Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2015 6:46 pm » wrote:YOU made the claim and YOU were challenged to back it up and YOU started bleeding from your butt instead. So **** off, you bring-nothing, bluffasaurus cocksucker. Go stalk someone else, you little bitch. I will not **** your mouth, so stop begging me. THIS DICK IS FOR CHICKS, YOU FREAK.

Now, say some more stupid ****, to signify that your mom is a whore and that your dad molested you with anal rape and that you molest children regularly. Seriously, if you molest boys by licking their asses, keep posting in this thread, you bring-nothing little ***.

Prove you're a child molester! GO!

RichClem » 09 Dec 2015 7:45 am » wrote: You actually think I'll waste time for a babbling psychotic liar like you?

Go hit the library and read the issues for yourself.

RichClem » 09 Dec 2015 7:43 am » wrote: .You actually waste time writing psychotic drivel like this?

What a complete and utter Dim you are.

Cannonpointer » 09 Dec 2015 3:39 pm » wrote: Good job, boy toucher.

Cannonpointer » 16 Feb 2014, 3:56 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2014, 3:56 am

Carter grew the economy in the four years of HIS budget 78,79, 80 and 81 (he took office in 77, but that was ford's year - and a good one) faster than reagan did in his eight years 81-89. If anyone wants to swap years (pretend 77 was Carter's, even though the fiscal year runs from October to October) that's fine, too. Either way, Carter ROMPS on Reagan - I just want to be accurate.

http://useconomy.about.com/od/GDP-by-Ye ... istory.htm

In 4 years, carter grew the economy to 154% of where he took over. It was 2.086 trillion in 77 when he took office, and 3.211 trillion for 81 - his last fiscal budget. The numbers are even better if you run it by election year rather than fiscal year (the more accurate and honest measure).

In his 8 years, Reagan took the economy from 3.211 trillion - Carter's last fiscal year - to 5,6577 trillion in 1989 - his last fiscal year, That's an increase to 177% of what it was when he took over - in EIGHT years. Carter almost made that figure in FOUR years.

Aided and abbetted by a willing conservative MSM, repukes have floated a false narrative about Carter and reagan, playing the former as befuddled and incompetent and the latter as an economic goliath. Nothing could be farther from the truth. This is why, in the face of ALL EVIDENCE, contards pretend the press is "librul." It's called projection.

I want to give credit where it's due: Glory Hole Clem is the fool who got me to googling and discovering these facts. My own nature is what gets me crowing about it.

Contards, you are on notice: CARTER WAS BETTER FOR THE ECONOMY THAN REAGAN. SO WAS CLINTON - BETTER THAN REAGAN, BUSH AND BUSH. You people suck at business and the economy - and everything else. You even suck off men in public bathrooms.

Let's see what Forbes has to say: http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/ ... -creation/

Cannonpointer » 08 Jul 2022, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 4:07 pm

This thread needs bumping.

roadkill » 08 Jul 2022, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 4:20 pm

Reagan passed tax breaks for R&D in the tech sector...the '90s exploded in the markets thanx to Reagan.

roadkill » 08 Jul 2022, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 4:33 pm

As in 20% interest rates bump?

Cannonpointer » 08 Jul 2022, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 5:55 pm

The sins of Johnson-Nixon-Ford had to be cleaned up.

You're welcome.

Cannonpointer » 08 Jul 2022, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 5:54 pm

Okay.

He passed the largest single tax HIKE against workers - at the same time he he gve a record tax CUR to wall street corporations.

roadkill » 08 Jul 2022, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 6:06 pm

So who's in bed with wall street now...and tax hikes, inflation, and the cost of gas?   Sure wasn't Trump.

Cannonpointer » 08 Jul 2022, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 6:09 pm

Oh, Trump is not without sin.

He called HIMSELF wall street's best friend - so your disagreement would be with Trump, not with me. Argue with TRUMP that he lied about his loyalties. Then, too, he pretended to take the pfizer shot, in an attempt to gull you - did he not?

That shines rather badly.

roadkill » 08 Jul 2022, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 6:12 pm

Why not just change yer name to "Bv" or "B.See".  I'm not going to go down this cobblestone road with you.

Cannonpointer » 08 Jul 2022, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 6:20 pm

Okay, I lied. Trump never said that - trump never did that.

Sorry - just funnin'.

roadkill » 08 Jul 2022, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 6:22 pm

No problem here...I'm just saturating the forum like you did.

Cannonpointer » 13 Oct 2014, 1:02 am » wrote: ↑

13 Oct 2014, 1:02 am

Conservatism lost it's party in Watergate. Nixon was the last American president that conservatives voted into office. Conservatism had already taken some hard blows. There was Vietnam, an unfortunate tendency toward jingo-patriotism, civil rights, rock music and an energetic counter culture which gave two **** about the Conservatives' moral high ground - which ten years earlier had made conservatives unassailable: masters of the social killing fields. 

But the kicker was fed notes. That's what brought them down - our getting off metal (and Bretton Woods) and on fiat as a currency - and the inflation that move precipitated. See, when Mama had to get her *** out there and win bread just like daddy, she wanted to be spoken to like a big girl, from that moment on. I mean to say, she stopped twirling her locks when she had a suggestion as quick as a Missouri cop stops his car when he spots an unarmed black man. 

Me, I was a scoffer and a sneerer - not a BIG job, but there was a big group doing it. Conservatism had always had the authority to look everyone in the eye and make them take stock of just what it was that they were up to at THAT minute of THAT day. It was an on-the-spot arbiter of what was and was not ****. Conservatism and authority were virtual synonyms. When you got pegged, you looked at the floor. 

In the late 1980's, a stage comic who made jokes on Christians was walking a dangerous line. You could lose a crowd like THAT! But then you had Swaggart and you had Jim and Tammy Faye and you had Swaggart Redux and you had Tilton - all in short order. And overnight, comics that spoofed religion went from edgy risk takers to cheerleaders and panderers. Audiences simply hit a water mark - and as a single entity, audience members decided that church-going Christians were fair game for humorists.

Conservatism in America had hit that same wall twelve to fifteen years earlier, when virtually EVERYONE, all in a trice and with no formal agreement, just stopped believing and stopped looking down. The day came that I did not break the gaze first. I gave conservatism the crazy eye, and conservatism broke contact. I was just another brick in the wall. 

All these years later, I miss conservatism - very much. The nation misses it. I'm sad that it's gone and would be happy to see its shadow at our door. When we helped daddy pack his bags, we were not cognizant of all the good stuff that was leaving with him, which WASN'T in those bags. The loss is everywhere observed, now - everywhere felt. The thing about conservatism was that it was where we kept our manhood - something you cannot put into bags - but that you cannot have without a certain pair of bags.

The on/off switch that would have prevented the shameful atrocities of abu ghraib was not in conservatism's bag - but I believe that switch hopped the same train that conservatism hopped when we stopped talking to it and stopped listening to it and started sneering at it, and defying it - and failing to imagine a single good thing to say about it. When we told conservatism to take a hike, there were no winners, and the biggest loser was anyone on this planet whose interests are served by America being a just and lawful nation. 

I am not suggesting that conseervatism can be expected, if it ever comes home, to restore those things single-handedly. But I CAN promise this: We won't restore this land to justice, to lawfuness or to prosperity WITHOUT conservatism in the partnership that does the heavy lifting. 

Daddy, we miss you. Please come home.