Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 10 May 2019 11:57 am » wrote:No illegal collusion with Russia.

Termin8tor » 10 May 2019 11:57 am » wrote:No obstruction of justice.

Termin8tor » 10 May 2019 11:57 am » wrote:Mueller would not have indicted even if Trump wasn't president.

Termin8tor » 10 May 2019 11:59 am » wrote:

Misty: Yes, I'm sure the children are much happier being kept in a cage with a bunch of strangers than they would be with their own parents.

Did you complain one single word when Obama did it?
No, not a freaking peep out of you.

Termin8tor » 10 May 2019 12:43 pm » wrote:

Misty: Obama did NOT have a policy of child separation.

I didn't say Obama had a policy, psycho.
I said he separated children from adults, because that's what federal law requires, which is why Trump does it.
And the pictures of kids in cages came from the Obama presidency.

Ricky Tavy » 10 May 2019 12:27 pm » wrote:

Misty » 10 May 2019 12:24 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 10 May 2019 11:59 am » wrote:Did you complain one single word when Obama did it?
No, not a freaking peep out of you.

And the biggest liar and propaganda artist on the forum strikes again. Obama did NOT have a policy of child separation.
Fact check: Did Obama administration separate families?

Chlammy relies heavily on the Deplorable strategery that he can lie faster than you can cite facts proving he's lying.

While Trump was meeting with Kim Jong Un in Singapore, a club championship was held at Trump International, the course Trump built near Mar-a-Lago in Florida.

So later on, Trump’s back on the course there with the Secret Service and the SWAT team guys and all that stuff.

And he sees Ted Virtue, who was involved in the financing of the movie Green Book.

I could never get Virtue to call me back on all this, but Golf.com reported it and I heard it from two members of the club as well.

They say Virtue was there playing with his son.

Trump sees Ted on the 9th hole and and decides to drive his cart over.

He tells Ted: “Congrats on winning the club championship, but you didn’t really win it, because I was out of town.”

Ted tries to laugh it off, but Trump is dead serious.

Trump says, “We’re gonna play these last six holes for the championship.”

And Ted’s like, “Oh, well, I’m playing with my son, but thanks anyway.”

But Trump says, “It’s okay. Your son can play, too.”

So what are you going to do? He’s the president. It’s his course. They end up playing.

Apparently, they get to a hole with a big pond in front of the green.

Both Ted and his son hit the ball on the green, but Trump hits his in the water.

By the time they get to the hole, though, Trump is lining up the son’s ball.

Only now it’s his ball and the caddie has switched it.

The son is like, “That’s my ball!”

But Trump’s caddie goes, “No, this is the president’s ball; your ball went in the water.”

Ted and his son look at each other confused, not sure if this is really happening.

Trump makes that putt, and wins one up.

Then, according to Golf.com, he tells Virtue something like, “I’ll tell you what, we’ll be co-champions.”

But the members tell me that when you look at the plaques on Trump’s locker there, it says: “2018 Men’s Club Champion.” No “co-” at all.

https://www.vox.com/2019/5/10/18524172/ ... ick-reilly

They say exonerated, but they won't show the full Mueller Report.

Psychopath.

Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) — passed by Congress — it is illegal to release grand-jury materials except for a specified list of purposes, and congressional investigations do not appear on this list.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/ ... s-general/

They say exonerated, but they won't show the full Mueller Report!

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 9:42 am » wrote:Why are psychopaths like little Miss Marxist smearing Barr?
Because he's going to thoroughly investigate the biggest abuse of power in US history and hold the criminals accountable.

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 9:40 am » wrote:

They say exonerated, but they won't show the full Mueller Report!

Yeah, how outrageous that Barr won't commit a batch of felonies to satisfy Nadler's illegal demand.

On May 3, 2019, Chairman Nadler sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr with a counter offer to immediately gain access to the redacted portions of Special Counsel Mueller’s report and underlying materials.

Nadler requested that the Department reconsider its refusal to allow all Members of Congress and appropriate staff to view redacted portions of the report in a secure location, not including the grand jury material.

Nadler asked that the Department work jointly with Congress to seek a court order to provide grand jury material.

https://judiciary.house.gov/news/press- ... rt-ag-barr

Misty » 11 May 2019 10:26 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 9:42 am » wrote:Why are psychopaths like little Miss Marxist smearing Barr?

Because he's going to thoroughly investigate the biggest abuse of power in US history and hold the criminals accountable.

.

He's going to thoroughly investigate the orange skidmark?

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 9:36 am » wrote:

They say exonerated, but they won't show the full Mueller Report.

Oh well gosh, because some anonymous babbling leftist says so, there must be a cover up!
When I pointed out that it was illegal to release the full Mueller Report, you accused me of lying.
Psychopath.

Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) — passed by Congress — it is illegal to release grand-jury materials except for a specified list of purposes, and congressional investigations do not appear on this list.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/ ... s-general/

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 10:52 am » wrote:

Misty » 11 May 2019 10:26 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 9:42 am » wrote:Why are psychopaths like little Miss Marxist smearing Barr?
Because he's going to thoroughly investigate the biggest abuse of power in US history and hold the criminals accountable.

He's going to thoroughly investigate the orange skidmark?

Wow, you're really dedicated to being reality-free.

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 10:52 am » wrote:No illegal collusion with Russia.

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 10:52 am » wrote:No obstruction of justice.

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 10:52 am » wrote:Mueller would not have indicted Trump even if he wasn't in office.

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 10:52 am » wrote:But there are at least four ongoing investigations into crimes committed by Obama and/or his corrupt officials.
Indictments are coming.

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 10:58 am » wrote:

Misty » 11 May 2019 10:52 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 9:40 am » wrote:Yeah, how outrageous that Barr won't commit a batch of felonies to satisfy Nadler's illegal demand.

I can't believe you keep repeating that lie after I have debunked it 3 or 4 times.
No one is asking Barr to commit any felonies.
You know this, yet you keep saying that Nadler is asking Barr to do something illegal.

I have cited multiple sources proving my claim beyond any doubt. Last I saw, you censored every single one of them.
Typical lying leftist brownshirt.
Never mind that Congress cannot force Barr into a lawsuit. That's a blatant violation of Separation of Powers and the Constitution.

Starr’s account went into intimate and prurient detail about Clinton’s encounters with Monica Lewinsky, to a degree that exceeded anything necessary to support the essential claim that he had lied about his sex life in a sworn deposition in an unrelated case, and later in grand jury testimony, as one sober observer later explained:

The Starr Report, however, went far beyond establishing that the President lied when he denied having sexual relations with Lewinsky, and included sexual details of various encounters that suggest the Report also had as its purpose to embarrass Clinton and thus limit his effectiveness as President.

Perhaps no detail revealed in the Starr Report better illustrates this prosecutorial overkill than the decision to include a description of Clinton putting a cigar in Lewinsky’s vagina, then putting it in his own mouth and saying that it “tastes good” (3-31-96).

The cigar incident would inspire countless jokes by late-night comics and greatly weakened the ability of the President to ever again be seen as “presidential.”

Much later it became a matter of considerable interest that at least one Starr staffer who argued for the humiliating level of sexual detail was a young attorney named Brett Kavanaugh.

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/04/ ... eport.html