Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
The Water Cooler Chat Room
‹
A Giggles Thread: Jokes, Cartoons, Parody, Satire, Sarcasm & Irony
A Giggles Thread: Jokes, Cartoons, Parody, Satire, Sarcasm & Irony
By Nobody
20 May 2017 10:16 pm in The Water Cooler Chat Room
26 Mar 2019 8:51 pm
27 Mar 2019 8:23 am
Boy, didn't the corrupt liberal MSM fawn all over this guy for his bitter attacks on Trump.
Those MSM hacks embraced a con artist, a flim-flam man, now indicted and faced with 100 or so years of prison time.
Michael Avenatti for president!
Those MSM hacks embraced a con artist, a flim-flam man, now indicted and faced with 100 or so years of prison time.
Michael Avenatti for president!
CNN comes out looking hideous after federal charges about its 'analysts' Avenatti and Geragos
By Monica Showalter
Less than a year ago, CNN was touting creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti for president of the United States. "Never say never," as CNN analyst Chris Cillizza wrote, arguing that if someone as awful as Trump could be president, well, then, that meant Avenatti, a CNN "legal analyst" at one point, could, too. " Look at the column inches he gives to Avenatti's glurgy and mendacious argument for the idea, handing out coveted news space so extensive it could be argued to be a campaign contribution.
Two-and-a-half years removed from my pledge came the news that Michael Avenatti, the man who has emerged in the national consciousness as the lawyer for porn star Stormy Daniels, is considering running against Trump in 2020.
"IF (big) [Trump] seeks re-election, I will run, but only if I think that there is no other candidate in the race that has a REAL chance at beating him," tweeted Avenatti on Wednesday morning. "We can't relive 2016. I love this country, our values and our people too much to sit by while they are destroyed. #FightClub #Basta"
Appearing on CNN's "The Lead" on Wednesday, Avenatti said that he'd be qualified "because I have three things this president lacks: Brains, heart and courage." He added: "if [Trump] is re-elected, this country is in a world of hurt."
Avenatti of course, partied hearty with CNN's finest, as Instapundit has noted:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/20 ... ragos.html
27 Mar 2019 1:08 pm
So I just finished doing my taxes.
Every year, I usually get a little sumpin' sumpin' back on my federal return.
This year I owe $160.
Thank you President Trump.
I really appreciate that you cocksucker.
Every year, I usually get a little sumpin' sumpin' back on my federal return.
This year I owe $160.
Thank you President Trump.
I really appreciate that you cocksucker.
27 Mar 2019 1:09 pm
27 Mar 2019 1:09 pm
Why do you think the federal government should subsidize your high tax state?Misty » 27 Mar 2019 1:08 pm » wrote:So I just finished doing my taxes.
Every year, I usually get a little sumpin' sumpin' back on my federal return.
This year I owe $160.
Thank you President Trump.
I really appreciate that you cocksucker.
Most people got refunds, some of them quite large.
But they're smart enough not to vote Democrat.
27 Mar 2019 1:16 pm
hahahahahhaha! Let's call you Lord HaHa!Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 1:09 pm » wrote:
Why do you think the federal government should subsidize your high tax state?
Most people got refunds, some of them quite large.
But they're smart enough not to vote Democrat.
27 Mar 2019 2:55 pm
WTF are you talking about?Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 1:09 pm » wrote:Why do you think the federal government should subsidize your high tax state?Misty » 27 Mar 2019 1:08 pm » wrote:So I just finished doing my taxes.
Every year, I usually get a little sumpin' sumpin' back on my federal return.
This year I owe $160.
Thank you President Trump.
I really appreciate that you cocksucker.
Another lie.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 1:09 pm » wrote:Most people got refunds, some of them quite large.
The average refund is DOWN 16% you stupid **** moron.
STFU you asshole.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 1:09 pm » wrote:But they're smart enough not to vote Democrat.
I got nothing from his HUGE tax cuts that were supposed to benefit the middle class.
It actually cost me more.
Republicans have been trying to sell that trickle down **** for decades.
Now he wants to take away healthcare to pay for his tax cuts for the rich.
27 Mar 2019 3:06 pm
I wouldn't watch that piece of **** or anything from that website if you held a gun to my head.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 1:28 pm » wrote:Speaking of jokes, here's Rachel Madcow.
EPIC! Hannity DUNKS on MSNBC Hack Rachel Maddow — Posts Stunning Compilation of Her Most Unhinged Lies (VIDEO)
Jim Hoft by Jim Hoft
https://youtu.be/diu50EcytMw
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/0 ... ies-video/
That's the same website that said that Rachel Maddow BURST INTO TEARS on the air over the lack of Mueller indictments.
Is that the same Sean Hannity who promoted the phony conspiracy theory (LIE) about Seth Rich?
He tortured that poor young man's family for over a year with that ****.
The family finally had to sue FOX News TRUMP TV to get him to stop.
And he never apologized.
So forgive me if I don't give a **** what he has to say about anyone else being a liar.
Rachel Maddow never made up or promoted a phony conspiracy theory about a murder victim.
Hannity did.
Don't post anything form that lying tin foil hat conspiracy site again.
27 Mar 2019 3:17 pm
I don't recall what Hannity said, but there legitimate questions about the death that still are unresolved.Misty » 27 Mar 2019 3:06 pm » wrote:Is that the same Sean Hannity who promoted the phony conspiracy theory (LIE) about Seth Rich?
He tortured that poor young man's family for over a year with that ****.
The family finally had to sue FOX News TRUMP TV to get him to stop.
And he never apologized.
So forgive me if I don't give a **** what he has to say about anyone else being a liar.
Rachel Maddow never made up or promoted a phony conspiracy theory about a murder victim.
Hannity did.
Don't post anything form that lying tin foil hat conspiracy site again.
But Hannity and his guests were absolutely on the money about the Fake News about Russian collusion and further indictments.
And about the biggest abuse of power in US history that you refuse to even address other than to lie.
Indictments are coming.
Run, Forrest,run!
27 Mar 2019 3:19 pm
27 Mar 2019 3:26 pm
27 Mar 2019 3:31 pm
I don't itemize, so those don't apply to me.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:12 pm » wrote:There were only two parts that would have resulted in a tax hike; the loss of deduction of state taxes and the lowering of the mortgage deduction.Misty » 27 Mar 2019 2:55 pm » wrote:Another lie.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 1:09 pm » wrote:Most people got refunds, some of them quite large.
But they're smart enough not to vote Democrat.
The average refund is DOWN 16% you stupid **** moron.
I take the Standard Deduction, which BTW I thought was supposed to double?
It was only $3300 more than last year.
Do you ever read anything besides wingnut websites?Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:12 pm » wrote:Oh my, the new Official Democrat Talking Point Lie, that you claim never to tell.Misty » 27 Mar 2019 2:55 pm » wrote:Now he wants to take away healthcare to pay for his tax cuts for the rich.
The Justice Department (which is supposed to support the laws) is now supporting a lawsuit that would strike down the ACA.
Trump could not repeal it, so now he is using the courts to get rid of it.
He's trying to take away healthcare from 20 million people with nothing to put in it's place.
He has to pay for his stupid tax cuts for the rich which are driving up the deficit, and he's going to do it by literally killing people.
That's right I said it.
People will die if they lose their healthcare.
27 Mar 2019 3:35 pm
You're as big a piece of **** as Hannity is.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:27 pm » wrote:How do you know it's phony? Was it solved?Misty » 27 Mar 2019 3:06 pm » wrote:Rachel Maddow never made up or promoted a phony conspiracy theory about a murder victim.
Hannity did.
YES it was solved.
Hannity accused Seth Rich of being the one who leaked the DNC emails.
Mueller indicted 12 Russian military intelligence officials in connection with the 2016 election hackings.
Name one.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:27 pm » wrote:And Rachel has spread 2 1/2 years of wacky conspiracies about almost everything about Trump.
Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:27 pm » wrote:That's why she was on the verge of a nervous breakdown the other night, crying or on the verge of tears.
27 Mar 2019 3:39 pm
No, the Justice Dept. is supposed to apply the law AND the Constitution. At least one court has already declared Obamacare to be unconstitutional, and Trump's attorneys are following that they believe to be the Constitution.Misty » 27 Mar 2019 3:31 pm » wrote:The Justice Department (which is supposed to support the laws) is now supporting a lawsuit that would strike down the ACA.
Trump could not repeal it, so now he is using the courts to get rid of it.
If they believe Obamacare as it is today is unconstitutional, they are obligated to petition SCOTUS as such.
That's their job.
Yes, very good, psycho. Well done!He's trying to take away healthcare from 20 million people with nothing to put in it's place.
He has to pay for his stupid tax cuts for the rich which are driving up the deficit, and he's going to do it by literally killing people.
That's right I said it.
People will die if they lose their healthcare.
Now that the Russian collusion hoax has collapsed, this is the new set of Official Democrat Talking Point Lies.
You tell them so well!
Trump is going to kill people to cut taxes for the rich!
27 Mar 2019 3:41 pm
Really? Who killed him and why?Misty » 27 Mar 2019 3:35 pm » wrote:You're as big a piece of **** as Hannity is.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:27 pm » wrote:How do you know it's phony? Was it solved?
YES it was solved.
And why didn't you respond to this?
And Rachel has spread 2 1/2 years of wacky conspiracies about almost everything about Trump.
That's why she was on the verge of a nervous breakdown the other night, crying or on the verge of tears.
"How do I explain to my viewers I'm absolutely full of crap? "
27 Mar 2019 3:58 pm
Hannity used the fact that his murder was unsolved to promote a phony conspiracy that it was Hillary and/or the DNC that had him killed because he leaked the emails.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:41 pm » wrote:Really? Who killed him and why?Misty » 27 Mar 2019 3:35 pm » wrote:You're as big a piece of **** as Hannity is.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:27 pm » wrote:How do you know it's phony? Was it solved?
YES it was solved.
He did NOT leak the emails, the Russians hacked them, so why would the DNC have had him killed (as if they would have done that even if he had leaked the emails).
I honestly can't think of anything more disgusting than the way that Hannity tortured the Seth family by smearing their son like that.
And you defending that piece of **** shows what we already know about the kind of person that you are.
You're scum.
Yet you can't name one.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:27 pm » wrote:And Rachel has spread 2 1/2 years of wacky conspiracies about almost everything about Trump.
27 Mar 2019 4:06 pm
You claimed that it was solved. It was never solved. If I played your dishonest game, I'd accuse you of lying for making a mistake.Misty » 27 Mar 2019 3:58 pm » wrote:Hannity used the fact that his murder was unsolved , blah, blahTermin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:41 pm » wrote:Really? Who killed him and why?
****, he did no such thing.to promote a phony conspiracy that it was Hillary and/or the DNC that had him killed because he leaked the emails.
Quote him blaming HRC or the DNC.
I'll wait.
The Beltway is a deeply corrupt place, and I'd be shocked if violence didn't happen on occasion, so it's absolutely legitimate to address this unsolved death under mysterious circumstances.
And it was the leftist Guardian that claimed that the Russians could not have downloaded this information. It had to have been an inside job.
27 Mar 2019 4:09 pm
Misty » 27 Mar 2019 3:58 pm » wrote:Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:27 pm » wrote:And Rachel has spread 2 1/2 years of wacky conspiracies about almost everything about Trump.
That's why she was on the verge of a nervous breakdown the other night, crying or on the verge of tears.
"How do I explain to my viewers I'm absolutely full of crap? "
Yet you can't name one.
I guess you never watch her show. The wild, lunatic speculation on the basis of zero evidence never freaking ended.
The lunatic worries that the Russians were going to cut off gas supplies during a cold spell.
That's why she almost had a nervous breakdown the other night.
Did you watch the video? No? Of course not.
Psychopath.
27 Mar 2019 4:19 pm
The Justice Dept is supposed to DEFEND the acts of Congress.Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 3:39 pm » wrote:No, the Justice Dept. is supposed to apply the law AND the Constitution. At least one court has already declared Obamacare to be unconstitutional, and Trump's attorneys are following that they believe to be the Constitution.Misty » 27 Mar 2019 3:31 pm » wrote:The Justice Department (which is supposed to support the laws) is now supporting a lawsuit that would strike down the ACA.
Trump could not repeal it, so now he is using the courts to get rid of it.
The ACA was an act of Congress.
27 Mar 2019 4:23 pm
I'm assuming that you are saying that this is a quote by Rachel Maddow?Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2019 4:11 pm » wrote:"How do I explain to my viewers I'm absolutely full of crap? "
Pleas provide the link and the context.
Who is online
In total there are 7363 users online :: 2 registered, 13 bots, and 7348 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Cannonpointer
Bots: Mojeek, Bolt, MicroMessenger, proximic, ADmantX, YandexBot, CriteoBot, bingbot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, Applebot