Liberal Forum

Misty » 07 Oct 2018 2:19 pm » wrote:

Huey » 07 Oct 2018 1:43 pm » wrote:And yet, you took it upon yourself to change the thread title.
At least twice. Even after told not to touch it.

You mean in the thread that you did not create?

Huey » 07 Oct 2018 12:38 am » wrote:How many more times you gonna abuse your powers, daddy’s little **** doll?
I did not create this thread. The bitch did.

Huey » 07 Oct 2018 12:32 am » wrote:Get the **** out my face, daddy’s **** doll. I did not start the thread in question.l, whore.

Huey » 07 Oct 2018 12:25 am » wrote:I did not start this thread.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 11:53 pm » wrote:Sorry, jo, no I don’t. I did not create the thread in question.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 11:10 pm » wrote:I did not start the thread in question.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 10:42 pm » wrote:Nope, I did not create the thread in Question.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 10:12 pm » wrote:I did NOT create that thread. Was daddy not good enough for you?

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 10:00 pm » wrote:I did not start that thread Jo. Got that, daddy’s **** doll?

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 9:58 pm » wrote:I did not start this thread.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 9:51 pm » wrote:Someone created a thread under my name.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 9:38 pm » wrote:Take my name off that thread, bitch. I did not create it you lying psycho.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 9:27 pm » wrote:Bitch, I started no thread that you are referring to. **** you loser. You abused your powers.
I am going to google ads to report this ****, Bitch, ya **** daddy **** piece of ****.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 9:24 pm » wrote:It is obvious I did not create that thread, Joanne Mc.
You are abusing your powers

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 9:21 pm » wrote:Cannon, get your psycho senior mod in check before you lose what little advertising dollars you receive. She has created a thread and put my name to it. I will go to google and let them know what a **** psycho she is.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 9:09 pm » wrote:I did not create that thread.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 3:44 pm » wrote:Hi Misty. How was this thread “created”? The evidence points to it being Clem’s thread discussing how you abused your moderator powers. Suddenly it appears with a new title and me as the thread starter.

Huey » 06 Oct 2018 3:22 pm » wrote:Misty, as a moderator can you explain how this post has this as a header “Re: I can’t post this because the senior moderator is abusing her powers”, the title of a thread Clem started earlier?

*************************

Huey » 07 Oct 2018 12:11 am » wrote:Only daddy can **** you like that.

Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 8:00 pm » wrote:

Misty » 07 Oct 2018 6:54 pm » wrote:
You're always whining that I won't debate you and then you post **** like that, so stop pretending that you are looking for serious debate.

I write 100 serious, substance filled posts, and one joke, so you pretend you didn't see the serious answers, but jump all over the joke.
Do you actually think you're fooling anyone?

You wrote 100 serious substance filled posts on how Kavanaugh managed to pay off a huge amount of debt almost overnight?
Where?
On this forum?


That is your answer for everything.
I wrote about that, you just haven't seen it.
You lying sack of ****.

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 11:14 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 8:00 pm » wrote:

Misty » 07 Oct 2018 6:54 pm » wrote:
You're always whining that I won't debate you and then you post **** like that, so stop pretending that you are looking for serious debate.

I write 100 serious, substance filled posts, and one joke, so you pretend you didn't see the serious answers, but jump all over the joke.
Do you actually think you're fooling anyone?

You wrote 100 serious substance filled posts on how Kavanaugh managed to pay off a huge amount of debt almost overnight?
Where?
On this forum?


That is your answer for everything.
I wrote about that, you just haven't seen it.
You lying sack of ****.

He wrote them on the walls of his looney bin cell..

Cannonpointer » 07 Oct 2018 8:10 pm » wrote:

Misty » 06 Oct 2018 12:49 am » wrote:Shazzam your post is now in the Peanut Gallery.
You know who defended Clinton and smeared his accusers jackass?
Looks like he was a big fan of Clinton's, huh Puss?

Most of us were - got my vote twice.
Con artists are generally very charming, and it's only AFTER the con that their victims dislike them.
Here's a thought exercise, to help you understand. Pretend clinton has an R after his name.
See that? Hes a rotten ****, ain't he?

If Clinton had an R after his name, Clem would be defending him just like he defends every pervert, child molester and sexual assaulter with an R after their name.

The point of my post was that I have been bashed by Clem for over ten years for 'defending a serial rapist' and 'smearing his victims' (his words) but Clem's dear leader gets a pass on defending Clinton as 'the real victim' and smearing his accusers by calling them 'terrible' and 'unattractive,' something I never did.

For the Clem the Trump toady, it's okay when his Cult 45 leader does it.

I see you added even more to my avatar.
Is that a blow up doll emoticon?

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 11:14 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 8:00 pm » wrote:I write 100 serious, substance filled posts, and one joke, so you pretend you didn't see the serious answers, but jump all over the joke.

Do you actually think you're fooling anyone?

You wrote 100 serious substance filled posts on how Kavanaugh managed to pay off a huge amount of debt almost overnight?
Where?
On this forum?


That is your answer for everything.
I wrote about that, you just haven't seen it.
You lying sack of ****.

So you're going Full Psycho again, telling obvious lies.

I never claimed to have written 100 responses about his finances nor would an honest person claim I had.

If you truly are this utterly stupid, you shouldn't be commenting on issues, psycho.

You don't have one single shred of evidence that Kavanaugh has been "bought," just like you lack actual evidence for any of your other ugly smears of him.

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 11:29 am » wrote: If Clinton had an R after his name, Clem would be defending him just like he defends every pervert, child molester and sexual assaulter with an R after their name.

Name one single time I've defended a Republican rapist, like you lied for years in defense of Clinton, psycho.

And smeared his victim and her witnesses.

Huey » 07 Oct 2018 8:51 pm » wrote:

Cannonpointer » 07 Oct 2018 8:43 pm » wrote:

Huey » 07 Oct 2018 8:33 pm » wrote:Don’t know Bludog. But shouldn’t Misty recuse herself? That what they request Justice Thomas and now Justice Kavanaugh do.

Given her hatred of our Flag and her Marxist tendencies, she should blow herself up with a sooey side vest at the statute of liberdy. But she ain't gonna do it. She's probably not even a cutter.
She punishes herself by horing around and being Daddy's Little **** Doll.

Fine. She is the forums perennial victim.

Says the person with a long list of whiny threads.
I ain't nobody's **** victim Chuckles.
Least of all yours.

Has anyone 'created' any threads and put your name on them today?

Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 8:54 pm » wrote:

Cannonpointer » 07 Oct 2018 8:28 pm » wrote:On another note, what the demoncrats did was dirty, and I laugh at their failure - BUT...Kavanaugh lied under oath, and should have been scrubbed for it. Yes, the circumstances were slimy.
But he lied. Under oath. We can do better. We MUST do better. His confirmation will always be a cause for schadenfreude, never be a cause for celebration or pride.

So what was it lied about, his brand of beer?
What boofus means?
Denying throwing ice?
I'm sure it was of huge importance.

Well it wasn't as important as Dr. Ford 'lying' about her front door, which seems to be consuming you today.


He lied under oath BEFORE the whole Ford incident, about very important issues, but you prefer to remain willfully ignorant on that subject.

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 11:39 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 8:54 pm » wrote:So what was it lied about, his brand of beer?

What boofus means?

Denying throwing ice?

I'm sure it was of huge importance.

Well it wasn't as important as Dr. Ford 'lying' about her front door, which seems to be consuming you today.

If she lied about it, her entire story falls apart. The door was the supposed reason she went to couple therapy where supposedly she revealed how she was assaulted.

And this isn't contradicted by some wackjob like the ridiculous gang rape story was. It was her husband's sworn testimony that destroyed her accusation.

He lied under oath BEFORE the whole Ford incident, about very important issues, but you prefer to remain willfully ignorant on that subject.

And still not one single shred of evidence to back up your endless smears.

Termin8tor » 08 Oct 2018 11:33 am » wrote:

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 11:29 am » wrote:If Clinton had an R after his name, Clem would be defending him just like he defends every pervert, child molester and sexual assaulter with an R after their name.

Name one single time I've defended a Republican rapist, like you lied for years in defense of Clinton, psycho.
And smeared his victim and her witnesses.

I don't even know who her supposed witnesses were, so how could I smear them?

Why are you allowed to call any woman who accuses a Republican a liar, but I am not allowed to question a woman's story when she did not report the incident at the time, only came forward after 21 years, swore under oath that it never happened, and changed her story several times?

Tell me that if a woman who did that was accusing a Republican, you would automatically believe her and call that Republican 'rapist.'

Go ahead.
I dare you, taintsmear.

Termin8tor » 08 Oct 2018 11:32 am » wrote:

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 11:14 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 8:00 pm » wrote:I write 100 serious, substance filled posts, and one joke, so you pretend you didn't see the serious answers, but jump all over the joke.
Do you actually think you're fooling anyone?

You wrote 100 serious substance filled posts on how Kavanaugh managed to pay off a huge amount of debt almost overnight?
Where?
On this forum?

That is your answer for everything.
I wrote about that, you just haven't seen it.
You lying sack of ****.

So you're going Full Psycho again, telling obvious lies.
I never claimed to have written 100 responses about his finances nor would an honest person claim I had.

We were talking about his finances jackass, so answer the **** question.
How did he manage to pay off so much debt, which he had carried for years, almost overnight?

Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 10:14 pm » wrote:

Cannonpointer » 07 Oct 2018 8:59 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 8:54 pm » wrote:So what was it lied about, his brand of beer?
What boofus means?
Denying throwing ice?
I'm sure it was of huge importance.

There were several lies - you named two of them. I was very sorry to see him lie - I don't feel like sitting here and picking through his testimony and listing all of them.
Pretend he's a democrat that lied under oath.
See that?
Yeah - you see it.

No, I don't see any lies......

Try opening your **** eyes.
I guess it is better to remain willfully ignorant, which is what you did.

Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 10:14 pm » wrote:...and if some liberal judge of high character made some minor mis-statement about a microscopic issue, I'd cut them slack.

Says the pinhead who wants to see Dr. Ford charged with perjury because his favorite wingnut rag, the gatewaypundit told him that she lied about her front door.

Termin8tor » 08 Oct 2018 11:43 am » wrote:

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 11:39 am » wrote:He lied under oath BEFORE the whole Ford incident, about very important issues, but you prefer to remain willfully ignorant on that subject.

And still not one single shred of evidence to back up your endless smears.

I wrote about in my Flying Monkeys thread, you just refuse to look at it.

So how do you like it when your own tactics are turned on you?

And speaking of evidence, when are you going to fork some over for your filthy lie?

When are you going to post the EVIDENCE that I accused Kavanaugh of rape, you filthy, insufferable, lying degenerate taintsmear?

Termin8tor » 19 Sep 2018 4:21 pm » wrote:

Misty » 19 Sep 2018 4:14 pm » wrote:Oh please, spare me the ****.

You mean like you denying that you accused Kavanaugh of rape, when in fact you did?

You have one gigantic set of balls to call anyone else a liar.
Much like your Cult 45 leader, you lie as easily as you breathe.

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 11:45 am » wrote:
I don't even know who her supposed witnesses were, so how could I smear them?

Thanks for making my point, psycho. You didn't care at all who they were or if their accounts were accurate.

Any more than you cared if Clinton raped Broaddrock.

...Miss Broaddrick and her so-called witnesses were likely on Richard Mellon Scaife's payroll

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 12:04 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 08 Oct 2018 11:43 am » wrote:And still not one single shred of evidence to back up your endless smears.

I wrote about in my Flying Monkeys thread, you just refuse to look at it.

So how do you like it when your own tactics are turned on you?

My "tactics" aren't lying through my teeth, psycho.

I've been in that thread, read your nonexistent "evidence" and noted that you have none.

All you have are your false accusations.

I don't expect anyone to accept my word, so I cite actual evidence, like the reference to Ford's husband's testimony that you keep censoring.

You have one gigantic set of balls to call anyone else a liar.
Much like your Cult 45 leader, you lie as easily as you breathe.

Full Pyscho again.


You aren't enjoying Trump's huge success as president, are you.

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 11:56 am » wrote:

Says the pinhead who wants to see Dr. Ford charged with perjury because his favorite wingnut rag, the gatewaypundit told him that she lied about her front door.

It has nothing to do with what Gateway "said."

They cited Ford's husband's testimony.

Was Gateway lying? Fabricating evidence?

Termin8tor » 08 Oct 2018 12:42 pm » wrote:Yadda, Yadda, yadda.

Way too much chatter in here today and not enough jokes.

Now go to my Flying Monkeys thread and answer the question that you totally ignored even after you replied to 4 of my posts after this one.

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 10:13 am » wrote:On Saturday the POTUS said this in Topeka, Kansas:

“Every single Democrat in the U.S. Senate has signed up for the open borders – and it’s a bill.
And it’s called The Open Borders Bill. What’s going on? And it’s written by – guess who – Dianne Feinstein.”

I have Googled it and I can't seem to find any such bill written by Feinstein or any other Democrat.
Can you find me a link for that Puss?

It couldn't possibly be that he was lying about that, could it?

Please find me a link to the 'Open Borders Bill' written by Diane Feinstein.

Misty » 08 Oct 2018 12:49 pm » wrote: Way too much chatter in here today and not enough jokes.

Speaking of hilarious humor, am I still an anti-semite for simply mentioning George Soros's name?

What should I call him if I'm not allowed to use his name, psychopath?