Liberal Forum

peepee » 19 Jun 2018 7:38 am » wrote:...way back on post #1 i wrote, "thanks to lf, hopefully, we are all going to learn something about 'money' and some of us are going to have some wicked good fun exposing the loud republicrat numbskulls who frequently work their gaping pie holes about 'the illion dollar economy' absent an honest clue as to the hideous origin and nature of even one dollar..."

....republican-radio-level dummy termin8or and several other republicrats have been exposed here as absolute monetary ignoramuses...recently the falsely-confident 'hat_creek' was exposed on another thread...the ridiculous nature of hc's claim deserves the publicity:...when asked to explain 'how is money is created and by whom?' the 20 gallon asshat creek responded thusly: "I create money. I have done this so often I cannot keep track of all the money I have created."... viewtopic.php?f=3&t=37554&u=0&start=160


...LOL!...and apparently this republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus doesn't pay the banksters interest on his loan$!...$hat_Creek has $uperhero power$!!... ...'look up in the sky! ..it's a bird-brain...it's a plain old republican dummy...no, it's asshat creek, $UPERBANKER!...

...btw, i hear all kinds of delusional crap from republicrats...i know this one goddamned republican fool who still swears 'our dollars are backed by gold'....[hint for republicrats: ...'dollars' are not 'backed by gold' and despite what many republicrat dummies believe, they never were...

Hi bozo,
My testimony remains in good standing.
You have been unable to provide evidence to the contrary.
As of now, you lost this case as you haven't even attempted to provide
evidence support your claim which is " Hat_Creek doesn't know what he's talking about".

Hat_Creek » 19 Jun 2018 10:32 am » wrote:

peepee » 19 Jun 2018 7:38 am » wrote:...way back on post #1 i wrote, "thanks to lf, hopefully, we are all going to learn something about 'money' and some of us are going to have some wicked good fun exposing the loud republicrat numbskulls who frequently work their gaping pie holes about 'the illion dollar economy' absent an honest clue as to the hideous origin and nature of even one dollar..."

....republican-radio-level dummy termin8or and several other republicrats have been exposed here as absolute monetary ignoramuses...recently the falsely-confident 'hat_creek' was exposed on another thread...the ridiculous nature of hc's claim deserves the publicity:...when asked to explain 'how is money is created and by whom?' the 20 gallon asshat creek responded thusly: "I create money. I have done this so often I cannot keep track of all the money I have created."... viewtopic.php?f=3&t=37554&u=0&start=160


...LOL!...and apparently this republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus doesn't pay the banksters interest on his loan$!...$hat_Creek has $uperhero power$!!... ...'look up in the sky! ..it's a bird-brain...it's a plain old republican dummy...no, it's asshat creek, $UPERBANKER!...

...btw, i hear all kinds of delusional crap from republicrats...i know this one goddamned republican fool who still swears 'our dollars are backed by gold'....[hint for republicrats: ...'dollars' are not 'backed by gold' and despite what many republicrat dummies believe, they never were...

Hi bozo,
My testimony remains in good standing.
You have been unable to provide evidence to the contrary.
As of now, you lost this case as you haven't even attempted to provide
evidence support your claim which is " Hat_Creek doesn't know what he's talking about".

Peewee just thinks he is the greatest fiscal expert but usually rants nonsense!!

Sgt Bilko » 19 Jun 2018 10:37 am » wrote:

Hat_Creek » 19 Jun 2018 10:32 am » wrote:

peepee » 19 Jun 2018 7:38 am » wrote:...way back on post #1 i wrote, "thanks to lf, hopefully, we are all going to learn something about 'money' and some of us are going to have some wicked good fun exposing the loud republicrat numbskulls who frequently work their gaping pie holes about 'the illion dollar economy' absent an honest clue as to the hideous origin and nature of even one dollar..."

....republican-radio-level dummy termin8or and several other republicrats have been exposed here as absolute monetary ignoramuses...recently the falsely-confident 'hat_creek' was exposed on another thread...the ridiculous nature of hc's claim deserves the publicity:...when asked to explain 'how is money is created and by whom?' the 20 gallon asshat creek responded thusly: "I create money. I have done this so often I cannot keep track of all the money I have created."... viewtopic.php?f=3&t=37554&u=0&start=160


...LOL!...and apparently this republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus doesn't pay the banksters interest on his loan$!...$hat_Creek has $uperhero power$!!... ...'look up in the sky! ..it's a bird-brain...it's a plain old republican dummy...no, it's asshat creek, $UPERBANKER!...

...btw, i hear all kinds of delusional crap from republicrats...i know this one goddamned republican fool who still swears 'our dollars are backed by gold'....[hint for republicrats: ...'dollars' are not 'backed by gold' and despite what many republicrat dummies believe, they never were...

Hi bozo,
My testimony remains in good standing.
You have been unable to provide evidence to the contrary.
As of now, you lost this case as you haven't even attempted to provide
evidence support your claim which is " Hat_Creek doesn't know what he's talking about".

Peewee just thinks he is the greatest fiscal expert but usually rants nonsense!!

I thought maybe he was the quiet smart kid sitting at the front of the class.
But I asked two simple questions. The first question, I provided in multiple choice answer format.
Multiple as in two. He had a 50% chance of getting the correct answer. He failed that one.
The second question he laughed at and mocked. Again he had a 50% shot as the answer
was either yes, or no. He made no attempt to answer.

Peewee's answers are all the same: Emoji

Hat_Creek » 19 Jun 2018 10:50 am » wrote:

Sgt Bilko » 19 Jun 2018 10:37 am » wrote:

Hat_Creek » 19 Jun 2018 10:32 am » wrote:
Hi bozo,
My testimony remains in good standing.
You have been unable to provide evidence to the contrary.
As of now, you lost this case as you haven't even attempted to provide
evidence support your claim which is " Hat_Creek doesn't know what he's talking about".

Peewee just thinks he is the greatest fiscal expert but usually rants nonsense!!

I thought maybe he was the quiet smart kid sitting at the front of the class.
But I asked two simple questions. The first question, I provided in multiple choice answer format.
Multiple as in two. He had a 50% chance of getting the correct answer. He failed that one.
The second question he laughed at and mocked. Again he had a 50% shot as the answer
was either yes, or no. He made no attempt to answer.

Peewee's answers are all the same: Emoji

I have known for years he is wacko!!

peepee » 19 Jun 2018 7:38 am » wrote:...way back on post #1 i wrote, "thanks to lf, hopefully, we are all going to learn something about 'money' and some of us are going to have some wicked good fun exposing the loud republicrat numbskulls who frequently work their gaping pie holes about 'the illion dollar economy' absent an honest clue as to the hideous origin and nature of even one dollar..."

....republican-radio-level dummy termin8or and several other republicrats have been exposed here as absolute monetary ignoramuses...recently the falsely-confident 'hat_creek' was exposed on another thread...the ridiculous nature of hc's claim deserves the publicity:...when asked to explain 'how is money is created and by whom?' the 20 gallon asshat creek responded thusly: "I create money. I have done this so often I cannot keep track of all the money I have created."... viewtopic.php?f=3&t=37554&u=0&start=160


...LOL!...and apparently this republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus doesn't pay the banksters interest on his loan$!...$hat_Creek has $uperhero power$!!... ...'look up in the sky! ..it's a bird-brain...it's a plain old republican dummy...no, it's asshat creek, $UPERBANKER!...

...btw, i hear all kinds of delusional crap from republicrats...i know this one goddamned republican fool who still swears 'our dollars are backed by gold'....[hint for republicrats: ...'dollars' are not 'backed by gold' and despite what many republicrat dummies believe, they never were...

Peepee is pissing all over himself!! He is being delusional again. His normal way of doing things!!

...poor private dildo, shat creek, indago!...so utterly confused by/ignorant of monetary realism...incapable of comprehending the wisdom of william gouge:... "As it is public credit that supports the Banks, and not the Banks that support public credit – as the deposits of the Banks are the property of the community generally, and as the profits derived from circulation come from the community generally, they ought to go to the community generally, and be used (if used at all) to lighten the burdens of taxation."

...instead these republican-radio-level monetary ignoramuses express only lo-info delusion and snivel:

"I bought a car a month or so ago. I created the money required to do so....I create money. I have done this so often I cannot keep track of all the money I have created...I created the money via deposit at the bank....I have borrowed money from myself and paid it back with interest, Interest I kept in my pocket....The bank is the borrower. Always. Only you can create money....I never stated I create my own money...' (hallucinations provided by **** creek)

...and then this queer query from monetary ignoramus and super-sniveler, 'ignoramo': "How do you think digital money should be handled, and without paying $25 for a 25¢ haircut?" [i told the goddamned republican fool to get a better barber and/or stop using such an expensive means of payment, but the republican-sucking monetary ignoramus went berserk on me!...
viewtopic.php?t=37554&u=835&f=3

peepee » 02 Jul 2018 11:50 am » wrote:...poor private dildo, shat creek, indago!...so utterly confused by/ignorant of monetary realism...incapable of comprehending the wisdom of william gouge:... "As it is public credit that supports the Banks, and not the Banks that support public credit – as the deposits of the Banks are the property of the community generally, and as the profits derived from circulation come from the community generally, they ought to go to the community generally, and be used (if used at all) to lighten the burdens of taxation."

...instead these republican-radio-level monetary ignoramuses express only lo-info delusion and snivel:

"I bought a car a month or so ago. I created the money required to do so....I create money. I have done this so often I cannot keep track of all the money I have created...I created the money via deposit at the bank....I have borrowed money from myself and paid it back with interest, Interest I kept in my pocket....The bank is the borrower. Always. Only you can create money....I never stated I create my own money...' (hallucinations provided by **** creek)

...and then this queer query from monetary ignoramus and super-sniveler, 'ignoramo': "How do you think digital money should be handled, and without paying $25 for a 25¢ haircut?" [i told the goddamned republican fool to get a better barber and/or stop using such an expensive means of payment, but the republican-sucking monetary ignoramus went berserk on me!...
viewtopic.php?t=37554&u=835&f=3

Talk about berserk...

BERSERK 1

BERSERK 2

....INDAGO, maybe sometime you could elaborate on this question you asked me: [which i answered but apparently my answer drove ignoramo berserk]: "How do you think digital money should be handled, and without paying $25 for a 25¢ haircut?"

...[in my defense, indago is an obvious republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus and ankle-biter whose 'thoughts' and 'ideas' on money are truly infantile, delusional...so his questions are bound to be delusional ****..always..]

peepee » 02 Jul 2018 12:10 pm » wrote:....INDAGO, maybe sometime you could elaborate on this question you asked me: [which i answered but apparently my answer drove ignoramo berserk]: "How do you think digital money should be handled, and without paying $25 for a 25¢ haircut?"

...[in my defense, indago is an obvious republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus and ankle-biter whose 'thoughts' and 'ideas' on money are truly infantile, delusional...so his questions are bound to be delusional ****..always..]

POSTED

peepee » 02 Jul 2018 11:50 am » wrote:...poor private dildo, shat creek, indago!...so utterly confused by/ignorant of monetary realism...incapable of comprehending the wisdom of william gouge:... "As it is public credit that supports the Banks, and not the Banks that support public credit – as the deposits of the Banks are the property of the community generally, and as the profits derived from circulation come from the community generally, they ought to go to the community generally, and be used (if used at all) to lighten the burdens of taxation."

...instead these republican-radio-level monetary ignoramuses express only lo-info delusion and snivel:

"I bought a car a month or so ago. I created the money required to do so....I create money. I have done this so often I cannot keep track of all the money I have created...I created the money via deposit at the bank....I have borrowed money from myself and paid it back with interest, Interest I kept in my pocket....The bank is the borrower. Always. Only you can create money....I never stated I create my own money...' (hallucinations provided by **** creek)

...and then this queer query from monetary ignoramus and super-sniveler, 'ignoramo': "How do you think digital money should be handled, and without paying $25 for a 25¢ haircut?" [i told the goddamned republican fool to get a better barber and/or stop using such an expensive means of payment, but the republican-sucking monetary ignoramus went berserk on me!...
viewtopic.php?t=37554&u=835&f=3

More of the insane idiocy of a person using the ludicrous name peepee. What kind of a mental problem does a person have to have to voluntarily use that name. It totally destroys any credibility he might have. To say nothing about the foolish rants about fiscal issues.

...'the money' is the most important issue you goddamned fool republicrats can focus on...but......not a peep!..EVER!...

[if it isn't on bank$ter-owned teevee/radio, republicrats are obliviou$...word..]

https://www.infogristle.com/merrill-jen ... o-oblivion"THINK [shat creek, ignoramo, private dildo, squirmin8or, wheezer, strange-edge and the rest of you republicrat monetary ignoramuses] PLACE YOURSELF IN THE POSITION OF BEING ABLE TO CREATE MONEY; EVERYONE MUST ACCEPT IT (YOUR LEGAL TENDER ACT); NO ONE REALLY UNDERSTANDS “WHAT” YOU HAVE “GOING” FOR YOU (ITS YOUR SECRET); ALL THE “MONEY” IN THE WORLD IS YOURS TO CREATE ('MONEY” IS OF NO OBJECT TO YOU); UNDER THOSE CONDITIONS:
What function of Government could not be corrupted, by you? What business could not be destroyed, by you? What manner of injustice could not be inflicted on anyone, by you? What truth could not be suppressed, by you? What commodity could not have its price suppressed, by you? What commodity could not have its price supported, by you? What commodity could not have its supply decreased, by you? What commodity could not have its supply increased, by you? What information media policy could not be directed, by you? What educational material could not be distorted, by you? What school could not have its policies directed, by you? What crime could not be “gotten-away-with,” by you?THERE IS NO AMOUNT OF CORRUPTION YOU COULD NOT “GET-AWAY WITH” IF YOU HAD ENOUGH “MONEY!"Government, Business, Justice, Truth, Prices, Supply, Information, Education, Schools and Crime are all subject to corrupting influences by anyone to whom “MONEY” IS NO OBJECT!

Government is controlled by Modern “money,” therefore Government does not create Modern “money,” or it would control itself. There is only one entity to whom Modern “money” is no object. It is the commercial banking system (under regulation by the Federal Reserve Board) that has an “OPEN ENDED” checking account."These are the men who create the money we all spend … in effect they determine whether you will be able to buy a car, can afford to take a vacation or buy a new home. Their decisions can effect the security of your job … in the deepest secrecy they plot their strategy … everything is cloaked in deepest secrecy … in making decisions they check with no one — not the President, not the Congress, not the people."

[btw, the over/under for how long it takes for private dildo to spew is 9 hours]

peepee » 13 Jul 2018 2:32 am » wrote:...'the money' is the most important issue you goddamned fool republicrats can focus on...but......not a peep!..EVER!...

[if it isn't on bank$ter-owned teevee/radio, republicrats are obliviou$...word..]

https://www.infogristle.com/merrill-jen ... o-oblivion"THINK [shat creek, ignoramo, private dildo, squirmin8or, wheezer, strange-edge and the rest of you republicrat monetary ignoramuses] PLACE YOURSELF IN THE POSITION OF BEING ABLE TO CREATE MONEY; EVERYONE MUST ACCEPT IT (YOUR LEGAL TENDER ACT); NO ONE REALLY UNDERSTANDS “WHAT” YOU HAVE “GOING” FOR YOU (ITS YOUR SECRET); ALL THE “MONEY” IN THE WORLD IS YOURS TO CREATE ('MONEY” IS OF NO OBJECT TO YOU); UNDER THOSE CONDITIONS:
What function of Government could not be corrupted, by you? What business could not be destroyed, by you? What manner of injustice could not be inflicted on anyone, by you? What truth could not be suppressed, by you? What commodity could not have its price suppressed, by you? What commodity could not have its price supported, by you? What commodity could not have its supply decreased, by you? What commodity could not have its supply increased, by you? What information media policy could not be directed, by you? What educational material could not be distorted, by you? What school could not have its policies directed, by you? What crime could not be “gotten-away-with,” by you?THERE IS NO AMOUNT OF CORRUPTION YOU COULD NOT “GET-AWAY WITH” IF YOU HAD ENOUGH “MONEY!"Government, Business, Justice, Truth, Prices, Supply, Information, Education, Schools and Crime are all subject to corrupting influences by anyone to whom “MONEY” IS NO OBJECT!

Government is controlled by Modern “money,” therefore Government does not create Modern “money,” or it would control itself. There is only one entity to whom Modern “money” is no object. It is the commercial banking system (under regulation by the Federal Reserve Board) that has an “OPEN ENDED” checking account."These are the men who create the money we all spend … in effect they determine whether you will be able to buy a car, can afford to take a vacation or buy a new home. Their decisions can effect the security of your job … in the deepest secrecy they plot their strategy … everything is cloaked in deepest secrecy … in making decisions they check with no one — not the President, not the Congress, not the people."

[btw, the over/under for how long it takes for private dildo to spew is 9 hours]

Why limit the situation we have to the Fed Res?
They are merely an underling of the IMF aka "The Bank". (Not the same definition of "a Bank")
Why don't we take the audience deeper into the rabbit hole?
The question then becomes: How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to
create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?

Hat_Creek » 13 Jul 2018 1:52 pm » wrote:
Why limit the situation we have to the Fed Res?
They are merely an underling of the IMF aka "The Bank". (Not the same definition of "a Bank")
Why don't we take the audience deeper into the rabbit hole?
The question then becomes: How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to
create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?

Good point. Scam. Fed is a scam. IMF=a scam too. Sometimes they admit they don't know what they're doing. In the last crisis. They're winging it. Who knows what kind of mess they've created for the future? After all the easy money they created. People are saying. the paradigm(spelling?) is totally shifting. Opposite. I really don't understand it, but perhaps the easy cheap money is gone? Higher rates? Higher inflation? What the heck are they talking about? I would never ask Bv, he's numb.

sooted up Cyndi » 13 Jul 2018 2:16 pm » wrote:

Hat_Creek » 13 Jul 2018 1:52 pm » wrote:
Why limit the situation we have to the Fed Res?
They are merely an underling of the IMF aka "The Bank". (Not the same definition of "a Bank")
Why don't we take the audience deeper into the rabbit hole?
The question then becomes: How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to
create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?

Good point. Scam. Fed is a scam. IMF=a scam too. Sometimes they admit they don't know what they're doing. In the last crisis. They're winging it. Who knows what kind of mess they've created for the future? After all the easy money they created. People are saying. the paradigm(spelling?) is totally shifting. Opposite. I really don't understand it, but perhaps the easy cheap money is gone? Higher rates? Higher inflation? What the heck are they talking about? I would never ask Bv, he's numb.

Someone may say different but inflation is a direct result of interest which must be paid in addition to principal.
The reason is, when the money was created for the loan, the money then did exist, and it is introduced into
the economy. What did not exist as it wasn't created, is the interest money itself. Think of it as a bubble, not
a financial bubble but a bubble as in a closed system. The money borrowed is created and exists within the
bubble. The interest is not created, it is not inside the bubble. So where does the money we will call interest
for now, where does it come from if it doesn't exist within the bubble?
This conundrum creates not inflation, it also must create bankruptcies. Because the bankruptcy is the only
vehicle whereby the non existing money can be destroyed. And, like any other current, (currency), the
money destroyed, we call this a discharge. If our gov created money and spent it, lent it, into the economy
without the burden of interest, we could all become debt free, no income taxes, the list is long of the
positive effects. The three presidents who have tried to do this were all murdered. Going off memory
here so I may be missing one or it may only be two. (Actually, there are other forms, other vehicles
whereby debt is discharged but the process is the same, the result is the same)

I cannot explain the interest phenomenon as well as I comprehend it. But there is ample evidence
and facts to back up what I stated available on the interweb.

Hat_Creek » 13 Jul 2018 3:58 pm » wrote:

sooted up Cyndi » 13 Jul 2018 2:16 pm » wrote:

Hat_Creek » 13 Jul 2018 1:52 pm » wrote:
Why limit the situation we have to the Fed Res?
They are merely an underling of the IMF aka "The Bank". (Not the same definition of "a Bank")
Why don't we take the audience deeper into the rabbit hole?
The question then becomes: How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to
create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?

Good point. Scam. Fed is a scam. IMF=a scam too. Sometimes they admit they don't know what they're doing. In the last crisis. They're winging it. Who knows what kind of mess they've created for the future? After all the easy money they created. People are saying. the paradigm(spelling?) is totally shifting. Opposite. I really don't understand it, but perhaps the easy cheap money is gone? Higher rates? Higher inflation? What the heck are they talking about? I would never ask Bv, he's numb.

Someone may say different but inflation is a direct result of interest which must be paid in addition to principal.
The reason is, when the money was created for the loan, the money then did exist, and it is introduced into
the economy. What did not exist as it wasn't created, is the interest money itself. Think of it as a bubble, not
a financial bubble but a bubble as in a closed system. The money borrowed is created and exists within the
bubble. The interest is not created, it is not inside the bubble. So where does the money we will call interest
for now, where does it come from if it doesn't exist within the bubble?
This conundrum creates not inflation, it also must create bankruptcies. Because the bankruptcy is the only
vehicle whereby the non existing money can be destroyed. And, like any other current, (currency), the
money destroyed, we call this a discharge. If our gov created money and spent it, lent it, into the economy
without the burden of interest, we could all become debt free, no income taxes, the list is long of the
positive effects. The three presidents who have tried to do this were all murdered. Going off memory
here so I may be missing one or it may only be two. (Actually, there are other forms, other vehicles
whereby debt is discharged but the process is the same, the result is the same)

I cannot explain the interest phenomenon as well as I comprehend it. But there is ample evidence
and facts to back up what I stated available on the interweb.

US Debt Clock

Total US Debt: $70.7 Trillion

Interest Paid: $2.6 Trillion

US National Debt: $21.2 Trillion

peepee » 13 Jul 2018 2:32 am » wrote:...'the money' is the most important issue you goddamned fool republicrats can focus on...but......not a peep!..EVER!...

[if it isn't on bank$ter-owned teevee/radio, republicrats are obliviou$...word..]

https://www.infogristle.com/merrill-jen ... o-oblivion"THINK [shat creek, ignoramo, private dildo, squirmin8or, wheezer, strange-edge and the rest of you republicrat monetary ignoramuses] PLACE YOURSELF IN THE POSITION OF BEING ABLE TO CREATE MONEY; EVERYONE MUST ACCEPT IT (YOUR LEGAL TENDER ACT); NO ONE REALLY UNDERSTANDS “WHAT” YOU HAVE “GOING” FOR YOU (ITS YOUR SECRET); ALL THE “MONEY” IN THE WORLD IS YOURS TO CREATE ('MONEY” IS OF NO OBJECT TO YOU); UNDER THOSE CONDITIONS:
What function of Government could not be corrupted, by you? What business could not be destroyed, by you? What manner of injustice could not be inflicted on anyone, by you? What truth could not be suppressed, by you? What commodity could not have its price suppressed, by you? What commodity could not have its price supported, by you? What commodity could not have its supply decreased, by you? What commodity could not have its supply increased, by you? What information media policy could not be directed, by you? What educational material could not be distorted, by you? What school could not have its policies directed, by you? What crime could not be “gotten-away-with,” by you?THERE IS NO AMOUNT OF CORRUPTION YOU COULD NOT “GET-AWAY WITH” IF YOU HAD ENOUGH “MONEY!"Government, Business, Justice, Truth, Prices, Supply, Information, Education, Schools and Crime are all subject to corrupting influences by anyone to whom “MONEY” IS NO OBJECT!

Government is controlled by Modern “money,” therefore Government does not create Modern “money,” or it would control itself. There is only one entity to whom Modern “money” is no object. It is the commercial banking system (under regulation by the Federal Reserve Board) that has an “OPEN ENDED” checking account."These are the men who create the money we all spend … in effect they determine whether you will be able to buy a car, can afford to take a vacation or buy a new home. Their decisions can effect the security of your job … in the deepest secrecy they plot their strategy … everything is cloaked in deepest secrecy … in making decisions they check with no one — not the President, not the Congress, not the people."

[btw, the over/under for how long it takes for private dildo to spew is 9 hours]

What a bunch of garbage!!

Hat_Creek » 13 Jul 2018 1:52 pm » wrote:Why limit the situation we have to the Fed Res?
They are merely an underling of the IMF aka "The Bank". (Not the same definition of "a Bank")
Why don't we take the audience deeper into the rabbit hole?
The question then becomes: How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to
create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?

...you STILL don't even understand how dollars come into 'existence' and now you want to blather about 'the imf'!... [i believe you'll find 'the imf' is small potatoe$ when compared to 'the fed' as to 'dollar creation/issuance'...but i doubt we can ever truly know as you ****-heel republicans and democrats gave away the farm a loooong time ago...no HONEST INDEPENDENT TRANSPARENT audit$... EVER...and not an intelligent peep about this monstro$ity from ANY of your ****-heel republicans/crats...EVER..but you know all about peter strzok and 'horseface page'!..you get all worked about that...because your head is full of ****...[gee, i wonder why!]

...btw, 'constitutional authority' is adjudicated by, ESSENTIALLY, 'the bankster$,' *******...maybe you'd understand that if your head wasn't filled with republican-radio-level talking/squawking points...

[...new private dildo comment time over/under: 12 hours...the overs won last time]

peepee » 16 Jul 2018 7:40 am » wrote:

Hat_Creek » 13 Jul 2018 1:52 pm » wrote:Why limit the situation we have to the Fed Res?
They are merely an underling of the IMF aka "The Bank". (Not the same definition of "a Bank")
Why don't we take the audience deeper into the rabbit hole?
The question then becomes: How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to
create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?

...you STILL don't even understand how dollars come into 'existence' and now you want to blather about 'the imf'!... [i believe you'll find 'the imf' is small potatoe$ when compared to 'the fed' as to 'dollar creation/issuance'...but i doubt we can ever truly know as you ****-heel republicans and democrats gave away the farm a loooong time ago...no HONEST INDEPENDENT TRANSPARENT audit$... EVER...and not an intelligent peep about this monstro$ity from ANY of your ****-heel republicans/crats...EVER..but you know all about peter strzok and 'horseface page'!..you get all worked about that...because your head is full of ****...[gee, i wonder why!]

...btw, 'constitutional authority' is adjudicated by, ESSENTIALLY, 'the bankster$,' *******...maybe you'd understand that if your head wasn't filled with republican-radio-level talking/squawking points...

[...new private dildo comment time over/under: 12 hours...the overs won last time]

Phuckwad fudge packer peewee.
I thought we'd have a discussion like men but now you went into the deep end of
the pool with lead boots on. You're to retarded to converse with. So I'll send you
to school on the short bus and after you learn sumthin, come back and maybe I'll
learn you some more.

Go look up this person. Dig deep boy.
John McCloy

We can't move on until you discuss this one question:
How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to
create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?

peepee » 16 Jul 2018 7:40 am » wrote:

Hat_Creek » 13 Jul 2018 1:52 pm » wrote:Why limit the situation we have to the Fed Res?
They are merely an underling of the IMF aka "The Bank". (Not the same definition of "a Bank")
Why don't we take the audience deeper into the rabbit hole?
The question then becomes: How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to
create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?

...you STILL don't even understand how dollars come into 'existence' and now you want to blather about 'the imf'!... [i believe you'll find 'the imf' is small potatoe$ when compared to 'the fed' as to 'dollar creation/issuance'...but i doubt we can ever truly know as you ****-heel republicans and democrats gave away the farm a loooong time ago...no HONEST INDEPENDENT TRANSPARENT audit$... EVER...and not an intelligent peep about this monstro$ity from ANY of your ****-heel republicans/crats...EVER..but you know all about peter strzok and 'horseface page'!..you get all worked about that...because your head is full of ****...[gee, i wonder why!]

...btw, 'constitutional authority' is adjudicated by, ESSENTIALLY, 'the bankster$,' *******...maybe you'd understand that if your head wasn't filled with republican-radio-level talking/squawking points...

[...new private dildo comment time over/under: 12 hours...the overs won last time]

ROTFLMAO
ROTFLMAO
ROTFLMAO

You just love to tell lies!!!

Hat_Creek » 16 Jul 2018 8:59 am » wrote:We can't move on until you discuss this one question: How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?

...[let me guess what's rattling around in the skull of a republican cheerleader who never uttered, or even attempted to utter, a peep about monetary reality until he got peepee'd on: HAT CREEK GAVE 'the IMF aka Fed Res' this 'constitutional authority' just like he, HAT CREEK, 'creates money':...

"I bought a car a month or so ago. I created the money required to do so....I create money. I have done this so often I cannot keep track of all the money I have created...I created the money via deposit at the bank....I have borrowed money from myself and paid it back with interest, Interest I kept in my pocket....The bank is the borrower. Always. Only you can create money.... (rap poetry written and performed by 'hat creek and the radioers')

...[btw, i may agree with a few of your disjointed thoughts on post #534...good work!...]

...[new private dildo inane comment time over/under: 8 hours...the unders took the last one...]