Liberal Forum

Misty » 17 Jul 2017 3:16 pm » wrote:There are quite a few ongoing investigations that will decide if he or anyone on his campaign did anything illegal.
So I am willing to wait until they are concluded.

You OTOH are not.
You have declared he and his campaign innocent before the investigations are over.

Quote me saying any such thing definitively, psycho. I don't believe I ever have.

So you're lying again, big surprise there.

At this point, given that even top Democrats and CNN figures are admitting they don't expect much from the investigation, I am strongly inclined to believe that.

Termin8tor » 17 Jul 2017 3:27 pm » wrote:You're lying again.
I have listed not only the specific crimes and impeachable acts Clinton committed, but cited a mountain of evidence that proves beyond reasonable any doubt he did.

Oh give it a rest already.
You have done no such thing.

You said the evidence was in some stupid boxes.

This fixation you have with the Clintons is abnormal and downright creepy.

They are gone.
Neither one of them will ever darken the doors of the WH again.

Misty » 17 Jul 2017 3:16 pm » wrote: I have never said that 45 absolutely broke any laws.
I am not a legal expert, and unlike you I do not pretend to be.

I have cited many opinion pieces by legal experts that have alleged that he may have violated certain statutes.

There are quite a few ongoing investigations that will decide if he or anyone on his campaign did anything illegal.
So I am willing to wait until they are concluded.

The crimes you alleged were nonsense, either idiotic opinions or smears or outright lies.

And given that you cannot even cite one single crime anyone can reasonably be charged with, you're admitting that your months and months of smears, insinuations and lies were all ****.

Just like the smears and lies you told about Bush, Rush and other conservatives.

Misty » 17 Jul 2017 3:36 pm » wrote: Oh give it a rest already.
You have done no such thing.

Thanks once again for revealing yourself as a psychopathic liar.

I not only did so, but had many, many, many exchanges with you about the validity of the evidence.

What, you have developed amnesia?

You said the evidence was in some stupid boxes.

Schippers, House Impeachment Managers and staff spent months collecting sworn testimony and evidence against Clinton.

So because the evidence was in boxes, it's not evidence? Not believable?


What's your point, psycho?

Misty » 17 Jul 2017 3:36 pm » wrote:This fixation you have with the Clintons is abnormal and downright creepy.

They are gone.
Neither one of them will ever darken the doors of the WH again.

Shazzam, you're lying again! I never would have expected that.

Hillary is running again for president and has a pretty good shot at it, given the weakness of your party.

But even so, it's history, RECENT history. Should that no longer be taught?

Should it not be taught that your party protected him and kept him in office, protected from any consequence?

What's creepy is that you were willing to lie for years on behalf of a serial felon / serial rapist.


Creepy doesn't even begin to express how utterly demented you are.

This is why I stay here.
I get to amuse myself by doing things like this.

Misty » 12 Jul 2017 12:30 pm » wrote:

Misty » 17 Jul 2017 4:25 pm » wrote:This is why I stay here.
I get to amuse myself by doing things like this.

Yes, **** over substance and reality.

Here's what you typically ignored and cannot possibly deal with.

Termin8tor » 17 Jul 2017 3:42 pm » wrote:Clinton's felonies and impeachable acts are history, RECENT history. Should that no longer be taught?

Should it not be taught that your party protected Clinton and kept him in office, protected from any consequence?

What's creepy is that you were willing to lie for years on behalf of a serial felon / serial rapist.

Creepy doesn't even begin to express how utterly demented you are.

Termin8tor » 17 Jul 2017 3:42 pm » wrote:Shazzam, you're lying again!

Who the **** is Shazzam?
You must be a little confused today.
It's me Misty.
Remember me Pumpkin?

Termin8tor » 17 Jul 2017 3:42 pm » wrote:Hillary is running again for president and has a pretty good shot at it, given the weakness of your party.

Who told you that Puss?
Did she tell you herself, or was it the voices in your head again?

My party?

Termin8tor » 17 Jul 2017 4:34 pm » wrote:Yes, **** over substance and reality.
Here's what you typically ignored and cannot possibly deal with.

OIC, so you're here to TEACH us about what happened during the 90's.
Newsflash genius, most of us were alive in the 90's and don't need you to TEACH us anything about what happened.

Besides which, this is a political forum, not Ding Dong School and you're not Miss Frances.

That's a **** excuse for your embarrassing obsession with Bubba and his wife.
And.... a diversion from the cluster **** taking place in the WH right now, which you refuse to deal with.

Termin8tor » 17 Jul 2017 3:34 pm » wrote:Quote me saying any such thing definitively, psycho. I don't believe I ever have.

So are you saying that when you ask me to prove that 45 has broken any laws, that doesn't imply that you think he hasn't?
And when you post a bunch of wingnut opinion pieces that definitively say that he hasn't broken any laws, that doesn't mean that you also think he hasn't?

Okay.....

Weren't you just lecturing me the other day about how when I post a source it must mean that I agree with everything in it?

Termin8tor » 17 Jul 2017 3:34 pm » wrote:At this point, given that even top Democrats and CNN figures are admitting they don't expect much from the investigation, I am strongly inclined to believe that.

You're taking the word of Democrats and 'CNN figures' now?

Haven't you heard Pumpkin?
CNN is FAKE News.

T-Bag said so, and I believe you may have said that yourself a time or two or 100, no?

Misty » 17 Jul 2017 4:47 pm » wrote: So are you saying that when you ask me to prove that 45 has broken any laws, that doesn't imply that you think he hasn't?
And when you post a bunch of wingnut opinion pieces that definitively say that he hasn't broken any laws, that doesn't mean that you also think he hasn't?

Okay.....

Given that you can't even credibly cite a crime, let alone any evidence, it makes sense to assume I'm correct, imbecile.

You're taking the word of Democrats and 'CNN figures' now?

Haven't you heard Pumpkin?
CNN is FAKE News.

T-Bag said so, and I believe you may have said that yourself a time or two or 100, no?

CNN and the rest of the corrupt MSM lied for months that Trump was under investigation. Why did they do that? Is that not Fake News?

But regarding my citing them, here's a hint, Dim.


When figures at CNN caught surreptitiously on video admit there's nothing to the Russia thing-ey, it's pretty safe to say it's all but over.

Not that you'll admit it, CNN is continuing to lie to viewers, while admitting behind the scenes the opposite.

So in others words they don't believe what Fredo himself admitted.

Misty » 18 Jul 2017 12:21 pm » wrote:Take your lawyer to work day

Have you got an actual crime you can point to yet, psycho?

No? Didn't think so.

Misty » 17 Jul 2017 7:14 pm » wrote:Which featured none of your products, btw

Insane clown president

Here's a hint, psycho. What matters is that Trump's policies are mostly excellent.

And I'd say the insane president was the leftist moonbat almost all of whose policies failed, especially his economic policies, the one who sank the country $9 trillion deeper in debt.

Oh gosh, weren't you a supporter of that utter incompetent?