Liberal Forum

ingo » 18 Jan 2018 10:51 am » wrote:

Sgt Bilko » 18 Jan 2018 2:29 am » wrote: What a bunch of drivel!!!

Bilko's Army

Is that the best ad hominem attack you can make?? Go back to the drawing board.. You are a failure with the Alinsky method.
1. Demonize the opposition.
2. Never discuss the issues with the opposition since it humanizes them.

You need to work harder on those rules. Get Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky for the complete methodology. You are pathetic.

What a bunch of drivel!!!Bilko's ArmyIs that the best ad hominem attack you can make?? Go back to the drawing board.. You are a failure with the Alinsky method.
1. Demonize the opposition.
2. Never discuss the issues with the opposition since it humanizes them.
You need to work harder on those rules. Get
Rules for Radicals
by Saul Alinsky for the complete methodology. You are pathetic. Sol Alinsky! Damm you're good. I was using his **** in the 60's to oust crooked politicians like......... You wouldn't know them by name seeing as how you only now have made it to level 2 on a 10 level reality field. You are either a kid or a
Bot or an angry invalid or

ingo » 18 Jan 2018 12:50 pm » wrote:What a bunch of drivel!!!Bilko's ArmyIs that the best ad hominem attack you can make?? Go back to the drawing board.. You are a failure with the Alinsky method.
1. Demonize the opposition.
2. Never discuss the issues with the opposition since it humanizes them.
You need to work harder on those rules. Get
Rules for Radicals
by Saul Alinsky for the complete methodology. You are pathetic. Sol Alinsky! Damm you're good. I was using his **** in the 60's to oust crooked politicians like......... You wouldn't know them by name seeing as how you only now have made it to level 2 on a 10 level reality field. You are either a kid or a
Bot or an angry invalid or

It is obvious to the casual observer that you are an ignorant atheist windbag spouting gibberish nonsense.

I'm 73 and get disgusted with idiots like you ranting BS with ad hominem attacks. Try using real rhetoric if you are able. It seems reasonable discussion is beyond your capabilities.

Just to throw a minor tangent into the mix...



http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2015/10/07/world-undergoing-major-population-shift-with-far-reaching-implications-for-migration-poverty-development-wbimf-report


World Undergoing Major Population Shift with Far-reaching Implications for Migration, Poverty, Development: WB/IMF Report

October 7, 2015

.........(excerpts).......


LIMA, October 7, 2015 -- As migrants and refugees from Africa and the Middle East continue to arrive in Europe in unprecedented numbers, a new World Bank/IMF report says that large-scale migration from poor countries to richer regions of the world will be a permanent feature of the global economy for decades to come as a result of major population shifts in countries.

The share of global population that is working age has peaked at 66 percent and is now on the decline.

More than 90 percent of global poverty is concentrated in lower-income countries with young, fast-growing populations that can expect to see their working-age populations grow significantly. At the same time, more than three-quarters of global growth is generated in higher-income countries with much-lower fertility rates, fewer people of working age, and rising numbers of the elderly.

At country level, governments with young populations can maximize the benefits of demography by investing in health and education to maximize the skills and future job prospects of their youth. Those countries with aging populations should consolidate their economic gains by boosting productivity and strengthening social safety nets and other welfare systems to protect the elderly. At the global level, freer cross-border flows of trade, investment, and people can help manage demographic imbalances.

Countries that are lagging in development and have high fertility rates are classified as pre-dividend, such as Niger. They would benefit from improving health care and education, facilitating lower fertility rates and accelerating the transition to a greater share of their populations that are working age, the report says.

Early-dividend countries that have already seen a drop in fertility but that still have young populations, such as Ethiopia, could benefit from speeding up job creation.

In late-dividend countries where the share of the working age population is declining, such as Brazil, economic dynamism is at risk of fading. There, governments should encourage savings for productive investment, female participation in the workforce, and strengthening of social welfare systems.

Post-dividend countries such as Japan, which are characterized by declining workforces and rising numbers of elderly, would do well to complete health care and pension reforms and take further steps to raise workforce participation and productivity, the report says.

Growth is expected to pick up to 3.6 percent in 2016, helped by strengthening recoveries in major advanced economies—led by the United States—and some turnaround from weak situations in several emerging market and developing economies.
Seán Nolan, Deputy Director in the IMF’s Strategy, Policy, and Review Department. “Supply-side reforms to revitalize productivity growth are essential, with the key actions required varying with country circumstances.”

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 5:16 am » wrote:Just to throw a minor tangent into the mix...


http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2015/10/07/world-undergoing-major-population-shift-with-far-reaching-implications-for-migration-poverty-development-wbimf-report


World Undergoing Major Population Shift with Far-reaching Implications for Migration, Poverty, Development: WB/IMF Report

October 7, 2015

.........(excerpts).......


LIMA, October 7, 2015 -- As migrants and refugees from Africa and the Middle East continue to arrive in Europe in unprecedented numbers, a new World Bank/IMF report says that large-scale migration from poor countries to richer regions of the world will be a permanent feature of the global economy for decades to come as a result of major population shifts in countries.

The share of global population that is working age has peaked at 66 percent and is now on the decline.

More than 90 percent of global poverty is concentrated in lower-income countries with young, fast-growing populations that can expect to see their working-age populations grow significantly. At the same time, more than three-quarters of global growth is generated in higher-income countries with much-lower fertility rates, fewer people of working age, and rising numbers of the elderly.

At country level, governments with young populations can maximize the benefits of demography by investing in health and education to maximize the skills and future job prospects of their youth. Those countries with aging populations should consolidate their economic gains by boosting productivity and strengthening social safety nets and other welfare systems to protect the elderly. At the global level, freer cross-border flows of trade, investment, and people can help manage demographic imbalances.

Countries that are lagging in development and have high fertility rates are classified as pre-dividend, such as Niger. They would benefit from improving health care and education, facilitating lower fertility rates and accelerating the transition to a greater share of their populations that are working age, the report says.

Early-dividend countries that have already seen a drop in fertility but that still have young populations, such as Ethiopia, could benefit from speeding up job creation.

In late-dividend countries where the share of the working age population is declining, such as Brazil, economic dynamism is at risk of fading. There, governments should encourage savings for productive investment, female participation in the workforce, and strengthening of social welfare systems.

Post-dividend countries such as Japan, which are characterized by declining workforces and rising numbers of elderly, would do well to complete health care and pension reforms and take further steps to raise workforce participation and productivity, the report says.

Growth is expected to pick up to 3.6 percent in 2016, helped by strengthening recoveries in major advanced economies—led by the United States—and some turnaround from weak situations in several emerging market and developing economies.
Seán Nolan, Deputy Director in the IMF’s Strategy, Policy, and Review Department. “Supply-side reforms to revitalize productivity growth are essential, with the key actions required varying with country circumstances.”

Scary! These are the Depopulation guys & gals that are causing all the sickness in our lives The IMF is part of the Rothschild-Rockefeller International MAFIA...

What a bunch of drivel!!!Bilko's ArmyIs that the best ad hominem attack you can make?? Go back to the drawing board.. You are a failure with the Alinsky method.1. Demonize the opposition. 2. Never discuss the issues with the opposition since it humanizes them. You need to work harder on those rules. Get Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky for the complete methodology. You are pathetic. Sol Alinsky! Damm you're good. I was using his **** in the 60's to oust crooked politicians like......... You wouldn't know them by name seeing as how you only now have made it to level 2 on a 10 level reality field. You are either a kid or a Bot or an angry invalid or It is obvious to the casual observer that you are an ignorant atheist windbag spouting gibberish nonsense. I'm 73 and get disgusted with idiots like you ranting BS with ad hominem attacks. Try using real rhetoric if you are able. It seems reasonable discussion is beyond your capabilities. Sorry, I apologize. Do you still want to see examples of American Mass Murder? Were you in the military? Do you remember VIETNAM? Do you know about the Body Count Reward System of Mass Murder Quotas ? How did the VIETNAM Mass Murder start? Or maybe go back to how many Germans did Eisenhower & his Gang Mass Murder??? or numerous other examples. Where do we start?

Imagine: Worker wages are finally rising after being stagnant for 20 years, and the Fed is about to hike interest rates at an accelerated pace to “clamp down” on inflation. This will inevitably lead to higher unemployment and decelerate wage growth - guess who’s getting the shaft...

Time to cull the rich and powerful

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 5:16 am » wrote:Just to throw a minor tangent into the mix... http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2015/10/07/world-undergoing-major-population-shift-with-far-reaching-implications-for-migration-poverty-development-wbimf-report


World Undergoing Major Population Shift with Far-reaching Implications for Migration, Poverty, Development: WB/IMF Report

October 7, 2015

.........(excerpts).......


LIMA, October 7, 2015 -- As migrants and refugees from Africa and the Middle East continue to arrive in Europe in unprecedented numbers, a new World Bank/IMF report says that large-scale migration from poor countries to richer regions of the world will be a permanent feature of the global economy for decades to come as a result of major population shifts in countries.

The share of global population that is working age has peaked at 66 percent and is now on the decline.

More than 90 percent of global poverty is concentrated in lower-income countries with young, fast-growing populations that can expect to see their working-age populations grow significantly. At the same time, more than three-quarters of global growth is generated in higher-income countries with much-lower fertility rates, fewer people of working age, and rising numbers of the elderly....”

...maybe you should heed the words of your very favorite republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus:

viewtopic.php?t=35168&u=871&f=3

"I don't follow that "scary 3rd world migration thing" with any vigor. It becomes senseless dithering at some point when the Rich Bastards cannot be touched... at all. All you Scary 3rd World Migration guys end up in the same place as far as I'm concerned. Impotent bitching. I might as well wish the moon had corners. Realize that will never happen. Get mad about it. Post constantly.-or-What's the plan? Let me in on it, please. Is it killing and destruction? ..So why should it matter at my pay scale?"

[note for monetary republitard(s): follow the money back to its creation/issuance...and you'll have to really dig and think for yourself here because not a **** one of your goddamned fool republican radio/teevee heroes has a **** clue and/or has a clue they are willing to share publicly!...word..]

...you go, deezer!...

Dantev2 » 19 Jan 2018 9:43 am » wrote:Imagine: Worker wages are finally rising after being stagnant for 20 years, and the Fed is about to hike interest rates at an accelerated pace to “clamp down” on inflation. This will inevitably lead to higher unemployment and decelerate wage growth - guess who’s getting the shaft...

Time to cull the rich and powerful

...how about before we 'cull' 'them' we shine an honest PUBLIC light upon 'them' first...FOR ONCE!!!...NEVER HAS THIS HIDEOUS MONETARY ORDER BEEN HONESTLY/PUBLICLY DISCUSSED!! CERTAINLY NOT BY DEEZER'S AND DILDOE'S GODDAMNED REPUBLICANS OR BY ?YOUR GODDAMNED DEMOCRATS!..

[i'd like to thank lf for helping me lower my blood pressure and raise my spirits!..]

Dantev2 » 19 Jan 2018 9:43 am » wrote:Imagine: Worker wages are finally rising after being stagnant for 20 years, and the Fed is about to hike interest rates at an accelerated pace to “clamp down” on inflation. This will inevitably lead to higher unemployment and decelerate wage growth - guess who’s getting the shaft..

Not to annoy you with reality, but growth is already accelerating to roughly 4%, and it's highly unlikely that moderate rate hikes will slow that down.

We are in the Trump Boom and will be for years.

.Time to cull the rich and powerful

Yes, we know you would be far happier if you'd been able to participate in Stalin's genocide.

peepee » 19 Jan 2018 10:15 am » wrote:

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 5:16 am » wrote:Just to throw a minor tangent into the mix... http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2015/10/07/world-undergoing-major-population-shift-with-far-reaching-implications-for-migration-poverty-development-wbimf-report


World Undergoing Major Population Shift with Far-reaching Implications for Migration, Poverty, Development: WB/IMF Report

October 7, 2015

.........(excerpts).......


LIMA, October 7, 2015 -- As migrants and refugees from Africa and the Middle East continue to arrive in Europe in unprecedented numbers, a new World Bank/IMF report says that large-scale migration from poor countries to richer regions of the world will be a permanent feature of the global economy for decades to come as a result of major population shifts in countries.

The share of global population that is working age has peaked at 66 percent and is now on the decline.

More than 90 percent of global poverty is concentrated in lower-income countries with young, fast-growing populations that can expect to see their working-age populations grow significantly. At the same time, more than three-quarters of global growth is generated in higher-income countries with much-lower fertility rates, fewer people of working age, and rising numbers of the elderly....”

...maybe you should heed the words of your very favorite republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus:

viewtopic.php?t=35168&u=871&f=3

"I don't follow that "scary 3rd world migration thing" with any vigor. It becomes senseless dithering at some point when the Rich Bastards cannot be touched... at all. All you Scary 3rd World Migration guys end up in the same place as far as I'm concerned. Impotent bitching. I might as well wish the moon had corners. Realize that will never happen. Get mad about it. Post constantly.-or-What's the plan? Let me in on it, please. Is it killing and destruction? ..So why should it matter at my pay scale?"

[note for monetary republitard(s): follow the money back to its creation/issuance...and you'll have to really dig and think for yourself here because not a **** one of your goddamned fool republican radio/teevee heroes has a **** clue and/or has a clue they are willing to share publicly!...word..]

...you go, deezer!...

Don't be picking only on half of the enemy...
You have let your liberal sensitivities elevate the republicans to "The Real Enemy".
You honestly believe those smarmy little rich **** on the left are any better?

Some of the worst people on the planet are American Democrats....and yet here you are carrying their water for them. Again.

I'm left to believe you are a staunch Democrat from this point onward.


Thanks for the tribute, too. I am a quotable person, aren't I?

ingo » 19 Jan 2018 8:04 am » wrote: Scary! These are the Depopulation guys & gals that are causing all the sickness in our lives The IMF is part of the Rothschild-Rockefeller International MAFIA...

So you are not against these rich people as much as you are for saving the human race?

Or are you simply trying to spook me to your side in the War on the Rich, after all?

My opinion is you just want rich people dead and will use whatever notion or event to bolster this viewpoint.
You just don't seem the Nice Guy type.

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 1:33 pm » wrote:
Don't be picking only on half of the enemy...
You have let your liberal sensitivities elevate the republicans to "The Real Enemy".
You honestly believe those smarmy little rich **** on the left are any better?

Some of the worst people on the planet are American Democrats....and yet here you are carrying their water for them. Again.

I'm left to believe you are a staunch Democrat from this point onward.

Thanks for the tribute, too. I am a quotable person, aren't I?

...when it comes to the most important issue$ only a **** fool could support either the demopuppet$ or your republipuppet$, you goddamed, trifling, quibbling, radio-republican...

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 1:42 pm » wrote:
So you are not against these rich people as much as you are for saving the human race?

Or are you simply trying to spook me to your side in the War on the Rich, after all?

My opinion is you just want rich people dead and will use whatever notion or event to bolster this viewpoint.
You just don't seem the Nice Guy type.

...methinks ingo, cannon, indago and a few others understand the destructive, insane, hideous nature of 'our' monetary system...particularly with respect to the creation/issuance of money...YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND...at least i've seen no evidence...[please feel free to merely copy and paste your best all-time thoughts on 'our' monetary system here..] [in advance, 'i didn't think so'!]

...[apparently asking/agitating/demanding for a sane, transparent, just, money system is making 'war on the rich' according to republican 'monetard' queezer]

peepee » 19 Jan 2018 2:04 pm » wrote:

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 1:33 pm » wrote:
Don't be picking only on half of the enemy...
You have let your liberal sensitivities elevate the republicans to "The Real Enemy".
You honestly believe those smarmy little rich **** on the left are any better?

Some of the worst people on the planet are American Democrats....and yet here you are carrying their water for them. Again.

I'm left to believe you are a staunch Democrat from this point onward.

Thanks for the tribute, too. I am a quotable person, aren't I?

...when it comes to the most important issue$ only a **** fool could support either the demopuppet$ or your republipuppet$, you goddamed, trifling, quibbling, radio-republican...

I have YET to see you put out ANY reason why this is important to you.
You keep telling me that I'm missing something or that I'm stupid or blah blah blah...
A real sweet talker, you are.

So I keep telling you that being OCD about one topic isn't enough.
You can't convey anything but hatred, jealousy, revenge, etc. about the topic.
Gee, life's unfair, numbnuts. YOU WEREN"T BORN INTO THE PRIVILEGED FAMILY CIRCLES.

I guess you really aren't that important. Just like the rest of us.
Get over that part of it and live your life the best you can.

-or-

Be OCD forever and try to win over people by calling them stupid.



Cannonpointer MAY agree with some of your ****. I don't know. I don't care.
At least he's able to appear human and almost converse like an adult.
I've seen him rant about two or three other topics before.


So what is your measure of success or victory?
At what point will you have seemed to have gained ground?
What is "progress" to peepee?

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 1:42 pm » wrote: So you are not against these rich people as much as you are for saving the human race?

Or are you simply trying to spook me to your side in the War on the Rich, after all?

My opinion is you just want rich people dead and will use whatever notion or event to bolster this viewpoint.
You just don't seem the Nice Guy type.

Gosh, question the dishonest money system, a slave accuses you of "making war on the rich."

We're very, very sorry that the poor are not the ones manipulating our currency, *** hat. We know how much you hate those **** on Jesus' orders.

There's no need to change positions. On your knees in front of George Soros is precisely where you belong, son.

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 2:43 pm » wrote: I have YET to see you put out ANY reason why this is important to you.

Nor should he.

Defending arguing for an honest, Constitutional medium of exchange would grant credibility to the cowardly pretense that it requires an explanation.

Stay on warren buffet's dick, boy.

Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2018 2:51 pm » wrote:

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 2:43 pm » wrote: I have YET to see you put out ANY reason why this is important to you.

Nor should he.

Defending arguing for an honest, Constitutional medium of exchange would grant credibility to the cowardly pretense that it requires an explanation.

Stay on warren buffet's dick, boy.

**** that. He's gotta have you come in for him too now?



So if I just read an amendment to the constitution, I have won.
Why didn't I think of that before?
The next twat that says "guns make me sad" should be all set when I say "#2."

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 3:01 pm » wrote:
**** that. He's gotta have you come in for him too now?


So if I just read an amendment to the constitution, I have won.
Why didn't I think of that before?
The next twat that says "guns make me sad" should be all set when I say "#2."

We're on pins and needles, Soros boy.

Tell us when Article One Section Ten was amended.

Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2018 2:49 pm » wrote:

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 1:42 pm » wrote: So you are not against these rich people as much as you are for saving the human race?

Or are you simply trying to spook me to your side in the War on the Rich, after all?

My opinion is you just want rich people dead and will use whatever notion or event to bolster this viewpoint.
You just don't seem the Nice Guy type.

Gosh, question the dishonest money system, a slave accuses you of "making war on the rich."

We're very, very sorry that the poor are not the ones manipulating our currency, *** hat. We know how much you hate those **** on Jesus' orders.

There's no need to change positions. On your knees in front of George Soros is precisely where you belong, son.

Our first fight

I'm just untrusting of the Emperor AND the serfs.
So, in questioning a guy who claims to know EVERYTHING about money, I hope for insight/perspective.

I can't seem to figure out who Warren and George are using as soks here. Otherwise, I'd ask them too.



Being told the same thing repeatedly "dishonest money", "you're stoooopid", "radiohead is not cool", etc. gets old.
THEN getting the "go ahead: copy/paste" crap from someone that copy/pastes... Wear me out.