Liberal Forum

Misty » 17 Jul 2017 7:07 pm » wrote:only 45% of Trump voters believe Donald Jr had a meeting with the Russians

So in others words they don't believe what Fredo himself admitted.

Here's a hint, Dim. He didn't meet with "the Russians" in the sense of formally meeting reps from the Russian government.

He met with some Russians.

Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2017 12:46 pm » wrote: Here's a hint, Dim. He didn't meet with "the Russians" in the sense of formally meeting reps from the Russian government.

He met with some Russians.

Here's a hunt, dim....
He jumped at the chance to meet with an attorney that he was told was linked to the Kremlin. The emails also said the Russian government was in support of Trump.
he didn't know beforehand that it was just some ****.

Annoyed Liberall » 18 Jul 2017 12:52 pm » wrote: Here's a hunt, dim....
He jumped at the chance to meet with an attorney that he was told was linked to the Kremlin. The emails also said the Russian government was in support of Trump.
he didn't know beforehand that it was just some ****.

My point was about the poll she cited, not about the details of this issue.


But the key fact remains, Trump Jr. was being offered information about criminal activity by the HRC campaign and maybe her as well.


In the context of running against to criminals who would do exactly the same thing, I'd have accepted the information.

If you're in a street fight, you'd be stupid to fight like a gentleman.

Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2017 1:31 pm » wrote: My point was about the poll she cited, not about the details of this issue.

But the key fact remains, Trump Jr. was being offered information about criminal activity by the HRC campaign and maybe her as well.

In the context of running against to criminals who would do exactly the same thing, I'd have accepted the information.

If you're in a street fight, you'd be stupid to fight like a gentleman.

Since when is a Presidential election a street fight?
The rules are different.
Trump is a pig wrestling in the mud and he wants to pull everyone in there with him.
Progressives like you are more than happy to follow.

Annoyed Liberall » 18 Jul 2017 1:42 pm » wrote: Since when is a Presidential election a street fight?
The rules are different.

You're kidding, right?

Go read about the Clinton's criminal behavior, especially Bill Clinton's massive illegal foreign fund raising, and the obstruction of justice he engaged in to cover it up.

And much more criminal behavior to keep him in office. Abuse of the IRS. Abuse of the INS, intimidation and blackmail of ordinary Americans.
Then get back to me.

Trump is a pig wrestling in the mud and he wants to pull everyone in there with him.
Progressives like you are more than happy to follow.

Trump is crude, but I prefer him to the glib lies and smears Democrats have engaged in for decades against conservatives. He's quite honest compared to them.

Don't kid yourself that Trump is dragging people down. I've seen the ugliest of lies from the liberal-left.

Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2017 1:46 pm » wrote: You're kidding, right?

Go read about the Clinton's criminal behavior, especially Bill Clinton's massive illegal foreign fund raising, and the obstruction of justice he engaged in to cover it up.

And much more criminal behavior to keep him in office. Abuse of the IRS. Abuse of the INS, intimidation and blackmail of ordinary Americans.
Then get back to me.
Trump is crude, but I prefer him to the glib lies and smears Democrats have engaged in for decades against conservatives. He's quite honest compared to them.

Don't kid yourself that Trump is dragging people down. I've seen the ugliest of lies from the liberal-left.

Is it possible for you to stick to the subject of Donald Trump Jr. and his meeting with whom he thought was a Kremlin connected lawyer to get dirt on the opposition?

Annoyed Liberall » 18 Jul 2017 1:56 pm » wrote: Is it possible for you to stick to the subject of Donald Trump Jr. and his meeting with whom he thought was a Kremlin connected lawyer to get dirt on the opposition?

No, because there is a context to politics, and judging one person is impossible without comparing him to what others have done.

Trump was running against two deeply corrupt criminals who had and would commit felonies to win.

So of course his son would accept evidence of criminal behavior on their part, even if it came from the Russians.

Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2017 2:40 pm » wrote: No, because there is a context to politics, and judging one person is impossible without comparing him to what others have done.

Trump was running against two deeply corrupt criminals who had and would commit felonies to win.

So of course his son would accept evidence of criminal behavior on their part, even if it came from the Russians.

And you don't see anything wrong with jumping at the chance to get help from the Russian government to win an American election?

Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2017 12:46 pm » wrote:Here's a hint, Dim. He didn't meet with "the Russians" in the sense of formally meeting reps from the Russian government.
He met with some Russians.

Uh oh.
He's parsing words now.
That's never a good sign.

You might want to read Fredo's emails again.

Annoyed Liberall » 18 Jul 2017 3:12 pm » wrote:And you don't see anything wrong with jumping at the chance to get help from the Russian government to win an American election?

He doesn't ever see anything wrong as long as the person has an R after their name.
They can do anything they want.
Even grab 'em by the ******.

Misty » 18 Jul 2017 3:25 pm » wrote: Uh oh.
He's parsing words now.
That's never a good sign.

I'm not parsing words at all, psycho. I'm responding to the poll you stupidly cited, which on balance isn't unreasonable by Trump voters.

It was factually accurate to believe he didn't meet with "the Russians."

Unlike you, I respond factually to questions, even if the deeper context is a little different.

You ignore 99% of questions, or just lie.

Annoyed Liberall » 18 Jul 2017 3:12 pm » wrote: And you don't see anything wrong with jumping at the chance to get help from the Russian government to win an American election?

If you're not going to respond to the specific context I gave, why should I answer your questions?

If I'm about to be attacked in the street by a criminal, it is "wrong" for me to preemptively kick him in the nuts before he slits my throat.

But I wouldn't hesitate to do so.

Misty » 18 Jul 2017 3:29 pm » wrote: He doesn't ever see anything wrong as long as the person has an R after their name.
They can do anything they want.
Even grab 'em by the ******.

Blah, blah, blah from a psychopathic liar who for years dishonestly defended a serial felon / serial rapist.

Who smeared a decent man as a "child molester."

Who lied that I "don't care about rape."

Consult a good psychiatrist, psycho.

Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2017 3:34 pm » wrote:It was factually accurate to believe he didn't meet with "the Russians."

You're right Puss.
My bad.
He didn't meet with all 144 million Russians.



Say, how's that whole 'repeal and replace Obamacare with something terrific' thingy going?

Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2017 3:37 pm » wrote:Consult a good psychiatrist, psycho.

Well I would ask you for a recommendation, but it's obvious you haven't found a good one yet.

Trump: ‘Let Obamacare Fail…I’m Not Going to Own It’




Flashback to 2013.

Misty » 18 Jul 2017 4:14 pm » wrote:

Trump: ‘Let Obamacare Fail…I’m Not Going to Own It’

Oh, so after we told you for years this would fail you holding someone else responsible?

How leftist of you.

Go to Venezuela with you ideology. Even you can't **** them up more than it already is.

Misty » 18 Jul 2017 4:00 pm » wrote: You're right Puss.
My bad.
He didn't meet with all 144 million Russians.

Nor did he meet with any government officials, which is my point, but you'll babble something dishonest anyway.

Say, how's that whole 'repeal and replace Obamacare with something terrific' thingy going?

It failed.

But isn't it great that Obamacare will continue to collapse and further wreck US health care and health insurance?

Huge success for you liberals.

Only a psychopath would laugh with joy about that.

Misty » 18 Jul 2017 4:01 pm » wrote: Well I would ask you for a recommendation, but it's obvious you haven't found a good one yet.

Empty words from a psychopathic liar.


What didn't you respond to?

The most important part of my post, as usual.

Blah, blah, blah from a psychopathic liar who for years dishonestly defended a serial felon / serial rapist.

Who smeared a decent man as a "child molester."

Who lied that I "don't care about rape."

Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2017 3:36 pm » wrote: If you're not going to respond to the specific context I gave, why should I answer your questions?

If I'm about to be attacked in the street by a criminal, it is "wrong" for me to preemptively kick him in the nuts before he slits my throat.

But I wouldn't hesitate to do so.

You didn't even have a question.