I look on these loons with shame.Cannonpointer » 27 Oct 2023, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ He's a suitcase. And like many folks' suitcases, he's proud of where he's been. Ya see the ones in the carousel, there, with the stickers showing where they went. PROUD suitcases. But no wiser for their travels.
He was grown in the 70s. So I have to shut up. Even though I was also grown in the 70s.
HOW CAN ONE FORGET THE 11,000 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS HE TERMINATEDCannonpointer » 27 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ That's what YOU have. ^![]()
I brought official numbers, fruity.
and funding OSAMA BIN LADENrighteous » 27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑ HOW CAN ONE FORGET THE 11,000 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS HE TERMINATED
I think many people forgot it.righteous » 27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑ HOW CAN ONE FORGET THE 11,000 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS HE TERMINATED
He broke that promise, broke their strike, and broke their union. Bully for him.You can rest assured that if I am elected President, I will take whatever steps are necessary to provide our air traffic controllers with the most modern equipment available and to adjust staff levels and work days so that they are commensurate with achieving a maximum degree of public safety.
if I lost, it's to made up numbers! by the government, so you lose cuck!
All Reagan did was accelerate NeoLiberal economic policies...sunburn » 28 Oct 2023, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ if I lost, it's to made up numbers! by the government, so you lose cuck!
The government "made up" my numbers, ya say.sunburn » 28 Oct 2023, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ if I lost, it's to made up numbers! by the government, so you lose cuck!
oh, you're just SO insightful..........but wrong.Cannonpointer » 28 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ The government "made up" my numbers, ya say.
Where did YOUR come from, assey-poo?
Oh, that's right. You had anecdotes and truculence - the fool-fodder of every neocon jack-wagon.
You think a debate is a yelling and foot stomping contest - because you were raised by trash.
It's like arguing with an encyclopedia.
No. I won't. Not unless you want me to adjust his ECONOMY to 2023, as well.Z09 » 28 Oct 2023, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Carter add $288 billion to the debt close to 50 years ago ..
???
Adjust that to 2023 $$$
the gubment has been making up numbers since its inception...fudging statistics and data to make the present administration look good...err better...Cannonpointer » 28 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ The government "made up" my numbers, ya say.
Where did YOUR come from, assey-poo?
Oh, that's right. You had anecdotes and truculence - the fool-fodder of every neocon jack-wagon.
You think a debate is a yelling and foot stomping contest - because you were raised by trash.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Cannonpointer » 28 Oct 2023, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ No. I won't. Not unless you want me to adjust his ECONOMY to 2023, as well.
And if You snivel me into adjusting HIS, I'll adjust Reagan's, too - dummy. You won't like that.

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Okay. That's lovely. And what should I do with this information?ROG62 » 29 Oct 2023, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ the gubment has been making up numbers since its inception...fudging statistics and data to make the present administration look good...err better...
Neither will you.
YOU do it.
^^^. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t13UHPXrdgsCannonpointer » 29 Oct 2023, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU do it.
I am not your servant or hers.
Adjusting the amount Carter borrowed to 2023 dollars would be meaningless unless I also adjusted his economy to 2023 dollars in order to maintain an apples to apples comparison. The ratio would not change - making it an exercise in repuke stupidity.
And you would REALLY hate it when I did the same for retard ronnie's numbers, kid.
You reagan cultists get mighty butt hurt when confronted with facts.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom What I'm saying is how much do you trust the gubment's numbers?Cannonpointer » 29 Oct 2023, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay. That's lovely. And what should I do with this information?
Do you doubt Reagan borrowed ANY MONEY AT ALL, or do you simply dispute how much?
Do you believe Carter borrowed MORE money that claimed - and if so, how much more?
Is it your thesis that Reagan actually SHRUNK the government as he promised, and then someone for some reason lied about it?
Is it your thesis that Carter's shrinking of the federal government is a chimera, created by the deep state so that I could unearth and lie on retard ronnie?
You've thrown out a factoid. PLEASE: put it some use, so it doesn't just sit there, voiceless, meaningless, looking like butt hurt.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Psssst. ****'s Brother.Cannonpointer » 16 Feb 2014, 3:56 am » wrote: ↑ Carter grew the economy in the four years of HIS budget 78,79, 80 and 81 (he took office in 77, but that was ford's year - and a good one) faster than reagan did in his eight years 81-89. If anyone wants to swap years (pretend 77 was Carter's, even though the fiscal year runs from October to October) that's fine, too. Either way, Carter ROMPS on Reagan - I just want to be accurate.
http://useconomy.about.com/od/GDP-by-Ye ... istory.htm
In 4 years, carter grew the economy to 154% of where he took over. It was 2.086 trillion in 77 when he took office, and 3.211 trillion for 81 - his last fiscal budget. The numbers are even better if you run it by election year rather than fiscal year (the more accurate and honest measure).
In his 8 years, Reagan took the economy from 3.211 trillion - Carter's last fiscal year - to 5,6577 trillion in 1989 - his last fiscal year, That's an increase to 177% of what it was when he took over - in EIGHT years. Carter almost made that figure in FOUR years.
Aided and abbetted by a willing conservative MSM, repukes have floated a false narrative about Carter and reagan, playing the former as befuddled and incompetent and the latter as an economic goliath. Nothing could be farther from the truth. This is why, in the face of ALL EVIDENCE, contards pretend the press is "librul." It's called projection.
I want to give credit where it's due: Glory Hole Clem is the fool who got me to googling and discovering these facts. My own nature is what gets me crowing about it.
Contards, you are on notice: CARTER WAS BETTER FOR THE ECONOMY THAN REAGAN. SO WAS CLINTON - BETTER THAN REAGAN, BUSH AND BUSH. You people suck at business and the economy - and everything else. You even suck off men in public bathrooms.
Let's see what Forbes has to say: http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/ ... -creation/
Government is policy, governors are chain of command enforcing policy that works against natural time evolving in plain sight. Intellect works past and current evolving, rule of law directs outcomes from now on.ROG62 » 29 Oct 2023, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ the gubment has been making up numbers since its inception...fudging statistics and data to make the present administration look good...err better...