Liberal Forum

crimsongulf » 30 Jan 2019 8:00 pm » wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YEhNHNydIs

Soooooo, **** is right!

Bernie Sanders: Bolshevik Party Boy
PAUL KENGOR
Amazing footage has been posted by the veteran left-wing magazine, Forward. The video comes from Bernie Sanders’ honeymoon to the Soviet Union in 1988, along with his bride and other officials from Burlington, Vermont, where he was mayor. The footage shows a literally shirtless Bernie partying like a frat boy and swilling booze with the Bolshies while singing — what else, eh? — comrade Woody Guthrie’s collectivist classic, “This Land Is Your Land.”
.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1089879769477459975
https://twitter.com/mgranville1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
https://spectator.org/bernie-bolshevik-party-boy/

Misty » 30 Jan 2019 10:45 am » wrote:So this happened last June.

Misty » 06 Jun 2018 4:49 pm » wrote:**** deer did a number on our brand new car.
We've only had it for a month.
Needs a whole new hood.

And now today my husband was at the stop sign right before you go through the gate to our community and one of the community snow plows backed into him.
We have no luck with this car.

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 2:55 pm » wrote:Given that my last post is absolutely hilarious, I dare you to take it down!

Russia and China are capable of launching cyberattacks that could disrupt electric grids and gas pipelines in the US, according to a new government report the intelligence community delivered to the Senate Intelligence Committee Tuesday.

The yearly Worldwide Threat Assessment report shows that the two nations pose the greatest threat for espionage and cyberattacks.

According to one warning in the report, "China has the ability to launch cyberattacks that cause localized, temporary disruptive effects on critical infrastructure — such as disruption of a natural gas pipeline for days to weeks — in the United States."

The report also says that Moscow is staging cyberattack assets to disrupt or damage US civilian and military infrastructure during a crisis.

https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/national-s ... nts-notice

Misty » 01 Feb 2019 3:09 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 2:55 pm » wrote:Given that my last post is absolutely hilarious, I dare you to take it down!

You dared me jackass.

Nothing funny about that.

I guess what your brilliant source did not tell you is that both Russia and China have the ability to shut down our power grids.

It was in the Worldwide Threat Assessment report that Trump's Intel chiefs testified about this week.
You know, the hearing that 45 says the DNI told him was 'FAKE News.'
I'm sure that is exactly what Dan Coats told him, right Precious?



So you laughed at Rachel Maddow for telling the truth.
You need to stop using that lying **** website gatewaypundit as a legitimate source.

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 3:21 pm » wrote:Oh give me a break. It's the job of those government officials to worry about conceivable threats that could happen at some point in the future.

Coats also described one type of cyber threat with particular specificity: “China has the ability to launch cyber attacks that cause localized, temporary disruptive effects on critical infrastructure—such as disruption of a natural gas pipeline for days to weeks.”

Coats discussed Russia’s ability to use cyber tactics to successfully attack domestic critical infrastructure, such as disrupting the electric grid, and he emphasized Russia’s previous cyber attacks against Ukraine’s electric infrastructure in 2015 and 2016 as evidence of Russia’s capability and willingness to do so.

Misty » 01 Feb 2019 3:41 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 3:21 pm » wrote:Oh give me a break. It's the job of those government officials to worry about conceivable threats that could happen at some point in the future

It's Madcow's job to shovel **** to her moonbat audience.

Ol' Rachie started her show asking,"What would happen if all the gas lines that serve Sioux Falls just poofed, blah, blah, blah.....What would you do?"

Given Madcow's endless hysterical **** about nonexistent Russian collusion, this is part of a pattern of sensational and often fictional lunacy.

Do you think any of those defense officials would have addressed the country that way?

You are a **** moron.

The DNI was not 'worried' about something that 'could' conceivably happen in the future.
The Worldwide Threat Assessment report is just what it sounds like.
An assessment of the threats that are currently facing the U.S..


China HAS the ability, not will have, HAS, present tense.


Got that Precious?
Russia HAS the ability to successfully attack our electric grid.
Not in the future, but NOW.

Intel Chiefs Testify on Global Threats, Cybersecurity and Elections

Any more lies jackass?

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 4:07 pm » wrote:

Misty » 01 Feb 2019 3:41 pm » wrote:Any more lies jackass?

My son was involved in building a facility that is EMP proof, so spare me the silly hysteria.
China and Russia have, gasp, the ability to nuke us, so why they bother destroying pipeline in South Dakota?

Misty » 01 Feb 2019 4:28 pm » wrote: If you had actually watched the segment on Maddow's show, you would know that she did not only talk about a pipeline in South Dakota.

But instead of searching for the actual truth, you post a bunch of **** and lies from wingnut websites that are full of ****.

I guess you don't mind looking like a lying idiot.

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 4:31 pm » wrote:

Misty » 01 Feb 2019 4:28 pm » wrote:If you had actually watched the segment on Maddow's show, you would know that she did not only talk about a pipeline in South Dakota.
But instead of searching for the actual truth, you post a bunch of **** and lies from wingnut websites that are full of ****.
I guess you don't mind looking like a lying idiot.

I guess you're going to ignore every single word I wrote and just lie through your teeth, psycho.

Misty » 01 Feb 2019 4:35 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 4:31 pm » wrote:I guess you're going to ignore every single word I wrote and just lie through your teeth, psycho.

Your lying rag of a source said that Maddow was seizing on the current cold weather conditions in order to fear monger about Russia, when what she was actually doing was reading straight from the Worldwide Threat Assessment report put out by Trump's own Intel Community.

If that is not dishonest, then I don't know what is.
But I expect no less from a lying scumbag like you.

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 4:43 pm » wrote:

Misty » 01 Feb 2019 4:35 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 4:31 pm » wrote:I guess you're going to ignore every single word I wrote and just lie through your teeth, psycho.

Your lying rag of a source said that Maddow was seizing on the current cold weather conditions in order to fear monger about Russia, when what she was actually doing was reading straight from the Worldwide Threat Assessment report put out by Trump's own Intel Community.
If that is not dishonest, then I don't know what is.
But I expect no less from a lying scumbag like you.

Given that she's been shrieking like a lunatic about Russia for two years, yeah, that's quite reasonable conjecture.
Still zero evidence of criminal activity or collusion, but that doesn't stop ol' Rachie the leftist wackjob.

Misty » 01 Feb 2019 6:15 pm » wrote: So that's your excuse to lie about what she said?
Because you don't like her talking about Russia?

Talking about? You're kidding, right?

Anyone watching her show would believe that Trump colluded with the Russians.

That he'd committed crimes.

Despite zero evidence.


They'd think he was on the verge of being impeached.

Despite zero evidence.

On the verge of being indicted.

Despite zero evidence.

And that's all ****, based on zero evidence and lunatic analysis.

I didn't like Sean Hannity shrieking like a lunatic about Obama for 8 years, but I did not slander him with lies.

I don't recall one single lie Hannity told about Obama. In fact, he more than anyone was correct about the massive abuse of power and broke most of the news.

You know, that abuse of power you refuse to read about?

Yet deny?

[qutoe]Do me a favor, the next time you are about to lecture me on how I smear Conservatives, shove it up your ***.
You smear and lie about Liberals every **** day.

Especially female Liberals it seems.
I'm guessing that with your charming personality you must have experienced quite a bit of rejection by women in your lifetime, so you are bitter and angry about that.
Too **** bad.

Misty » 01 Feb 2019 6:15 pm » wrote:So that's your excuse to lie about what she said?
Because you don't like her talking about Russia?d.

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 6:24 pm » wrote:
I don't like Maddow because she's a dishonest, lunatic partisan hack, not one single word of whose can be believed.

crimsongulf » 01 Feb 2019 6:30 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2019 6:24 pm » wrote:I don't like Maddow because she's a dishonest, lunatic partisan hack, not one single word of whose can be believed.

You need to get a new writer for your act.