I am open to hearing your magnificent solutionMisty » 21 Feb 2018 7:26 pm » wrote:Show me where in the Constitution it says that you have a right to own an AR15?
tRump is a pervert.Misty » 22 Feb 2018 11:32 pm » wrote:BLOTUS: "A gun free zone to a killer or somebody that wants to be a killer, that's like going in for the ice cream."
This guy was a rising star in the Republican Party until he decided to play 50 Shades of Grey with his mistress, take a picture of her bound and blindfolded and threaten to use it to blackmail her if she should ever go public with their affair.Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2018 11:47 pm » wrote:tRump is a pervert.Misty » 22 Feb 2018 11:32 pm » wrote:BLOTUS: "A gun free zone to a killer or somebody that wants to be a killer, that's like going in for the ice cream."
So is this guy: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/22/us/e ... icted.html
If democrats had their way, tRump and this perv governor would have a civil right to shower with women, for the low low price of pretending to "feel" like a chick.
Inside.
Why would you want to give sexual predators this civil right?
But if you had your way, the pretense would make it okay.Misty » 23 Feb 2018 4:01 pm » wrote: This guy was a rising star in the Republican Party until he decided to play 50 Shades of Grey with his mistress, take a picture of her bound and blindfolded and threaten to use it to blackmail her if she should ever go public with their affair.
Now he will forever be known as that 'kinky' governor.
SCROTUS said that as a beauty pageant owner, he had the right to walk in on young girls in a state of undress.
No need to even pretend to "feel" like a girl inside.
Asking her to stop dancing and defend her pro-rape position is not an attack, captain saveaho.Ricky Tavy » 23 Feb 2018 11:48 pm » wrote: Kee-rist. Now, you are even attacking one of the women you use as a human shield, because she won't accept your Deplorable justification for your obsessive projections of your gender insecurities.
There is no requirement that women wear dresses, Ward Cleaver. The fifties called and want their ideas back, you moron.Ricky Tavy » 23 Feb 2018 11:48 pm » wrote: Rapists are lurking outside female restrooms, waiting only for liberals to allow them to wear dresses as a rape strategy.
No, previously rapists went into women's showers to rape them - but they had to sneak. You want to make it a right.Ricky Tavy » 23 Feb 2018 11:48 pm » wrote:Previously, they had been held back from employing this strategy because of the belief that pretending to be transgender would risk a misdemeanor charge.
No, they are more concerned. Your pretense that you can waive rights for them concerns them, too. They asked me to tell you to **** off.Ricky Tavy » 23 Feb 2018 11:48 pm » wrote:Now, they are to be unleashed on the women who are much less concerned about this certain assault than you are.
You are the one concerned about what they wear. I'm concerned about you demanding women allow men into their showers, rapo.Ricky Tavy » 23 Feb 2018 11:48 pm » wrote: Of course, nobody I've seen anywhere is as concerned about hordes of dress-wearing rapists lining up outside women's restrooms as you are.
Ad homs in place of argument - we get it, loser.Ricky Tavy » 23 Feb 2018 11:48 pm » wrote:I'm beginning to think your mama made a mistake by making you wear dresses and taking you into places where people had breasts you could never quite achieve. Congratulations on coming close, though.
Here are five cases of transgenders abusing children in bathrooms, ***: https://www.dailywire.com/news/5190/5-t ... exit-modalRicky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 12:00 am » wrote: Hypocritical whining about ad homs does not camouflage your weird obsession with this matter, to the point that you insist that you are a better spokesmodel in defense of the virginal women of your weirder fantasies than are actual women.
You asked for trannies acting out.Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 12:54 am » wrote: You were right to reach for preemptive victimhood, realizing that a source that cited itself for three of its five, silly horror stories might be seen as suspect by people capable of critical thinking.
Demanding I show you stats from what WOULD happen IF you got your fantasy of men in women's showers proves your dishonesty.Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 12:54 am » wrote: I would point out that none of what you were given by your wacko Deplorable site shows any of the rapes you keep insisting would result from a removal of your prissiness.
I've never been concerned with how men dress - only that they not be allowed in women's showers, moron.Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 12:54 am » wrote:Another of your fab five has nothing to do with anybody dressing up like a woman to do their peeping.
And you got them, in spades - and you whined, because you're dishonest.Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:11 am » wrote: No, cowardly liar, I asked for transgender rapes and assaults.
I gave you transgenders committing sexual assaults.Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:11 am » wrote: You provided a Deplorable propaganda site that mostly cited itself to back up its absurd assertions, some of which had nothing to do with anyone even dressing up like women, let alone actions by transgenders.
You asked for transgenders committing sexual assaults.I gave you transgenders committing sexual assaults.You defended those assaults by arguing they don't count unless there is penetration and unless the tranny is in drag. You also cried about the source.That is goal post moving, misogynist.Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:11 am » wrote: No, cowardly liar, I asked for transgender rapes and assaults.
You mean no penetration.Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:21 am » wrote: No rapes.