Liberal Forum

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 3:02 pm » wrote: And apparently he was schtupping porn stars and Playboy models while he wife was either pregnant or nursing his infant son.

Even if true, that's miniscule compared to enriching one's self by 100's of millions of dollars selling government access and favors as both Clinton's did.

Are you somehow affected if he had an affair? Is the federal government somehow corrupted?

As the Clinton's and Obama thoroughly corrupt the IRS, the Justice Dept, the FBI and US intelligence agencies?

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 1:22 pm » wrote:Talk about anti-climactic.
I was so looking forward to the Trumpy Awards.

Trump Hands Out ‘Fake News Awards,’ Sans the Red Carpet

President Trump — who gleefully questioned President Barack Obama’s birthplace for years without evidence, long insisted on the guilt of the Central Park Five despite exonerating proof and claimed that millions of illegal ballots cost him the popular vote in 2016 — wanted to have a word with the American public about accuracy in reporting.

On Wednesday, after weeks of shifting deadlines, and cryptic clues, Mr. Trump released his long-promised “Fake News Awards,” an anti-media project that had alarmed advocates of press freedom and heartened his political base.

“And the FAKE NEWS winners are …,” he wrote on Twitter at 8 p.m.

The message linked, at first, to a malfunctioning page on GOP.com, the Republican National Committee website. An error screen read: “The site is temporarily offline, we are working to bring it back up. Please try back later.”

When the page came back online less than an hour later, it resembled a Republican Party news release.

Headlined “The Highly Anticipated 2017 Fake News Awards” and attributed to “Team GOP,” it included a list of Trump administration accomplishments and jabs at news organizations presented in the form of an 11-point list.

The “winners” were CNN, mentioned four times; The New York Times, with two mentions; and ABC, The Washington Post, Time and Newsweek, with one mention apiece.

That's it?
After weeks of teasing, that's all we get?
How disappointing.
I was dying to see the acceptance speeches when they picked up their Trumpy awards.

Talk about hate filled rhetoric. You win the prize hands down.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 3:02 pm » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 2:21 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 2:14 pm » wrote:Apparently character means nothing to you two pinheads, as you are just as bereft of that quality as he is.

Don’t lecture me. You voted for and supported a defender of rape and abuse of women, a compulsive liar, con-artist/fraud/grifter, and one who broke classified document laws

You support the person who bragged about sexually assaulting women, and was accused by something like 16 of them for doing just that.

And apparently he was schtupping porn stars and Playboy models while he wife was either pregnant or nursing his infant son.

He also ripped off millions of dollars with his phony University, cheated countless small business owners out of the money they were owed by him, and stiffed waiters and countless other employees of their rightful wages.

Not to mention that whole housing discrimination thing and the fact that he admitted to self-dealing when it came to his phony charity.

I could go on for a week.

There is nothing that you could say about Hillary, that would make this piece of **** look any better.

But I guess you'll probably say that you didn't vote for him, right?
It doesn't matter if you did or not.
You support him now.


I would have voted for Jack The Ripper over this despicable excuse for a human being.

Aren’t you being reckless?

Misty » 13 May 2016 2:48 pm » wrote:

roadkill » 13 May 2016 2:36 pm » wrote:

Misty » 13 May 2016 2:33 pm » wrote:It seem like you are the one who has the obsession with my siggys, since you mention them quite often.
My cartoons are a way of expressing my contempt for the assclown that you guys have nominated.
Ironic that you would accuse me of being obsessed, when it's quite clear that your obsession with Bill Clinton's sex life is borderline creepy.
The more I think about it, the more you remind me of RichClem.
He was also obsessed with Bill Clinton's dick.
BTW, have you checked out my new avatar?

The only thing creepy is Bill Clinton raping and assaulting innocent women...and you defend and deflect for him when ever you get the chance.
That means you are creepy...little girl.

Says the idiot who defends a womanizing fraud, liar and con-artist all day long.

The truth is that you have no proof that Bill Clinton raped anyone, and I think it's reckless to throw around words like rape, when there is no proof.
You guys sure didn't like it when that happened to the Duke Lacrosse team, did you?
I would defend Doofus Drumpf if someone said the same thing about him.

Wake up roadkill.
The 90's are over.
Get over your obsession with Bubba Clinton.

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 3:48 pm » wrote:
Aren’t you being reckless?

Misty » 13 May 2016 2:48 pm » wrote:The truth is that you have no proof that Bill Clinton raped anyone, and I think it's reckless to throw around words like rape, when there is no proof.
You guys sure didn't like it when that happened to the Duke Lacrosse team, did you?
I would defend Doofus Drumpf if someone said the same thing about him.

Wake up roadkill.
The 90's are over.
Get over your obsession with Bubba Clinton.

Not to AGAIN point out little Miss Marxist's double standard, but she babbles about the '90's being over when discussing Clinton's felonies, impeachable acts and rapes.

Then babbles about Trump "assaulting" women 20 years ago.


Not to mention the old lawsuits, etc. which are very dated.

If she didn't have double standards, she wouldn't have any standards at all.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 2:14 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 1:54 pm » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 1:34 pm » wrote:Ok. Fine, he lied.
Next.......

She can't talk about the Trump Boom or any of his many, many accomplishments, so she has to babble about something.

**** the 'Trump Boom.'

Unlike you and your lover Huey, I'm not going to pretend that it is perfectly normal to have a bigoted, ****** grabbing con-artist/fraud/grifter, who lies every time he opens his mouth or uses his tiny Twitter fingers, and who acts like the presidency is a **** reality show, sitting in the White House.

Apparently character means nothing to you two pinheads, as you are just as bereft of that quality as he is.

You are getting sucked in!!! Resist!!! Stay funny!!

Obviously the dotard has no idea that there is a six year extension of CHIP in the CR.
IOW, long term.

Republican Texas Senator John Cornyn said that he doesn't know whether it is clear to BLOTUS what they are trying to do as they authorize CHIP long term.

Yesterday the White House Chief of Staff called SCROTUS 'uninformed' when it came to his big beautiful border wall.

The one that he says Mexico is going to pay for.

NeoConvict » 18 Jan 2018 6:12 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 2:14 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 1:54 pm » wrote:She can't talk about the Trump Boom or any of his many, many accomplishments, so she has to babble about something.

**** the 'Trump Boom.'
Unlike you and your lover Huey, I'm not going to pretend that it is perfectly normal to have a bigoted, ****** grabbing con-artist/fraud/grifter, who lies every time he opens his mouth or uses his tiny Twitter fingers, and who acts like the presidency is a **** reality show, sitting in the White House.
Apparently character means nothing to you two pinheads, as you are just as bereft of that quality as he is.

You are getting sucked in!!! Resist!!! Stay funny!!

These two assholes (Huey and Clem, who work as a tag team) **** all over my comedy thread (and my Flying Monkeys thread) and if I send their garbage to the Peanut Gallery they start whining like a couple of toddlers who had their binkies snatched away from them, that I am 'censoring' them and that I am 'abusing my powers.'

I'm so **** sick of them.
They suck the funny right out of this thread.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 7:14 pm » wrote:

NeoConvict » 18 Jan 2018 6:12 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 2:14 pm » wrote:**** the 'Trump Boom.'
Unlike you and your lover Huey, I'm not going to pretend that it is perfectly normal to have a bigoted, ****** grabbing con-artist/fraud/grifter, who lies every time he opens his mouth or uses his tiny Twitter fingers, and who acts like the presidency is a **** reality show, sitting in the White House.
Apparently character means nothing to you two pinheads, as you are just as bereft of that quality as he is.

You are getting sucked in!!! Resist!!! Stay funny!!

These two assholes (Huey and Clem, who work as a tag team) **** all over my comedy thread (and my Flying Monkeys thread) and if I send their garbage to the Peanut Gallery they start whining like a couple of toddlers who had their binkies snatched away from them, that I am 'censoring' them and that I am 'abusing my powers.'

I'm so **** sick of them.
They suck the funny right out of this thread.

I asked you the other day if you really wanted to start this ****. I told you it never ends well. I told you it will end with whining. Well, you decided you did and you ended whining.

You forgot to tell him what kicked this all off was you trolling me. That is when I warned you how this would end.

Take responsibility for your actions misty. No one force you to respond. No one forced you to troll.

Now, get back to your whiny little rant blaming everyone else for what happens. Remember this the bone that time you are warned what will happen if you persist.

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 2:21 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 2:14 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 1:54 pm » wrote:She can't talk about the Trump Boom or any of his many, many accomplishments, so she has to babble about something.

**** the 'Trump Boom.'
Unlike you and your lover Huey, I'm not going to pretend that it is perfectly normal to have a bigoted, ****** grabbing con-artist/fraud/grifter, who lies every time he opens his mouth or uses his tiny Twitter fingers, and who acts like the presidency is a **** reality show, sitting in the White House.
Apparently character means nothing to you two pinheads, as you are just as bereft of that quality as he is.

Don’t lecture me. You voted for and supported a defender of rape and abuse of women, a compulsive liar, con-artist/fraud/grifter, and one who broke classified document laws

I suppose that the person you support (and probably voted for) who bragged about sexually assaulting women, and was accused by something like 16 of them for doing just that and apparently was schtupping porn stars and Playboy models while he wife was either pregnant or nursing his infant son, who also ripped off millions of dollars with his phony University, cheated countless small business owners out of the money they were owed by him, and stiffed waiters and countless other employees of their rightful wages is so much better.

Not to mention that whole housing discrimination thing and the fact that he admitted to self-dealing when it came to his phony charity.

He's also the racist piece of **** who for over five years said that the first black POTUS was not born in the US.

I would have voted for Saddam Hussein over him.
If he were running.....and not dead.

Which classified document law did Comey say that HRC violated?
Cite it.

The dotard revealed "highly classified information" without the permission of Israel who gave us the info,
to a couple of Russians, one of whom Russia experts say is a spy.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 7:40 pm » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 2:21 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 2:14 pm » wrote:**** the 'Trump Boom.'
Unlike you and your lover Huey, I'm not going to pretend that it is perfectly normal to have a bigoted, ****** grabbing con-artist/fraud/grifter, who lies every time he opens his mouth or uses his tiny Twitter fingers, and who acts like the presidency is a **** reality show, sitting in the White House.
Apparently character means nothing to you two pinheads, as you are just as bereft of that quality as he is.

Don’t lecture me. You voted for and supported a defender of rape and abuse of women, a compulsive liar, con-artist/fraud/grifter, and one who broke classified document laws

I suppose that the person you support (and probably voted for) who bragged about sexually assaulting women, and was accused by something like 16 of them for doing just that and apparently was schtupping porn stars and Playboy models while he wife was either pregnant or nursing his infant son, who also ripped off millions of dollars with his phony University, cheated countless small business owners out of the money they were owed by him, and stiffed waiters and countless other employees of their rightful wages is so much better.

Not to mention that whole housing discrimination thing and the fact that he admitted to self-dealing when it came to his phony charity.

He's also the racist piece of **** who for over five years said that the first black POTUS was not born in the US.

I would have voted for Saddam Hussein over him.
If he were running.....and not dead.

Which classified document law did Comey say that HRC violated?
Cite it.

The dotard revealed "highly classified information" without the permission of Israel who gave us the info,
to a couple of Russians, one of whom Russia experts say is a spy.

Already addressed this.

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 7:21 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 7:14 pm » wrote:I'm so **** sick of them.
They suck the funny right out of this thread.

I asked you the other day if you really wanted to start this ****. I told you it never ends well.
I told you it will end with whining. Well, you decided you did and you ended whining.
You forgot to tell him what kicked this all off was you trolling me. That is when I warned you how this would end.
Take responsibility for your actions misty. No one force you to respond. No one forced you to troll.
Now, get back to your whiny little rant blaming everyone else for what happens.

You know you sound like a jerk and an asshole with this whole tough guy routine, right?
What a sad and pathetic life you must have that you have to act like a bully on a stupid internet forum to make yourself feel superior.

I'm guessing that in real life you are a huge ******, so you need to hide behind a keyboard in order to spew your venom.

You fill up my two threads with your petty ridiculous little bitchfests every day, but when I make a few posts in your threads, I'm trolling you?


Guess what Bunkey? If that is what you consider trolling you, then get used to it, because I'm going to post whatever I want to in your threads whenever I want to.

What are you going to do about it?
**** up my threads with more of your ****?
Report me?
Start a new bunch of whining threads about me?

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 7:21 pm » wrote:Remember this the bone that time you are warned what will happen if you persist.

No way does that sentence make any sense grammatically.
You must be drunk again.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 8:00 pm » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 7:21 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 7:14 pm » wrote:I'm so **** sick of them.
They suck the funny right out of this thread.

I asked you the other day if you really wanted to start this ****. I told you it never ends well.
I told you it will end with whining. Well, you decided you did and you ended whining.
You forgot to tell him what kicked this all off was you trolling me. That is when I warned you how this would end.
Take responsibility for your actions misty. No one force you to respond. No one forced you to troll.
Now, get back to your whiny little rant blaming everyone else for what happens.

You know you sound like a jerk and an asshole with this whole tough guy routine, right?
What a sad and pathetic life you must have that you have to act like a bully on a stupid internet forum to make yourself feel superior.

I'm guessing that in real life you are a huge ******, so you need to hide behind a keyboard in order to spew your venom.

You fill up my two threads with your petty ridiculous little bitchfests every day, but when I make a few posts in your threads, I'm trolling you?


Guess what Bunkey? If that is what you consider trolling you, then get used to it, because I'm going to post whatever I want to in your threads whenever I want to.

What are you going to do about it?
**** up my threads with more of your ****?
Report me?
Start a new bunch of whining threads about me?

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 7:21 pm » wrote:Remember this the bone that time you are warned what will happen if you persist.

No way does that sentence make any sense grammatically.
You must be drunk again.

Waaaa!!!!!

You can not make this **** up. Really. I told you this would happen.

Just remember to take responsibility for your own actions.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 7:14 pm » wrote: These two assholes (Huey and Clem, who work as a tag team) **** all over my comedy thread (and my Flying Monkeys thread) and if I send their garbage to the Peanut Gallery they start whining like a couple of toddlers who had their binkies snatched away from them, that I am 'censoring' them and that I am 'abusing my powers.'

I'm so **** sick of them.

Oh my gosh, we're actually trying to debate issues on a political forum?

How totally unreasonable.

And yes, you did censor a lot of my posts by moving them where no one would ever see them.


Imagine what kind of shrieking liberals would engage in if Trump said,""I didn't censor the NYTimes. I just forbid it to distribute its newspaper or operate its website."

They suck the funny right out of this thread.

Almost none of it is funny, psycho.

That's just an excuse to put up endless propaganda, because you can't win a n an honest debate on the merits of issues.

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 8:17 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 7:14 pm » wrote: These two assholes (Huey and Clem, who work as a tag team) **** all over my comedy thread (and my Flying Monkeys thread) and if I send their garbage to the Peanut Gallery they start whining like a couple of toddlers who had their binkies snatched away from them, that I am 'censoring' them and that I am 'abusing my powers.'

I'm so **** sick of them.

Oh my gosh, we're actually trying to debate issues on a political forum?

How totally unreasonable.

And yes, you did censor a lot of my posts by moving them where no one would ever see them.

Imagine what kind of shrieking liberals would engage in if Trump said,""I didn't censor the NYTimes. I just forbid it to distribute its newspaper or operate its website."

They suck the funny right out of this thread.

Almost none of it is funny, psycho.

That's just an excuse to put up endless propaganda, because you can't win a n an honest debate on the merits of issues.

At least she is predictable.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 8:00 pm » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 7:21 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 7:14 pm » wrote:I'm so **** sick of them.
They suck the funny right out of this thread.

I asked you the other day if you really wanted to start this ****. I told you it never ends well.
I told you it will end with whining. Well, you decided you did and you ended whining.
You forgot to tell him what kicked this all off was you trolling me. That is when I warned you how this would end.
Take responsibility for your actions misty. No one force you to respond. No one forced you to troll.
Now, get back to your whiny little rant blaming everyone else for what happens.

You know you sound like a jerk and an asshole with this whole tough guy routine, right?
What a sad and pathetic life you must have that you have to act like a bully on a stupid internet forum to make yourself feel superior.

I'm guessing that in real life you are a huge ******, so you need to hide behind a keyboard in order to spew your venom.

You fill up my two threads with your petty ridiculous little bitchfests every day, but when I make a few posts in your threads, I'm trolling you?


Guess what Bunkey? If that is what you consider trolling you, then get used to it, because I'm going to post whatever I want to in your threads whenever I want to.

What are you going to do about it?
**** up my threads with more of your ****?
Report me?
Start a new bunch of whining threads about me?

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 7:21 pm » wrote:Remember this the bone that time you are warned what will happen if you persist.

No way does that sentence make any sense grammatically.
You must be drunk again.

Misty says:


Need a tissue?

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 8:00 pm » wrote: What are you going to do about it?
**** up my threads with more of your ****?

Here's some new ****.

The House Intelligence Committee just voted to release proof of vast FISA abuse to the full Congress.

On a party line vote.

Shazzam, why would your party oppose releasing this information?

Help me out here.

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 1:01 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 12:44 pm » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 11:22 am » wrote:Pick the lies that are used to sell policy.
Then, eliminate those that are repeats. Then ask me the question.
Ask me about alleged SPECIFIC Lies.

How about the lie that his tax cuts are going to mainly benefit middle and working class people and hurt rich people like him?
Or the lie that his failed healthcare bill was going to deliver on his promise that everyone would be covered, and it would be much better care, that would cost people less than what they had under Obamacare.
I seem to remember him saying during the campaign that he was only going to deport 'bad hombres' with criminal records and that he was not going to tear families apart.
That was a lie.

1. Which part of his tax cuts are you discussing? Specifics please.

I'm talking about the whole thing jerkoff.
Tell me that what 45 said was true, when he was trying to sell us on his tax cuts, that they would mainly benefit the middle and working class and hurt him and his rich friends.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwew1UupOHc

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 1:01 pm » wrote:2.. Link to the specific lie on health care.

Would the health care bill that failed would have accomplished all of that?

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 1:01 pm » wrote:3. When his immigration policy is in place I will agree or disagree. I will say that his comments recently on immigration appear to be an Obama Pivot on this particular issue.

Some of his immigration policies are already in effect through executive order.
He said that he was only going to concentrate on deporting 'bad hombres' but that is not what he is doing.

Five deported immigrants slam Trump's 'bad hombre' lie.

He is deporting people who are working, paying taxes and who are not criminals.
And he is deporting people who were brought here as children, through no fault of their own.
Ask people like Jorge Garcia or those who are losing their DACA protection every day.

He also said that he would not break up families.
Again, ask people like Jorge Garcia if their family was broken up.

NEW DHS NUMBERS SHOW TRUMP IS DEPORTING LONGTIME U.S. RESIDENTS, RIPPING FAMILIES APART

The Mothers Being Deported by Trump

The dotard told Chuck Todd that he would not break up families and he would accomplish that goal by deporting the whole family together.

45: “We’re going to keep the families together, but they have to go.”

Trump told Todd he wasn’t going to break up families.

He would boot all of them.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/08 ... ave-to-go/

Many families, like Jorge Garcia's are mixed status.
His wife and kids are US citizens, so I guess the idiot thinks that he can deport US citizens.

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 1:01 pm » wrote:But again, without specific comments and links I am not agreeing or disagreeing. You have a failed memory and this is your MO. Post generalities so you can’t be pinned down.

Is that pinned down enough for you Sparkey?

45 has lied repeatedly to sell us on his policies.
You have said that those are the only lies that you care about.
Now you are dancing and squirming all around, asking for specifics, because you know that what I said was true.
You failed.

Huey » 14 Jan 2018 5:32 pm » wrote:

Misty » 14 Jan 2018 5:09 pm » wrote:

Huey » 14 Jan 2018 5:00 pm » wrote:Yadda, yadda, yadda......

Huey » 14 Jan 2018 10:19 am » wrote:I tend to stay away from her cesspool threads.

That must be your evil twin.

Have you and your BFF Clem asked management to check the logs yet, so you can prove that your allegations that I am editing a bunch of stuff are true?

Do you have that post from the threads in question where I claimed you changed the posts of others?

Yes or no? The answer is no, lying ****, because it does not exist. You would have posted it already. All you got is me claiming YOU CHANGED YOUR OWN POSTS, and you agreeing.

You just can't accuse someone of claiming you make changes to people’s posts without a quote from the thread that links their exact words, twat

Run, ****, run

This is where Misty started her crap and know she is whining blaming me. The quote where little Miss victim changed it to yadda yada was a conversation between me and onlyaladd. Prior to that I haven’t posted to this thread since November.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 9:00 pm » wrote: I'm talking about the whole thing jerkoff.
Tell me that what 45 said was true, when he was trying to sell us on his tax cuts, that they would mainly benefit the middle and working class and hurt him and his rich friends.

80% of Americans are going to get a very significant tax cut.

The Trump Boom has begun.

Good luck selling your babbling **** to voters when they find that out in detail.

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 9:00 pm » wrote:

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 1:01 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2018 12:44 pm » wrote:How about the lie that his tax cuts are going to mainly benefit middle and working class people and hurt rich people like him?
Or the lie that his failed healthcare bill was going to deliver on his promise that everyone would be covered, and it would be much better care, that would cost people less than what they had under Obamacare.
I seem to remember him saying during the campaign that he was only going to deport 'bad hombres' with criminal records and that he was not going to tear families apart.
That was a lie.

1. Which part of his tax cuts are you discussing? Specifics please.

I'm talking about the whole thing jerkoff.
Tell me that what 45 said was true, when he was trying to sell us on his tax cuts, that they would mainly benefit the middle and working class and hurt him and his rich friends.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwew1UupOHc

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 1:01 pm » wrote:2.. Link to the specific lie on health care.

Would the health care bill that failed would have accomplished all of that?

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 1:01 pm » wrote:3. When his immigration policy is in place I will agree or disagree. I will say that his comments recently on immigration appear to be an Obama Pivot on this particular issue.

Some of his immigration policies are already in effect through executive order.
He said that he was only going to concentrate on deporting 'bad hombres' but that is not what he is doing.

Five deported immigrants slam Trump's 'bad hombre' lie.

He is deporting people who are working, paying taxes and who are not criminals.
And he is deporting people who were brought here as children, through no fault of their own.
Ask people like Jorge Garcia or those who are losing their DACA protection every day.

He also said that he would not break up families.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/08 ... ave-to-go/

Again, ask people like Jorge Garcia if their family was broken up.

NEW DHS NUMBERS SHOW TRUMP IS DEPORTING LONGTIME U.S. RESIDENTS, RIPPING FAMILIES APART

The Mothers Being Deported by Trump

The dotard told Chuck Todd that he would not break up families and he would accomplish that goal by deporting the whole family together.

Many families, like Jorge Garcia's are mixed status.
His wife and kids are US citizens, so I guess the idiot thinks that he can deport US citizens.

Huey » 18 Jan 2018 1:01 pm » wrote:But again, without specific comments and links I am not agreeing or disagreeing. You have a failed memory and this is your MO. Post generalities so you can’t be pinned down.

Is that pinned down enough for you Sparkey?

45 has lied repeatedly to sell us on his policies.
You have said that those are the only lies that you care about.
Now you are dancing and squirming all around, asking for specifics, because you know that what I said was true.
You failed.

Specifics please.

Do you mean the part where most brackets are getting a cut? The bottom brackets 3-4 percent and the rich around 2? Or something like the mortgage deduction getting capped @ 750,000? You got one of those mortgages? How about the cap on property deductions and such?

Again, you ask a general question then when it is answered you claim that isn’t what you were talking about.