Liberal Forum

Misty » 29 Sep 2018 3:17 pm » wrote:

First of all, when did she say that she was too scared to fly?

Do you have an exact quote?

Misty » 29 Sep 2018 3:43 pm » wrote:Here you go jackass.
This is where your Trumplican Talking Point Lies come from.
Right from the lying little mouth of Fredo and people like Dana Loesch.

Trump Jr. and the GOP’s Obsession with Christine Blasey Ford’s ‘Fear of Flying’Fearful fliers can and often do fly.
Nevertheless, GOP lawmakers and conservative pundits have latched onto the argument that Ford lacks credibility because she flew to D.C.

Your efforts to undercut Dr. Ford's credibility with this Trumplican Talking Point Lie are not working.

Misty » 30 Sep 2018 2:04 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 29 Sep 2018 5:21 pm » wrote:I didn't watch the hearings

Nuff said.
I am NOT interested in hearing anything about the hearings from a liar like you who gets his info from wingnut websites and regurgitates Trumplican Talking Point Lies.

Sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, a non-partisan third-party with more than 25 years’ experience prosecuting sex crimes in the state of Arizona, carefully reviewed the allegations made by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, including hours of testimony, and has released a report on the matter. In the report, Mitchell points out more than a dozen glaring inconsistencies in Dr. Ford’s account and paints the accusations as potentially fraudulent.
Mitchell’s points out several points, including:
“Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened.”

“Dr. Ford struggled to identify Judge Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.”

“When speaking with her husband, Dr. Ford changed her description of the incident to become less specific.”

“Dr. Ford has no memory of key details of the night in question—details that could help corroborate her account.”

“She does not remember in what house the alleged assault took place or where that house was located with any specificity.”

“Perhaps most importantly, she does not remember how she got from the party back to her house.”

Rachel Mitchell reaches the conclusion that ““A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that.”




Rachel Mitchell sums up her report on Page 2, in saying “I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/0 ... ew-report/

Termin8tor » 01 Oct 2018 8:38 pm » wrote:

Misty » 29 Sep 2018 3:17 pm » wrote:

First of all, when did she say that she was too scared to fly?
Do you have an exact quote?

I don't recall if it was under oath, but yes, she did say that.

Lucifershammer » 14 Sep 2018 10:18 pm » wrote:Isn't this cute.. I've convinced enough people to ignore little Ricky to the point his Friday night drunks gets almost no response. . You're welcome

Cannonpointer » 01 Oct 2018 11:53 pm » wrote: You're taking credit for lil ricky's own hard work.

Misty » 01 Oct 2018 11:26 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 01 Oct 2018 8:38 pm » wrote:
I don't recall if it was under oath, but yes, she did say that.

You know why you 'don't recall' jackass?

Because...........



If you had you would know what she said about flying.
So STFU.

Your boy Kavanaugh lied through his teeth under oath about EVERYTHING, but you've been ignoring that fact and whining about what Dr. Ford may or may not have said about her fear of flying for days.