A Giggles Thread: Jokes, Cartoons, Parody, Satire, Sarcasm & Irony

User avatar
By Nobody
20 May 2017 10:16 pm in The Water Cooler Chat Room
1 322 323 324 325 326 543
User avatar
Termin8tor
30 Mar 2019 10:21 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 30 Mar 2019 10:07 am » wrote: Hey genius, do you know what it's called when you inflate your assets and hide your debts in order to get a bank loan?

Here's a hint.
It starts with an F and ends in a D, with the letters RAU in between.
And it's a crime you stupid giggling asshole.
Look at the fascistic little brownshirt censor my responses.

Like all leftists, she can't allow the truth to be seen.

Well gosh, minor financial crimes that will result in fines are quite a comedown from collusion and treason, wackjob. :rofl: :rofl:

Who got the Russian collusion story right, Gateway Pundit or your trusted sources? :clap:

Run, Forrest, run!
User avatar
Termin8tor
30 Mar 2019 10:22 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 30 Mar 2019 10:07 am » wrote: Hey genius, do you know what it's called when you inflate your assets and hide your debts in order to get a bank loan?

Here's a hint.
It starts with an F and ends in a D, with the letters RAU in between.
And it's a crime you stupid giggling asshole.
Half of real estate investors would be indicted, wackjob.

This is a minor issue, a huge comedown from the lunatic conspiracy theories Rachel Madcow has babbled about for 2 1/2 years.


Quick, censor my response before anyone sees it! :\
User avatar
Termin8tor
30 Mar 2019 10:24 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 30 Mar 2019 10:02 am » wrote: Like what? Schtupping porn stars and Playboy models right after her wife gave birth, grabbing women by the ****** or lusting after her own daughter?
Why are you censoring my cartoons, wackjob?

I thought you claimed this was a humor thread.

.
Image
User avatar
Termin8tor
30 Mar 2019 10:25 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 30 Mar 2019 10:07 am » wrote: Hey genius, do you know what it's called when you inflate your assets and hide your debts in order to get a bank loan?

Here's a hint.
It starts with an F and ends in a D, with the letters RAU in between.
And it's a crime you stupid giggling asshole.
Did the Russians help him do that? :rofl:

.

Image
User avatar
Termin8tor
30 Mar 2019 10:25 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 30 Mar 2019 10:07 am » wrote: Hey genius, do you know what it's called when you inflate your assets and hide your debts in order to get a bank loan?

Here's a hint.
It starts with an F and ends in a D, with the letters RAU in between.
And it's a crime you stupid giggling asshole.
.


Image
User avatar
MarkMathews
30 Mar 2019 10:31 am
User avatar
  
118 posts
No obstruction... No "collusion". : )

Image
User avatar
MarkMathews
30 Mar 2019 10:35 am
User avatar
  
118 posts
Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 10:32 am » wrote:
That look on her face is priceless. :rofl: :rofl:
Yes sir... yes it is. :die:
User avatar
Nobody
30 Mar 2019 10:47 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
MarkMathews » 30 Mar 2019 10:31 am » wrote:No obstruction... No "collusion". : )

Image
Image
User avatar
Nobody
30 Mar 2019 10:58 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 10:45 am » wrote:
Misty » 30 Mar 2019 10:07 am » wrote:Hey genius, do you know what it's called when you inflate your assets and hide your debts in order to get a bank loan?
Here's a hint.
It starts with an F and ends in a D, with the letters RAU in between.
And it's a crime you stupid giggling asshole.
Oh my, so Trump might have to pay some small fines?
You mean like the small $25 million dollar fine he paid for his fraudulent Trump University?
:rofl:
Anyone who “knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice”

To defraud a financial institution; or
To obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;

faces a fine of up to $1,000,000, and may be imprisoned up to 30 years.

https://legaldictionary.net/bank-fraud/
Never, not once have I called for his impeachment, you filthy degenerate liar.
Just the opposite.
Misty » 14 Mar 2019 9:42 pm » wrote:
Huey » 14 Mar 2019 9:34 pm » wrote:It is a simple question. Are you in for impeachment proceedings or not?
Run away, puss.
Seriously?
WTF is wrong with you?
I told you three times that I am against impeachment at this point, and I told you why.
What part of NO do you not understand?
User avatar
MarkMathews
30 Mar 2019 11:03 am
User avatar
  
118 posts
It was a brilliant move by the Prez to keep ol' Rosie-stein around. Can you imagine ol' Rosie-stein sitting there and signing his name to the final say on "no obstruction"? I can. Glorious! : )
User avatar
Nobody
30 Mar 2019 11:08 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 10:54 am » wrote:Blah, blah blah.........
Okay, so I have been here for an hour, and all I have done is either reply to your posts in my two threads or moved them to the Peanut Gallery.

You jumped on me the minute I logged in and have pounded out posts faster than I can deal with them.

I do not wish to spend all of my time here dealing with an obsessive freak like you.
I would like to be able to talk to some other people too.
That is why I spend less and less time here lately.

Feel free to waste your time posting a bunch of **** in here.
It will only end up in the PG.
User avatar
indago
30 Mar 2019 11:56 am
User avatar
   
662 posts
Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 11:16 am » wrote:
Misty » 30 Mar 2019 11:08 am » wrote:Feel free to waste your time posting a bunch of **** in here.
It will only end up in the PG.
If what I write is "****," it wouldn't bother you. You could laugh at it, and expect others to laugh at it, too.

If it was "****," you wouldn't have to immediately censor it for fear that someone would see it.

A number of people write **** about me on a regular basis. One wackjob "stalks" me.

And I don't care, because they do write ****, so I ignore them.

You censor me because I'm correct.
You mean, like THIS "****":

POSTED
User avatar
Nobody
30 Mar 2019 11:59 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 11:16 am » wrote:A number of people write **** about me on a regular basis. One wackjob "stalks" me.
You seriously have the balls to accuse someone of stalking you?

Image
User avatar
Nobody
30 Mar 2019 12:01 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
User avatar
Nobody
30 Mar 2019 12:05 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
User avatar
Nobody
30 Mar 2019 12:08 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Trump's neck vagina has it's own Twitter account.


Image
User avatar
Nobody
30 Mar 2019 12:12 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
User avatar
Nobody
30 Mar 2019 12:14 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
User avatar
Nobody
30 Mar 2019 12:17 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
MarkMathews » 30 Mar 2019 11:03 am » wrote:
It was a brilliant move by the Prez to keep ol' Rosie-stein around. Can you imagine ol' Rosie-stein sitting there and signing his name to the final say on "no obstruction"? I can. Glorious! : )
Is that the same Rosenstein who wrote the phony memo about James Comey being fired because of how he handled the Hillary email investigation?
:rofl:
User avatar
MarkMathews
30 Mar 2019 12:31 pm
User avatar
  
118 posts
Misty » 30 Mar 2019 12:17 pm » wrote: Is that the same Rosenstein who wrote the phony memo about James Comey being fired because of how he handled the Hillary email investigation?
:rofl:
Yes ma'am.

The deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein, told lawmakers on Capitol Hill that he stood by a memo he wrote which was used to fire the FBI director, James Comey, insisting: “I wrote it. I believe it. I stand by it.”
During a pair of separate briefings with House and Senate lawmakers this week, Rosenstein said that Donald Trump had resolved to fire Comey before he produced the memo.
But in his statement, made public on Friday after he briefed House lawmakers, Rosenstein summarized what he called “longstanding concerns” over Comey’s handling of the agency’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server.
And turning to the day in July when Comey held a press conference about the Clinton emails, Rosenstein said: “I thought the July 5 press conference was profoundly wrong and unfair both to the Department of Justice and secretary Clinton.”
Rosenstein said he had learned about Trump’s intention to fire Comey the day before it happened, and believed it was an appropriate course of action, telling Congress: “Notwithstanding my personal affection for Director Comey, I thought it was appropriate to seek a new leader.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/19/comey-deeply-uncomfortable-trump-attempts-relationship
1 322 323 324 325 326 543

Who is online

In total there are 3087 users online :: 11 registered, 14 bots, and 3062 guests
Bots: MQQBrowser, CensysInspect, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, proximic, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, ADmantX, Googlebot, DuckDuckBot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, bingbot
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search