Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
The Water Cooler Chat Room
‹
A Giggles Thread: Jokes, Cartoons, Parody, Satire, Sarcasm & Irony
A Giggles Thread: Jokes, Cartoons, Parody, Satire, Sarcasm & Irony
By Nobody
20 May 2017 10:16 pm in The Water Cooler Chat Room
File this under irony.
The Lock Her Up! brigade is upset that in a closed door meeting Nancy Pelosi reportedly called for Donald Trump to be prosecuted for his crimes.
Hannity is shameless.
The Lock Her Up! brigade is upset that in a closed door meeting Nancy Pelosi reportedly called for Donald Trump to be prosecuted for his crimes.
Hannity is shameless.
Nov. 20, 2018 - WASHINGTON — President Trump told the White House counsel in the spring that he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute two of his political adversaries: his 2016 challenger, Hillary Clinton, and the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with the conversation.
The lawyer, Donald F. McGahn II, rebuffed the president, saying that he had no authority to order a prosecution.
Mr. McGahn said that while he could request an investigation, that too could prompt accusations of abuse of power.
To underscore his point, Mr. McGahn had White House lawyers write a memo for Mr. Trump warning that if he asked law enforcement to investigate his rivals, he could face a range of consequences, including possible impeachment.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/20/us/p ... tment.html
7 Jun 2019 10:12 pm
You cited the dictionary definition you jackass.Termin8tor » 07 Jun 2019 4:33 pm » wrote:I cited both federal law and the dictionary. You likely censored both, brownshirt.Misty: Again, you have no idea what treason is.
The definition in the Constitution is the only one that counts.
Again, that is the dictionary definition, not the law you **** imbecile.Termin8tor » 07 Jun 2019 4:33 pm » wrote:Hey wackjob, people aren't charged with treason from the Constitution. They are charged with treason as defined by federal law, which I quoted.
And you didn't.
How freaking typical.
There's also the English language, which most people accept.
The Founding Fathers defined what treason is, not **** Merriam Webster.
It means I will use the weasel word 'maybe' so if anyone accuses me of calling for executions, I can weasel my way out of it.Termin8tor » 07 Jun 2019 4:33 pm » wrote:What does the word "maybe" mean, psycho? It means I have not yet called for executions as you claimed I did, liar.
Will you PLEASE learn to use the quote function properly you gaping asshole.
WTF is wrong with you?
I am not going to keep replying to you unless you do.
Your posts are a **** mess.
I'm sick and tired of spending all my time trying to sort out who said what.
8 Jun 2019 10:28 am
8 Jun 2019 10:43 am
Is that the best you can do?Termin8tor » 08 Jun 2019 9:02 am » wrote:Do you really think that anyone on this forum is stupid enough to fall for that ****, psycho?Misty » 05 Jun 2019 6:59 pm » wrote:They cheated on their taxes?The Dildo said:Trump was supposed to know that Cohen and Manafort cheated on their taxes, wackjob?
That Manafort told a minor lie on a mortgage application, for which Mueller and his team of hacks charged him with "bank fraud?"
And I believe that in the end it will be shown that not only didn't Flynn lie to the FBI,
but was set up by Obama's corrupt officials.
Do you really think that anyone on this forum is stupid enough to fall for that **** Precious?
Manafort: Five counts of filing false tax returns, two counts of bank fraud, one count of failing to disclose a foreign bank account, conspiracy to defraud the United States, failing to register as a foreign agent, money laundering, witness tampering and making false statements.
That doesn't count the 16 felony charges he still faces in the state of New York including residential mortgage fraud, and a yearlong scheme in which he allegedly falsified business records to obtain millions of dollars in loans.
Cohen: Five counts of tax evasion, one count of making false statements to a financial institution, one count of willfully causing an unlawful corporate contribution, one count of making an excessive campaign contribution at the request of a candidate (Trump) for the "principal purpose of influencing [the] election" and one count of lying to Congress.
That's not **** you stupid **** jackass.
Those are the exact crimes that Manafort and Cohen were convicted of.
I notice that you weren't able to dispute any of them.
If they were ****, you could have.
They're still crimes you dildo.Termin8tor » 08 Jun 2019 9:02 am » wrote:None of which has the slightest thing to do with colluding with Russia or with Trump.
Why did Trump have so many criminals working for him?
More **** and lies.Termin8tor » 08 Jun 2019 9:02 am » wrote:It is crystal clear that the payment to Daniels was personal, according to the exact wording of the law.
And he broke that law in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1, AKA Donald Trump.How Michael Cohen broke campaign finance law.
During the 2016 election, Cohen paid $130,000 to adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, known as Stormy Daniels, and arranged for a publishing company to pay $150,000 to model Karen McDougal for her story in exchange for the women agreeing to not go public with allegations that they had affairs with Trump.
Prosecutors said the purpose of the hush payments was to influence the 2016 election, and treated them as campaign contributions, which are subject to restrictions under the Federal Election Campaign Act.
Cohen’s payment to Clifford, they said, exceeded the $2,700 limit on personal contributions to a single candidate for an election.
The payment he helped arrange for McDougal flouted the ban on corporations contributing directly to campaigns.
No one is stupid enough to fall for your ****.Termin8tor » 08 Jun 2019 9:02 am » wrote:Do you really think that anyone on this forum is stupid enough to fall for that ****?
That's for sure.
Like you're a big rent to *** guy, right? More like, you're one of the *** trump wouldn't rent to.nuckin futz » 08 Jun 2019 9:59 am » wrote:
Y'know who rallies to make people rent to ***?
People who never owned a piece of real property in their lives.
Here's what a city looks like, after being hit by atomic bombs:
Here's a modern city that was hit by ***:
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Did you just list the people and agencies that tricked us into the iraq war, and characterize them in the "should be believed" column?nuckin futz » 08 Jun 2019 10:28 am » wrote:
As to "science," Misty believes little boys can grow up to be women.
Is that very sciency? I'd say she's indoctrinated.
You?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Petals in the wind.Misty » 08 Jun 2019 6:09 pm » wrote:
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You did NOT cite the law you lying piece of ****.Termin8tor » 08 Jun 2019 9:08 am » wrote:That's just utterly **** ridiculous.Misty » 07 Jun 2019 10:12 pm » wrote:You cited the dictionary definition you jackass.The Dildo Said: I cited both federal law and the dictionary.
You likely censored both, brownshirt.
The definition in the Constitution is the only one that counts.
First, are you really claiming that Trump cannot use the English language when communicating with Americans?
Second, when people are charged with treason, they are charged with what is defined as treason in federal law.
Which I have also cited.
The only thing you have cited is the dictionary definition.
This is the law you **** lying imbecile, and it says almost exactly what the Constitution says.
Treason is fighting against the US. or giving aid and comfort to our enemies during wartime.
That's the **** law you slack-jawed moron.
Says the biggest liar, propagandist and **** artist the Earth has ever seen.Termin8tor » 08 Jun 2019 9:08 am » wrote:Not even you can be this freaking stupid, so you must be lying.
You really thought you could get away with that **** saying that you cited the law, when you know damn well that you never did?
You must think that I'm as stupid as you are to fall for that crap.
Go do your song and dance somewhere else you gaping asshole.
I do not believe that little boys can grow up to be women.Cannonpointer » 08 Jun 2019 6:29 pm » wrote:As to "science," Misty believes little boys can grow up to be women.
Is that very sciency? I'd say she's indoctrinated.
You?
I believe that they were born little girls, but they were just born with the wrong parts.
Like this little girl who knew at 2 years old that she was born with a girl brain in a boy's body.
https://youtu.be/6nR16HZ5rEg
She's 18 years old now, and thanks to modern medicine has the body she always knew she should have.
https://youtu.be/YvgjDYaVN38
Okay, you believe that girls have y chromosomes and penises.Misty » 08 Jun 2019 7:11 pm » wrote: I do not believe that little boys can grow up to be women.
I believe that they were born little girls, but they were just born with the wrong parts.
This is actually MORE Rational, in la la land? THIS, you would rather defend?
And "her" mommy never ONCE suggested anything to her - she just "knew" that she had a "girl" brain.Misty » 08 Jun 2019 7:11 pm » wrote: Like this little girl who knew at 2 years old that she was born with a girl brain in a boy's body.
https://youtu.be/6nR16HZ5rEg
She's 18 years old now, and thanks to modern medicine has the body she always knew she should have.
https://youtu.be/YvgjDYaVN38
Not a girl soul - right? A girl brain.
Final answer? Mull it over while I peruse your everdunce.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
I watched what I could stomach. My only response if that the plural of retarded isn't genius.Misty » 08 Jun 2019 7:11 pm » wrote: I do not believe that little boys can grow up to be women.
I believe that they were born little girls, but they were just born with the wrong parts.
Like this little girl who knew at 2 years old that she was born with a girl brain in a boy's body.
https://youtu.be/6nR16HZ5rEg
She's 18 years old now, and thanks to modern medicine has the body she always knew she should have.
https://youtu.be/YvgjDYaVN38
When I see a child claim that she remembers being two and wanting to play with barbies, I'm pretty clear on whose "memories" those are - and what weight they ought to be given.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
I cited what I thought was the law, but perhaps these crimes fall under Sedition.You did NOT cite the law you lying piece of ****.That's just utterly **** ridiculous.
First, are you really claiming that Trump cannot use the English language when communicating with Americans?
Second, when people are charged with treason, they are charged with what is defined as treason in federal law.
Which I have also cited.
Overthrowing a duly elected president is exactly what Obama, HRC and their corrupt officials tried, and they committed a huge number of felonies to do so.If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384
So if you want to shriek and babble that it was sedition, not treason, you go right ahead. Be my guest.
"Hey, it wasn't really treason! It was sedition!"
I'm sure Americans will be duly impressed by your distinction, especially after a dozen or two indictments.
Shrieks the psychopath who told years of lies in defense of a serial felon / serial rapist.Says the biggest liar, propagandist and **** artist the Earth has ever seen.
Who censors almost all my posts and sources so the truth won't be seen.
Who refuses to read the evidence about the biggest scandal in US history.
You're kidding, right?
No one on the board with an ounce of common sense buys your demented babbling, psycho.You really thought you could get away with that **** saying that you cited the law, when you know damn well that you never did?
You must think that I'm as stupid as you are to fall for that crap.
Go do your song and dance somewhere else you gaping asshole.
I doubt even most of the wackjobs do.
You're severely mentally ill.
What, are you claiming that Trump isn't allowed to use the English language to explain what happened to Americans?You cited the dictionary definition you jackass.
The definition in the Constitution is the only one that counts.
The English language "doesn't count?"
How freaking stupid.
Obama, HRC and their corrupt officials tried to steal an election, then topple the duly elected president in a coup.
And many, many felonies were committed in the attempt.
Only a psychopath like you would play stupid semantic games while ignoring this massive abuse of power.
Hannity is a man of great courage for more than anyone exposing the biggest scandal in US history.Hannity is shameless.
Which is exactly why the liberal left despises him.
And tries to drive him off the air.
You fascists.
Quick, brownshirt, censor this before anyone sees the truth!
Congressman Mark Meadows said that information soon to come out would "curl your hair."
Congressman Mark Meadows said that information soon to come out would "curl your hair."
The FBI Just Dropped New Documents On Hillary Clinton And They Are Really Bad
Posted at 6:00 pm on June 8, 2019 by Bonchie
Late Friday night, we got a document dump from the FBI dealing with the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illegal email server.
While we’ve already gotten ample evidence that she absolutely should have been charged for her mishandling of classified information, these latest revelations are still pretty mind-blowing. After you read them, you are left asking yourself how it was possible that she wasn’t indicted.
Well, we know why.https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/sta ... lly-bad%2FJordan Schachtel
Verified account
@JordanSchachtel
Jun 7
More
New docs from FBI vault:
-FBI concludes Hillary Clinton was in "violation of basic server security" w/ home-brew server.
-Discusses possibility that *all* of her emails were stolen.
-Review found HRC stripped classification of highest possible level.
@JordanSchachtel
Follow Follow @JordanSchachtel
More
This part is INSANE. Sidney Blumenthal attempted to leverage his relationship with Hillary to get her to hand over a classified intelligence file that contains a "roadmap" to a $30 billion fortune.
Starting with Hillary’s actions, her criminality isn’t even in doubt anymore. Stripping highly classified materials of their markings and then pushing them out via unapproved means is illegal. Nowhere in the statute is their a requirement for “intent” nor could any serious person argue she didn’t intend to do what she actively chose to do.
While we already knew that, it’s pretty amazing to see that even the FBI was admitting it at the time. Shortly after, the full whitewash would go into effect.
The revelations about Sidney Blumenthal are even crazier.....
There’s even evidence of Hillary’s involvement in the start of the Trump-Russia hoax in these documents....
If this were a Republican, it’d be a massive scandal. But because we are dealing with Democrats, the media won’t touch this stuff.
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/0 ... eally-bad/
More hugely important information that brownshirt little Miss Marxist will censor.
I so look forward to Mueller testifying under oath.
I wonder if he'll plead the 5th.
I so look forward to Mueller testifying under oath.
I wonder if he'll plead the 5th.
MARK MEADOWS: FBI KNEW ‘WITHIN 60 DAYS’ THAT RUSSIA PROBE WAS ‘BUILT ON A FOUNDATION OF SAND’
11:38 AM 06/08/2019 | US
Chuck Ross
North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows said Friday night that the FBI knew within 60 days of opening the Trump-Russia probe that the investigation was “built on a foundation of sand.”
“Within 60 days of them opening the investigation, prior to [Robert] Mueller coming on, the FBI and the [Department of Justice] knew that Christopher Steele was not credible, the dossier was not true, George Papadopoulos was innocent,” Meadows said on Fox News’s “Hannity.”
“When you look at that foundation, it’s all built on a foundation of sand. That’s going to start to show up soon,” the Republican said.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/08/mark ... on-flimsy/
This is pretty freaking funny while Democrats and their fawning toadies in the corrupt liberal MSM run around with their hair on fire.
Sen. Ron Johnson: GOP fully supports Trump's 'brilliant' tactics with Mexico
by Dominick Mastrangelo
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... ith-mexico
Who is online
In total there are 6524 users online :: 6 registered, 15 bots, and 6503 guests
Bots: GPTBot, TTD-Content, oBot, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, proximic, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, NING, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, bingbot, Applebot, curl/7