
That came straight from The Military Times Huey, NOT the MSM.Huey » 03 Jul 2019 7:17 pm » wrote:Misty, I’ll give you the Sherman.Misty » 02 Jul 2019 5:37 pm » wrote:The Dotard actually said we have the 'brand new' Sherman and Abrams tanks.
The M4 Sherman, best known for its role in World War II, went out of service in 1957.
The M1 Abrams came online in 1980.
But the M1A1 Abrams built today and in service is not the same M1 built in 1980. They are up to the M1A3. The original had a Diesel engine. The 2 had a turbine engine and they have been advanced to a 3.
Stay away from military stuff and stick to reading zip codes. Your embarrassing yourself.
Do a **** google search for Christ sake instead of parroting what the MSM told you.

Her reading deficiencies continue.Misty » 04 Jul 2019 11:28 am » wrote:That came straight from The Military Times Huey, NOT the MSM.Huey » 03 Jul 2019 7:17 pm » wrote:Misty, I’ll give you the Sherman.Misty » 02 Jul 2019 5:37 pm » wrote:The Dotard actually said we have the 'brand new' Sherman and Abrams tanks.
The M4 Sherman, best known for its role in World War II, went out of service in 1957.
The M1 Abrams came online in 1980.
But the M1A1 Abrams built today and in service is not the same M1 built in 1980. They are up to the M1A3. The original had a Diesel engine. The 2 had a turbine engine and they have been advanced to a 3.
Stay away from military stuff and stick to reading zip codes. Your embarrassing yourself.
Do a **** google search for Christ sake instead of parroting what the MSM told you.
Maybe you think they should stay away from military stuff too.
![]()
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your ... lebration/
The artcle also points out that, "The Associated Press reported late on Monday that one of its photographers saw at least two M1A1 Abrams tanks and two Bradley Fighting Vehicles on a flatcar in a railyard at the southern edge of Washington.
Try reading my sources before you chime in next time Huey.
In your zealousness to make me look stupid, you stepped on your own dick again.
They were too embarrassed that they might have to clarify whether they were talking about a man's penis or a woman's penis, darling.Misty » 28 Jun 2019 7:59 pm » wrote:20 Democrats debated each other over two nights and not once did the subject of hand/penis size come up.
I tend to believe women who claim they were raped - even when the rapist is democrat.Misty » 29 Jun 2019 10:49 am » wrote:Isn't that ironic.
Juanita Broaddrick testified under oath that Bill Clinton did not rape her, then changed her story in an interview years later.
Ivana Trump testified under oath that her husband raped her, then changed her story in an interview years later.
And you believe that they both lied under oath and told the truth in interviews.
I tend to put a lot more weight into what people say under penalty of perjury than what they say to a reporter.
I wonder how both dead people just HAPPEN to both have their heads above water. If they weren't dead, they might be breathing.Misty » 29 Jun 2019 10:58 am » wrote: I would ask you to back up that **** that 90% of asylum seekers are dishonestly claiming asylum and are renting or kidnapping the children they are bringing with them to this country, but there's no way to back up ****.
Was this child clinging to the neck of the man who rented or kidnapped her?
![]()



