Liberal Forum

Misty » 28 Jan 2019 8:32 pm » wrote: The House gets to work on hearings tomorrow.
Armed Services Committee investigating 45's deployment of troops to the Southern border.

That and 6 bucks will get you a coffee at starbuckies.

45 keeps talking about women being gagged and tied up and driven across the border in the back of vehicles that are stronger, bigger and faster than either ICE or border patrol have.
He also talks about the Border Patrol finding prayer rugs in the desert.

Human-trafficking experts have said they are perplexed by this increasingly repeated story in Trump’s repertoire — and are at a loss for where he got his information. It was not from them, they say; in fact, they have no idea what he is talking about.

Border experts have told reporters that they’ve never heard of anything like what Trump is talking about.

Turns out all of those things are plot points in a movie called Sicario Day Of The Soldado.
WTF?
Did he see all that stuff in a movie and think it was real?

crimsongulf » 28 Jan 2019 8:34 pm » wrote:

Misty » 28 Jan 2019 8:32 pm » wrote:The House gets to work on hearings tomorrow.
Armed Services Committee investigating 45's deployment of troops to the Southern border.

That and 6 bucks will get you a coffee at starbuckies.

I would never drink that swill.

Misty » 28 Jan 2019 8:54 pm » wrote: I would never drink that swill.

Well, I honestly don't know, I have never had one n my life. their CEO sure has the Dems wadded up.

Love the Colonel.

crimsongulf » 28 Jan 2019 8:58 pm » wrote:

Misty » 28 Jan 2019 8:54 pm » wrote:I would never drink that swill.

Well, I honestly don't know, I have never had one n my life. their CEO sure has the Dems wadded up.

I've never even seen a Starbucks around here.
I tried it once when I lived in NYC.
Never went back.
I am a Dunkin' Donuts girl.

Why shouldn't Dems be upset about Schultz?
They've been down that road before with 3rd party candidates.

He's just another billionaire with an overinflated ego.

crimsongulf » 28 Jan 2019 8:58 pm » wrote:
Well, I honestly don't know, I have never had one n my life. their CEO sure has the Dems wadded up.

Schultz is a third party RINGER for the Rethugs!

Misty » 28 Jan 2019 10:32 pm » wrote:

crimsongulf » 28 Jan 2019 8:58 pm » wrote:

Misty » 28 Jan 2019 8:54 pm » wrote:I would never drink that swill.

Well, I honestly don't know, I have never had one n my life. their CEO sure has the Dems wadded up.

I've never even seen a Starbucks around here.
I tried it once when I lived in NYC.
Never went back.
I am a Dunkin' Donuts girl.

Why shouldn't Dems be upset about Schultz?
They've been down that road before with 3rd party candidates.

He's just another billionaire with an overinflated ego.

I just recently bought a package of Starbucks Italian dark roast coffee beans. I hand grind them, and use the pour over, drip method. Makes pretty good coffee.

Misty » 28 Jan 2019 5:19 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 28 Jan 2019 1:12 pm » wrote:"I never called those teenagers racist!" little Miss Marxist lied.

That's exactly what Hillary Clinton meant by the term.

I don't give a **** what she meant.
The word deplorable is not synonymous with racist.

****. You and all of us know that you mean it in the ugliest, Clinton-created sense of the term.

But when you're revealed as a smear artist it's,"Oh gosh, I never meant it that way!"

You can't tell the truth to save your sad little wackjob life.

I use it as a generic term for a certain type of Trump supporter.
You know, the sycophantic lickspittles like you.

I praise Trump when he deserves it and criticize him when he deserves that.

A real "lickspittle is someone who told years of lies in defense of a serial felon / serial rapist.


And denied every single major scandal and abuse of power Obama committed or allowed to be committed.

Do you have

Misty » 28 Jan 2019 10:32 pm » wrote: I've never even seen a Starbucks around here.
I tried it once when I lived in NYC.
Never went back.
I am a Dunkin' Donuts girl.

Why shouldn't Dems be upset about Schultz?
They've been down that road before with 3rd party candidates.

He's just another billionaire with an overinflated ego.

If not for Perot, there would have been no Clinton dynasty. Actually, Schultz makes far more sense and would have a much better chance in the general if the dems nominated him. At this point in the Dem debacle, Biden is about the only one that could beat Trump or Pence.

crimsongulf » 29 Jan 2019 9:54 am » wrote:
If not for Perot, there would have been no Clinton dynasty. Actually, Schultz makes far more sense and would have a much better chance in the general if the dems nominated him. At this point in the Dem debacle, Biden is about the only one that could beat Trump or Pence.

Joe Gaff is way too old! Voters want younger, fresh faces!

And no more Niquas!

nuckin futz » 29 Jan 2019 10:59 am » wrote:
Joe Gaff is way too old! Voters want younger, fresh faces!

And no more Niquas!

For Dems to win nationally, they had better get off this hard left dumbalina nonsense the "young fresh faces" are spouting.

crimsongulf » 29 Jan 2019 11:36 am » wrote:
For Dems to win nationally, they had better get off this hard left dumbalina nonsense the "young fresh faces" are spouting.

Well, that Cortez twat is way out there, that's for sure, but there are more moderate candidates popping up daily.

And that Schultz gazillionaire is a " Rethug plot to divide up the vote and make sure Mr. T gets in.

No more billionaires! "Just say NO!"

Sims was a Special Assistant to the President and Director of White House Message Strategy who spent 500 days in the WH.

crimsongulf » 29 Jan 2019 11:36 am » wrote:For Dems to win nationally, they had better get off this hard left dumbalina nonsense the "young fresh faces" are spouting.

So you think Trump has a chance to win nationally this time with less than 1/3 of the country supporting him?
He has probably lost all the Dems that crossed over and voted for him last time, and most of the Independents.

Misty » 29 Jan 2019 2:40 pm » wrote: So you think Trump has a chance to win nationally this time with less than 1/3 of the country supporting him?
He has probably lost all the Dems that crossed over and voted for him last time, and most of the Independents.

Absolutely he has almost two years to go, if Dems didn't think he was formidable they wouldn't be **** their pants over the Starbucks guy.

crimsongulf » 29 Jan 2019 2:48 pm » wrote:

Misty » 29 Jan 2019 2:40 pm » wrote:So you think Trump has a chance to win nationally this time with less than 1/3 of the country supporting him?
He has probably lost all the Dems that crossed over and voted for him last time, and most of the Independents.

Absolutely he has almost two years to go, if Dems didn't think he was formidable they wouldn't be **** their pants over the Starbucks guy.

Dems/Libs were so traumatized by his win last time that they are terrified of anyone who will siphon off even one vote from them.

Global Waming
**** dotard.

So this happened last June.

Misty » 06 Jun 2018 4:49 pm » wrote:**** deer did a number on our brand new car.
We've only had it for a month.
Needs a whole new hood.

And now today my husband was at the stop sign right before you go through the gate to our community and one of the community snow plows backed into him.
We have no luck with this car.