Liberal Forum

RichClem » 17 Jan 2015 5:04 pm » wrote: Blah, blah, and babble baloney.

I have on my side liberal Time, liberal Newsweek, the liberal New Republic, all the networks at the time, every business publication I've ever seen, most historians most of whom are liberal, National Review, American Spectator, Weekly Standard, Human Events, etc, etc.

You have on your side your own psychotic analysis and accompanying delusions.

you have on YOUR side, the ones that wish women would be raped by a pack of wild dogs, and the ones that think that animal rape videos are no big deal.

THAT is you legacy.
is any one around here standing up for you?

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 5:11 pm » wrote: That's not an improvement, Lisa. Every time I think you can;t sink lower, you do.

Yeah, I know how painful reality is for you.

I have on my side liberal Time, liberal Newsweek, the liberal New Republic, all the networks at the time, every business publication I've ever seen, most historians most of whom are liberal, National Review, American Spectator, Weekly Standard, Human Events, etc, etc.

You have on your side your own psychotic analysis and accompanying delusions.

RichClem » 17 Jan 2015 7:19 pm » wrote: I have on my side liberal Time, bla bla bla etc, etc.

You have on your side a delicious penis that I love to suck, which is why I lied just now about Time being on my side.

Okay, ****. I made specific claims. Refute one of them. Use Time - sorry, I mean LIBERAL Time - the one that hates Walll Street which owbs it. Use LIBER\AL Time to debunk ANYTHING I HAVE SAID IN THIS THREAD

I'm gonna wait right here while you show that you didn't tell a "clem" when you said Time Magazine - sorry, LIBERAL Time Magazine - was on your side.

GO!

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 11:16 pm » wrote: Okay, ****. I made specific claims. Refute one of them.

I have, but you respond with lies, bulls*** and your usual psychotic idiocy.

Cite a single mainstream opinion that supports your claims about Carter and Reagan.

You can't, so you'll write more drivel, lies and obscenities.

RichClem » 18 Jan 2015 6:45 am » wrote:
I have, but you wah wah wah wah My mother's a whore. I love cock. Waaahhh!!!

That's what I thought, you little bitch.

You have chased me around the board like a ****, INSISTING that Time Magazine agrees with you and disagrees with me. I've ignored you, becuase I knew it was a bluff. I finally get tired of your spamming that over and over and over and over - and I call your bluff. Okay, I say: refute one claim with the source you claim refutes me.

"I DID," you bluff again, "but my ****** hurts and I need a dick in my mouth! Waaaaahhh!!!"

**** you, turd. You bring jack ****, you little cock chasing ape.

Here is the post you responded to, WITHOUT MEETING THE CHALLENGE, YOU COWARDLY COCKSUCKER:

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 11:16 pm » wrote:
Okay, ****. I made specific claims. Refute one of them. Use Time - sorry, I mean LIBERAL Time - the one that hates Walll Street which owns it. Use LIBER\AL Time to debunk ANYTHING I HAVE SAID IN THIS THREAD

I'm gonna wait right here while you show that you didn't tell a "clem" when you said Time Magazine - sorry, LIBERAL Time Magazine - was on your side.

GO!

YOU made the claim and YOU were challenged to back it up and YOU started bleeding from your butt instead. So **** off, you bring-nothing, bluffasaurus cocksucker. Go stalk someone else, you little bitch. I will not **** your mouth, so stop begging me. THIS DICK IS FOR CHICKS, YOU FREAK.

Now, say some more stupid ****, to signify that your mom is a whore and that your dad molested you with anal rape and that you molest children regularly. Seriously, if you molest boys by licking their asses, keep posting in this thread, you bring-nothing little ***.

Prove you're a child molester! GO!

I just know that history disproves your thread topic.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2015 6:48 pm » wrote:I just know that history disproves your thread topic.

I'm ****' awestruck at your virtuosity, sonny.

Boy, that post BROUGHT it! Your source is unimpeachable: "History." And your link to it - inside the cavern of your mind. Amazing!

**** amazing. The years you've been posting have given you amazing chops, buddy. You really BRING it! I'm standing in a veritable PUDDLE of refutation.

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2015 6:57 pm » wrote:I'm ****' awestruck at your virtuosity, sonny.

Boy, that post BROUGHT it! Your source is unimpeachable: "History." And your link to it - inside the cavern of your mind. Amazing!

**** amazing. The years you've been posting have given you amazing chops, buddy. You really BRING it! I'm standing in a veritable PUDDLE of refutation.

you should be in awe. Hey, I have never stooped to the sok strategy.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2015 6:59 pm » wrote:
you should be in awe. Hey, I have never stooped to the sok HAVING A strategy.

Edited for clarity, sonny.. You don't get any praise for not sokking, son. You SHOULDN'T **** with a sok until you do SOMETHING wortth a **** with the screen name you're currenty underserving, ya podunk *** hat. Littlehawk has more business sokking than you do. Every once in a while he does more than bluff.

"History says yer wrong! BAM! I refutidja!" Derp.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2015 6:59 pm » wrote: you should be in awe. Hey, I have never stooped to the sok strategy.

Sour grapes, kid. You're a jealous bitch because I jave colorfful soks and you can barely manage the level of lameness we're seeing in your repsonses here.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2015 6:59 pm » wrote:
you should be in awe. Hey, I have never stooped to the sok strategy.

I ain't got a dawg in dis fite, but you is a jealous bitch.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2015 6:59 pm » wrote: you should be in awe. Hey, I have never stooped to the sok strategy.

In the Muslim community, I would be stoned for pointing out that you are a jealous bitch.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2015 6:59 pm » wrote: you should be in awe. Hey, I have never stooped to the sok strategy.

Me thinkum maybeum, you-um jealousum bitchum.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2015 6:59 pm » wrote:
you should be in awe. Hey, I have never stooped to the sok strategy.

I consider EVERY voter one of my potential voters - even jealous bitches.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2015 6:59 pm » wrote:
you should be in awe. Hey, I have never stooped to the sok strategy.

Mmmm.

Me too drunk.

You knowum.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2015 6:59 pm » wrote: you should be in awe. Hey, I have never stooped to the sok strategy.

I have only been in this stable for a few days - I was forcibly requisitioned from a homosexual named gooey. My name was shamed to project no innocence. But even I know a jealous bitch when I see one.

And the meltdown continues...

And the whiney bitch continues to talk ABOUT me instead of TO me. Living in that kind of fear - having a foe you respect THAT much.

Hell, I'm jealous. All I have is lames like this fukaluk "sweet baby hooey" and "boy-chaser gooey" and clem "dick-suck" fooey for opponents.

Silverfox » 17 Feb 2014 2:58 pm » wrote:Oh. My. God.

It looks as if only logical fallacies earn respect in some quarters.

I certainly respect them, but I also occasionally respect arguments that don't craft any into them. I see that as a weakness, but not always a fatal weakness.

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2015 6:46 pm » wrote: That's what I thought, you little bitch.

You have chased me around the board like a ****, INSISTING that Time Magazine agrees with you and disagrees with me. I've ignored you, becuase I knew it was a bluff. I finally get tired of your spamming that over and over and over and over - and I call your bluff. Okay, I say: refute one claim with the source you claim refutes me.

"I DID," you bluff again, "but my ****** hurts and I need a dick in my mouth! Waaaaahhh!!!"

**** you, turd. You bring jack ****, you little cock chasing ape.

Here is the post you responded to, WITHOUT MEETING THE CHALLENGE, YOU COWARDLY COCKSUCKER:
YOU made the claim and YOU were challenged to back it up and YOU started bleeding from your butt instead. So **** off, you bring-nothing, bluffasaurus cocksucker. Go stalk someone else, you little bitch. I will not **** your mouth, so stop begging me. THIS DICK IS FOR CHICKS, YOU FREAK.

Now, say some more stupid ****, to signify that your mom is a whore and that your dad molested you with anal rape and that you molest children regularly. Seriously, if you molest boys by licking their asses, keep posting in this thread, you bring-nothing little ***.

Prove you're a child molester! GO!

.

You actually waste time writing psychotic drivel like this?

What a complete and utter Dim you are.