Liberal Forum

Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:24 am » wrote: No, lying freak, you didn't. You provided a Deplorable source that mostly cited itself reaching desperately for anything any male had ever done in a female facility. Even by those silly standards, your lying site could only find five dishonest examples between here and Canada.

Liar. My link to five cases didn't even cite the case where a canadian tranny beat woman half to death IN A BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER.

And I provided a sixth link to a tranny abusing a child in a bathroom. I also gave a link to a case where a tranny on steroids is beating natural girls in school athletics - and all of this is from quick googling, the tip of the ice burg. Bragging that there are not a lot of cases yet, since you haven't gotten your way, is more dishonesty - especially when you claimed there were NONE, freak.

Why do you hate women and want to force them to accept rapists into their most vulnerable and isolated spaces, you freak?

Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:29 am » wrote:
I require something other than drama queenery from somebody who dismissed Misty as less qualified than himself to be the spokesmodel for the women you use as human shields for your sexual deviancy. I point again to the fact that someone of your intelligence should be able to take a hint from the fact that nobody, NOBODY, on a site full of sexually weird, Deplorable cultural warriors comes anywhere near being as obsessed by this crap as you are.

Hardly anybody here posts much about how transgenders are a clear threat to apple pie. It is the focus of something like 20% of your posts. One more time, take a hint, Twitch.

Rather than answer to the legitimate objections your agenda to change our laws engenders, you attack the person raising the issue.

First, you lie that there has never been any sexual assault by trannies in bathrooms. When confronted with proofs, you make the sexist argument that I - a member of the same society you are - have no standing to question your agenda, because of my gender.

The reason I do not let go of the issue is the same reason I don't let go of hooey's hypocritical positions on torture: You are a dancing queen who lacks the answers to the questions put about your agenda, and equally lack the dignity to admit it.

Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:32 am » wrote: I never claimed there were no cases of anyone doing anything. That would involve the kind of absurd hysteria that marks your weird fetish and the casual dishonesty you employ to defend your sickness.

You asked, you got answered, you started dancing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipEhNVKhskQ

Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:42 am » wrote:That you flash that does not bore me makes me feel like I need a shower.

I don't bathroom with bathroomers, bathroomer.

You were "done" when you started dancing, bitch. You cannot address legitimate objections to your agenda, without resorting to ad homs and dishonest prevarications - your agenda is therefore retarded.

You are NOT the spokesmodel for women. You do NOT have their power of attorney to waive their privacy and safety rights.

Your war on women is a fail.

Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:47 am » wrote: Stroke yourself, sicko. I'm done being the object of your gender-confused, victim-wannabe onanism.

Gender confused - that's pretty funny, misogynist.

Do you think ted bundy would have been willing to pretend he felt feminine inside, to get next to his prey in an isolated and vulnerable condition?

I think he would have, misogynist.

How about gary ridgeway - the green river killer? Do you think HE might have been willing to pretend to feel girly, in order to get access to women in isolated and vulnerable positions?

Nothing wrong with having new ideas, son. But being unwilling to answer legitimate questions about those ideas marks you for a pseudo intellectual poseur whose agenda is driven by pack mentality, not principled thinking.

Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:29 am » wrote:

Cannonpointer » 24 Feb 2018 1:23 am » wrote:

Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 1:21 am » wrote: No rapes.

You mean no penetration.

Look how the mighty have fallen. You NOW require penetration - and the rapist HAS to be in drag, or it doesn't count.

Why do you hate women?

I require something other than drama queenery from somebody who dismissed Misty as less qualified than himself to be the spokesmodel for the women you use as human shields for your sexual deviancy. I point again to the fact that someone of your intelligence should be able to take a hint from the fact that nobody, NOBODY, on a site full of sexually weird, Deplorable cultural warriors comes anywhere near being as obsessed by this crap as you are.

Hardly anybody here posts much about how transgenders are a clear threat to apple pie. It is the focus of something like 20% of your posts. One more time, take a hint, Twitch.

You must have missed THIS

indago » 24 Feb 2018 2:29 am » wrote: You must have missed THIS

He admitted in another thread that he believes gary ridgeway, ted bundy and other psychotic serial killers who prey on women would be delighted to have a civil right to join their prey in public showers.

Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 2:41 am » wrote:

Cannonpointer » 24 Feb 2018 2:33 am » wrote:He admitted in another thread that he believes gary ridgeway, ted bundy and other psychotic serial killers who prey on women would be delighted to have a civil right to join their prey in public showers.

Or, a sick **** like you hopes a clumsy lie will get you some validation from someone you don't much respect.

Wait, wait, wait.

Are you saying you DON'T believe bundy and ridgeway would have been delighted to take advantage of a civil right to shower with women?

Is THAT your thesis?




Dahnce.

Ricky Tavy » 24 Feb 2018 2:46 am » wrote: Yeah. I'm saying they did not need the itch that fuels your disease, Pvt. Maggot.

What particular reasoning led you to conclude that neither bundy nor ridgeway would have taken advantage of a civil right to shower with women?

Share your thinking - you might change someone's mind.





Dahnce again.

Misty » 21 Feb 2018 7:26 pm » wrote: Show me where in the Constitution it says that you have a right to own an AR15?

Go to the NRA's website and read the pages and pages of documentation about why the 2nd Amendment was written.

It wasn't for hunting or mere self protection.

But like all liberals, you prefer to shriek and accuse and vilify from a position of ignorance.

Trump is correct, if off on the numbers. The corrupt Democrat Party allows, even encourages illegal immigrants to vote.

.

Misty » 21 Feb 2018 7:26 pm » wrote: And I am sick and **** tired of hearing that there is nothing we can do and that we must accept this **** as the new normal.

I have three grandkids in school, and I am terrified that some nut is going to shoot up their school one day.

Show me where in the Constitution it says that you have a right to own an AR15?

.

Not sure I fully agree with the logic...But what are your thoughts?

onlyaladd » 24 Feb 2018 6:27 pm » wrote:Not sure I fully agree with the logic...But what are your thoughts?

The meme misrepresents those who defend the right to own an ar15.

It's cheap - funny, but cheap.

No one believes the army will ever turn on the people. Crooked local officials, however, might - and such are in FACT susceptible to being "overthrown" by ar15s.

Cannonpointer » 25 Feb 2018 12:05 pm » wrote:The meme misrepresents those who defend the right to own an ar15.

It's cheap - funny, but cheap.

No one believes the army will ever turn on the people. Crooked local officials, however, might - and such are in FACT susceptible to being "overthrown" by ar15s.

I would think that local officials and the people would stand up to oppressive Federal troops!
STATES RIGHTS!