A Giggles Thread: Jokes, Cartoons, Parody, Satire, Sarcasm & Irony

User avatar
By Nobody
20 May 2017 10:16 pm in The Water Cooler Chat Room
1 331 332 333 334 335 543
User avatar
nuckin futz
14 May 2019 10:25 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
5,726 posts
User avatar
Nobody
14 May 2019 9:16 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Mr. Goebbels: Trump was wiretapped and his campaign and presidency spied on.
Misty: Is there any **** propaganda that you won't spread Mr. Goebbels?
Termin8tor » 12 May 2019 1:23 pm » wrote:Hey wackjob, Barr testified to Congress that this is true.
Hey wackjob, Baghdad Barr is a liar, but he NEVER said that Trump was wire tapped and he walked back the spying accusation later in the hearing.

Maybe you should actually watch important hearings instead of repeating the crap you hear on FOX News TRUMP TV and read on your wingnut websites.
Barr walks back testimony on ‘spying’ after making a stir.

Attorney General William Barr sought to “please add one point of clarification” at the end of his testimony Wednesday before a Senate appropriations subcommittee — and the veteran law enforcement official needed it.

“I just want to make it clear thinking back on all the different colloquies here, that I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred,” Barr offered at the close of the hearing.
“I am saying I am concerned about it and looking into it, that’s all.”
You are the biggest liar and propaganda artist on this forum.
User avatar
nuckin futz
15 May 2019 10:04 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
5,726 posts
User avatar
nuckin futz
15 May 2019 1:50 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
5,726 posts
User avatar
Nobody
15 May 2019 4:43 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 14 May 2019 10:34 pm » wrote:
Hey wackjob, Baghdad Barr is a liar, but he NEVER said that Trump was wire tapped and he walked back the spying accusation later in the hearing.
Maybe you should actually watch important hearings instead of repeating the crap you hear on FOX News TRUMP TV and read on your wingnut websites.
You are the biggest liar and propaganda artist on this forum.
Barr walks back testimony on ‘spying’ after making a stir.Attorney General William Barr sought to “please add one point of clarification” at the end of his testimony Wednesday before a Senate appropriations subcommittee — and the veteran law enforcement official needed it.
“I just want to make it clear thinking back on all the different colloquies here, that
I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred” Barr offered at the close of the hearing.
“I am saying I am concerned about it and looking into it, that’s all.
He didn't "walk back" anything, wackjob.
I saw that part of hist testimony a few times.........
I don't believe you, liar.

What part of "I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred" do you not understand?

He's trying to straddle the fence.

He knows there was no improper surveillance, but he has to look into it anyway just to satisfy the whining manbaby in the WH.
This AG is a disgrace.
User avatar
crimsongulf
15 May 2019 4:53 pm
User avatar
        
1,685 posts
Misty » 15 May 2019 4:43 pm » wrote: I don't believe you, liar.

What part of "I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred" do you not understand?

He's trying to straddle the fence.

He knows there was no improper surveillance, but he has to look into it anyway just to satisfy the whining manbaby in the WH.
This AG is a disgrace.
So, how do you explain getting a FISA warrant based on a fictional dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign?
User avatar
Nobody
16 May 2019 9:44 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
crimsongulf » 15 May 2019 4:53 pm » wrote:
Misty » 15 May 2019 4:43 pm » wrote:I don't believe you, liar.
What part of "I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred" do you not understand?
He's trying to straddle the fence.
He knows there was no improper surveillance, but he has to look into it anyway just to satisfy the whining manbaby in the WH.
This AG is a disgrace.
So, how do you explain getting a FISA warrant based on a fictional dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign?
I don't have to explain something that did not happen.

The Russia investigation began after the FBI learned that George Papadopoulos, had been approached by a Russian agent, and the agent told Papadopoulos that the Russians had incriminating information about Hillary Clinton, including emails.

Papadopoulos then mentioned to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had dirt on Clinton, and the Australians contacted the U.S. government, and the FBI began to take a look.

The dossier formed only a smart part of the evidence used to meet the legal burden of establishing probable cause that Carter Page was an agent of Russia.

Page was playing footsie with Russians for years before Trump even declared his run for the presidency.
It's not the first time he was suspected of being a Russian asset.

This **** about the origins of the investigation, or as Trump calls them the 'oranges' of the investigation, is a bunch of crap used as a defection from what really happened.

There were Russians all over the place reaching out to members of the Trump campaign, saying they wanted to help Trump and offering dirt on Hillary.
Members of the campaign were secretly meeting with those Russians, and they all lied about it.
The FBI would have been delinquent in their duties not to investigate that.
User avatar
crimsongulf
17 May 2019 11:41 am
User avatar
        
1,685 posts
Misty » 16 May 2019 9:44 pm » wrote: I don't have to explain something that did not happen.T.
****
User avatar
Termin8tor
17 May 2019 12:08 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Leftist brownshirt that she is, little Miss Marxist will censor this post, because she can't tolerate the truth being seen.
He didn't "walk back" anything, wackjob.

I saw that part of hist testimony a few times, and although he said spying had occurred, he wasn't sure at that time if it was proper or not.
But I'll bet it wasn't and that Barr all but knows it.
Joe DeGenova said tonight
that Barr's investigators have determined that three out of the four FISA warrants were illegal and are on the verge of proving that the first was, too.

Indictments are coming.
I don't believe you, liar.

What part of "I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred" do you not understand?
I have understood that from the second he said it.

But I also understand that he is being extremely cautious in his statement not to falsely charge those involved.

But the evidence is overwhelming. It's only a matter of time before Obama officials are indicted.
He's trying to straddle the fence.

He knows there was no improper surveillance, but he has to look into it anyway just to satisfy the whining manbaby in the WH.[/quote
I don't care what you lie that you believe or not.

Barr, Durham and the other prosecutor almost certainly have found that felonies were committed, many, many of them in this massive abuse of power.

Indictments are coming, and they won't be for process crimes.
This AG is a disgrace.
Yes, yes, that's the panic-stricken DNC's latest Official Democrat Talking Point Lie.

That you deny EVER telling.
User avatar
Nobody
17 May 2019 3:52 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:
crimsongulf » 15 May 2019 4:53 pm » wrote:So, how do you explain getting a FISA warrant based on a fictional dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign?
I don't have to explain something that did not happen.
Except that sworn testimony reveals that without the unverified dossier, they could not have gotten the FISA warrant.
Whose sworn testimony?
Link?
Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:And it will soon be revealed that the rest of the "information" used was even less reputable.
I won't hold my breath.
Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:And guess what, it's a violation of federal law, a felony, to use unverified information to apply for a FISA warrant.
Indictments are coming, and they won't be for Process Crimes.
Again, not holding my breath.

Your whole timeline is off Precious.

The FBI opened its counterintelligence investigation at the end of July, 2016.
They did not file an application with the FISA Court, looking for authority to secretly monitor Carter Page’s communications until October 21, 2016.

FYI, Carter Page was on the FBI's radar since 2013 when he shared information and research with a Russian national whom the FBI later accused of being a Kremlin spy.
That's why they took another look at him when he showed up as an adviser to the Trump campaign.
They would have been delinquent not to.

The Russia probe: A timeline from Moscow to Mueller
User avatar
Nobody
17 May 2019 4:04 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:08 pm » wrote:It's only a matter of time before Obama officials are indicted.
You cling to that Precious.

Meanwhile we just found out that Trump's lawyers and someone in Congress were apparently trying to tamper with another witness (Michael Flynn) in order to obstruct justice.

And 'good lordy' there's a tape!
Flynn told Mueller that people tied to Trump and Congress tried to obstruct probe.

Former national security adviser Michael Flynn told investigators that people linked to the Trump administration and Congress reached out to him in an effort to interfere in the Russia probe, according to newly unredacted court papers filed Thursday.

The court filing from special counsel Robert Mueller is believed to mark the first public acknowledgement that a person connected to Capitol Hill was suspected of engaging in an attempt to impede the investigation into Russian election interference.

“The defendant informed the government of multiple instances, both before and after his guilty plea, where either he or his attorneys received communications from persons connected to the Administration or Congress that could’ve affected both his willingness to cooperate and the completeness of that cooperation," says the newly revealed section of a sentencing memo originally filed in December.

Flynn even provided a voicemail recording of one such communication, the court papers say.
User avatar
Nobody
17 May 2019 5:33 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 4:14 pm » wrote:Here's a hint, psycho. Mueller had all that information and didn't indict anyone. Case closed, duuuh!
He was never going to indict a sitting president.
Instead of listening to Baghdad Barr and Mitch 'The Turtle' McConnell you should read the report firsthand.
Would you like to borrow my copy?

Image
User avatar
Nobody
17 May 2019 5:35 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 4:18 pm » wrote:
Misty » 17 May 2019 3:52 pm » wrote:Whose sworn testimony?
Link?
My thread is on this page. Go read it.
So, no link as usual.
How typical of you.

You're the biggest liar, propagandist, and **** artist on this forum.
User avatar
Inglorious
17 May 2019 6:13 pm
User avatar
  
209 posts
Termin8tor » 12 May 2019 1:23 pm » wrote:
Hey wackjob, Barr testified to Congress that this is true.

Wow, so you're claiming that Barr committed perjury three times? :o

I'm sure he'll be indicted any day now. :rofl:

Psychopath. :loco:

Yeah, you're severely reality averse. :rofl:

Say, how did 2 1/2 years of Rachel Madcow's wild, hysterical blabbering turn out?

Imbecile. :rofl: :rofl:
Hey Clump. You ever going to post anything funny on this thread??

How many times can you rub someone's nose in the total lie they were scammed in to for 3 yrs????....Do you know what it must feel like that everything told to you whole life is a lie???...You know how hard that has to be looking at yourself in the mirror every day calling yourself a fool?
User avatar
Nobody
17 May 2019 8:26 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
91 million dollars on a **** rabbit?
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin’s Father Just Blew $91 Million on a Stainless Steel Rabbit That Doesn’t Even Vibrate

Now we know Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin gets his balling from his father.

It was just last year that Mnuchin was under fire for spending $1 million in taxpayers’ money because he couldn’t dare sit his *** on a commercial flight, instead taking a military jet all around the country.

Well, his dad just blew $91 million on a **** stainless steel rabbit and not even the kind of rabbit that women enjoy.

According to Bloomberg, Mnuchin’s papa, art dealer Bob Mnuchin, opened his wallet all the way up to buy the Jeff Koons creation at Christie’s auction house, making it the largest payout for a living artist.

Mnuchin’s father claims that he made the purchase on behalf of a client but that’s art talk for “don’t break into my house looking for the stainless steel rabbit because it won’t be there.”
This asshole paid 91 million for this piece of crap?

Image

Oh, sorry.
I meant the piece of crap on the left, not the one on the right.
User avatar
Nobody
17 May 2019 8:36 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Titties N Beer » 17 May 2019 6:13 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 12 May 2019 1:23 pm » wrote:(the usual ****)
Hey Clump. You ever going to post anything funny on this thread??
No.
Titties N Beer » 17 May 2019 6:13 pm » wrote:How many times can you rub someone's nose in the total lie they were scammed in to for 3 yrs????....Do you know what it must feel like that everything told to you whole life is a lie???...You know how hard that has to be looking at yourself in the mirror every day calling yourself a fool?
He knows very well what it feels like to be a fool and he is being scammed into total lies every day by FOX news TRUMP TV, the wingnut websites he reads, and the orange skidmark in the WH, AKA The Scammer-In-Chief.
User avatar
nuckin futz
18 May 2019 9:00 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
5,726 posts
New pic of the Squiminator:

Image
1 331 332 333 334 335 543

Who is online

In total there are 3168 users online :: 14 registered, 16 bots, and 3138 guests
Bots: SiteLockSpider, okhttp, proximic, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, CensysInspect, NING, DuckDuckBot, YandexBot, Applebot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, CriteoBot, curl/7
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search