Mr. Goebbels: Trump was wiretapped and his campaign and presidency spied on.
Misty: Is there any **** propaganda that you won't spread Mr. Goebbels?
Hey wackjob, Baghdad Barr is a liar, but he NEVER said that Trump was wire tapped and he walked back the spying accusation later in the hearing.Termin8tor » 12 May 2019 1:23 pm » wrote:Hey wackjob, Barr testified to Congress that this is true.
You are the biggest liar and propaganda artist on this forum.Barr walks back testimony on ‘spying’ after making a stir.
Attorney General William Barr sought to “please add one point of clarification” at the end of his testimony Wednesday before a Senate appropriations subcommittee — and the veteran law enforcement official needed it.
“I just want to make it clear thinking back on all the different colloquies here, that I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred,” Barr offered at the close of the hearing.
“I am saying I am concerned about it and looking into it, that’s all.”
I don't believe you, liar.Termin8tor » 14 May 2019 10:34 pm » wrote:He didn't "walk back" anything, wackjob.Hey wackjob, Baghdad Barr is a liar, but he NEVER said that Trump was wire tapped and he walked back the spying accusation later in the hearing.
Maybe you should actually watch important hearings instead of repeating the crap you hear on FOX News TRUMP TV and read on your wingnut websites.
You are the biggest liar and propaganda artist on this forum.
Barr walks back testimony on ‘spying’ after making a stir.Attorney General William Barr sought to “please add one point of clarification” at the end of his testimony Wednesday before a Senate appropriations subcommittee — and the veteran law enforcement official needed it.
“I just want to make it clear thinking back on all the different colloquies here, that
I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred” Barr offered at the close of the hearing.
“I am saying I am concerned about it and looking into it, that’s all.
I saw that part of hist testimony a few times.........
So, how do you explain getting a FISA warrant based on a fictional dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign?Misty » 15 May 2019 4:43 pm » wrote: I don't believe you, liar.
What part of "I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred" do you not understand?
He's trying to straddle the fence.
He knows there was no improper surveillance, but he has to look into it anyway just to satisfy the whining manbaby in the WH.
This AG is a disgrace.
I don't have to explain something that did not happen.crimsongulf » 15 May 2019 4:53 pm » wrote:So, how do you explain getting a FISA warrant based on a fictional dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign?Misty » 15 May 2019 4:43 pm » wrote:I don't believe you, liar.
What part of "I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred" do you not understand?
He's trying to straddle the fence.
He knows there was no improper surveillance, but he has to look into it anyway just to satisfy the whining manbaby in the WH.
This AG is a disgrace.
I have understood that from the second he said it.I don't believe you, liar.He didn't "walk back" anything, wackjob.
I saw that part of hist testimony a few times, and although he said spying had occurred, he wasn't sure at that time if it was proper or not.
But I'll bet it wasn't and that Barr all but knows it.
Joe DeGenova said tonight
that Barr's investigators have determined that three out of the four FISA warrants were illegal and are on the verge of proving that the first was, too.
Indictments are coming.
What part of "I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred" do you not understand?
Yes, yes, that's the panic-stricken DNC's latest Official Democrat Talking Point Lie.He's trying to straddle the fence.
He knows there was no improper surveillance, but he has to look into it anyway just to satisfy the whining manbaby in the WH.[/quote
I don't care what you lie that you believe or not.
Barr, Durham and the other prosecutor almost certainly have found that felonies were committed, many, many of them in this massive abuse of power.
Indictments are coming, and they won't be for process crimes.
This AG is a disgrace.
Whose sworn testimony?Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:Except that sworn testimony reveals that without the unverified dossier, they could not have gotten the FISA warrant.I don't have to explain something that did not happen.crimsongulf » 15 May 2019 4:53 pm » wrote:So, how do you explain getting a FISA warrant based on a fictional dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign?
I won't hold my breath.Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:And it will soon be revealed that the rest of the "information" used was even less reputable.
Again, not holding my breath.Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:And guess what, it's a violation of federal law, a felony, to use unverified information to apply for a FISA warrant.
Indictments are coming, and they won't be for Process Crimes.
You cling to that Precious.Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:08 pm » wrote:It's only a matter of time before Obama officials are indicted.
Flynn told Mueller that people tied to Trump and Congress tried to obstruct probe.
Former national security adviser Michael Flynn told investigators that people linked to the Trump administration and Congress reached out to him in an effort to interfere in the Russia probe, according to newly unredacted court papers filed Thursday.
The court filing from special counsel Robert Mueller is believed to mark the first public acknowledgement that a person connected to Capitol Hill was suspected of engaging in an attempt to impede the investigation into Russian election interference.
“The defendant informed the government of multiple instances, both before and after his guilty plea, where either he or his attorneys received communications from persons connected to the Administration or Congress that could’ve affected both his willingness to cooperate and the completeness of that cooperation," says the newly revealed section of a sentencing memo originally filed in December.
Flynn even provided a voicemail recording of one such communication, the court papers say.
He was never going to indict a sitting president.Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 4:14 pm » wrote:Here's a hint, psycho. Mueller had all that information and didn't indict anyone. Case closed, duuuh!
So, no link as usual.Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 4:18 pm » wrote:My thread is on this page. Go read it.Misty » 17 May 2019 3:52 pm » wrote:Whose sworn testimony?
Link?
Hey Clump. You ever going to post anything funny on this thread??Termin8tor » 12 May 2019 1:23 pm » wrote:
Hey wackjob, Barr testified to Congress that this is true.
Wow, so you're claiming that Barr committed perjury three times?![]()
I'm sure he'll be indicted any day now.![]()
Psychopath.![]()
Yeah, you're severely reality averse.![]()
Say, how did 2 1/2 years of Rachel Madcow's wild, hysterical blabbering turn out?
Imbecile.![]()
This asshole paid 91 million for this piece of crap?Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin’s Father Just Blew $91 Million on a Stainless Steel Rabbit That Doesn’t Even Vibrate
Now we know Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin gets his balling from his father.
It was just last year that Mnuchin was under fire for spending $1 million in taxpayers’ money because he couldn’t dare sit his *** on a commercial flight, instead taking a military jet all around the country.
Well, his dad just blew $91 million on a **** stainless steel rabbit and not even the kind of rabbit that women enjoy.
According to Bloomberg, Mnuchin’s papa, art dealer Bob Mnuchin, opened his wallet all the way up to buy the Jeff Koons creation at Christie’s auction house, making it the largest payout for a living artist.
Mnuchin’s father claims that he made the purchase on behalf of a client but that’s art talk for “don’t break into my house looking for the stainless steel rabbit because it won’t be there.”

No.Titties N Beer » 17 May 2019 6:13 pm » wrote:Hey Clump. You ever going to post anything funny on this thread??Termin8tor » 12 May 2019 1:23 pm » wrote:(the usual ****)
He knows very well what it feels like to be a fool and he is being scammed into total lies every day by FOX news TRUMP TV, the wingnut websites he reads, and the orange skidmark in the WH, AKA The Scammer-In-Chief.Titties N Beer » 17 May 2019 6:13 pm » wrote:How many times can you rub someone's nose in the total lie they were scammed in to for 3 yrs????....Do you know what it must feel like that everything told to you whole life is a lie???...You know how hard that has to be looking at yourself in the mirror every day calling yourself a fool?