I own that I post things that I think are funny.Cedar » 06 Oct 2018 6:34 am » wrote:If you post someone else’s tweet, you own the sentiment, unless posting it as evidence of something you don’t agree with, as you do with Donald’s tweets.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 1:09 am » wrote:I'm not saying anything.
That is not my Tweet.
I just thought the Devil's Triangle reference was funny.
BTW, Susan Collins did not believe in due process for Al Franken.
He asked that the Ethics Committee do an investigation, but she called for his immediate resignation.
No due process for him.
Kavanaugh's nomination should have been pulled even before Dr. Ford made her accustions because of the amount of times he perjured himself during his confirmation hearing.
Own that ****.
So no comment on the fact that your Dear Cult 45 Leader defended a serial rapist like Bill Clinton and smeared his accusers?Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 9:39 am » wrote:Yup.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 12:49 am » wrote:Shazzam your post is now in the Peanut Gallery.
You know who defended Clinton and smeared his accusers jackass?
So riddle me this jackass........Reality Check: Did Hillary Clinton attack her husband's accusers?
Juanita Broaddrick
One of the women, Juanita Broaddrick, had accused Bill Clinton of raping her in 1978 when he was attorney general of Arkansas.
Broaddrick's allegation that Hillary Clinton warned her to remain silent about the rape stems from an encounter she had with Hillary Clinton at a fund raiser that same year.
In an interview with the website, Breitbart, last week, Broaddrick recalled how Hillary Clinton held her hand and said to her, "I just want you to know how much Bill and I appreciate the things you do for him.
Do you understand? Everything you do."
Broaddrick told Breitbart: "What really went through my mind at that time is 'She knows. She knew.
She's covering it up and she expects me to do the very same thing."
![]()
Broaddrick did not initially report the alleged assault to law enforcement, but she did make the claim in interviews with the Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and The New York Times.
Years later, she was subpoenaed to testify in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.
As part of her testimony, she signed an affidavit denying that Clinton sexually assaulted her.
She later recanted that denial when interviewed by investigators from Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's office.
But, House managers chose not to call her as a witness in the case to impeach President Bill Clinton.
In a February 1999 NBC interview, correspondent Lisa Myers asked Broaddrick, "did Bill Clinton or anyone near him ever threaten you, try to intimidate you, do anything to keep you silent?"
Broaddrick answered: "no."
Does that image bother you taintsmear?Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 12:36 pm » wrote:Smears and defamatory lies aren't funny, psycho.
"Go ahead and rape our daughters?" "Girls should shut up?"
Ha.
You're **** deranged.
OMFG!Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 8:26 am » wrote:Given that he was a businessman and likely didn't read conservative media, he likely believed the leftist propaganda in the corrupt liberal MSM that covered up his rape and abuse of women.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 12:49 am » wrote:You know who defended Clinton and smeared his accusers jackass?
Looks like he was a big fan of Clinton's, huh Puss?![]()
![]()
It was quite difficult to get the facts at that time.
Yeah because it's not like that whole impeachment thing was covered on TV.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 8:26 am » wrote:It was quite difficult to get the facts at that time.

Need to get the attention of a moderator so I have to break my absence from this thread.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 1:02 pm » wrote:OMFG!Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 8:26 am » wrote:Given that he was a businessman and likely didn't read conservative media, he likely believed the leftist propaganda in the corrupt liberal MSM that covered up his rape and abuse of women.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 12:49 am » wrote:You know who defended Clinton and smeared his accusers jackass?
Looks like he was a big fan of Clinton's, huh Puss?![]()
![]()
It was quite difficult to get the facts at that time.
You really outdid yourself with that crap you sycophantic lickspittle.
The Clintons were his friends jackass.
They went to his wedding.
And 45 was not a 'business man.'
He was and still is a con artist/fraud/ grifter.
Yeah because it's not like that whole impeachment thing was covered on TV.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 8:26 am » wrote:It was quite difficult to get the facts at that time.
When Hillary and Donald Were Friends
Donald Trump, Bill and Hillary Clinton and Melania Trump at the Trumps’ wedding reception, in January 2005.
Are you stupid, blind or lying? The corrupt liberal MSM were covering up his rapes, assaults, etc.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 1:02 pm » wrote:OMFG!Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 8:26 am » wrote:Given that he was a businessman and likely didn't read conservative media, he likely believed the leftist propaganda in the corrupt liberal MSM that covered up his rape and abuse of women.
It was quite difficult to get the facts at that time.
You really outdid yourself with that crap you sycophantic lickspittle.
The Clintons were his friends jackass.
They went to his wedding.
Yeah, that's the Democrat Talking Point Lie that you claim to never tell.And 45 was not a 'business man.'
He was and still is a con artist/fraud/ grifter.
I have no idea. Maybe he hadn't decided to run for president yet.Yeah because it's not like that whole impeachment thing was covered on TV.
Donald Trump, Bill and Hillary Clinton and Melania Trump at the Trumps’ wedding reception, in January 2005.
Quite a few of his old drinking buddies say that he was a stumbling fall down belligerent drunk.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 8:29 am » wrote:Wow, Kavanaugh is a drunk?Misty » 06 Oct 2018 5:03 am » wrote:Will a mean drunk seek revenge?
Got any evidence that's true?
Other than that one appearance when he was angry at being falsely accused of many horrific acts including setting up gang rapes, do you have any evidence he's mean?
They can't seem to get their story straight on this one.The Many Mysteries of Brett Kavanaugh’s Finances
Before President Donald Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, he had a lot of debt.
In May 2017, he reported owing between $60,004 and $200,000 on three credit cards and a loan against his retirement account.
By the time Trump nominated him to the high court in July 2018, those debts had vanished.
Overall, his reported income and assets didn’t seem sufficient to pay off all that debt while maintaining his upper-class lifestyle: an expensive house in an exclusive suburban neighborhood, two kids in a $10,500-a-year private school, and a membership in a posh country club reported to charge $92,000 in initiation fees.
His financial disclosure forms have raised more questions than they’ve answered, leading to speculation about whether he’s had a private benefactor and what sorts of conflicts that relationship might entail.
Hey wackjob, you called him a drunk. He's been sober for 36 years, you imbecile.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 1:32 pm » wrote:Quite a few of his old drinking buddies say that he was a stumbling fall down belligerent drunk.Wow, Kavanaugh is a drunk?
Got any evidence that's true?
Other than that one appearance when he was angry at being falsely accused of many horrific acts including setting up gang rapes, do you have any evidence he's mean?
No, you're making a "joke:" i.e. ugly leftist lies disguised as "humor."
Psychopath.
Kavanaugh himself referred to his crowd as a bunch loud obnoxious drunks with prolific pukers among them.
A new lie? No, not until you provide evidence that he committed perjury by denying he drank to excess.Now would you like to talk about what happened to all of his debts Puss?
I'm sure it was the Russians who paid it off. The ones Trump colluded with.So riddle me this Puss......
How did Kavanaugh manage to make all of that debt suddenly disappear?
You really thought he accidentally fell of, dim?Misty » 06 Oct 2018 12:07 pm » wrote:Can't stop watching this.
Raymond Arroyo and Laura Ingraham decided to taunt the libs over the impending confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh by cracking open a couple cold Bud Lights to celebrate.
It didn't work out that well for Arroyo.
Now they claim his fall was intentional.
Right.
He hired a magician, wackjob.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 1:32 pm » wrote: So riddle me this Puss......
How did Kavanaugh manage to make all of that debt suddenly disappear?
****.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 1:11 pm » wrote:Are you stupid, blind or lying? The corrupt liberal MSM were covering up his rapes, assaults, etc.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 1:02 pm » wrote:OMFG!Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 8:26 am » wrote:Given that he was a businessman and likely didn't read conservative media, he likely believed the leftist propaganda in the corrupt liberal MSM that covered up his rape and abuse of women.It was quite difficult to get the facts at that time.
You really outdid yourself with that crap you sycophantic lickspittle.
The Clintons were his friends jackass.
They went to his wedding.

That's not a talking point jackass.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 1:11 pm » wrote:Yeah, that's the Democrat Talking Point Lie that you claim to never tell.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 1:02 pm » wrote:And 45 was not a 'business man.'
He was and still is a con artist/fraud/ grifter.![]()
That is the truest thing you have ever said.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 1:11 pm » wrote:I have no idea.
So you can't explain how he managed to make hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt vanish overnight.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 1:55 pm » wrote:He hired a magician, wackjob.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 1:32 pm » wrote:So riddle me this Puss......
How did Kavanaugh manage to make all of that debt suddenly disappear?
A lifetime with a black cloud over his head and an asterisk next to his name.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 1:55 pm » wrote:Lifetime appointment.
Same reason Anita Hill was at the Clarence Thomas hearing.Cedar » 06 Oct 2018 6:39 am » wrote:If it was a job interview why was Lyin’ Dr Ford there?Ricky Tavy » 06 Oct 2018 1:33 am » wrote:I thought I would point out to all those who continue to say they want things run according a Constitution they clearly do not understand, there is no guarantee of "due process" when applying for a job. There is also no guarantee that preppie white males will not have their lives "ruined" by not getting a particular job, as opposed to what having a life ruined means to those less entitled.
OIC, due process is only for Trumplicans.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 8:37 am » wrote:Franken admitted many of the incidents, and there was a picture of him doing something rather rude. That wouldn't have been a big deal had he been 17, but he was a Senator at the time.Misty » 06 Oct 2018 1:09 am » wrote:BTW, Susan Collins did not believe in due process for Al Franken.
He asked that the Ethics Committee do an investigation, but she called for his immediate resignation.
No due process for him.
So why did there have to be due process, wackjob?
I don't know about that Puss.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 12:36 pm » wrote:Smears and defamatory lies aren't funny, psycho.
I'm so tickled that my Siggy gets under your thin skin so bad.Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2018 12:36 pm » wrote:
"Go ahead and rape our daughters?" "Girls should shut up?"
Ha.
You're **** deranged.
Cut it out MM.
Which thread are you talking about?Huey » 06 Oct 2018 1:07 pm » wrote:Hi Misty. I see you are posting. You might want to look into this. You might, although I doubt it, have a serious security breach. Remember, I have screen shots.
Hi Misty.
Please put on your moderator hat. Could you please explain how a thread I did no create, with OP I did not create, with a title I did not create shows me as the the thread starter? See, this thread appears to be termin8tors thread where someone changed the title. Remember, the title can be changed all day long. But posts have a header with the name of the thread on it when a post is made.
So, either someone hacked my account ((not likely due to the presence of other thread titles) OR a moderator changed the thread title and deleted posts and edited an OP.
Any explanation would be appreciated. And since it looks as if I created this thread I am not giving permission to change it just yet. I do have screen shots.