much better care, that would cost people less than what they had under Obamacare.

I seem to remember him saying during the campaign that he was only going to deport 'bad hombres' with criminal records and that he was not going to tear families apart.
That was a lie.

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 10:24 am » wrote:

indago » 18 Jan 2018 10:04 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 8:39 am » wrote:What's your evidence to refute what I said?

Nothing.

Imbecile.

I see you signed your little rant "Imbecile"

.

Another liberal genius heard from.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 12:44 pm » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 11:22 am » wrote:

onlyaladd » 18 Jan 2018 11:16 am » wrote: It seems like a pretty simple question. And no it's not old news, it's not as if he stopped lying 5 times a day.
Are you ok with it or not? Simple.

Pick the lies that are used to sell policy.
Then, eliminate those that are repeats. Then ask me the question.
Ask me about alleged SPECIFIC Lies.

How about the lie that his tax cuts are going to mainly benefit middle and working class people and hurt rich people like him?

Or the lie that his failed healthcare bill was going to deliver on his promise that everyone would be covered, and it would be much better care, that would cost people less than what they had under Obamacare.

I seem to remember him saying during the campaign that he was only going to deport 'bad hombres' with criminal records and that he was not going to tear families apart.
That was a lie.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 12:44 pm » wrote: How about the lie that his tax cuts are going to mainly benefit middle and working class people and hurt rich people like him?

Or the lie that his failed healthcare bill was going to deliver on his promise that everyone would be covered, and it would be much better care, that would cost people less than what they had under Obamacare.

I seem to remember him saying during the campaign that he was only going to deport 'bad hombres' with criminal records and that he was not going to tear families apart.
That was a lie.

indago » 18 Jan 2018 12:57 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 10:24 am » wrote:Another liberal genius heard from.

Someone who can't mouseclick a couple of links, and signs his little rants "Imbecile", wouldn't be expected to be able to wipe his own ***. Maybe you could get Huey to help you...

Failing that, maybe you could mouseclick THIS

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 1:03 pm » wrote:

indago » 18 Jan 2018 12:57 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 10:24 am » wrote:Another liberal genius heard from.

Someone who can't mouseclick a couple of links, and signs his little rants "Imbecile", wouldn't be expected to be able to wipe his own ***. Maybe you could get Huey to help you...

Failing that, maybe you could mouseclick THIS

Oh wow, how clever. A stupid accusation that I need a psychiatrist.

How original.

Like your moonbat buddies, you're as dumb as a freaking fence post.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 12:44 pm » wrote:How about the lie that his tax cuts are going to mainly benefit middle and working class people and hurt rich people like him?e.

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 1:06 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 12:44 pm » wrote:How about the lie that his tax cuts are going to mainly benefit middle and working class people and hurt rich people like him?e.

When Bill Clinton was elected on a promise to middle class taxes he never intended to keep, he immediately tried to do the opposite and raise taxes on the middle class.

There wasn't a shred of honesty in that promise, because he'd done the same con job in Arkansas.

Never saw you complain about that or any lie any Democrat has ever told.

Why is that? Oh, but gosh, I forget, you're, guffaw, not a Democrat.

Psychopath.

indago » 18 Jan 2018 12:57 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 10:24 am » wrote:

indago » 18 Jan 2018 10:04 am » wrote:
I see you signed your little rant "Imbecile"

.

Another liberal genius heard from.

Someone who can't mouseclick a couple of links, and signs his little rants "Imbecile", wouldn't be expected to be able to wipe his own ***. Maybe you could get Huey to help you...

Failing that, maybe you could mouseclick THIS

Trump Hands Out ‘Fake News Awards,’ Sans the Red Carpet

President Trump — who gleefully questioned President Barack Obama’s birthplace for years without evidence, long insisted on the guilt of the Central Park Five despite exonerating proof and claimed that millions of illegal ballots cost him the popular vote in 2016 — wanted to have a word with the American public about accuracy in reporting.

On Wednesday, after weeks of shifting deadlines, and cryptic clues, Mr. Trump released his long-promised “Fake News Awards,” an anti-media project that had alarmed advocates of press freedom and heartened his political base.

“And the FAKE NEWS winners are …,” he wrote on Twitter at 8 p.m.

The message linked, at first, to a malfunctioning page on GOP.com, the Republican National Committee website. An error screen read: “The site is temporarily offline, we are working to bring it back up. Please try back later.”

When the page came back online less than an hour later, it resembled a Republican Party news release.

Headlined “The Highly Anticipated 2017 Fake News Awards” and attributed to “Team GOP,” it included a list of Trump administration accomplishments and jabs at news organizations presented in the form of an 11-point list.

The “winners” were CNN, mentioned four times; The New York Times, with two mentions; and ABC, The Washington Post, Time and Newsweek, with one mention apiece.