Liberal Forum

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 3:13 pm » wrote: 25-year economic and jobs boom with a couple interruptions.

Yeah. We call the interruptions "republican presidencies."

Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2014 3:22 pm » wrote: Yeah. We call the interruptions "republican presidencies."

Yeah, your fellow psychotics get a kick about bulls*** like that.

So Dubya is to blame for the recession that started two months after he took office for example?

Reagan is to blame for two recessions that happened even before his tax cuts took effect?

Share your psychosis with everyone.

Where did the psychotic go?

.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 3:13 pm » wrote: Okay, I'll just assume you're lying, because anyone who knows anything knows that there was a 25-year economic and jobs boom with a couple interruptions.

Clearly beginning around 1983, unemployment plummeted as 20 million jobs were created over Reagan's presidency.

Oh, look. Glory Hole carefully aboided the chart, already posted by Amazon Tania, which shows the huge percentage of PART TIME jobs which Clem's chart hides.

Reagan gamed the system. In reagan's world, the catsup on a school lunch hamburger counted as a "vegetable." He was forever gaming the system with smoke and mirrors, backwards engineering and social engineering - like when he federalized America's public schools.

Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2014 3:38 pm » wrote:Oh, look. Glory Hole carefully aboided the chart, already posted by Amazon Tania, which shows the huge percentage of PART TIME jobs which Clem's chart hides.

Reagan gamed the system. In reagan's world, the catsup on a school lunch hamburger counted as a "vegetable." He was forever gaming the system with smoke and mirrors, backwards engineering and social engineering - like when he federalized America's public schools.

And let's not forget how the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy spread lies to fool Americans!

On 8 of the 10 key economic variables examined, the American economy performed better during the Reagan years than during the pre- and post-Reagan years.

Real economic growth averaged 3.2 percent during the Reagan years versus 2.8 percent during the Ford-Carter years and 2.1 percent during the Bush-Clinton years.
Real median family income grew by $4,000 during the Reagan period after experiencing no growth in the pre-Reagan years; it experienced a loss of almost $1,500 in the post-Reagan years.

Interest rates, inflation, and unemployment fell faster under Reagan than they did immediately before or after his presidency.
http://www.cato.org/publications/policy ... mic-record

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 3:47 pm » wrote:
And let's not forget how the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy spread lies to fool Americans!

It's 11 to 0 right now, clem. My position seems to be winning.

With everyone.
You claim my second option did not properly represent your position. How SHOULD I have phrased it, if I were as honest as you are?

Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2014 6:46 pm » wrote:
It's 11 to 0 right now, clem.

Sure it is, liar. That's why you're dodging my questions; because you're so brilliant.

How many jobs were created after Reagan's tax cuts took full effect?

What policies and who caused the recessions of 1980 and 1981-2?

That's a different thread, clem.

It's 11 to 0 right now. My position seems to be winning.

With everyone.

You claim my second option did not properly represent your position. How SHOULD I have phrased it, if I were as honest as you are?

Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2014 6:46 pm » wrote: It's 11 to 0 right now, clem. My position seems to be winning. h:

Strange, when I have a winning hand, I don't hide my cards behind bulls*** and lies.

The whole board can see what an ignorant, bleating psychotic you are.

And why did you avoid this fact?

Real median family income grew by $4,000 during the Reagan period

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 6:49 pm » wrote:
Strange, when I have a winning hand, I don't hide my cards behind bulls*** and lies.

The whole board can see what an ignorant, bleating psychotic you are.

And why did you avoid this fact?

That's a different thread, clem.

How should I have worded the poll?

Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2014 6:49 pm » wrote: That's a different thread, clem.

How should I have worded the poll?

Look at the cowardly psychotic lie and hide. You started this thread specifically over your anger at me in the Carter-Reagan thread.

Why are you hiding from the following fact?

Real median family income grew by $4,000 during the Reagan period

Wrong thread, clem.

What should the wording of my poll have been?

Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2014 6:56 pm » wrote:Wrong thread, clem.

The eternal refuge of a cowardly troll and a fraud.

What should the wording of my poll have been?

You, the troll who has evaded two questions 10, 20 time already, expects me to answer a question?

Who are you f***ing kidding.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 3:28 pm » wrote:So Dubya is to blame for the recession that started two months after he took office for example?

You don't even blame him for the economic collapse that happened 7 years after he took office.

Nice title BTW. I only wish I had thought of it.


Still a liberal I see.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 6:59 pm » wrote:
The eternal refuge of a cowardly troll and a fraud.


You, the troll who has evaded two questions 10, 20 time already, expects me to answer a question?

Who are you f***ing kidding.

You complained I worded the poll dishonestly. That puts the onus on you to say what WOULD have been proper wording. Your refusal is revealing. Keep ducking, dancer. we get it.

Your complaint was just a distraction from the fact that your position took a drubbing. No one respects your methodology - or at least, they respect what I did MORE, and you sneered at what I did. You're as out of step on this board as you are in real life.

Bathrooms are for pooping in pieces, clemtard - not for meeting lovers.

Misty » 18 Feb 2014 8:30 pm » wrote: You don't even blame him for the economic collapse that happened 7 years after he took office.

Are you blind or just lying?

I have repeatedly blamed Bush for 1) his lax Fed monetary policy and 2) on the basis of evidence you presented, his small expansion of liberal lending policies.

How did you manage to miss every post in which I expressed that?

But most of the blame falls on Democrats; liberal institution Fannie Mae, liberal lending policies and their repeated obstruction of Bush's 13 attempts to reform them.

You stupidly blame Bush and only Bush for his role in slightly expanding liberal lending policies, while sparing (liberal Dems.)


How hilariously dishonest.

Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2014 9:56 pm » wrote: You complained I worded the poll dishonestly. That puts the onus on you to say what WOULD have been proper wording. Your refusal is revealing. Keep ducking, dancer. we get it.

Your complaint was just a distraction from the fact that your position took a drubbing. No one respects your methodology - or at least, they respect what I did MORE, and you sneered at what I did. You're as out of step on this board as you are in real life.

Bathrooms are for pooping in pieces, clemtard - not for meeting lovers.

It is now established beyond doubt for everyone on the board to see that you're a shameless lying troll and a coward.


Have a nice troll life.

Pointing out Clem's irrational arguments is the discussion equivalent of clubbing baby seals.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 6:59 pm » wrote:
The eternal refuge of a cowardly troll and a fraud.


You, the troll who has evaded two questions 10, 20 time already, expects me to answer a question?

Who are you f***ing kidding.

translation:
you have made me look like an idiot too many times, so I am scared to death of that question

This thread has certainly been illustrative of Glory Hole Clem's character.