Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 28 Jun 2019 11:23 am » wrote:Buy yourself a good asbestos raincoat after your years of lies in defense of a serial felon / serial rapist.

You are on really shaky ground here Precious.

Was the orange skidmark's first wife lying when she testified under oath in a deposition that he raped her in a fit of rage?

Are the two women who have now come forward as E. Jean Carroll's contemporaneous witnesses lying?

You lie constantly in defense of a serial sexual assaulter, pretending that all of those women were receptive to his attacks and that it was nothing more than a 'vulgar form of seduction.'

You also lie constantly in defense of a man who cozies up to every brutal murderous dictator in the world and abuses children in his baby jails.

Burn in hell.

Misty » 28 Jun 2019 9:49 am » wrote:
I am so stealing that for my siggy.
It will trigger the Deplorable snowflakes like crazy.

I love Paul Lee Ticks.
He does the best stuff on Twitter.

P.S. What's up with your avatar?
You still couldn't get it to work?
If you want maybe you could call me and I'll try to help you with it, or you can ask CP if he can change it for you.

Let me know.
I'll email you my phone number.

I don't get why the urls for the images you post are so **** long.
Mine are usually just one line.
Where are you getting those long urls from?

I dunno! I am such a dunce when it come to the internet!

Termin8tor » 28 Jun 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:

Misty » 28 Jun 2019 11:53 am » wrote:Was the orange skidmark's first wife lying when she testified under oath in a deposition that he raped her in a fit of rage?

Given that they have been on good terms for many years, I find that unlikely.

Don't you know by now that I don't write checks that my *** can't cash Precious?
In a deposition taken in 1989 during their divorce proceedings Ivana Trump testified that in a fit of anger Trump ripped out hair from her scalp and raped her.
Look it up.

Termin8tor » 28 Jun 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:But unlike you, I won't tell years of blatant lies in Trump's defense.

You already have and continue to do so every day.

Termin8tor » 28 Jun 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:

Misty: You lie constantly in defense of a serial sexual assaulter, pretending that all of those women were receptive to his attacks and that it was nothing more than a 'vulgar form of seduction.'

What do the words,"They let me" mean, wackjob?

What do the words 'I just start kissing them.....I don't even wait' mean you jackass?
What is it that he doesn't even wait for Precious?
Their permission?

Termin8tor » 28 Jun 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:If he mildly assaulted any women without their consent, a court will offer the appropriate sentence.

MILDLY ASSAULTED?
WTF?

Termin8tor » 28 Jun 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:Unlike you, I haven't told years of lies in his defense.

You just did.......again.

Burn in hell.

20 Democrats debated each other over two nights and not once did the subject of hand/penis size come up.

Don't you know by now that I don't write checks that my *** can't cash Precious?
In a deposition taken in 1989 during their divorce proceedings Ivana Trump testified that in a fit of anger Trump ripped out hair from her scalp and raped her.
Look it up.

You would never smear someone with a false allegation, right wackjob?

Like you did when you tried to smear John Fund as a "child molester?"

Ivana and Trump get along and have for years. If I recall correctly, she has correct that claim.

In a separate interview with Time Magazine, Ivana was asked about allegations she reportedly made in a 1991 sworn deposition that she was raped by the reality TV star three years previously.
“That was all just the lawyers' talk”, she said, after having previously clarified she did not accuse him in “a literal or criminal sense”.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 93041.html

Naked and Unafraid!

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 8:38 am » wrote:

Don't you know by now that I don't write checks that my *** can't cash Precious?
In a deposition taken in 1989 during their divorce proceedings Ivana Trump testified that in a fit of anger Trump ripped out hair from her scalp and raped her.
Look it up.

You would never smear someone with a false allegation, right wackjob?

That's your MO Precious, not mine.

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 8:38 am » wrote:Ivana and Trump get along and have for years. If I recall correctly, she has correct that claim.

In a separate interview with Time Magazine, Ivana was asked about allegations she reportedly made in a 1991 sworn deposition that she was raped by the reality TV star three years previously.
“That was all just the lawyers' talk”, she said, after having previously clarified she did not accuse him in “a literal or criminal sense”.

Yes, she changed her story while they were negotiating the financial settlement.
I'm sure she wasn't pressured to do that. [/sarcasm]
Doesn't change what she testified to under oath.

Ivana Trump was granted a divorce on the grounds of “cruel and inhuman treatment” by Trump.
She has been issued a gag order that bars her from discussing her marriage to Trump without his permission.

If she talks the money gets cut off.
That's how Trump has always operated.

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 10:13 am » wrote:

You still don't get it do you?
People who were trying to enter this country illegally have been dying for years under every president.
It's a very dangerous journey crossing a desert and a river.

But those were usually Mexican men coming here to find work.

These two people were not trying to enter the country illegally.



Like most of the Central American families coming here now, they presented themselves at a legal port of entry to apply for asylum and were turned away.

But you will dishonestly keep conflating the two circumstances, because that is what you do.
You lie in defense of a president who also lies and you make yourself look really stupid in the process.

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 10:33 am » wrote:Or she was bitterly angry that Trump wanted a divorce and made up a story.

Isn't that ironic.
Juanita Broaddrick testified under oath that Bill Clinton did not rape her, then changed her story in an interview years later.
Ivana Trump testified under oath that her husband raped her, then changed her story in an interview years later.

And you believe that they both lied under oath and told the truth in interviews.
I tend to put a lot more weight into what people say under penalty of perjury than what they say to a reporter.

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 10:33 am » wrote:You don't know what the facts are, but that's never stopped you from smearing your political opponents.
You can't debate honestly, so you lie and smear.

There is more projection in your posts than a chain of movie theaters.

I am alway gobsmacked by how much you have in common with the orange skidmark.
You lie just like him and you project all of your own **** onto everyone else.

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 10:40 am » wrote:90% of "asylum seekers" are people who have learned that dishonestly claiming asylum will get them into the country and allow them to stay. They have also learned that if they rent or kidnap a child, they cannot be legally turned away.

I would ask you to back up that **** that 90% of asylum seekers are dishonestly claiming asylum and are renting or kidnapping the children they are bringing with them to this country, but there's no way to back up ****.

Was this child clinging to the neck of the man who rented or kidnapped her?



Seriously, unless you repent, when you meet your maker you will be sent straight to hell for your defense of a child abusing sexual predator.

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 10:51 am » wrote:

Misty » 29 Jun 2019 10:49 am » wrote:I am alway gobsmacked by how much you have in common with the orange skidmark.
You lie just like him and you project all of your own **** onto everyone else.

You can't debate honestly, so you lie and smear.
Name one single dishonest charge I've made against anyone.

You're kidding, right?

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 11:01 am » wrote:

Misty: I would ask you to back up that **** that 90% of asylum seekers are dishonestly claiming asylum and are renting or kidnapping the children they are bringing with them to this country, but there's no way to back up ****.

It's been repeated by Immigration officials and other knowledgeable people for many months now, wackjob including a day or two ago on Laura Ingraham's show.

OIC. It was on Laura Ingraham's show.
That changes everything.

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 11:01 am » wrote:The corrupt liberal MSM won't report important facts like that.
If you were actually interested in the truth, you'd google it.

If I do will you accept any source that is not a far right wingnut source?
Let's find out.



https://www.politifact.com/texas/statem ... out-merit/

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 11:01 am » wrote:

Misty: Seriously, unless you repent, when you meet your maker you will be sent straight to hell for your defense of a child abusing sexual predator.

Consult a good mental health professional, wackjob.

Get down on your knees and ask God for forgiveness before it's too late.

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 11:05 am » wrote:

Misty » 29 Jun 2019 11:02 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 10:51 am » wrote:You can't debate honestly, so you lie and smear.
Name one single dishonest charge I've made against anyone.

You're kidding, right?

Have I told lunatic lies like this, wackjob?

Misty » 24 Jan 2019 6:09 pm » wrote:You have never made common sense in your whole miserable **** life.

Hey, that's believable.

It's very believable.
You say **** that makes no sense on a regular basis.

Termin8tor » 29 Jun 2019 10:58 am » wrote:

Misty » 29 Jun 2019 10:49 am » wrote:Isn't that ironic.
Juanita Broaddrick testified under oath that Bill Clinton did not rape her, then changed her story in an interview years later.

Oh look, the psychopath left out a key detail. Broaddrick told four people immediately after it happened, including a nurse who treated her badly bitten lip.

Funny you should say that.
E. Jean Carroll told two people that Trump raped her immediately after it happened and those two women have now come forward to back up her story, so you must believe her, right?