Liberal Forum

greatnpowerfuloz » 17 Feb 2014 3:52 pm » wrote:Amazing what passes for good judgement, Clem. Many would say good judgement would have been Jesus not walking barefoot and unarmed to Gethsemane that Thursday night. Especially considering he knew what was going to happen to him.

WTF?

Maybe he'd still be around today to remind you of what a selfish, uncharitable prick Reagan was.

Maybe you shouldn't be such a shameless lying troll.

Here's a hint. "Generosity" isn't giving away taxpayer money.

Buy a freaking dictionary.

RichClem » 17 Feb 2014 3:57 pm » wrote: No, moonbat, as I pointed out several times, Singapore must be judged on the broad range of policies, not on your psychotic insistence to cherry pick only what you want to bleat about.

But that's too common sense for you to grasp.

No, Singapore must be judged by HERITAGE, whom you will then parrot. Independent judgement is something you already have attacked and smirked at in the OP, son. Don't pretend you apply it, when you're on record smirking at it and belittling it.

Figures the psychotic would utterly mis-represent what I've been doing and asking.

More respectable: Arguing from raw data, or citing partisan opinion which references those data?

You may select 1 option

1. Arguing your own opinion from data sourced to independent, nonpartisan authorities

2, Citing the opinions of talking heads, luminaries, and assorted "official" spokespeople, who reference those data in their arguments

I don't recall citing one single "talking head" or "official spokespeople," so WTF are you babbling about? A "luminary?" WTF do you mean by that?

What I do recommend in addition to examining data and information on one's own is to read and consider the analysis of more knowledgeable commentators, not because they're, snicker, "Alpha Males," but for the logic, additional information and insight they offer.

As opposed to the idiocy you express as you bungle historically settled issues by refusing to consider some of the most important information.

Cannonpointer » 17 Feb 2014 3:03 pm » wrote:I will now present you with the DEFINING POST of Glory Hole Clem's career. You will be exposed to the difference between me, and the vast majority of right wing hacks on this board - the very worst elements of which are incorporated and incarnated (if he's human and not a bot) in the drivel we get from Glory Hole Clem.

BTW, great job at completely ignoring every single source I've cited and all the important information.

Obviously you think knowledge very, very dangerous.

RichClem » 17 Feb 2014 3:50 pm » wrote: Amazing that an ignorant imbecile would give so much weight to her own worthless opinion.

Hey moonbat, why do publications like the WSJ, IBD and Forbes sell? Because their informed, successful intelligent readers want false propaganda?

That's the money theory, yes. Some want to have their own beliefs confirmed. You are among those who desire that.

"Paid to skew raw data?" Thanks for showing everyone
you've never, ever read a single one of the sources I cite, except maybe rarely in passing.

How the **** do you know what I've read? Do you assume because I lean slightly more liberal overall that I don't read conservative opinion? Think again. I can certainly appreciate a well though out opinion based on the data presented, that doesn't fall in line with what conservatives believe should appeal to my progressive leanings. As a social Libertarian, I can well appreciate the value of fiscal responsibility and smaller, more effective government, especially as it applies to a more localized, community based sort of governance.

You are a narrow-minded amoeba reacting only to what assuages your fears and titillates your greedy, nasty inclinations.

it's impossible for you to fathom a person like me.

Hush now, he's been reading for decades. DECADES! He CAN'T be wrong.

He can just tell who is right and who is wrong. He can't explain WHY - but believe me, he can just tell!

DECADES!

Goodness!

He couldn't pour water from a boot if there were instructions on the heel but he could tell you you are wrong ... it's just that "Why?" question is so damn tricky!

People follow him, you know. Sure, they only follow him out of curiosity but he has followers! Must mean he is a leader!

This is a man who has completed his posting duties to his entire satisfaction. He has delusions of adequacy.

In short, he is entertaining but I wouldn't recommend that you breed from him.

greatnpowerfuloz » 17 Feb 2014 4:07 pm » wrote:It's impossible for you to fathom a person like me.

It's not as impossible as you would like to believe.
We derive your ignorance from things like not knowing about the CLASS Act and the 1099 repeal, and claiming that some guy holding a sign was Mark Levin when it was not.

greatnpowerfuloz » 17 Feb 2014 4:07 pm » wrote:It's impossible for you to fathom a person like me.

Pfft.

You're a woman.

You're SUPPOSED to be unfathomable!

greatnpowerfuloz » 17 Feb 2014 4:07 pm » wrote: How the **** do you know what I've read?

Because you're hopelessly ignorant and referred to "the same biased opinion generator who gave the bizarre, unsupportable ****."

Because even though my opinions closely resemble the best minds on Economics and conservative/ libertarian thought, you called me "the village idiot."

Does that give you a hint, moonbat?

Do you assume because I lean slightly more liberal overall that I don't read conservative opinion? Think again. I can certainly appreciate a well though out opinion based on the data presented, that doesn't fall in line with what conservatives believe should appeal to my progressive leanings. As a social Libertarian, I can well appreciate the value of fiscal responsibility and smaller, more effective government, especially as it applies to a more localized, community based sort of governance.

You are a narrow-minded amoeba reacting only to what assuages your fears and titillates your greedy, nasty inclinations.

it's impossible for you to fathom a person like me.

You're ignorant, have appalling judgment and are shamelessly dishonest.

What's to fathom? You're a typical moonbat.

RichClem » 17 Feb 2014 3:59 pm » wrote: WTF?

Translated for Clem the village idiot. Good judgement is something best viewed in retrospect. If you had anything close to good judgement, then 99% of your posts would not exist.

golfboy » 17 Feb 2014 4:11 pm » wrote: It's not as impossible as you would like to believe.
We derive your ignorance from things like not knowing about the CLASS Act and the 1099 repeal, and claiming that some guy holding a sign was Mark Levin when it was not.

A "narrow minded amoeba" like me wouldn't think of smearing someone as a racist on the basis of vaguely similar appearance in a country with hundreds of millions of people.


Then repeat the false claim without a shred of evidence.

Only the compassionate liberal-left would attempt something so ugly.

greatnpowerfuloz » 17 Feb 2014 4:15 pm » wrote:Translated for Clem the village idiot. Good judgement is something best viewed in retrospect. If you had anything close to good judgement, then 99% of your posts would not exist.

You're as shameless a lying troll as the rest of your insane buddies.

And hopelessly clueless, as well.

My opinions closely resemble the best minds on Economics and conservative/ libertarian thought. So you think they're "village idiots."

Stunningly stupid.

RichClem » 17 Feb 2014 4:19 pm » wrote:
You're as shameless a lying troll as the rest of your insane buddies.

And hopelessly clueless, as well.

My opinions closely resemble the best minds on Economics and conservative/ libertarian thought. So you think they're "village idiots."

Stunningly stupid.

bla bla bla.... absolutely meaningless bluster. credibility running on empty... pushing irrationality to new heights

greatnpowerfuloz » 17 Feb 2014 4:15 pm » wrote:Translated for Clem the village idiot. Good judgement is something best viewed in retrospect. If you had anything close to good judgement, then 99% of your posts would not exist.

Hey moonbat, it was settled long ago, literally decades, that Carter was incompetent on the economy and Reagan excellent.

If you haven't figured that out after 30 freaking years, don't bleat about "retrospect" because you're the village idiot.

Silverfox » 17 Feb 2014 4:10 pm » wrote:Hush now, he's been reading for decades. DECADES! He CAN'T be wrong.

He can just tell who is right and who is wrong. He can't explain WHY - but believe me, he can just tell!

DECADES!

Goodness!

He couldn't pour water from a boot if there were instructions on the heel but he could tell you you are wrong ... it's just that "Why?" question is so damn tricky!

People follow him, you know. Sure, they only follow him out of curiosity but he has followers! Must mean he is a leader!

This is a man who has completed his posting duties to his entire satisfaction. He has delusions of adequacy.

In short, he is entertaining but I wouldn't recommend that you breed from him.

That might deserve a BJ.

RichClem » 17 Feb 2014 4:26 pm » wrote: Hey moonbat, it was settled long ago, literally decades, that Carter was incompetent on the economy and Reagan excellent.

If you haven't figured that out after 30 freaking years, don't bleat about "retrospect" because you're the village idiot.

And furthermore, when's the last time you changed your underwear, young man!

Cannonpointer » 17 Feb 2014 3:15 pm » wrote: ....Your type of thinking is what creates glass ceilings in corporations - if an opinion comes from an alpha male, it resonates with more "truthiness" than if it comes form a mere skirt. You value sources over logic, sources over argument, sources over independent judgment.

.

Oh gosh, well okay. I'll take the word of an ignorant, foul mouthed psychotic over that of informed commentators whose job it is to be objective.


There, happy?

greatnpowerfuloz » 17 Feb 2014 4:32 pm » wrote: And furthermore, when's the last time you changed your underwear, young man!

Empty rhetoric and bulls***.

How impressive.

Never get between a moonbat and their dedication to ignorance and stupidity.

RichClem » 17 Feb 2014 4:32 pm » wrote: whose job it is to be objective.

Ahem.

Sorry.

RichClem » 17 Feb 2014 4:19 pm » wrote: You're as shameless a lying troll as the rest of your insane buddies.

And hopelessly clueless, as well.

My opinions closely resemble the best minds on Economics and conservative/ libertarian thought. So you think they're "village idiots."

Stunningly stupid.

The best minds in conservative economics are paid Heritage Foundation shills. For the record, you're the village idiot, not your sources. They're just greedy **** who can't get laid and have convinced themselves that money compensates for the loss.