Liberal Forum

ANother interesting tidbit of info:

http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Jimmy_ ... conomy.htm

Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2015 2:41 am » wrote: Your mouth is a hole where arab men ehacutalte.I answer for me, and I don't take the word of pakistani cum dumpsters as to who is and is not liberal - nor do I presume to explain what other adults are thinking, toilet.

You think the media owned and operated by your wall street heros is liberal, you eager pakistani face rape opportunity. If you don't see it at the rest area, you assume it's liberal, bathroom boy.

Meanwhile, you post charts that you don't understand, and then name call when you're asked what the chart means by an honest poster who would never post **** that he doesn't even comprehend.

You're a hack and a spewbot, andf you only post to me because you want to suck my cock.

Now, these are my instructions, ***. Post to me again, so that everyone will know I speak the truth, and you are genuinely after my dick.

DO IT, SISSY.

.

Wow, how can anyone deal with such a towering intellect?? The logic, the wisdom!!

Here you go again, psycho.

I remember as a mere callow college student when I made out that Jimmy Carter was finished: when liberals turned on him. For example, Ken Bode, then the revered moderator of “Washington Week in Review” on PBS, wrote in 1979 “It’s Over For Jimmy” in The New Republic: “The past two weeks will be remembered as the period when President Carter packed it in, put the finishing touches on a failed presidency”
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... elding.php

Huey » 16 Jan 2015 4:56 am » wrote: Once again CanoBrattle does not wish to discuss an OP, particularly his own.

.

You clean camels with your tongue, you lap dancer for overweight salesmen! Worms anticipate your death!

Your mother pays full commission!

RichClem » 16 Jan 2015 7:35 am » wrote: Wow, how can anyone deal with such a towering intellect?? The logic, the wisdom!!
Here you go again, psycho.

That's what I thought, kid. You want the dick.

Huey » 16 Jan 2015 5:17 am » wrote: It was a simple question related to YOUR OP. Afraid to post the answer? Afraid to accept reality?
Very entertaining.

I have to say, when a bitch made punk wants some of Daddys dick, the cock-craving is NOT to be denied. This little bitch is HUNGRY for it.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 2:13 am » wrote:
I have to say, when a bitch made punk wants some of Daddys dick, the cock-craving is NOT to be denied. This little bitch is HUNGRY for it.

How long before he needs to seek professional help for this mental meltdown?

Huey » 17 Jan 2015 6:33 am » wrote: How long before he needs to seek professional help for this mental meltdown?

Uh, yesterday?

Huey » 17 Jan 2015 6:33 am » wrote: How long before he needs to seek professional help for this mental meltdown?

Who can say? Keep following me around crying and begging for cock, and let's see.

Please respond to signal a desire for my dick in your mouth.

RichClem » 17 Jan 2015 7:48 am » wrote:
Uh, yesterday?

Ah, another mouse-skeeter. This fruitcake^^ is the one who posts anything he finds on rightwing blogs - even charts he doesn't comprehend. When the person inb whose thread he posted such a chart turns out to be an honest man who actually LOOKS AT AND CONSIDERS COUNTER ARGUMENTS, and that person admits ignorance and requests help comprehending the said chart, Glory Hole Clem calls that person "psycho" as a diversion from his own sliminess.

What a worthless piece of ****. And the *** will STILL come sliming into my threads, posting charts quite shamelessly, and expecting answers. **** this little monkey. He has less than two fingers of forehead, without a doubt. Now that I know he does not even understand the charts he posts, why would I study and research to respond?

Huey » 16 Jan 2015 5:17 am » wrote: It was a simple question related to YOUR OP. .

It was a punkass *** question aimed at making a date to suck my cock. I don't do research for homosexuals who can't address the OP, little queer. If you have a theory that you think debunks my OP, stalker-queer, do your own research. I am not your mom - not even a filthy slut.

Now, post pertinently to the OP, or post off-topic to let me know you want to suck my dick.

If you want to suck my dick AND lick my ***, then insist that I do YOUR research, little girl.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 2:46 pm » wrote: Ah, another mouse-skeeter. This fruitcake^^ is the one who posts anything he finds on rightwing blogs - even charts he doesn't comprehend. When the person inb whose thread he posted such a chart turns out to be an honest man who actually LOOKS AT AND CONSIDERS COUNTER ARGUMENTS, and that person admits ignorance and requests help comprehending the said chart, Glory Hole Clem calls that person "psycho" as a diversion from his own sliminess.

What a worthless piece of ****. And the *** will STILL come sliming into my threads, posting charts quite shamelessly, and expecting answers. **** this little monkey. He has less than two fingers of forehead, without a doubt. Now that I know he does not even understand the charts he posts, why would I study and research to respond?

Are you still babbling about a chart I admitted might be a mistake?

Which I immediately replaced with an accurate one showing the Carter meltdown and the Reagan Boom?

Did you ever find a single mainstream opinion that supports your psychotic idiocy about Carter and Reagan?

No? Knew you'd never even try.

RichClem » 17 Jan 2015 3:39 pm » wrote: admitted might be a mistake

The rest was too long, I didn't bother to ead it. I have no particular reason to believe you understood it, anyway. It could be uncritically copy-pasted blather from a blog. It would have taken time for me to discern whether it was or wasn't, and my time is suddenly a precious commodity where you are concerned, copy-paste clem.

In other words, go **** yourself, fraud. Now I know: You don't understand what you post. There's no reason for me to respond to a blind copy paster which might or might not be a machine or a retarded man, unless I feel like it, for the benefit of others. You don't count, because you don't understand \what YOU post, much less what I post.

After someone explains this post, you really should go **** yourself, hack.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 3:58 pm » wrote:
The rest was too long, I didn't bother to ead it. I have no particular reason to believe you understood it, anyway. It could be uncritically copy-pasted blather from a blog. It would have taken time for me to discern whether it was or wasn't, and my time is suddenly a precious commodity where you are concerned, copy-paste clem.

In other words, go **** yourself, fraud. Now I know: You don't understand what you post. There's no reason for me to respond to a blind copy paster which might or might not be a machine or a retarded man, unless I feel like it, for the benefit of others. You don't count, because you don't understand \what YOU post, much less what I post.

After someone explains this post, you really should go **** yourself, hack.

Stupid **** thinks telling posters over and over to go **** themselves is the sign of an intelligent Post.

Huey » 17 Jan 2015 4:01 pm » wrote:
Stupid **** thinks telling posters over and over to go **** themselves is the sign of an intelligent Post.

I don't waste intelligent posts on shameless *** who try to conjob me into doing their work for them, You USED to get intelligent posts from me - benefit of the doubt. There is no longer any doubt. I NEVER posted intelligently to truthwarrior or nightstalker or coloneatery. - because there was never any doubt they were morons. You now get the level you've shown yourself to deserve - the treatment appropriate to a lazy, shameless, lying, entitled ***.

No offense - just being honest.

Your girlfriend gets the posts which a fellow who doesn't understand his posts and is unlikely to understand mine merits.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 3:58 pm » wrote: The rest was too long, I didn't bother to ead it. I have no particular reason to believe you understood it, anyway. It could be uncritically copy-pasted blather from a blog. It would have taken time for me to discern whether it was or wasn't, and my time is suddenly a precious commodity where you are concerned, copy-paste clem.

In other words, go **** yourself, fraud. Now I know: You don't understand what you post. There's no reason for me to respond to a blind copy paster which might or might not be a machine or a retarded man, unless I feel like it, for the benefit of others. You don't count, because you don't understand \what YOU post, much less what I post.

After someone explains this post, you really should go **** yourself, hack.

Because I make one minor mistake, "I don't understand what I post."

Pretty hilarious coming from someone with a psychotic view of Economics and history.

I have on my side liberal Time, liberal Newsweek, the liberal New Republic, all the networks at the time, every business publication I've ever seen, most historians most of whom are liberal, National Review, American Spectator, Weekly Standard, Human Events, etc, etc.

You have on your side your own psychotic analysis and accompanying delusions.

RichClem » 17 Jan 2015 4:26 pm » wrote:I don't understand what I post.

Sorry, the rest was too much to read - especially considering tthe admission which preceded it

Okay, so what was your point? I already pointed this out, myself. Don't you read anything?

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 4:31 pm » wrote: Sorry, the rest was too much to read - especially considering tthe admission which preceded it

Okay, so what was your point? I already pointed this out, myself. Don't you read anything?

Wow, what an intellect. And such high integrity.

I have on my side liberal Time, liberal Newsweek, the liberal New Republic, all the networks at the time, every business publication I've ever seen, most historians most of whom are liberal, National Review, American Spectator, Weekly Standard, Human Events, etc, etc.

You have on your side your own psychotic analysis and accompanying delusions.

RichClem » 17 Jan 2015 4:42 pm » wrote:
Wow, what an intellect. And such high integrity.

TLDR. I lose patience after one sentence from you, glory hole.You're gonna have to learn to bottom line it. I figure you won't copy-paste your first sentence.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 4:59 pm » wrote: TLDR. I lose patience after one sentence from you, glory hole.You're gonna have to learn to bottom line it. I figure you won't copy-paste your first sentence.

Blah, blah, and babble baloney.

I have on my side liberal Time, liberal Newsweek, the liberal New Republic, all the networks at the time, every business publication I've ever seen, most historians most of whom are liberal, National Review, American Spectator, Weekly Standard, Human Events, etc, etc.

You have on your side your own psychotic analysis and accompanying delusions.

RichClem » 17 Jan 2015 5:04 pm » wrote:
Blah, blah, and babble baloney.

.

That's not an improvement, Lisa. Every time I think you can;t sink lower, you do.