Misty » 03 Aug 2017 1:28 am » wrote:
I go after Misty because of her hatred for Trump predating him running for president. Asked for reasons she was unable to come up with any reasonable facts. She was angry that when he was in charge of a beauty pagent he went into the dressing room when they were dressing for the gown judging. He asked if they needed anything. In Misty's mind they were nude!!! At most some might have still been in undergarments but not nude. Misty just looks for something to hate him for. Reality means nothing to her!!!indago » 03 Aug 2017 2:54 pm » wrote:You sure are after Misty today, OlFuk: you must be wanting a sniff...
What are you talking about?roadkill » 03 Aug 2017 7:21 pm » wrote:What was the "asshole" thing you use to do with pictures.
You think I've changed?roadkill » 03 Aug 2017 7:21 pm » wrote:I miss the old Misty. lol
Avoiding the issue again!!! You are the creepy one!!!
Nah, it isn't.
I refuse to ever stop laughing.O.E. » 04 Aug 2017 3:01 am » wrote:Nah, it isn't.
Let me start with a heart-felt "Thank You" to Misty for keeping this service to humanity going. At a time when giggles are scarce and occasions for disgust abound, this is sorely needed.
On the other hand, let's not forget about the invaluable contributions from the most sincere and honorable other contributors to these hallowed halls, namely, Termin8tor, roadkill, huey, and Sgt Bilko. Apologies to all those who thought it worthwhile to reiterate the "Uh, butt this are just cahtoons! Your demented!" accusation, whom I forgot. Among the occasions for belly-laughs and giggles, "Girls are torturing men with their looks", still stands out, and this thread wouldn't be what it is without you. So, a "Thank You" to all of you as well. The American Taliban sure have their valuable and valued representatives on here. Naturally, they're all goofs to whom even a smidgen of self-awareness would be a mortal threat. On the other hand, in a just world everyone ought to have every liberty to expose themselves for what they are, for all to see, and that, as it turns out, was the main function of this thread. Thanks, Misty!
You go, girl!
They didn't get everything they wanted, as they still miss the times when women knew their place, and they could chase ****** off the sidewalk. Also, they have yet to exact their revenge for years and years of fear from this powerful woman. They'll not be satisfied until she burns at the stake. Not to forget: The politically more astute among them (I know, I know) have by now probably realized that, out of sheer spite, they've elected what is best dubbed "a ludicrous catastrophe" at every level you care to name.Misty » 04 Aug 2017 3:17 am » wrote:I refuse to ever stop laughing.
Some people just don't get it.
What I don't understand is their anger.
They got everything they wanted, but they're still so **** angry.
You'd think it would kill them to crack a smile once in a while.
They will not accept any criticism of their Circus Peanut Messiah.
Then they call us snowflakes.
It is obvious you don't understand how the comments you make hurt and anger them!! When you trample on someone's heart felt beliefs that makes them angry!!!Misty » 04 Aug 2017 3:17 am » wrote: I refuse to ever stop laughing.
Some people just don't get it.
What I don't understand is their anger.
They got everything they wanted, but they're still so **** angry.
You'd think it would kill them to crack a smile once in a while.
They will not accept any criticism of their Circus Peanut Messiah.
Then they call us snowflakes.
From The Washington Post 12 October 2016:Sgt Bilko » 03 Aug 2017 5:58 pm » wrote: I go after Misty because of her hatred for Trump predating him running for president. Asked for reasons she was unable to come up with any reasonable facts. She was angry that when he was in charge of a beauty pagent he went into the dressing room when they were dressing for the gown judging. He asked if they needed anything. In Misty's mind they were nude!!! At most some might have still been in undergarments but not nude. Misty just looks for something to hate him for. Reality means nothing to her!!!
Notice her current avatar.
Huh? You're bitterly angry in most of your posts, psycho.Misty » 04 Aug 2017 3:17 am » wrote:I refuse to ever stop laughing.
Some people just don't get it.
What I don't understand is their anger.
They got everything they wanted, but they're still so **** angry.
Is there any stupid, false liberal cliche you missed, moonbat?O.E. » 04 Aug 2017 3:43 am » wrote:
They didn't get everything they wanted, as they still miss the times when women knew their place, and they could chase ****** off the sidewalk. Also, they have yet to exact their revenge for years and years of fear from this powerful woman. They'll not be satisfied until she burns at the stake.
Baloney.Not to forget: The politically more astute among them (I know, I know) have by now probably realized that, out of sheer spite, they've elected what is best dubbed "a ludicrous catastrophe" at every level you care to name.
The "little" people are the imbeciles who voted for the serial felon or that clueless leftist wackjob Bernie Sanders.All told, the little piddlers have ample reason to be angry, and they know no better than to inflict it on those in a position to tell them, "I told you so!"
Damning? What he did as a civilian was creepy and was flat out wrong, yes, but why all the condemnation of his prior life when no one of the left ever seemed to give the first **** about either Bill or Hillary's doings before they were in the national picture? Did Trump bite a girl's lip and then tell her to get some ice on it? "Oh, well that was never proven!"...ok. Believe that if it helps, but it's one of several examples. Why was there no condemnation from the left of Obama's prior life? Nothing there to condemn? Ok...believe that if it helps. And now here we are with a special counsel searching for something to indict Trump or his associates for while Hillary walks around unscathed after exposing classified material, over and over and over. It sure is good to be a democrat, right?indago » 04 Aug 2017 6:16 am » wrote:
From The Washington Post 12 October 2016:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless. Others girls were naked.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
article
"Well, I'll tell you the funniest is that I’ll go backstage before a show, and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else, and you know, no men are anywhere. And I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm inspecting it. You know, I'm inspecting, I want to make sure that everything is good.
You know, the dresses. ‘Is everyone okay?’ You know, they're standing there with no clothes. ‘Is everybody okay?’ And you see these incredible looking women, and so, I sort of get away with things like that."
Looks pretty damning to me...
Another But... but... what about... posting.larryc12 » 04 Aug 2017 8:47 am » wrote: Damning? What he did as a civilian was creepy and was flat out wrong, yes, but why all the condemnation of his prior life when no one of the left ever seemed to give the first **** about either Bill or Hillary's doings before they were in the national picture? Did Trump bite a girl's lip and then tell her to get some ice on it? "Oh, well that was never proven!"...ok. Believe that if it helps, but it's one of several examples. Why was there no condemnation from the left of Obama's prior life? Nothing there to condemn? Ok...believe that if it helps. And now here we are with a special counsel searching for something to indict Trump or his associates for while Hillary walks around unscathed after exposing classified material, over and over and over. It sure is good to be a democrat, right?
No, I didn't miss any point. You said what he did and said about it was "damning". OK, he ogled girls in a dressing room and you call that "damning". Think that of him if you so choose and I don't like what he did either, but should I be damning him, condemning him for that when the other side of the coin ignores all it has? I'm sorry, but I can't quite wrap my mind around that one-sidedness. Bill Clinton did far more "damning" things with women than did Trump - he just didn't admit to it like Trump has. What I said is not this "but...but...what about" like you want to characterize it. It's about double standards and the results of those double standards, and it goes beyond JUST double standards as we witness right now. Is it not evident to you that the special counsel on Trump and the election without the same for Hillary and her unlawful handling of classified information is subversion of the rule of law in this country? I didn't vote for Trump, but I don't know what he could have done that measures up to exposing Top Secret information to the world, yet he is the one being investigated while Hillary walks away unscathed. That's not a but...but....it's about our Constitution and the rule of law it provides. You ought to be just as concerned about that as I.indago » 04 Aug 2017 9:38 am » wrote:
Another But... but... what about... posting.
You missed the point...